پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,219 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,473 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 20,218,595 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,907,565 |
تحلیل پیکربندی عوامل موفقیت در توسعه محصول استارت‌آپ‌ها با رویکرد کارآفرینی دیجیتال | ||
| پژوهش های کتابخانه های دیجیتالی و هوشمند | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 11، شماره 4 (پیاپی 43)، بهمن 1403، صفحه 17-32 اصل مقاله (1.21 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/mrs.2025.74786.1633 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی بدیع زاده* 1؛ رضا بازگیر2؛ محمدرضا ثنایی3؛ روح اله زابلی4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه کارآفرینی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران. | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران. | ||
| 4دانشیار، گروه مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی و درمانی دانشکده بهداشت دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بقیه الله (عج)، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف بسیاری از استارت‌آپ‌ها، رشد سریع و توسعه بازار است، اما مطالعات پیشین کمتر به تحلیل پیکربندی‌های علی عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت آن‌ها پرداخته‌اند. روش این پژوهش با کاربرد تکنیک تحلیل مقایسه‌ای کیفی فازی به شناسایی ترکیبات مؤثر عوامل در توسعه محصول استارت‌آپ‌ها با رویکرد کارآفرینی دیجیتال می‌پردازد. این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی همبستگی است که به شیوه پیمایشی اجرا شده و جامعه آماری شامل ۱۹۰ شرکت استارتاپی فعال در زیست‌بوم کارآفرینی ایران است که با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. مطابق یافته‌ها: چهار پیکربندی موفقیت را نشان می‌دهد: (۱) تأکید بر رهبری دیجیتال و چابکی سازمانی، (۲) تمرکز بر ایده پردازی ناب و تحلیل رقبا، (3) بهینه‌سازی هزینه از طریق همکاری با پلتفرم‌ها و (۴) فناوری محوری همراه با مدیریت ریسک. نتایج حاکی از آن است که هیچ فرمول واحدی برای موفقیت وجود ندارد و استارت‌آپ‌ها می‌توانند با توجه به منابع خود، مسیرهای متفاوتی را انتخاب کنند. این مطالعه با ارائه چارچوبی پیکربندی محور، سهم نظری و عملی در حوزه کارآفرینی دیجیتال دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کارآفرینی دیجیتال؛ توسعه محصول جدید؛ استارت‌آپ‌ها؛ تحلیل مقایسه‌ای کیفی فازی (fsQCA)؛ پیکربندی عوامل | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis of the Configuration of Success Factors in the Startup Product Development with a Digital Entrepreneurship Approach | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Badizadeh1؛ Reza Bazgir2؛ Mohamadreza Sanaei3؛ Rouhollah Zaboli4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student Department of Entrepreneurship, Qa.c., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Qa.c., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Information Technology Management, Qa.c., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran. | ||
| 4Associated Professor, Department of Health Management Research Center, BMSU, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The goal of many startups is rapid growth and market expansion, but previous studies have rarely analyzed the causal configurations of factors affecting their success. The aim of this study was to present a configuration analysis of the success factors in product development of startups with a digital entrepreneurship approach. The research method was descriptive-exploratory and conducted in a survey manner. The statistical population of the study included all startups active in the field of digital technology in the Iranian entrepreneurial ecosystem that have developed a specific product to the market launch stage. From this population, using a simple random sampling method, 190 single-product startups were selected, whose selection criteria were activity in the digital field and focus on developing a specific product. The research constructs, including dimensions of product development with a digital entrepreneurship approach in startups, which were obtained based on qualitative structural-interpretive analysis and MICMACK, include risk variables (entrepreneurial innovation and competitor analysis); influential variables (fundamental foundations, ideation and validation, development and optimization); regulatory variables (commercialization and marketing, environmental factors, focus on agility, digital leadership, development of the entrepreneurial ecosystem); secondary levers (user experience) and influential ones (scalability and sustainability, digital ecosystem integration). The required information was collected using a researcher-made questionnaire based on the Likert scale. The findings show four configurations of success: Configuration 1: Emphasizes the central role of digital leadership and organizational agility as key success factors. This includes digital leadership attributes such as support, technical knowledge and adaptability, alongside organizational agility components like data-driven decision-making and rapid response to change. Additionally, effective digital strategies are critical. Configuration 2: Highlights the significance of innovative ideas and competitor analysis, often without prioritizing sustainability. In certain scenarios, product-centric and market-centric approaches may take precedence over customer-centricity. Success in this configuration can occur without a focus on user experience, particularly in emerging markets (like groundbreaking technologies) or B2B products, where buyers prioritize technical functionality over user experience. Configuration 3: Focuses on cost optimization and collaboration with platforms. Key strategies include leveraging automation, reducing research and development expenses and partnering with accelerators and research labs as essential conditions for product development. Configuration 4: Centers on technology-driven approaches and risk management, emphasizing advanced technology and environmental risk management as crucial factors, regardless of regulatory influences. Based on the findings of this study, future research should explore the impact of various digital leadership styles on the development of dynamic digital capabilities in startups, analyze how organizational agility contributes to the long-term sustainability of startups across different industries and investigate specific contexts where neglecting user experience can lead to success—such as in B2B markets with technical buyers or pioneering products in their early phases. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Digital Entrepreneurship, New Product Development, Startups, Fuzzy Qualitative Comparative Analysis (FSQCA), Factor Configuration | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aryadita, H., Sukoco, B. M., & Lyver, M. (2023). Founders and the success of start‑ups: An integrative review. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), Article 2284451. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2284451 Albannai, N. A., Raziq, M. M., Malik, M., Scott‑Kennel, J., & Igoe, J. (2024). Unraveling the role of digital leadership in developing digital dynamic capabilities for the digital transformation of firms. Benchmarking: An International Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2023-0756 Bigliardi, B., Dolci, V., Filippelli, S., Petroni, A., & Pini, B. (2025). The role of digitalization in startups: A keyword‑based literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 253, 2665–2673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.326 Badiizadeh, M., Maboudi Temay, M., & Nazari Shirkouhi, S. (2023). Development of a university entrepreneurship ecosystem based on learning digital skills in order to achieve the goals of the Nakhlestan and Kahad plans of the Technical and Vocational Organization. Retrieved from https://civilica.com/doc/1771193 (In Persian) Baragde, D. B. (2023). Role of information technology for startups in India. In Ecosystem Dynamics and Strategies for Startup Scalability (pp. 114–132). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979‑8‑3693‑0527‑0.ch006 Block, J. H., Diegel, W., & Fisch, C. (2024). How venture capital funding changes an entrepreneur’s digital identity: More self‑confidence and professionalism but less authenticity! Review of Managerial Science, 18, 2287–2319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00686-1 Danil, L., Jahroh, S., Syarief, R., & Taryana, A. (2025). Technological innovation in start‑ups on a pathway to achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 8: A systematic review. Sustainability, 17(3), 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031220 Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2023). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 41(6), 821–844. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Coombs, C., Constantiou, I., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., ... & Upadhyay, N. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. International journal of Information Management, 55, 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211 Du, W., Pan, S. L., Zhou, N., & Ouyang, T. (2024). From a marketplace of electronics to a digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE): The emergence of a meta‑organization in Zhongguancun, China. Information Systems Journal, 28, 1158–1175. Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, Article 119791. Effendi, P. L., Wirjodirdjo, B., & Rosdaniah, S. I. (2024). Influence factors on sustainable business models for renewable energy supply: Indonesian electricity industry. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2293303. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2293303 Sońta‑Drączkowska, E. (2019). New product development in high‑tech startups - A conceptual framework. Marketing i Rynek / Journal of Marketing and Market Studies. Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393–420. Gimenez‑Fernandez, E. M., Sandulli, F. D., & Bogers, M. (2020). Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative start‑ups: Investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms. Research Policy, 49, 104049. Greco, F. (2023). Access to new technologies as a lever for start‑up scalability. In Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics (pp. 65–76). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑031‑34414‑5_5 Huang, J., Henfridsson, O., Liu, M. J., & Newell, S. (2017). Growing on steroids: Rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/201 Johnston, L. A. (2021). World trade, e‑commerce, and COVID‑19. China Review, 21(2), 65–86. Kapoor, K., Bigdeli, A. Z., Dwivedi, Y. K., Schroeder, A., Beltagui, A., & Baines, T. (2021). A socio‑technical view of platform ecosystems: Systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 128, 94–108. Kraus, S., Breier, M., Jones, P., & Hughes, M. (2019). Individual entrepreneurial orientation and intrapreneurship in the public sector. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 1247–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00593-6 Lammers, T., Rashid, L., Kratzer, J., & Voinov, A. (2022). An analysis of the sustainability goals of digital technology start‑ups in Berlin. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, Article 122096. Lange, F., Tomini, N., Brinkmann, F., Kanbach, D. K., & Kraus, S. (2023). Demystifying massive and rapid business scaling – An explorative study on driving factors in digital start‑ups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, Article 122841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122841 Le Dinh, T., Vu, M. C., & Ayayi, A. (2018). Towards a living lab for promoting the digital entrepreneurship process. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22(1), 1–17. Lu, H., & Shaharudin, M. S. (2024). Role of digital transformation for sustainable competitive advantage of SMEs: A systematic literature review. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2419489 Bejjani, M., Göcke, L., & Menter, M. (2023). Digital , 189. entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change Shabbir, M. S., Mohd Shariff, M. N., Kiran, R., Ahmad Zaidi, M. F., & Shahzad, A. (2016). Cyber entrepreneurship: A note on indigenous perspective from a developing country. The Social Sciences, 11(5), 704–709. Steininger, D. M. (2019). Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT‑associated and digital entrepreneurship research. Information Systems Journal, 29(2), 363–407. Sahut, J. M., Iandoli, L., & Teulon, F. (2021). The age of digital entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 56(3), 1159–1169. Sion, G. (2019). Smart city big data analytics: Urban technological innovations and the cognitive Internet of Things. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 11(2), 69–75. Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55–73. Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2019). Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: An overview. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1347–1366. Salmela, H., Baiyere, A., Tapanainen, T., & Galliers, R. D. (2022). Digital agility: Conceptualizing agility for the digital era. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(5), 1080–1101. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00767 Srinivasan, A., & Venkatraman, N. (2018). Entrepreneurship in digital platforms: A network‑centric view. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1272 Sreenivasan, A., & Suresh, M. (2024). Enabling technologies influencing the start‑up operations 5.0. Operations Management Research, 17, 1–22. Silveira, G. B., Farina, M. C., & Santos, I. C. D. (2023). High‑technology based startup in agribusiness sector: Mapping linkages, products and services. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 61, e246210. Sudaryana, S. H., Wirjodirdjo, B., & Windrarto, A. (2024). A systematic literature review of digital startup business dynamics and policy interventions. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2440636 Stroe, S., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2018). Effectuation or causation: An fsQCA analysis of entrepreneurial passion, risk perception, and self‑efficacy. Journal of Business Research, 89, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.035 Sreenivasan, A., Ma, S., Rehman, A. U., & Muthuswamy, S. (2023). Assessment of factors influencing agility in start‑ups Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 15(9), 7564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097564 Sreenivasan, A., & Suresh, M. (2024). A comparative analysis of lean start‑up and design thinking and its integration. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 18(2), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-09-2023-0181 Tajrloo, A., Ansari, M., Divandari, A., & Kimasi, M. (2021). Designing a new product development framework with a digital banking approach (Case study: Bank Mellat). Industrial Management, 13(4), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.22059/imj.2022.334341.1007892 (In Persian) Zeynali, S., Omidi, F., & Mehrabi, A. (2023). A model of ethical marketing capability affecting the development of eco-friendly new products. Ethics in Science and Technology, 18(0), 148–155. (In Persian) Maboudi Tamay, M., Badi’zadeh, A., & Nazari Shirkouhi, S. (2023). Development of an academic entrepreneurship ecosystem based on digital skills learning in line with the goals of the Nakhlestan and Kahad plans of the Technical and Vocational Organization. Civilica. https://civilica.com/doc/1771193 (In Persian) Zeinali, S., Omidi, F., & Mehrabi, A. (2023). Ethical marketability model effective on the development of new environmentally friendly products. Ethics in Science and Technology, 18(0), 19. (In Persian) Zhang, K., Feng, L., Wang, J., Qin, G., & Li, H. (2022). Start‑up’s road to disruptive innovation in the digital era: The interplay between dynamic capabilities and business model innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 925277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925277 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 120 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 65 |
||