پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,219 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,473 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 20,217,751 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,905,611 |
اثر برداشت مثبت یا منفی بر ارزیابی درد توسط پرستاران | ||
| روانشناسی سلامت | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 53، خرداد 1404، صفحه 19-30 اصل مقاله (957.23 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/hpj.2025.72227.6109 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| سوسن علیزاده فرد* | ||
| دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه: ارزیابی درد بیمار ممکن است تاثیر قابل توجهی بر سطح مراقبتی داشته باشد که بیمار دریافت میکند. بسیاری از مطالعات نشان دادهاند که عوامل زمینهای ممکن است بر تخمین درد ناظر تأثیر بگذارد؛ ازجمله مشخص شده است که چگونگی برداشت مثبت یا منفی دربارة فرد دردمند ممکن است موجب ارزیابی بیشتر یا کمتر درد در آنان شود. هدف از پژوهش حاضر مقایسة اثر برداشت مثبت و منفی دربارة فرد دردمند بر ارزیابی درد آنها در پرستاران و افراد عادی است. روش: 60 فرد پرستار و عادی زن و مرد (هرگروه 30 نفر) روایتهایی را دربارة چهار شخصیت مثبت و چهار شخصیت منفی (مرد و زن) همراه با نام و عکس آنها شنیدند. سپس ویدیوهای از چهره دردمند همان افراد در چهار سطح (خنثی، خفیف، متوسط، شدید) مشاهده کردند. از آنان خواسته شد تا میزان درد هر کدام را از 1 تا 100 ارزیابی نمایند. دادههای دو گروه با کمک نرم افزار SPSS-21 مقایسه شد. یافته‌ها: نتایج حاصل از تحلیل واریانس اندازهگیری مکرر (4×2) در دو گروه مشخص نمود که اولاً افراد عادی، درد شخصیتهای مثبت را بیش از شخصیتهای منفی ارزیابی نموده بودند؛ درحالیکه ارزشگذاری مثبت یا منفی در پرستاران تفاوتی ایجاد نکرده بود. دوماً پرستاران درمجموع سطح درد کمتری را گزارش کرده بودند. نتیجه‌گیری: این نتایج در کنار تاکید بر اهمیت برداشت ناظران عادی از فرد دردمند، همچنین مشخص نمود که تجربه و دانش حرفهای پرستاران در زمینههای درمانی، اثر سوگیری برداشت را در آنان کاهش داده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ارزیابی درد؛ برداشت مثبت و منفی؛ پرستاران | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effect of Positive or Negative Impression on Pain Estimation between Nurses | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| susan alizadehfard | ||
| Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: Facial expression is one of the most important signs of pain, which is very effective in transmitting pain to others. The facial appearance of pain is directly related to the observers' direct perception of the presence or intensity of pain and is the result of the interaction between emotional, cognitive and sensory components. Pain perception is related to a set of attitudes, beliefs and also cognitive distortions of the observer. This issue is more important in medical environments. If patients are unable to express and convey their pain experiences; Or the caregivers and therapists are not able to identify and understand the pain experiences of the patients, the appropriate help or treatment may not be provided. In other words, understanding these biases in the treatment environment is very necessary and can help reduce the effects of bias and improve the quality of healthcare. Based on the available research literature, in previous researches, only the comparison of pain assessment by patients and experts has been examined, and no comparison was found regarding the effects of valuation and the resulting bias in therapeutic fields. Considering this research gap, the aim of the present study was to compare the effect of positive and negative evaluation of patients on pain assessment in nurses and normal people. Method: Sixty men & females (each group thirty) heard four pictured scenarios about 4 positive and 4 negative persons (half female). It should be noted that while reading the scenarios, the photos of the characters are also shown. These scenarios are expected to create a positive or negative perception of the characters. Then, thirty-two videos of dynamic facial expressions (one second long) of eight characters with four levels of pain expression (neutral, mild, moderate, and strong) were shown. The participants have to evaluated these pain expressions videos from 1 to 100. The data of the groups were compared by SPSS-21 software. Results: To deliberate the research hypothesis repeated measurement variance analysis 4×2 was used (four levels of pain intensity: neutral, mild, moderate, strong pain; two levels of characters' valence: positive vs. negative) as within‐subject factors. The results shown a significant main effect of pain intensity; as their evaluation for different pain levels are significantly different and high level of pain expressions received correctly higher estimations. Also, positive or negative impressions did not make a difference in nurses. Conclusion: These results are very important to indicated that the experience and professional knowledge of nurses in the field of treatment reduced the effect of evaluation bias in them. The alignment of information with the context increases the emotional understanding of other people's faces. For nurses, seeing the faces of people in pain is completely aligned with their information background; So, they have understood those images more accurately and with less effect of evaluation bias. Also, it is necessary to pay attention to the compatibility with pain empathy. In other words, since nurses are frequently and continuously exposed to the pain of others, and the diagnosis of pain is an important task for them, the level of empathy with the pain of others is often unconsciously reduced in them, and as a result, they underestimate the pain of others. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Pain estimation, Negative & Positive Impression, Nurses | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasi, M., saberi, H., & Taheri, A. (2022). Prediction of Pain Perception based Childhood Trauma Mediated by Emotional Regulation in People with Chronic Pain. Health Psychology, 11(41), 7-26.https://doi: 10.30473/hpj.2022.60912.5345 [in Persian] Alizadehfard, S. & Rouhani, R. S. (2023). Culture & Health. Tehran: Payme Noor Press. [in Persian] Alotaibi, M., Aljahany, M., Alhamdan, Z., Alsaffar, M., Almojally, A., Alassaf, W. (2022). Differences in acute pain perception between patients and physicians in the emergency department. Heliyon, 8, 11, e11462.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11462 Chen, D., Lew, R., Hershman, W., & Orlander, J. (2007). A cross-sectional measurement of medical student empathy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(10), 1434–1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0298-x Chen, J., Chang, B., Li, W., Shi, Y., Shen, H., Wang, R., & Liu, L. (2020). Dispositional SelfConstrual Modulates the Empathy for Others' Pain: An ERP Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 508141-508141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.508141 Cheng, Y., Lin, C.-P., Liu, H.-L., Hsu, Y.-Y., Lim, K.-E., Hung, D., & Decety, J. (2007). Expertise Modulates the Perception of Pain in Others. Current Biology, 17(19), 1708-1713.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.020 Decety, J., Yang, C.-Y., & Cheng, Y. (2010). Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study. NeuroImage, 50(4), 1676-1682.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.025 De Ruddere, L., Goubert, L., Prkachin, K.M., Louis Stevens, M.A., Van Ryckeghem, D.M.L., Crombez, G. (2011). When you dislike patients, pain is taken less seriously. Pain, 152(10): 2342-2347.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.028 Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (2017). Social Cognition: from brains to culture (4th ed.). SAGE Publication. Gijsbers, K., Niven, C. A. (1997). Psychobiological sex differences in pain: Psychological as much as biological. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(3) :449-449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97321499 Giummarra, M. J., Fitzgibbon, B. M., Georgiou-Karistianis, N., Beukelman, M., Verdejo-Garcia, A., Blumberg, Z., Chou, M., & Gibson, S. J. (2015). Affective, sensory and empathic sharing of another's pain: The Empathy for Pain Scale. European journal of pain (London, England), 19(6), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.607 Gleichgerrcht, E., & Decety, J. (2014). The relationship between different facets of empathy, pain perception and compassion fatigue among physicians. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(243). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00243 Greifeneder, R., Bless, B., Fiedler, K. (2018). Social Cognition: How Individuals Construct Social Reality (Second Edition). Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group). International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP),https://www.iasp-pain.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/revised-definition-flysheet_R2-1-1-1.pdf Jia, L., Zheng, Z., Sung, B., Compton, B. J., Wang, J. (2023a). Resisting repeated exposure: Characteristics of pain empathy for experienced physicians. Behavioural Brain Research, 436, 114099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114099 Jia, L., Cheng, M., Lu, J., Wu, Y., Wang, J. (2023b). Context consistency improves ensemble perception of facial expressions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02154-5 Khatibi, A., Mazidi, M. (2019). Observers’ impression of the person in pain influences their pain estimation and tendency to help. European Journal of Pain, 23, 936-944.https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1361 Khatibi, A., Schrooten, M. G., Bosmans, K., Volders, S., Vlaeyen, J. W., & Van den Bussche, E. (2015). Sub‐optimal presentation of painful facial expressions enhances readiness for action and pain perception following electrocutaneous stimulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 913.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00913 Khatibi, A., Schrooten, M. G., Vancleef, L. M., & Vlaeyen, J. W. (2014a). An experimental examination of catastrophizing‐related interpretation bias for ambiguous facial expressions of pain using an incidental learning task. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1002. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01002 Khatibi, A., Vachon‐Presseau, E., Schrooten, M., Vlaeyen, J., & Rainville, P. (2014b). Attention effects on vicarious modulation of nociception and pain. Pain, 155(10), 2033–2039. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.005 Kunz, M., Peter, J., Huster, S., & Lautenbacher, S. (2013). Pain and disgust: the facial signaling of two aversive bodily experiences. PloS one, 8(12), e83277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083277 Kunz, M. and Lautenbacher, S. (2016). Pain perception in dementia. In "An Introduction to Pain and its Relation to Nervous System Disorders", A.A. Battaglia (Ed.): p. 361-372. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118455968.ch15 Liu, X., Li, Y. H., & Tang, H. (2017). The level and factors associated with empathy among medical personnel. Journal of Nursing Science, 32(4), 54-57.https://doi.org/10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.04.054 Liu, Y., Meng, J., Yao, M., Ye, Q., Fan, B., & Peng, W. (2019). Hearing other’s pain is associated with sensitivity to physical pain: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 145, 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.03.011 May, A., Rodriguez-Raecke, R., Schulte, A., Ihle, K., Breimhorst, M., Birklein, F., & Jürgens, T. P. (2012). Within-session sensitization and between-session habituation: A robust physiological response to repetitive painful heat stimulation. European Journal of Pain, 16(3), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00023.x Meldrum, M. L. (2024). pain. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/pain Mende-Siedlecki, P., Lin, J., Ferron, S., Gibbons, C., Drain, A., & Goharzad, A. (2021). Seeing no pain: Assessing the generalizability of racial bias in pain perception. Emotion, 21(5), 932-950. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000953 Paknahad, N., & saffarinia, M. (2023). The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Perceived Stress, Negative Mood, Self-Efficacy and Pain Perception in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Health Psychology, 12(45), 129-146. https://doi: 10.30473/hpj.2023.53231.4838 [in Persian] Puntillo, K., Neighbor, M., O'Neil, N., & Nixon, R. (2003). Accuracy of emergency nurses in assessment of patients' pain. Pain management nursing: official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 4(4), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1524-9042(03)00033-x Roy, S., Roy, C., Fortin, I., Ethier‐Majcher, C., Belin, P., & Gosselin, F. (2007). A dynamic facial expression database. Journal of Vision, 7, 944. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.944 Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2004). Encoding Under Trust and Distrust: The Spontaneous Activation of Incongruent Cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 668–679.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.668 Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. et al. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature ,439, 466–469. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04271 Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973 Wu, L., Kirmse, U., Flaisch, T., Boiandina, G., Kenter, A., & Schupp, H. T. (2017). Empathy, pain and attention: Cues that predict pain stimulation to the partner and the self-capture visual attention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00465 Yang, S. C., Huang, H. M., Yeh, T. F., Shen, C. H., Wu, C. L., Hsieh, Y. J., Wu, C. C., & Hung, C. J. (2023). Differences in Pain Assessments Between Inpatients and Nurses Leads to Considerable Misestimated Pain. Pain physician, 26(1), 61–68. https://www.painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=NzYyNQ%3D%3D&journal=150 Zhang, L., Reynolds Losin, E. A., Ashar, Y. K., Koban, l., Wager, T. D. (2021). Gender Biases in Estimation of Others’ Pain. The Journal of Pain, 22, 9, 1048-1059.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.001 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 187 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 131 |
||