پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 46 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,226 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,524 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 20,809,513 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,187,041 |
بررسی تأثیر جهانی شدن بر فقر قابلیتی در کشورهای منتخب اسلامی | ||
| پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 14، شماره 56، مهر 1403، صفحه 149-133 اصل مقاله (633.89 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/egdr.2024.68590.6753 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سیداحسان حسینی‌دوست* 1؛ حمید سپهردوست2؛ فرشید مرادی3 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان، ایران. | ||
| 2استاد گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان، ایران. | ||
| 3کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقابله با فقر از جمله اهداف مهمی است که در تمامی برنامه‌ریزی‌های اقتصادی بدان توجه می‌شود اما به دلیل چند بعدی بودن این پدیده، پرداختن به عوامل مؤثر بر آن همواره جزء مسائل چالش برانگیز در مباحث اقتصادی می‌باشد. از یک سو، علیرغم توصیه‌های دین اسلام درخصوص ارتقاء رفاه اقتصادی و فقرزدایی از جامعه، آمارهای منتشره بیانگر فاصله داشتن کشورهای مسلمان نسبت به شرایط مطلوب است و از سوی دیگر، فقدان مطالعه جامعی که به بررسی اثر متغیرهای مختلف اقتصادی بر فقر قابلیتی در این گروه از کشورها پرداخته باشد به چشم می‌خورد. همچنین، پژوهش‌های انجام شده درمورد سایر کشورها نیز دچار تناقض در یافته‌ها هستند که ضرورت بررسی این مسئله را دوچندان می‌کند. بر این اساس، هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی اثر عوامل مؤثر بر فقر قابلیتی از قبیل شاخص جهانی شدن، نرخ تورم، نرخ شهرنشینی و رشد اقتصادی در کشورهای منتخب مسلمان موسوم به گروه D8 مبتنی بر روش حداقل مربعات تعمیم یافته در دسترس (FGLS) طی دورة زمانی 2021-1997 می‌باشد. نتایج حاصله نشان‌دهنده اثر منفی و معنادار جهانی‌شدن بر فقر قابلیتی در کشورهای مذکور هستند که حاکی از ایجاد بهبود نسبی در وضعیت رفاهی این کشورها است. همچنین، تأثیر رشد اقتصادی بر فقر قابلیتی مثبت بوده که ناشی از عدم بکارگیری منافع حاصل از رشد در جهت بهبود زیرساخت‌های رفاهی در این کشورها می‌باشد. اثر متغیرهای کنترلی مانند تورم و توزیع جغرافیایی جمعیت نیز بر فقر قابلیتی مثبت ارزیابی شده است. براساس نتایج حاصله می‌توان توصیه نمود که اقتصادهای گروه D8 به اتخاذ برنامه‌های کنترل تورم همگام با جلوگیری از رشد حاشیه نشینی در شهرها بپردازند و با ارتقای شاخص‌های جهانی شدن در کنار کنترل جنبه‌های منفی آن، به کاهش فقر در اقتصادهای خود کمک نمایند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| فقر قابلیتی؛ جهانی‌شدن؛ رشد اقتصادی؛ تورم؛ توزیع جغرافیایی جمعیت؛ کشورهای گروه D8؛ رویکرد FGLS | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the Effect of Globalization on Capability Poverty in the Selected Islamic Countries | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seyed Ehsan Hosseinidoust1؛ Hamid Sepehrdoost2؛ Farshid Moradi3 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. | ||
| 2Professor, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan,, Iran. | ||
| 3MSc of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Poverty is one of the oldest and even the most important problems of human societies, which affects various aspects of individual and social life. Due to the multi-dimensional nature of this phenomenon, dealing with the factors affecting it has always been one of the challenging issues in economic discussions and solving this problem is one of the important goals that are considered in all of the economic planning. Considering the guidelines of Islam regarding to the economic welfare and poverty alleviation of the society, the lack of a study that examines the effect of various variables on the capability poverty index in Muslim countries is noticeable. Moreover, the studies conducted on other countries are along with contradictions in their findings, which doubles the necessity of investigating this issue. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of factors affecting capability poverty in the selected Muslim countries known as the D8 group relying on the Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) method during the period of 1997-2021. Results show the negative and significant effect of globalization on capability poverty in the D8 countries during the covered period, such that for each unit increase in the globalization index, capability poverty decreases by 1.8%, which indicates a relative improvement in the welfare of these countries. Likewise, the impact of economic growth on capability poverty is positive, so that a one percent increases in economic growth leads to an increase in capability poverty by 0.21 percent. Such finding can be due to not utilization of the benefits of growth to improve welfare infrastructure in the mentioned countries. In addition, the effect of control variables such as inflation and geographical distribution of the population has also been evaluated positively on capability poverty. Based on the findings of the current study, it is recommended to adopt inflation control programs and moving towards the promotion of globalization indicators in the economies of the D8 group. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Capability Poverty, KOF Globalization Index, Economic Growth, Inflation, Geographical Distribution of Population, D8 Countries, FGLS Approach | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Acar, H. & Karaağaç, Y. (2021). “D-8 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Turkey Within the Scope ofInternational Political Relations”. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences, 5(3), 67-80.
Adams Jr, R. H. (2004). “Economic Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Estimating the Growth Elasticity of Poverty”. World Development, 32(12), 199-214.
Afghah, S. M., motalebalnejad, M. & Ghobishavi, A. K. (2018). “Investigating the Effect of Globalization and Economic Growth on Poverty in Iran”. Financial and Economic Policy Quarterly, 7(25), 31-57. (In Persian).
Akbarian, R. & Zare Haghighi, N. (2010). “Investigating the Impact of Economic Openness and Economic Growth on Poverty: the Case of Iran”. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (Formerly Economic Reviews), 2, 25-50. (In Persian).
Bass, A. (2014). “Revining the Globalization and Poverty Debate: Effects of Real and Financial Integration on the Developing World”. Advances in Economics and Business, 2(1), 42-57.
Basu, K. (2006). “Globalization, Poverty, and Inequality: What is the Relationship? What Can Be Done?” World Development, 34(8), 1361-1373.
Bergh, A. & Nillson, T. (2014). “Is Globalization Reducing Absolute Poverty?” World Development, 62, 42-61.
Bhagwati, J. N. (1988). “Poverty and Public Policy”. World Development Report, 16(5), 539-654.
Bhasin, V. K. & Obeng, C. K. (2006). “Trade Liberalization, Foreign Borrowing, Poverty and Income Distributions of Households in Ghana”. ICFAI Journal of Applied Economics, 5(4), 38-53.
Biswas, A. K. & Seetharam, K. E. (2008). “Achieving Water Security for Asia: Asian Water Development Outlook, 2007”. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(1), 145-176.
Breunig, R. & Majeed, O. (2019). “Inequality, Poverty and Economic Growth”. International Economics, 161, 83-99.
Dollar, D. & Kaary, A. (2004). “Trade, Growth, and Poverty”. The Economic Journal, 114, 22-490.
Feqheh Majidi, A., Zarooni, Z. & Samadipour, Sh. (2014). “Impact of Globalization on Poverty in Developing Countries”. Quarterly Magazine of Strategic and Macro Policies. 3(12), 79-98. (In Persian).
Greenaway, D., Morgan, W. & Wright, P. (2002). “Trade Liberalization and Growth in Developing Countries”. Journal of Development Economics, 67, 229–244.
Jafari Samimi, A. & Bahraini, N. (2014). “Comparison of the Impact of the three Dimensions (economic, Social and Political) of Globalization on Economic Growth in Selected Countries of the Middle East and North Africa Region”. Economic Strategy Scientific-Research Quarterly, 4(13), 77-110. (In Persian).
Jafari Samimi, A., Zaruki, S. & Sadati Amiri, S. R. (2017). “Analysis of Economic Welfare with Emphasis on the Dimensions of Globalization”. Economic Modeling, 12(44), 1-23. (In Persian).
Hamidian, A., Hizbavi, A. & Yusofund, H. R. (2013). “Poverty, Inequality, Middle Class in Iran”. Social Development, 9(1), 37-66. (In Persian).
Hanson, G. H. (2007). “Globalization, Labor Income, and Poverty in Mexico”. in Globalization and Poverty (pp. 417-456). University of Chicago Press.
Harrison, A. (2006). “Globalization and Poverty”. National Bureau of Economic Research1050 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, June 2006Working paper.
Hassanzadeh, A. & Foz Muslimian, M. (2009). “Evaluating the Effects of Globalization on Poverty; a Case Study of Developing Countries”. Economic Research Journal, 10(1), 254-223. (In Persian).
Hekmati Farid, S., Jahangiri, Kh. & Moradkhani, A. (2014). “The Impact of Globalization on the Human Poverty Index (HPI)”. Quarterly Journal of Applied Economic Theories, 2(2), 61-80. (In Persian).
Hick, R. (2012). “The Capability Approach: Insights for a New Poverty Focus”. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 291-308.
Kakwani, N. & Pernia, E. M. (2000). “Pro-Poor Growth and Income Inequality”. Asian Development Bank.
Kratou, H. & Goaied, M. (2016). “How Can Globalization Affect Income Distribution? Evidence from Developing Countries”. The International Trade Journal, 30(2), 132-158.
Kuznets, S. (1955). “Economic Growth and Income Inequality: In the Gap between Rich and Poor”. American Economic Review, 45, 25-37.
Madanigha Farrokhi, S. (2016). “The Necessity of Fighting the Phenomenon of Poverty and Inequality in Iran”. Tehran: Aghaz Publications. (In Persian).
Mahmoudi V. & Samimifar, S. Q. (2004). “Capability Poverty”. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Social Welfare, 4(17), 10-47. (In Persian).
Monjazeb, M. R. & Nosrati, R. (2017). “Advanced Econometric Models with Eviews and Stata”. Tehran: Mehraban Nashr Institute of Books. (In Persian).
Mujeri, M. K. & Khondker, B. H. (2002). Globalization Poverty Interactions in Bangladesh. MIMAP-Bangladesh Technical Paper; No. 04.
Raghfar, H., Babapour, M. & Yazdanpanah, M. (2014). “Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Poverty and Inequality in Iran During the First to Fourth Development Plans”. Iranian Applied Economic Studies Quarterly, 4(16), 59-79. (In Persian).
Robeyns, I. (2006). “The Capability Approach in Practice”. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351-376.
Sen, Amartya kumar (2013) “Development Means Freedom”. (Nuri Naini, Mohammad Saeed; Translator). Tehran: Ney Publishing (Published the Original Work 1999. (In Persian).
Sen, A. K. (1985). “A Sociological Approach to the Measurement of Poverty”. Oxford Economic Papers.
Sen, Amartya K. (1998) “Development as Freedom”. NewYork: Knopf.
Sen, A. K. (1999). “Beyond the Crisis: Development Strategies in Asia”. Institute of Southeast Asian.
Shakil, A. & Imran, Kh. (2022). “The Impact of Globalization, Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Openness on Poverty: a Case Study of Pakistan”. Economic Consultant, 37(1), 41-60.
Sharifzadegan, M. H. (1386). “Strategies of Economic Development and Social Justice”. Social Welfare, 24(1), 7-30. (In Persian).
Son, H. (2004). “A Note on Pro-Poor Growth”. Economics Letters, 82, 307-314.
Townsend, P. (1979). “Poverty in the United Kingdom, A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living”. New York 10022, U. S. A.
Woo, B. & Jun, H. J. (2020). “Globalization and Slums: How do Economic Political, and Social Globalization Affect”. Wiley Pub Inc.
Xiaoyuan, H., Haito, W. & Wei, W. (2022). “Identification and Measurement of Multidimensional Relative Poverty of Chinese Rural Adults Considering Climate Factors”. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2(79), 1-11.
Yanhui, Xu & Ziyu, Gong (2017). “Social Quality, Community Capacity, and Capability Poverty of Urban Residents in Shenzhen, China”. The International Journal of Social Quality, 35(4), 114-135. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 691 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 232 |
||