پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 46 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,226 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,523 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 20,809,446 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,187,025 |
طراحی و اعتباریابی برنامه اصلاح رفتار پایدار مصرف بهینه برق براساس رویکرد بازاریابی اجتماعی اجتماع‌محور | ||
| فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 1، 1404، صفحه 149-162 اصل مقاله (4.96 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ee.2024.68765.2663 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| آتنا سادات مهاجری* 1؛ حسین اسکندری2؛ احمد برجعلی3؛ نورعلی فرخی4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی عمومی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استاد گروه روانشناسی بالینی و عمومی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه علامه طبابایی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3استاد گروه روانشناسی بالینی و عمومی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 4استاد گروه سنجش و اندازه‌گیری، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و ورانشناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف این پژوهش طراحی و اعتباریابی یک برنامه بازی‌وارسازی برای اصلاح رفتار پایدار بر اساس رویکرد بازاریابی اجتماعی اجتماع‌محور (CBSM) و بررسی اثربخشی آن بر میزان مصرف برق است. ابتدا برنامه بازی‌وارسازی برای اصلاح رفتار مصرف برق مشترکان خانگی بر اساس CBSM طراحی و بر اساس نظر ده متخصص اعتباریابی انجام شد. مرحله دوم به‌صورت تک موردی با طرح سری زمانی منقطع بود. جامعه آماری مشترکان خانگی برق شهر تهران و نمونه سه خانواده بودند که به شیوه در دسترس انتخاب شدند. داده‌های مصرف برق، ماهیانه گردآوری شد. خط پایه از تیر 1395 تا اسفند 1399، مداخله از فروردین 1400 تا آذر 1400 و پیگیری از دی 1400 تا خرداد 1402 بود. سرانه مصرف برق مشترکان خانگی برق شهر تهران در همین بازه‌های زمانی به‌عنوان گواه در تحلیل‌ها استفاده شد. اندازه اثر با روش «کاهش میانگین از خط پایه» محاسبه شد. تحلیل کلی داده‌های سری زمانی و معناداری تغییرات با روش تحلیل سری زمانی منقطع و مدل میانگین متحرک یکپارچه خودرگرسیونی (ARIMA) در نرم‌افزار SPSS 26 انجام شد. شاخص‌های CVR و CVI بالای 9/0 شدند که گویای اعتبار برنامه هستند. محاسبه اندازه اثر از کاهش مصرف خانواده یک و دو بعد از آغاز مداخله حکایت داشت و بیشتر کاهش مصرف مربوط به مرحله پیگیری است. بر اساس تحلیل سری زمانی منقطع فقط کاهش مصرف خانواده یک که مشترک پرمصرفی بود معنادار شد. می‌توان گفت که برنامه دارای اعتبار است. مطالعه بیشتر اثربخشی آن با لحاظ کردن محدودیت‌های این پژوهش به‌ویژه در خانوارهای پرمصرفی که در مرحله پیش عمل قرار دارند توصیه می‌شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اصلاح رفتار پایدار؛ بازی‌وارسازی؛ رویکرد بازاریابی اجتماعی اجتماع‌محور؛ مصرف بهینه برق | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Design and Validation of a Sustainable Behavior Modification Program for Optimal Electricity Consumption Based on the Community-Based Social Marketing (CBSM) Approach | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Atena Sadat Mohajeri1؛ Hossein Eskandari2؛ Ahmad Borjali3؛ Noorali Farrokhi4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student in General Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Clinical and General Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Clinical and General Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Professor, Department of Educational Measurement, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this research is to design and validate a gamification program to improve sustainable behavior based on the community-based social marketing (CBSM) approach and to investigate its effectiveness on electricity consumption. First, the gamification program was designed to modify the electricity consumption behavior of household subscribers based on CBSM. According to the stage model of behavior change, behavior modification strategies were divided into four stages. Validation was done based on the opinions of ten experts. The second stage was a single-case study with an interrupted time series design. The statistical population consisted of household electricity subscribers in Tehran, and the sample included three families, selected in an available manner. Electricity consumption data were collected monthly. The baseline was from June 2016 to March 2021, the intervention from April 2021 to December 2021, and the follow-up from January 2022 to June 2023. The per capita electricity consumption of household electricity customers in Tehran during the same time periods was used as a control in the analysis. The effect size was calculated using the "mean baseline reduction" method. The overall analysis of time series data and the significance of changes were done using the interrupted time series analysis method and the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model in SPSS 26 software. CVR and CVI indices were above 0.9, indicating the validity of the program. The calculation of the effect size showed a decrease in the consumption of families one and two after the start of the intervention, with most of the decrease occurring in the follow-up phase. The continuation of lower consumption in the follow-up period indicated the relative persistence of new habits. Family three and household electricity subscribers in Tehran showed a slight increase in consumption. In the visual analysis, only in the time series of family 1 was a decreasing trend observed after the implementation of the intervention. All time series exhibited a pattern of seasonal changes. These seasonal changes were controlled with the ARIMA model and the data of Tehran electricity subscribers. Based on the interrupted time series analysis, only the decrease in consumption of family 1, which was a high-consumption household, was significant (P<0.05). This family reduced consumption by about 50%. It can be said that the program is valid. Further study of its effectiveness is recommended, considering the limitations of this research, especially in high-consumption households that are in the pre-operation stage. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Community-Based Social Marketing Approach, Gamification, Modification of Sustainable Behavior, Optimal Electricity Consumption | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Velk, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2007). “The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents”. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 27, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002
Akbari, N., Talebi, H. & Jalai, A. (2017). “An Investigation of Socio-Cultural Factors Affecting the Household Energy Consumption after the Implementation of Targeted Subsidies Law”. Journal of Applied Sociology. 64 (4), 1-26. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22108/JAS.2017.21157
Bamberg, S. (2013). “Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change”. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.002
Brauer, R. M., Kuntz, K., Shukla, R. & Bensch. (2017). “Making Cool Choices for sustainability: testing the effectiveness of a game-based approach to promoting pro-environmental behaviors”. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.007
Campbell, J, M. (2004). “Statistical comparison of four effect sizes for single subject designs”. Journal of Behavior Modification, 28(2), 234-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445503259264.
Carrus, G., Tiberio, L., Mastandrea, S., Chokrai, P., Fritsche, I., Klöckner, C. A., Masson, T., Vesely, S. & Panno, A. (2021). “Psychological Predictors of Energy Saving Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Approach”. Frontier in Psychology. 12(64), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648221
Corner, A., & Randall, A. (2011). “Selling climate change? The limitations of social marketing as a strategy for climate change public engagement”. Global Environmental Change. 21(3), 1005- 1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.05.002
Douglas, B. D. & Brauer, M. (2021). “Gamification to prevent climate change: a review of games and apps for sustainability”. Current opinion in psychology. 42, 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.008
European Environment Agency. (2013). “Achieving energy efficiency through behavior change: what does it take?” Copenhagen: EEA Technical report.
Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2002). “Environmental problems and human behavior (2nd ed.)”. Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing. Gilbert, G. E., & Prion, S. (2016). “Making Sense of Methods and Measurement”. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 12(12), 530-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.12.002
Haeri, H., & Khawaja, M. S. (2012). “The trouble with freeriders: The debate about freeridership in energy efficiency isn’t wrong, but it is wrongheaded”. Public Utilities Fortnightly, (pp. 34-42). Waltham: Cadmus Group.
Huber, M. Z. & Hilty, L. M. (2014). “Gamification and Sustainable Consumption: Overcoming the Limitations of Persuasive Technologies”. In L. M. Hilty, & B. Aebischer, (eds.). ICT Innovations for Sustainability: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (vol 310, pp. 367-386). Cham: Springer.
Information technology office, virtual space security and statistics of the Ministry of Energy. (2023). 1401 water and electricity industry performance report. Tehran: Ministry of Energy. [In Persian]
McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2002). “New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: Promoting Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing”. Journal of Social Issues. 56 (3) 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00183
McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Schultz, P. W. (2014). “Choosing Effective Behavior Change Tools”. Social Marketing Quarterly, 20(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500413519257
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). “The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterizing and designing behaviour change intervention”. Implementation Science, 6(1) 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Nejat, P., Jomehzadeh, F., Taheri, M. M., Gohari, M., & Zaimi Abd. M. M. (2015). “A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries)”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 43, 843-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.066 Ohnmacht, T., Schaffner, D., Weibel, C., & Schad, H. (2017). “Rethinking social psychology and intervention design: A model of energy savings and human behavior”. Energy Research & Social Science, 26,40-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.017
Osbaldiston, R. & Schott, J. P. (2012). “Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science: Meta-Analysis of Proenvironmental Behavior Experiments”. Environment and Behavior. 44(2), 257-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402673
Rabinovich, A., Morton, T.A. & Duke, C.C. (2010). “Collective self and individual choice: the role of social comparisons in promoting climate change”. In L. Whitmarsh, S. O’Neill, & I. Lorenzoni (Eds.), Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication. (Chap 4, pp. 66-84) London: Earthscan.
Rezafar, I. & Behrouz, A. (2013). Forecasting the consumption of fossil fuels in Iran’s power plants until 1404 with an emphasis on environmental sustainability. Tehran: The first national conference on sustainable ecology and development. [In Persian]. http://civilica.com/doc/256762
Ro, M., Brauer, M., Kuntz, K., Shukla, R., & Bensch. I. (2017). “Making Cool Choices for sustainability: Testing the effectiveness of a game-based approach to promoting pro-environmental behaviors”. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 53, 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.007 Rodriguez-Sanchez, C. (2023). The role of social marketing in achieving the planet sustainable development goals (SDGs). International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing. 20, 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-023-00385-3
Rogers, E. M. (2004). “A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model”. Journal of health communication. 9(S1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490271449
Saffarinia, M., Alipour, A. & Mansouri, M. A. (2014). “Study about Influence of methods to change attitudes and behavior of north of Tehran city electrical energy consumption”. Journal of Industrial/Organization Psychology. 5(18), 23-33. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.28222476.1393.5.18.2.8
Schultz, P. W. (2014). “Strategies for Promoting Proenvironmental Behavior”. European Psychologist, 19(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a003
Seaborn, K. & Fels, D. I. (2015). “Gamification in theory and action: A survey”. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies. 74, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
Smith, T., Scahill, L., Dawson, G., Guthrie, D., Lord, C., Odom, S., Rogers, S., & Wagner, A. (2007). “Designing Research Studies on Psychosocial Interventions in Autism”. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorder, 37, 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0173-3
Sonbolekar, M., Dehnavi, J. & Haji molla darvish, N. (2023). “Investigating the Impact of Gamification on the Behavior of Electricity Consumers”. Quarterly Energy Economics Review. 19 (77), 1-31. [In Persian]. http://iiesj.ir/article-1-1561-fa.html
Wantland, D. J., Portillo, C. J., Holzemer, W. L., Slaughter, R., & McGhee, E. M. (2004). “The effectiveness of web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: A meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes”. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(4), e40. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40
Williamson, K., Satre-Meloy, A., Velasco, K., & Green, K. (2018). “Climate Change Needs Behavior Change: Making the Case for Behavioral Solutions to Reduce Global Warming”. Arlington, VA: Rare.
White, K., Habib, R. & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). “How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework”. Journal of Marketing, 83, 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 492 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 318 |
||