| تعداد نشریات | 48 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,236 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,631 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 21,621,175 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,553,801 |
تحلیلی بر عدالت توزیعی و تأثیر آن بر دسترسی به خدمات شهری شهر ارومیه | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهش های بوم شناسی شهری | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 16، شماره 3 (پیاپی 40)، مهر 1404، صفحه 125-144 اصل مقاله (1.63 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/grup.2024.70309.2827 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهرا نوری1؛ ایوب منوچهری میاندوآب* 2؛ خدیجه جوان3؛ مجید رمضانی مهریان4 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد، گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه جغرافیا و اقلیم شناسی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران. | ||
| 4استادیار، گروه مطالعات محیطی، پژوهشکده تحقیق و توسعه علوم انسانی (سمت)، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مهمترین هدف برنامهریزی شهری افزایش کیفیت زندگی شهروندان است. یکی از مهمترین شاخصهای مؤثر در این راستا دسترسی عادلانه شهروندان به خدمات شهری است. برنامهریزان برای متوازن سازی دسترسی به خدمات شهری از مفهوم عدالت توزیعی استفاده میکنند. اعتقاد بر این است که با توزیع متعادل خدمات شهری، دسترسی نیز برای همه ساکنان مطلوب خواهد شد. بر همین اساس هدف این تحقیق آزمون تأثیر عدالت توزیعی بر دسترسی مناسب به خدمات شهری است. روش تحقیق، توصیفی - تحلیلی و به لحاظ هدف کاربردی است. برای جمعآوری اطلاعات از روشهای کتابخانهای و میدانی و برای تحلیل دادهها از نرمافزارهای GIS و Geo Da استفاده شده است. نتایج اولیه نشان میدهد که در سطح محلههای ارومیه نابرابری در توزیع خدمات شهری و دسترسی به خدمات شهری وجود دارد و محلههای مرکزی نسبت به محلههای حاشیهای وضعیت مطلوبتری دارند. در خصوص برآیند دو معیار عدالت توزیعی و دسترسی، ۴۶ درصد از محلهها در وضعیت مطلوب و کاملاً مطلوب، ۳۱ درصد محلهها نیز در وضعیت نامطلوب و کاملاً نامطلوب و ۲۲ درصد نیز در وضعیت متوسط قرار دارند. برای آزمون فرض تأثیرگذاری توزیع خدمات بر دسترسی، از رگرسیون جغرافیایی وزندار استفاده شد که بر اساس نتایج نحوه توزیع خدمات شهری ۷۱ درصد از دسترسی مطلوب به خدمات شهری را تبیین میکند. این نتایج نشان میدهد که عدالت توزیعی تأثیر زیادی در دسترسی شهروندان به خدمات شهری دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| عدالت؛ توزیعی؛ خدمات شهری؛ دسترسی؛ ارومیه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| An Analysis of Distributive Justice and its Impact on Access to Urban Services Urmia City | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahra Nouri1؛ Ayoub Manoochehri MiyandoAb2؛ Khadijeh Javan3؛ Majid Ramezani Mehrian4 | ||
| 1M.A, Department of Geography, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Climatology, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. | ||
| 4Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Studies, Humanities Research and Development Institute (Samt), Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The most important goal of urban planning is to increase the quality of life for citizens. One of the most important indicators of this popups is fair accessibility of citizens to services. Planners use the concept of distributive justice to balance accessibility to urban services. It is believed that with a fair distribution of urban services, accessibility will also be favorable for all residents. Accordingly, the purpose of this research is to examine the effect of distributive justice on accessibility to urban services. The research method is descriptive-analytical and in terms of purpose is practical. Library and field methods were used to collect information and GIS and Geo Data softwares were used for data analysis. The preliminary results show that there are inequalities in the distribution of urban services and accessibility to urban services across the Urmia neighborhoods; the central neighborhoods have a more favorable situation than the peripheral ones. Regarding the result of the analysis of both criteria (distributive justice and accessibility) , 46% of the neighborhoods are in a favorable and completely favorable condition, 31% are in an unfavorable and completely unfavorable condition, and 22% are in an average condition. To test the hypothesis about the impact of the distribution of services on accessibility, a weighted geographic regression was used, and based on the results; the distribution of services explains 71% of the optimal accessibility to urban services. These results show that distributive justice has a great impact on citizens' access to urban services. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| justice, distributive, urban services, accessibility, Urmia | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abu Bakar, N., Abdul Malek, N., & Mansor, M. (2016). Access to Parks and Recreational Opportunities in Urban Low Income Neighbourhood. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234, 299 – 308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.246 Ahmadi, M., |& Shamsipour, A.A. (2019). Analysis of distribution of public services with the approach of spatial justice (case study: Bojnord city). Urban Planning Geography Research, 8(1), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2020.273616.1041 (In Persian) Amanpour, S., Maleki, S., & Hosni, N. (2015). An analysis on the distribution of urban services in Ahvaz metropolis from the perspective of spatial justice. Urban Ecology Research, 7(14), 112-99. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25383930.1395.7.14.7.9 (In Persian) Ashik, F. R., Mim, S. A., & Neema, M. N. ( 2020(. Towards vertical spatial equity of urban facilities: An integration of spatial and aspatial accessibility. Journal of Urban Management, 9(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.11.004 Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009). Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 767–787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00045600903102949 Chang, H. S., & Liao, C. H. (2011). Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks. Cities, 28(5), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.04.002 Cohen, B. (2006). Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technology in Society, 28, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005 Curtis, C., & Scheurer, J. (2010). Planning for sustainable accessibility: Developing tools to aid discussion and decision-making. Prog. Plan, 74 (2), 53–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2010.05.001 Dadashpoor, H., Rostami, F., & Alizadeh, B. (2016). Is inequality in the distribution of urban facilities inequitable? Exploring a method for identifying spatial inequity in an Iranian city. Cities, 52, 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.12.007 . Dadashpour, H., Alizadeh, B., & Madani B. (2013). Investigating and glorifying the development process and spatial inequality in the cities of West Azarbaijan Province. Journal of Social Sciences, 18(53), 173-208. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17351162.1390.18.53.5.8. (In Persian) Dadashpour, H., & Rostami, F. (2019). Measuring integrated spatial justice of urban public services based on population distribution, accessibility and efficiency in Yasouj city. Regional urban studies and researches, 3(10), 1-22. https://urs.ui.ac.ir/article_19992.html (In Persian) Dai, D. (2011). Racial/Ethnic and Socio-economic Disparities in Urban Green Space Accessibility: Where to Intervene? Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(4), 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.002 Dikec, M. (2001). Justice and the spatial imagination, Environment and Planning, 1785-1805. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3467 Ebrahimzadeh, I., Ghadermarzi, J., & Kashfi Dost D. (2017). Analysis of the distribution of urban services in residential areas with a social justice approach, case study: Dehgolan city – Kurdistan. Urban Ecology Research, 9(18), 13-26. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25383930.1397.9.18.1.5 (In Persian) Gonzalez-Feliu, J., Salanova Grau, J. M., & Beziat, A. (2014). A location-based accessibility analysis to estimate the suitability of urban consolidation facilities. Int. J. Urban Sci. 18 (2), 166–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2014.930673 Gruber, E., Rauha, D. (2016). Spatial Justice and the Welfare State: SGI Provision in Peripheral Austria and Sweden. Regional Studies ssociation’s European Conference, Austria. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04234-8_13 Hataminejad, H., & Rasti, O. (2005). Social justice and spatial (regional) justice, review and comparison of theories of Rawls and David Harvey. Political and Economic Journal, 3, (1) -40-52. (In Persian) Kelobonyea, K., McCarneya, G., Xia, J., Swapan, M. S. H., Mao, F., & Zhoua, H. (2019). Relative accessibility analysis for key land uses: A spatial equity perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 75, 82–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.01.015 Khaksari, A., & Masoumifar A., & Asayesh, M. (2022). Analysis of spatial justice research in the enjoyment of urban services in Iran. Human Geography Research (Geographic Research), 53(3), 793-810. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2020.296238.1008074. (In Persian) Khalji, M. A., & Hajinejad, A., & Mehdikhah, A. (2019). Spatial analysis of social justice in Tabriz metropolis using factor analysis. Regional Planning, 10(37), 109-122. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22516735.1399.10.37.8.6. (In Persian) Khorasani, M. M., Tahmasi, B., & Hojjat, S. (2017). Measuring and analyzing the development levels of the rural areas of Kohdasht. Geographical engineering of the land, 2(4), 127-139. https://www.jget.ir/article_69895.html (In Persian) Kim, C.W., Lee, S.Y., & Hong, S.C. (2005). Equity in utilization of cancer inpatient services by income classes. Health Policy, 72, 187–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.03.009 Kinman, E.L. (1999). Evaluating health services equity at a primary care clinic in Chilimarca, Bolivia. Soc. Sci. Med., 49, 663–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00147-1 La Rosa, D., Takatori, C., Shimizu, H., & Privitera, R. (2018). A planning framework to evaluate demands and preferences by different social groups for accessibility to urban greenspaces. Sustainable cities and society, 36, 346-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.026 Lee, J., & Miller, H. J. (2018). Measuring the impacts of new public transit services on space-time accessibility: An analysis of transit system redesign and new bus rapid transit in Columbus, Ohio, USA. Applied Geography, 93(February), 47–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.02.012 Li M, K. M.P., Chen, J., Wang, J., Yin, J., & Yu, D. (2021). Measuring emergency medical service (EMS) accessibility with the effect of city dynamics in a 100-year pluvial flood scenario, Cities, 117:103314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103314 Lotfi, S., & Koohsari, M. J. (2009). Measuring objective accessibility to neighborhood facilities in the city (A case study: Zone 6 in Tehran, Iran). Cities, 26(3), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.02.006 Lotfi, S., Manouchehri Miandoab, A., Ahar, Hassan., & Saleki, M. A. (2011). Measuring the accessibility of urban facilities using fuzzy logic. Case example: Tabriz city. Urban Management, 10(30), 113-130. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286020.1390.3.45.7.9 (In Persian) Mayaud, J. R., Tran, M., & Nuttall, R. )2019(. An Urban Data Framework for Assessing Equity in Cities: Comparing Accessibility to Healthcare Facilities in Cascadia. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 78, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101401 Mohammadi H. S., Ahadanjadroshti M., & Mousavi., M. (2015). Survey and spatial analysis of distribution and access to urban public services (Study case: middle school educational services of Miandoab city). Geographical analysis of space, 6(21), 125-|140. https://doi.org/10.22067/gusd.v3i1.34437. (In Persian) Namdarardakani M. J., Shakur A., & Khorram Bakht A. A. (2022). City and spatial justice; An analysis on the distribution of sustainable development indicators in the spatial justice of the city: a case study of Shiraz city areas. Geography and Environmental Studies, 11(43), 142-160. https://journals.iau.ir/article_691233.html (In Persian) Rahnama M. R., & Lis A. (2015). Measuring accessibility changes in an area of the mother city of Sydney. Journal of Geography and Development, 4(7), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2006.3804 (In Persian) Sabokbar, F.S., Mohmmadi, H., Tahmasebi, S., Rafii, Y., & Hosseini, A. (2021). Measuring spatial accessibility and equity to healthcare services using fuzzy inference system. Applied Geography, 136 102584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sste.2017.04.002 Saeed Nia, A. (2012). Urban green spaces, publications of the country's municipalities. Tehran. (In Persian) Sheikh A., B., & Abdulahi A. A., |& PourKhosravani, M. (2018). Surveying the distribution of urban services in line with spatial justice (case study: the four regions of Kerman city). Journal of Geography and Urban-Regional Planning, 9(31), 15-34. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23452277.1398.9.31.2.1 (In Persian) Shieh, E. (2019). An introduction to the basics of urban planning, Iran University of Science and Technology. Tehran. (In Persian) Smoyer, T., Hewko, J. N., & John, H. ( 2004). Spatial accessibility and equity of playgrounds in Edmonton, Canada. Canadian Geographer, 48(3), 287-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-3658.2004.00061.x Taleai, M., Sliuzas, R., & Flacke, J. (2014). An integrated framework to evaluate the equity of urban public facilities using spatial multi-criteria analysis. Cities, 40, 56–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.04.006 Tsou, K. W., Hung, Y. T., & Chang, Y.L. (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22(6), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.07.004 Yuan, Y., Xu, J., & Wang, Z. (2017). Spatial equity measure on urban ecological space layout based on accessibility of socially vulnerable groups—a case study of Changting, China. Sustainability, 9, 1552. 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9091552 Zhang, R., Sun, F., Shen, Y., Peng, Sh., & Che, Y. (2021). Accessibility of urban park benefits with different spatial coverage: Spatial and social inequity, Applied Geography, 135 (2021) 102555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102555 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 537 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 237 |
||