| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,264 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,909 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 22,310,331 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,991,884 |
تحلیل و تبیین فضاهای شهری بندر ماهشهر از منظر اصول شهر دوستدار کودک، مورد مطالعه: پارک مهروماه | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهش های بوم شناسی شهری | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 16، شماره 4(پیاپی 41)، دی 1404، صفحه 149-162 اصل مقاله (1.48 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/grup.2025.71413.2859 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سید محسن موسوی مهر1؛ صادق بشارتی فر* 2 | ||
| 1کارشناس ارشد، گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری –کاربری اراضی و ممیزی املاک-، واحد ماهشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ماهشهر، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد ماهشهر، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، ماهشر، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه دسترسی برابر به خدمات و عدالت بین نسلی به یکی از رویکردهای اصلی در کشورهای توسعه یافته تبدیل شده است. در این میان، حمایت از کودکان و نیازهای آنها بهویژه در طراحی فضاهای شهری از جایگاه ویژهای در نظام مدیریت شهری برخوردار شده است. این پژوهش با هدف سنجش میزان رضایتمندی والدین کودکان از پارک مهر و ماه بندر ماهشهر پرداخته که از نظر روش توصیفی-تحلیلی و پیمایشی و به لحاظ هدف از نوع، کاربردی-توسعهای میباشد. جامعه آماری شامل والدین کودکان بوده که حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 383 نمونه انتخاب شده است. اعتبار و روایی پرسشنامه با استفاده از نظرات متخصصان تأیید شد و برای سنجش میزان پایایی پرسشنامه از روش آلفای کرونباخ استفاده گردید. میزان آلفاب کرونباخ شاخصهای اصلی (ایمنی، کالبدی، دسترسی و بهداشتی) 8/0 بهدست آمد که نشانگر وضعیت پایایی مطلوب میباشد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل شاخصها از آزمون t تک نمونهای، تحلیل رگرسیون چند متغیره، ضریب همبستگی و تحلیل واریانس استفاده شده است. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که امتیاز شاخصهای شهر دوستدار کودک به غیر از شاخص بهداشتی-سلامتی در شرایط مطلوبی قرار دارند. شاخص ایمنی و امنیت با مقدار بتای 368/0 بیشترین نقش و قدرت تبیین را در پیشبینی تحققپذیری رضایتمندی والدین کودکان در بین شاخصهای دوستدار کودک در پارک مهر و ماه بندر ماهشهر دارد، معیار محیطی و کالبدی با مقدار بتای 267/ در اولویت دوم و معیار بهداشتی –سلامتی با مقدار بتای 166/0 از کمترین اولویت برخوردار است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ارزیابی؛ رضایتمندی؛ معیارهای شهر دوستدار کودک؛ پارک مهر و ماه؛ بندر ماهشهر | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis and Explanation of the Urban Spaces of Mahshahr Port from the Perspective of the Principles of a Child-Friendly City, Case Study: Mehrumah Park | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Syed Mohsen Mosavimeher1؛ Sadegh Besharatifar2 | ||
| 1Msc, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Mahshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahshahr, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Mahshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahshahr, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Today, equal access to services and intergenerational justice has become one of the main approaches in developed countries. Meanwhile, supporting children and their needs, especially in the design of urban spaces, has a special place in the urban management system. This research aims to measure the level of satisfaction of the parents and children in MehrMah Park in Bandar Mahshahr, which is descriptive-analytical and survey method, and in terms of the purpose, it is applied-developmental. The statistical population includes children's parents, and the sample size is 383 samples selected using Cochran's formula. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed by the opinions of experts, and the Cronbach's alpha method was used to measure the reliability of the questionnaire. Cornbrash’s alpha of the main indicators (safety, physical, accessibility and health) was 0.8, which indicates a good reliability situation.The results of the research indicate that the score of child-friendly city indicators is in favorable conditions, except for the health-sanitary index. The safety and security index with a beta value of 0.368 has the greatest role and explanation power in predicting the satisfaction of parents of children among the child-friendly indicators in Mehrumah Park, Mahshahr port, and the environmental and physical criterion with a beta value of 0.267 is the second priority, Health - sanitary has the lowest priority with a beta value of 0.166. Based on this, the four basic principles for realizing the criteria of a child-friendly city in Mehrumah Park in Mahshahr port are: a one-dimensional view of creating a child-friendly city, paying attention to education as the basis and foundation of development, giving priority to local culture in creating friendly cities child and considering the city as an educational laboratory where the child learns and experiences what he has learned (coordination of education and lived experience).Therefore, according to the current situation of Mehrumah Park in Mahshahr port, it can be said that at the highest level, should to the planning and management system, and Then At the design of urban spaces based the on the approach of Child-Friendly City be Attention. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Evaluation, Satisfaction, Child-Friendly City criteria, Mehrumah Park, Mahshahr Port | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aarts, M. J., Jeurissen, M. P., Van Oers, H. A., Schuit, A. J., & Van de Goor, I. A. (2011). Multi-sector policy action to create activity-friendly environments for children: a multiple-case study. Health Policy, 101(1), 11-19. Doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.011. Abdolahi, A.A., & Azarnoosh, F. (2022). Evaluation of urban spaces for children based on the principles of a child-friendly city (Case study: Kerman). Urban Social Geography (USG), 9(1), 77-96. (In Persian) Doi: 10.22103/JUSG.2022.2062. Ahmadi, M., Srami, H., Ghayour, H., & Hayrapetiyan, V.(2019). Evaluation of the role of the city's structure in the realization of the development of Yazd's neighborhoods, Journal of Sustainable City,2(4),31-45. (In Persian) Doi:10.22034/jsc.2020.195824.1077. Ahmadi, Sh. (2023). Studying and Analyzing the Role of Public Spaces in Social Sustainability of Cities Case Study: Sardasht City. Urban Ecological Research, 14(1), 99-118. (In Persian) Doi: 10.30473/grup.2023.35954.2002. Ahmadvand, M., Soltani, Z., & Goodarzi,M. (2023). Analyzing the Child Friendly City Indicators in Ahvaz Metropolis. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 10(63), 63-84. (In Persian) Doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2022.339123.1662. Baharvand, S. (2014). Child Friendly Cities Children of the review of contributions to design standards. Providing Operational and Strategic Solutions , 13 (34), 297-32. (In Persian) Brown, C., de Lannoy, A., McCracken, D., Gill, T., Grant, M., Wright, H., & Williams, S. (2019). Child-friendly cities. Cities & health, 3(1-2), 1-7.Doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2019.1682836. Carroll, P., Witten, K., Kearns, R., & Donovan, P. (2015). Kids in the City: children's use and experiences of urban neighbourhoods in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of urban design, 20(4), 417-436. Doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1044504. Chavai, F. (2011). GitaologyUrbanization of Realities and Imaginations. translated by Seyed Mohammad Habibi, Tehran University of Tehran. Dryskl, D. (2007). Creating Better Cities with Children and Adolescents. Translation to Farsi by Tawakoni, M. & Rezvani, N.S.Tehran: Depeche Press. Easthope, H., & Tice, A.(2011). Children in apartments implications for the compact city. Urban policy and Research, 29,415-434. Esmailzadeh Kovaki, A. (2012). Investigation and analysis of indicators of a child-friendly city, a case study, Qochan, Master's Thesis of Geography and Urban Planning, Zabul University. Flouri, E., Midouhas, E., & Joshi, H. (2014). The role of urban neighbourhood green space in children's emotional and behavioural resilience. Journal of environmental psychology, 40, 179-186.Doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.007. Gummesson, M. (2007). Barns sakra tillangli ghet till skolan (Children ssafe accessibility to school)Institutional for architecture, Chalmers Tenaska Hogs kola, Goteborg. Hampshire, K. R., Porter, G., Owusu, S. A., Tanle, A., & Abane, A. (2011). Out of the reach of children? Young people’s health-seeking practices and agency in Africa’s newly-emerging therapeutic landscapes. Social science & medicine, 73(5), 702-710. Doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.035. Heidari, A. (2024). Analysis of Factors Affecting Women's Security in Urban Parks, Case Study: Azadi Park in Shiraz. Urban Ecological Research, 15(1), 119-138. (In Persian) Doi: 10.30473/grup.2024.37972.2073. Holt, N. L., Cunningham, C. T., Sehn, Z. L., Spence, J. C., Newton, A. S., & Ball, G. D. (2009). Neighborhood physical activity opportunities for inner-city children and youth. Health & Place, 15(4), 1022-1028. Doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.04.002. Johnson,W.(2014). Brussels the Childish Capital Urban Studies.11(2), 115-132. Kharazmi, O., Johari, L&., Kharazmi, A. (2020). Assessing the Child Friendly City Indicators in Mashhad Metropolis. Journal of Urban Social Geography, 7 (1), 191-210. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/1031577 Li, M., & Li, J. (2017). Analysis of methods of allocating grass space for the design of child-friendly cities: a case study of Changsha. Procedia Engineering, 198, 790-801.Doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.130. Mirzaei, R., & Siyadar Baii, K.(2021). Designing a child-friendly center considering the development of children's creativity as a case study, Mashhad. Shabak Scientific Journal, 6(2), 127-142. (In Persian) Prihantini, P., & Kurniawati, W. (2019, August). Mapping of child friendly parks availability for supporting child friendly city in Semarang. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 313, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing. Doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/313/1/012035 Rashid Kolvir, H., Karimi Azeri, A., & Purreza, S.H. (2020). Assessment of creating child friendly city components in Bandar-e Anzali. Urban Planning Knowledge, 4(3), 51-65. (In Persian) Doi.org/10.22124/upk.2020.14181.1273 Resideh, B., Marsoosi, N., Taleshi, M., & Moosa Kazemi, S.M. (2023). Analysis of Infrastructure Index of Elderly-Friendly City in Mashhad Metropolis. Urban Ecological Research,14(2), 1-16. (In Persian) Doi.org/10.30473/grup.2023.65521.2736 Riggio, E.(2002). Child Friendly cities: good governance in the best interests of the child. Environment & Urbanization, 14(2),45-58. Doi.org/10.1177/095624780201400204 Saberi, H., & Tahmasbi Zadeh, S. (2022). Child-friendly urban spaces, attitudes and indicators. 5th National Conference on Architecture, Urban Development and Environment Restoration. Safavi Moghadam, S.M., & Noghani Dekht Bahmani, M. (2015). A Child Friendly City and Happiness of Children in Mashhad. Journal of social sciences, 12(1), 143-165. https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v12i1.22577. (In Persian). Shahrizadeh, S. (2018). Child-friendly Strategic planning with emphasis children's creativityCase Study: Yazd City). Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 8(28), 149-170. (In Persian) Dor: 20.1001.1.22285229.1396.8.28.9.1 Shakoi, H. (2011). New Thoughts in the Philosophy of Geography. Tehran Institute of Gitashnasi Geographical and Cartographical Institution. Shia, E.(1997). Introduction to the basics of urban planning. Tehran University of Science and industrial. Thomas, N., & Percy-Smith, B. (2010). A handbook of children and young people’s participation. Perspectives from. Tranter, P., & Whitelegg, J. (1994). Children's travel behaviours in Canberra: car-dependent lifestyles in a low-density city. Journal of Transport Geography, 2(4), 265-273. Doi.org/10.1016/0966-6923(94)90050-7. VanVilet, W., & Karstem, A. (2015). Child-Friendly Cities in a Globalizing World: Different Approaches and a Typology of Children He's. Children. Youth and Environments, 25(2), Doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.25.2.0001. Yao, S., & Xiaoyan, L. (2017). Exploration on ways of research and construction of chinese child-friendly city-a case study of changsha. Procedia engineering, 198, 699-706.. Doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.121. Yao, S., Dingxuehua, Z., Si, L., & Sheng, J. (2015). A spatial study on School-Age children’s routes between school and home after class against the backdrop of urban redevelopment as exemplified in central Changsha. Architectural Journal, 9, 94-99. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 414 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 389 |
||