| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,261 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,847 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 22,201,434 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,928,229 |
بررسی تأثیر حکمرانی خوب در کیفیت محیطزیست: تأکیدی بر نقش کیفیت نهادی در حصول توسعه پایدار | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهش های اقتصاد صنعتی | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 30، دی 1403، صفحه 59-83 اصل مقاله (1.11 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کاربردی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/jier.2025.73616.1488 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سمیه اعظمی* 1؛ مهسا محجوبی2 | ||
| 1گروه اقتصاد دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد اقتصاد انرژی، دانشگاه رازی، گروه اقتصاد. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| حکمرانی خوب نقشی کلیدی در ایجاد توسعه پایدار و مدیریت کارآمد منابع عمومی ایفا میکند و به عنوان یکی از ابزارهای اصلی برای بهبود کیفیت زندگی مردم و عدالت اجتماعی شناخته میشود. هدف این مطالعه بررسی تأثیر شاخصهای حکمرانی خوب بر انتشار دیاکسید کربن کشورهای منتخب آسیایی است که سهم بالایی در انتشار دیاکسید کربن جهانی دارند. مطابق با مدل پانل آستانهای، رابطه CO2- تولید وابسته به شاخصهای حکمرانی خوب در نظر گرفته شده است. نتایج برآورد مدل نشان میدهد با بهبود شاخص های حکمرانی خوب و فراتر رفتن از حد آستانهای، ضرایب متغیرهای تولید در رابطه CO2 - تولید به گونهای تغییر میکند که در ازای یک واحد تولید میزان کربن کمتری منتشر می شود. بیشترین کاهش انتشار دیاکسید کربن با بهبود شاخص کیفیت مقررات و نظارت حاصل میشود. همچنین، در سطوح بالاتر تولید بهبود شاخصهای حکمرانی منجر به کاهش بیشتر انتشار دیاکسید کربن میشود. در همه شاخصها به جزء شاخص ثبات سیاسی حد آستانهای کمتر از متوسط شاخص است. به عبارتی در سطوح بالاتر شاخص ثبات سیاسی میتوان شاهد تأثیر گذاری مثبت آن بر کیفیت محیطزیست بود. وجود منحنی زیست محیطی کوزنتس N- شکل برای این گروه از کشورها نگران کننده و بیانگر آن است که تولید در بلندمدت حل کننده مسایل زیست محیطی نیست. آلودگی با رشد اقتصادی بطور خودکار از بین نمیرود و حکمرانی خوب میتواند راه حلی برای توسعه پایدار باشد. لذا، راهکارهایی در جهت ارتقای کیفیت نهادی میتواند در بهبود حصول توسعه پایدار مفید باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| کیفیت نهادی؛ انتشار دیاکسید کربن؛ منحنی زیست محیطی کوزنتس N- شکل؛ مدل پانل آستانه ای | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the Effect of Good Governance on Environmental Quality: An Emphasis on the Role of Institutional Quality in Achieving Sustainable Development | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mahsa Mahjoubi2؛ | ||
| 2Master of Energy Economics, Razi University, Department of Economics, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Good governance plays a key role in creating sustainable development and efficient management of public resources and is recognized as one of the main tools for improving people''s quality of life and social justice. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of good governance indicators on carbon dioxide emissions in selected Asian countries that contribute significantly to global carbon dioxide emissions. According to the threshold panel model, the CO2-GDP relationship is considered dependent on good governance indicators. The results of the model estimation show that with the improvement of good governance indicators and exceeding the threshold level, the coefficients of GDP variables in the CO2-GDP relationship change in such a way that less carbon is emitted per unit of GDP. The greatest reduction in carbon dioxide emissions is achieved by improving the regulatory quality. Also at higher levels of GDP, improving governance indicators leads to a greater reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. In all indicators, except for the political stability, the threshold level is lower than the average of the index. In other words, at higher levels of the political stability, we can witness its positive impact on environmental quality. The existence of an N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve for this group of countries indicates that GDP does not solve environmental problems in the long run. Pollution does not automatically disappear with economic growth and good governance can be a solution to sustainable development. Therefore, strategies to improve institutional quality can be useful in achieving of sustainable development. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Institutional Quality, CO2 Emissions, N-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve, Panel Threshold Model | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbas, H. S. M., Xu, X., & Sun, C. (2021). Role of foreign direct investment interaction to energy consumption and institutional governance in sustainable GHG emission reduction. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(40), 56808–56821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14650-7
Abid, M. (2017). Does economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? A comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.007
Adams, S., & Klobodu, E. K. M. (2017). Urbanization, democracy, bureaucratic quality, and environmental degradation. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(6), 1035–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.04.006
Adebayo, T. S., Udemba, E. N., Ahmed, Z., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). Determinants of consumption-based carbon emissions in Chile: an application of non-linear ARDL. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(32), 43908–43922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13830-9
Ahmadi Niaz, S., Zeynalzadeh, R., & Raeispour Rajabali, A. (2018). Investigating the impact of good governance on the environmental quality index in selected developing countries. Environmental Sciences and Technology, 20(4), 165-177. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/362711/fa (in Persian)
Alizadeh, S., & Bayat, M. (2016). Investigating the impact of good governance on the environment in middle-income countries. Environmental Sciences and Technology, 18(2), 501-513. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/839965 (in Persian)
Allard, A., Takman, J., Uddin, G. S., & Ahmed, A. (2018). The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(6), 5848–5861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0907-0
Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., Jansson, B.-O., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Perrings, C., & Pimentel, D. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 15(2), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(95)00059-3
Azam, M., Liu, L., & Ahmad, N. (2021). Impact of institutional quality on environment and energy consumption: evidence from developing world. Environment Development and Sustainability, 23(2), 1646–1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00644-x
Azami, S., Rahmani, H., & Delangizan, S. (2024). N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from developing and developed countries. Economic Growth and Development Research, 14(55), 93-109. doi: 10.30473/egdr.2024.70318.6811 (in Persian)
Azimi, M. N., Rahman, M. M., & Nghiem, S. (2023). Linking governance with environmental quality: a global perspective. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 15086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42221-y
Barbier, E. B. (2021). The evolution of economic views on natural resource scarcity. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 15(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/712926
Bildirici, M. (2022). The impacts of governance on environmental pollution in some countries of Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: the evidence from panel quantile regression and causality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(12), 17382–17393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15716-2
Bilgili, F., Kuşkaya, S., Ünlü, F., & Gençoğlu, P. (2020). Does waste energy usage mitigate the CO2 emissions? A time-frequency domain analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(5), 5056–5073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07253-w
Bisset, T. (2023). N-shaped EKC in sub-Saharan Africa: the three-dimensional effects of governance indices and renewable energy consumption. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(2), 3321–3334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22394-1
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
Dadgar, Y., & Nazari, R. (2016). The impact of good governance on environmental pollution in Southwest Asian countries. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 5(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.22099/ijes.2017.23649.1292 (in Persian)
Dasgupta, S., Hamilton, K., Pandey, K. D., & Wheeler, D. (2006). Environment During growth: Accounting for governance and vulnerability. World Development, 34(9), 1597–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.12.008
De Bruyn, S. M. (2012). Economic growth and the environment: An empirical analysis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4068-3
Dunlap, R. E., & Jorgenson, A. K. (2012). Environmental Problems. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog174
Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance (Oxford, England), 17(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental impacts of a north American Free Trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w3914
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(99)00025-1
Hargrove, A., Qandeel, M., & Sommer, J. M. (2019). Global governance for climate justice: A cross-national analysis of CO2 emissions. Global Transitions, 1, 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2019.11.001
Hassaballa, H. (2015). The effect of corruption on carbon dioxide emissions in the Mena region. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2015.v4n2p301
Hess, P. N. (2016). Economic growth and sustainable development (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722467
Hunjra, A. I., Tayachi, T., Chani, M. I., Verhoeven, P., & Mehmood, A. (2020). The moderating effect of institutional quality on the financial development and environmental quality nexus. Sustainability, 12(9), 3805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093805
Hussain, M., & Dogan, E. (2021). The role of institutional quality and environment-related technologies in environmental degradation for BRICS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 304(127059), 127059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127059
Ibrahim, M. H., & Law, S. H. (2016). Institutional quality and CO2Emission-trade relations: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 84(2), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12095
Jabeur, S. B., & Sghaier, A. (2018). The relationship between energy, pollution, economic growth and corruption: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) approach. Economics Bulletin, 38(4), 1927–1946. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/eblecbull/eb-17-00951.htm
Kazemzadeh, E., Karimi Alavijeh, N., & Ebrahimi Salari, T. (2020). The effect of governance on carbon dioxide emissions in G8 countries: A quantile panel regression approach. Economics and Regional Development, 26(18), 173-196. https://doi.org/10.22067/erd.v26i18.77394 (in Persian)
Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2007). Governance indicators: Where are we, where should we be going? The World Bank Research Observer, 23(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkm012
Khan, M., & Rana, A. T. (2021). Institutional quality and CO2 emission-output relations: The case of Asian countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 279(111569), 111569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111569
Le, T.-H., Chang, Y., & Park, D. (2016). Trade openness and environmental quality: International evidence. Energy Policy, 92, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.030
Leblois, A., Damette, O., & Wolfersberger, J. (2017). What has driven deforestation in developing countries since the 2000s? Evidence from new remote-sensing data. World Development, 92, 82–102.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.012
Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. (2006). Democracy and environmental degradation. International Studies Quarterly: A Publication of the International Studies Association, 50(4), 935–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00432.xLotfali Pour, M. R. (2021). Investigating the impact of oil and gas resource rents and governance quality on the environmental resource degradation index in selected Middle East and North Africa countries. In *First National Conference on Green Management in the Third Millennium: Experiences, Challenges, and Solutions*. Iran.https://profdoc.um.ac.ir/paper-abstract-1091562.html (in Persian)
Mahmoudi, M., & Dehmardeh Ghaleno, N. (2021). Investigating the impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and governance quality on CO2 emissions in Asian countries. Economics and Modeling (Economics),12(4),181-215. https://doi.org/10.29252/jem.2022.225029.1698 (in Persian)
Mohammadian, F. (2023). Proposing a model for developing and evaluating economic feasibility reports of industrial projects. Quarterly Journal of Industrial Economics Research, 7(25), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.30473/jier.2024.69541.1419 (in Persian)
Muhammad, S., & Long, X. (2021). Rule of law and CO2 emissions: A comparative analysis across 65 belt and road initiative(BRI) countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279(123539), 123539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123539
Narcisse, M., Zhang, S., Shahid, M. S., & Shehzad, K. (2023). Investigating the N-shaped EKC in China: An imperious role of energy use and health expenditures. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1149507
Pal, D., & Mitra, S. K. (2017). The environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide in India and China: Growth and pollution at crossroad. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(2), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.03.005
Pourali, A., Fallahi, M. A., & Naji Meidani, A. A. (2019). The impact of good governance and political-civil liberties indices on environmental performance index: An analysis of 101 countries worldwide. Economics and Regional Development, 26(17), 63-94. https://profdoc.um.ac.ir/paper-abstract-1079043.html (in Persian)
Raskhi, S., & Khodam-al-Hosseini, S. H. (2023). The impact of green technology and innovation on electronic waste production in selected OECD countries. Quarterly Journal of Industrial Economics Research, 7(24), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.30473/jier.2024.70065.1431 (in Persian)
Shahab, M. R., & Nasersadrabadi, S. M. (2014). Investigating the impact of government economic policies on environmental quality in selected countries. Environmental Sciences and Technology, 16(2), 139-150. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/87306/fa (in Persian)
Soleimani Morchekhorti, E., & Cheraghi, M. (2022, July 26). An introduction to good governance in the environmental sector. Tehran, Iran: Islamic Parliament Research Center. https://sid.ir/paper/1048627/fa (in Persian)
Safdar, S., Khan, A., & Andlib, Z. (2022). Impact of good governance and natural resource rent on economic and environmental sustainability: an empirical analysis for South Asian economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(55), 82948–82965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21401-9
Sah, M. R. (2021). Effects of institutional quality on environmental protection in CEMAC countries. Modern Economy, 12(05), 903–918. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2021.125045
Shehzad, K., Zeraibi, A., & Zaman, U. (2022). Testing the N-shaped environmental Kuznets Curve in Algeria: An imperious role of natural resources and economic globalization. Resources Policy, 77(102700), 102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102700
Simionescu, M., Neagu, O., & Gavurova, B. (2022). The role of quality of governance in reducing pollution in Romania: An ARDL and nonparametric Bayesian approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.892243
Simionescu, M., & Plopeanu, A.-P. (2023). Impact of governance quality on pollution in nuclear energy consuming countries in the European Union. Energy Reports, 9, 4122–4134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.12.068
Sinha, A., Gupta, M., Shahbaz, M., & Sengupta, T. (2019). Impact of corruption in public sector on environmental quality: Implications for sustainability in BRICS and next 11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 1379–1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.066
Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004
Taylor, M. S., & Copeland, B. R. (2013). Trade and the environment: Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/36444/
Torras, M., & Boyce, J. K. (1998). Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 25(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(97)00177-8
Walker, R. M., & Hills, P. (2012). Partnership Characteristics, Network Behavior, and Publicness: Evidence on the Performance of Sustainable Development Projects. International Public Management Journal, 15(4), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2012.761070
Zeraibi, A., Ahmed, Z., Shehzad, K., Murshed, M., Nathaniel, S. P., & Mahmood, H. (2022). Revisiting the EKC hypothesis by assessing the complementarities between fiscal, monetary, and environmental development policies in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(16), 23545–23560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17288-7
Zhang, Y.-J., Jin, Y.-L., Chevallier, J., & Shen, B. (2016). The effect of corruption on carbon dioxide emissions in APEC countries: A panel quantile regression analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.027
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 487 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 334 |
||