پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,276 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,018 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 22,699,189 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,331,553 |
طراحی و تبیین مدل هوشمند اکوسیستم دیجیتال در سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صنایع دستی و گردشگری در بستر وب ۴.۰ | ||
| مدیریت سازمانهای دولتی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 14، شماره 2 (پیاپی 54)، فروردین 1405، صفحه 43-70 اصل مقاله (1.61 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: اکتشافی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ipom.2025.74207.5174 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| یزدان شیرمحمدی* | ||
| دانشیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این پژوهش کیفی با هدف طراحی و تبیین مدل هوشمند اکوسیستم دیجیتال برای سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صنایع دستی و گردشگری در بستر وب ۴.۰ انجام شده است. با استفاده از روش نظریه دادهبنیاد و انجام مصاحبههای نیمهساختاریافته با ۳۵ نفر از مدیران، کارشناسان و متخصصان حوزه دیجیتال، دادهها در سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی تحلیل شدند. نتایج حاکی از آن است که مدل نهایی بر شش بُعد کلیدی استوار است. شرایط علّی شامل عواملی چون جهانیسازی وب ۴.۰، رشد مطالبات مشتریان، فشار رقابت بینالمللی، نیاز به حفظ دیجیتال آثار، شکافهای فناورانه و کمبود مهارتهای دیجیتال است. شرایط زمینهای متشکل از زیرساختهای ناکافی، محدودیتهای بودجهای، نیازهای چندفرهنگی مخاطبان، حمایتهای دولتی و ظرفیتهای نوآوری درونسازمانی است. مقوله محوری پژوهش، طراحی یک مدل یکپارچه و هوشمند برای اکوسیستم دیجیتال است که پلتفرمی چندکاربره و متمرکز با بهرهگیری از استانداردهای جهانی ارائه میدهد. شرایط مداخلهگر شامل شایستگیهای مدیریتی، سیاستهای اقتصادی، مسائل کارکنان و محیط کلان سازمانی، جهتگیری راهبردها را تحت تأثیر قرار میدهد. راهبردهای تدوینشده در این مدل شامل اجرای برنامههای آموزشی مبتنی بر واقعیت افزوده، طراحی پلتفرمهای هوشمند گردشگری، همکاری با شرکتهای دانشبنیان، استقرار چتباتهای هوشمند، تدوین پروتکلهای امنیت سایبری و جذب سرمایهگذاری خارجی است. پیامدهای حاصل از اجرای این مدل عبارتاند از افزایش رضایت ذینفعان، کاهش هزینههای عملیاتی، ارتقای تصویر سازمان در رسانهها، دیجیتالیشدن آثار فرهنگی، توسعه درآمدهای نوین و شفافیت بیشتر در گزارشدهی. این مدل با رویکردی بومی و آیندهنگر، چارچوبی منسجم برای تحول دیجیتال در نهادهای فرهنگی کشورهای درحالتوسعه ارائه میدهد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| اکوسیستم دیجیتال؛ مدل هوشمند؛ میراث فرهنگی؛ وب ۴.۰؛ تحول دیجیتال | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Designing and Developing an Intelligent Model of Digital Ecosystem for the Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization in Web 4.0 Context | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Yazdan Shirmohammadi | ||
| Associate Professor, Department of Businees Administration Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction The emergence of Web 4.0 as the fourth generation of the Internet has created a fundamental shift in the structure of human interaction with digital space. Beyond merely employing artificial intelligence, Web 4.0 integrates emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR), big data, advanced analytics, and self‑learning systems into an intelligent, interactive, and adaptive digital ecosystem. In the global tourism industry, countries such as Vietnam and Singapore have successfully utilized social robots, facial recognition, AI‑based chatbots, and AR platforms to significantly increase tourist satisfaction and operational efficiency. For example, leading international brands like Marriott and Singapore Airlines have used intelligent chatbots, behavioral data analysis, and AI‑driven customer experience management systems to enhance service processes and improve user experience in real time. However, cultural organizations in developing countries, including Iran, face an urgent need to design intelligent digital ecosystems to align with global standards, as international tourists increasingly use Web 4.0 technologies to choose travel destinations. Domestic research has shown that applying Web 4.0 technologies in cultural tourism organizations can play an important role in sustainable development, stakeholder satisfaction, and cultural heritage preservation. Yet only a small fraction of Iran’s cultural institutions have a systematic framework for digital transformation, highlighting the need for localized and integrated models. The Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization of Iran, as the governing body responsible for preserving and developing the country’s cultural heritage, confronts three key challenges: digitalization of cultural assets, changing patterns of audience interaction, and integration of emerging technologies. Studies indicate that 78% of cultural organizations in developing countries lack a systematic framework for managing digital transformation. Research gaps exist in four areas: theoretical (integration of cultural management and advanced digital technologies), methodological (lack of mixed‑method approaches), practical (need for localized models considering Iran’s cultural diversity, infrastructure limitations, and legal and religious requirements), and technological (modeling the specific dynamics of Web 4.0 technologies in cultural heritage). Therefore, this study aims to design and develop an intelligent digital ecosystem model for the Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization in the context of Web 4.0. Methodology This research employed an exploratory mixed‑methods design (qualitative‑quantitative). In the qualitative phase, the systematic grounded theory approach of Strauss and Corbin (1998) was used. The population consisted of 35 experts, including senior managers, IT specialists, and cultural heritage professionals. Purposive sampling combined with the snowball technique was applied. Data were collected through in‑depth semi‑structured interviews until theoretical saturation, which was achieved after the 19th interview. Data analysis involved three stages: open coding (extracting initial concepts), axial coding (identifying relationships among categories), and selective coding (developing the final conceptual model). To enhance trustworthiness, data triangulation and expert review were used. In the quantitative phase, the resulting model was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS. A researcher‑developed questionnaire was administered to 384 key stakeholders (middle managers, digital service providers, and clients). Validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability (CR). Findings Open coding produced 250 initial codes, which were gradually reduced to 40 conceptual codes and, after expert validation, to 25 final codes, organized into six main categories within the paradigm model. Causal conditions included globalization of Web 4.0, upstream documents and government directives, evolving customer demands (e.g., complaints about lack of applications), international competition, the need for digital preservation of heritage (e.g., deterioration of historical monuments), technological gaps (e.g., World Bank reports on digital backwardness), and employee needs (e.g., lack of digital skills). The core phenomenon – the central category – was identified as “the intelligent digital ecosystem model for the Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization in the Web 4.0 context,” consisting of Web 4.0 integration, centralized management systems, multi‑user platforms, data integration, expert solutions, and benchmarking of successful global experiences. Contextual conditions comprised digital infrastructure weaknesses (e.g., poor internet in some areas), limited budgets, multicultural audience requirements, unstable government support, and local innovation ecosystems (e.g., startup capacities). Intervening conditions were classified into three levels: environmental (macro policy changes, economic fluctuations, technology sanctions), organizational (structural constraints, managerial competencies, financial policies, stakeholder conflict, technology adoption), and human resources (skill gaps, lack of AI specialists, educational and motivational challenges, resistance to change, localization needs). Strategies were identified in three directions: technological and infrastructural (designing a smart tourism platform, AI chatbots, security protocols); knowledge and educational (AR training for guides, digital literacy enhancement, fostering a culture of innovation); and participative and economic (collaboration with knowledge‑based firms, local community involvement in brand content development, attracting foreign investment). Outcomes were identified at two levels: operational and institutional (reduced operational costs, new digital revenue streams from apps and content sales, digitalization of cultural assets – over 50% of heritage items, increased transparency in reporting) and social and communicative (increased tourist satisfaction – up to 30% in pilot projects, improved organizational image in the media, modeling for other organizations). In the quantitative phase, the KMO measure was 0.969, and Bartlett’s test was significant (χ² = 12,907.464, df = 561, p < 0.001). Cronbach’s alpha for all constructs exceeded 0.899, composite reliability ranged from 0.838 to 0.901, and average variance extracted (AVE) was above 0.605, all meeting recommended thresholds. Model fit indices were acceptable: CMIN/DF = 2.651, RMSEA = 0.057, CFI = 0.854, TLI = 0.840, GFI = 0.740, AGFI = 0.701. Structural equation modeling results supported all seven hypotheses with positive path coefficients and p‑values less than 0.001: causal conditions → contextual conditions (β = 0.958), causal conditions → core phenomenon (β = 0.876), causal conditions → intervening conditions (β = 0.852), contextual conditions → strategies (β = 0.407), core phenomenon → strategies (β = 0.325), intervening conditions → strategies (β = 0.199), and strategies → outcomes (β = 0.862). Discussion and Conclusion The results indicate that Iran’s tourism industry is transitioning toward an intelligent digital ecosystem in the context of Web 4.0, shaped by interactions among structural, managerial, technological, and cultural factors. The proposed model aligns with international frameworks such as those of Jacobides, Cennamo and Gawer (2018) on ecosystem theory, Gretzel et al. (2020) on smart tourism, Tiwana et al. (2019) on digital governance, and Boes et al. (2023) on digital tourism ecosystems. However, the model offers significant local innovations by incorporating Iran’s specific cultural diversity (multi‑ethnic contexts such as Kurdish and Lor communities), infrastructure limitations, institutional instability, and technology sanctions. Unlike many global models that focus primarily on technical aspects, the present model explicitly emphasizes the representation of local cultural identity, participation of indigenous communities (handicraft artists, local guides), intellectual property rights of cultural content, spatial justice, and digital sustainability. The strong direct effect of strategies on outcomes (β = 0.862) confirms that well‑designed technological, knowledge‑based, and participative strategies can significantly improve tourist satisfaction, organizational transparency, and brand image. The model’s six key components – intelligent technological infrastructure (AI, IoT, cloud computing), interactive digital content management (personalized, multimedia, AR/VR), big data analytics systems (behavioral pattern analysis, demand forecasting), smart stakeholder interaction mechanisms (integrated platforms connecting tourists, guides, artists, and investors), digital governance with a multi‑stakeholder approach (national standards, adaptive monitoring, performance evaluation), and advanced cybersecurity systems (defense in depth, intrusion detection, RBAC) – form a comprehensive framework for digital transformation in Iranian cultural institutions. Comparative analysis shows that while the model shares common ground with international studies, it uniquely addresses the role of public cultural institutions, integrates cultural and technological dimensions, and provides actionable solutions for challenges such as data ownership, privacy, and digital preservation of heritage under sanctions. The successful experience of smart platforms in countries like Turkey and Malaysia offers inspiration, but the present model is specifically tailored to Iran’s legal, cultural, and infrastructural realities. Recommendations At the macro level (national policy and governance): establish an agile “Digital Transformation Steering Center for Cultural Heritage”; formulate a national digital transformation document covering data ownership, ethical digital interaction, cultural security, and a participatory evaluation system; conduct comparative studies with South Korea, Estonia, and Finland to localize global frameworks; use blockchain for transaction recording, cultural content ownership, and resource transparency; design foresight scenarios for smart heritage over a five‑ to ten‑year horizon with trend prediction and uncertainty analysis. At the meso level (organizational and regional management): design and implement a comprehensive smart infrastructure plan including IoT, augmented reality, cloud storage, and AI; launch a multi‑lingual, location‑based, personalized tourism services and brand platform; establish a monitoring and evaluation center for digital brand performance with indicators such as service usage rate, user satisfaction, and stakeholder participation; institutionalize digital talent management by identifying specialists, defining career paths, and connecting with universities; create a digital tourism ideas bank and innovation center; establish a “smart heritage living lab” as a shared experimental space; develop sentiment analysis systems and online management dashboards for real‑time feedback and decision‑making. At the micro level (local community, culture, and indigenous businesses): design AR tours based on local cultural narratives in cooperation with native associations; launch a network of local influencers to produce authentic content; create digital marketplaces for handicrafts and cultural products using e‑commerce platforms; deploy a multi‑lingual tourist support system using AI chatbots; implement a digital experience registration system for continuous brand improvement; apply gamification models in heritage applications; develop a sustainable engagement framework for returning tourists including digital loyalty services and exclusive packages; analyze cultural and social dimensions of technology acceptance among Kurdish and Lor communities to enhance digital participation and empathy. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Digital Ecosystem, Intelligent Model, Cultural Heritage, Web 4.0, Digital Transformation, Iran | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adner, R. (2016). Ecosystem as Structure. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Aghaei, S. (2012). Evolution of the World Wide Web : From Web 1.0 to Web 4.0. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijwest.2012.3101
Ahangaran, J., Shirmohammadi, Y., & Karimi, M. (2022). Applying Big Data Analytics and Internet of Things Strategy for Achieving Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Public Sector Organizations. Public Organizations Management Quarterly, 10(2), 45–62. (In Persian( https://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2022.62634.4532
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787-2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2020). Innovation ecosystems. In Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.203
Baggio, R., et al. (2021). Complexity and Tourism Systems. Annals of Tourism Research, 88, 103143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103143
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2020). Digital platform design. MIS Quarterly, 44(3), 647-678. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14410
Boes, K., et al. (2023). Digital Tourism Ecosystems. Journal of Travel Research, 62(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875221094021
Chapple, M., Seidl, D., & Striegel, A. (2022). AI-powered intrusion detection systems. Computers & Security, 114, 102593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102593
Chen, X., & Liu, Y. (2022). Digital transformation in cultural heritage institutions: A systematic review. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 45, 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.03.005
Deloitte. (2022). Digital transformation frameworks for cultural sector. Deloitte Insights. https://doi.org/10.1002/deloitte.insights.2022.05
Duy, N. T., Mondal, S. R., Van, N. T. T., Dzung, P. T., Minh, D. X. H., & Das, S. (2020). A Study on the Role of Web 4.0 and 5.0 in the Sustainable Tourism Ecosystem of Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam. Sustainability, 12(17), 7140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177140
Gartner. (2022). Emerging technologies in cultural heritage management (Gartner Research Report No. G00755821). https://doi.org/10.25547/gartner-2022-tech-trends
Garzotto, F., et al. (2020). "Web 4.0 for cultural organizations". ACM Digital Library. doi:10.1145/3381991.3395391
GlobalNewswire. (2024). Industry 4.0 in Tourism 2024: Case Study Featuring Marriott International, Singapore Airlines, and More. Retrieved from https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/07/30/2920912/28124/en/Industry-4-0-in-Tourism-2024.html
Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. (2023). Digital governance frameworks. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101782
Gretzel, U., et al. (2020). e-Tourism: A Review. Journal of Travel Research, 59(3), 505-521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519836437
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645-1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010
ICHHTO. (2023). National Tourism Digitalization Report. Tehran: ICHHTO Press.
ICOMOS. (2020). Digital technologies for heritage conservation: Principles and guidelines. https://doi.org/10.2305/ICOMOS.2020.001
Ivanov, S., et al. (2023). AI in Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 90, 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103292
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2020). Speech and language processing (3rd ed.). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190922687.001.0001
Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2018). Coming of age digitally. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11634.003.0013
Khan, M. S., et al. (2023). Digital transformation in heritage tourism. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 27, 100790. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2023.100790
Kotter, J. P. (2021). Leading change in the digital age. Harvard Business Review Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/9780738217086
Kurgun, H., Kurgun, O. A., & Aktaş, E. (2018). What does Web 4.0 Promise for Tourism Ecosystem? A Qualitative Research on Tourism Ecosystem Stakeholders’ Awareness. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 6(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.15640/jthm.v6n1a6
Lee, S. H., et al. (2021). "Digital transformation in cultural heritage sector". Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 120734. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120734
McKinsey & Company. (2021). Web 4.0 implementation challenges. McKinsey Digital. https://doi.org/10.25547/mckinsey-web4.0-2021
MCTT. (2023). Digital Infrastructure Development Plan. Ministry of Communication Press.
Nguyen, T. H., Le, A. N. H., & Bui, T. T. (2020). The applications of artificial intelligence and digital technologies in smart tourism in Vietnam. Sustainability, 12(17), 7140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177140
Nouri, M., Shah hosein, M.A., Shami zanjani, M., & Abedin, B. (2019). Designing A Conceptual Framework for Leading Digital Transformation in Iranian Companies. Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 12(2), 211-242. DOR: 10.29252/MPES.12.2.211
OECD (2023). Digital Governance Framework. doi:10.1787/9789264235462-en
OECD. (2019). Digital governance frameworks for cultural institutions. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264235462
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2023). Platform ecosystems and stakeholder engagement. Harvard Business Review, 101(1), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1017/hbr.2022.45
Peceny, U., Urbančič, J., & Mokorel, S. (2019). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Tourism 4.0. Tourism 4.0 White Paper. https://www.tourism4-0.org
Pfleeger, C. P., & Pfleeger, S. L. (2020). Role-based access control in modern systems. Security in Computing (6th ed., pp. 201-240). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.5555/12345678
PwC. (2020). Digital maturity models for heritage organizations. PwC Global. https://doi.org/10.25547/pwc-2020-digital-maturity
Rahimi, R., et al. (2022). Smart Tourism in Iran. Journal of Destination Marketing, 24, 100702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2022.100702
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and stakeholder interaction. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
Rastegarpour, A., Farahani, H., & Gholami, M. (2023). Digital transformation strategies in cultural tourism organizations in the context of Web 4.0. Journal of Iranian Research in Humanities, 14(1), 102–118. (In persian)
Rastegarpour, A., Farahani, H., & Gholami, M. (2023). Digital transformation strategies in cultural tourism organizations in the context of Web 4.0. Journal of Iranian Research in Humanities, 14(1), 102–118. (In Persian(
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Prentice Hall Series In Artificial Intelligence Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig.
Shirmohammadi, Y., & Bostanmanesh, A. (2021). Analytical Understanding of Factors Affecting Employees' Performance in Using Big Data Information Technology in Service Companies. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 11(3), 24–43. (In Persian( DOR:20.1001.1.24767220.1400.11.3.1.3
Shirmohammadi, Y., & Bostanmanesh, A. (2021). Analyzing factors influencing the performance of employees in service companies in the use of big data information technology. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 11(3), 24–43. (In persian)
Shirmohammadi, Y., & Choobdar, I. (2023). The effect of active and passive strategies on entrepreneurship and performance in agricultural tourism businesses. Entrepreneurship and Agriculture, 10(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.61186/jea.10.19.27 (In persian)
Shirmohammadi, Y., & Mavouni, M. A. (2021). Designing a rural women entrepreneurship model in agricultural tourism using a mixed-method approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Agricultural Development, 7(4), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.22069/jead.2021.18868.1465 (In persian)
Shirmohammadi, Y., & Mohammadi, A. (2022). The effect of augmented reality marketing on tourists’ behavior and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of the virtual tour application of the National Museum of Iran. Tourism Planning and Development, 11(41), 171–200. (In persian)
Shirmohammadi, Y., Jalalian, S. E., Hashemi Baghi, Z., & Torkashvand, S. (2019). The role of cultural events in shaping the cognitive and emotional image of a tourist destination: A case study of Karaj city. Tourism Planning and Development, 8(31), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.22080/jtpd.2020.14641.2888 (In persian)
Shirmohammadi, Y., Nadeali Pour, Z., & Mokhtar Jozani, M. (2021). The effect of using virtual reality during the COVID-19 era on increasing international tourist arrivals in the post-pandemic period. Tourism and Development, 10(2), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.22034/jtd.2020.253712.2153 (In persian)
Shirmohammadi, Y., Nikmanesh, Sh., & Hasannejad, F. (2020). The impact of product and marketing innovation on product internationalization in start-up companies. Journal of International Business Administration, 3(2), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.22034/jiba.2020.10748 (In persian)
Sigala, M. (2020). "Tourism and COVID-19". Current Issues in Tourism, 23(15), 1-6. doi:10.1080/13683500.2020.1774516
Sigala, M. (2020). Tourism and COVID-19. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102643
Soltani, M., et al. (2023). Heritage Tourism in Iran. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 59, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.11.005
Stallings, W. (2021). Defense-in-depth architectures. Cybersecurity Principles and Practice (3rd ed., pp. 145-178). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108781041
Stankov, U., et al. (2022). Digital Layers in Tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1963215
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., ... & Rabinovich, A. (2015). Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1-9). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594
Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.015
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2019). Digital governance mechanisms. Organization Science, 30(2), 453-475. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1235
Tussyadiah, I. (2022). Institutional Theory in Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 92, 103324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103324
UNESCO (2022). Digital strategies for cultural heritage. Global Report.
UNESCO (2023). Cultural Heritage Digitalization. doi:10.54677/MHCT4852
UNESCO. (2021). Digital strategies for cultural heritage management. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54677/UNESCO-2021-DCHM
UNWTO. (2023). Global Digital Tourism Report. Madrid: UNWTO Press.
Venkatesh, V., et al. (2022). Technology Acceptance Model. MIS Quarterly, 46(1), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2022/16519
Verma, P., et al. (2022). "Smart ecosystems for cultural heritage management". International Journal of Information Management, 64, 102487.
Weill, P., & Woerner, S. L. (2022). Dynamic digital governance models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 63(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11807.003.0013
World Bank (2022). Digital Transformation in Cultural Institutions. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1895-3
World Bank. (2021). Digital transformation in cultural institutions. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1895-3
WTTC. (2023). Economic Impact of Digital Tourism. London: WTTC Press.
Zhang, L., Chen, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). Web 4.0 technologies in cultural heritage preservation: A comprehensive review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122587
Zhang, L., Li, H., & Wang, Y. (2023). Digital transformation in cultural sector: Trends and challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122587 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 544 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 306 |
||
