
تعداد نشریات | 45 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,219 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,473 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 20,217,751 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,905,610 |
جامعهپذیری همتایان و راهبردهای ادبورزی در یادگیری زبان انگلیسی: پژوهش قوم نگاری شبکه ای | ||
فصلنامه علمی - پژوهشی زبانشناسی اجتماعی | ||
مقاله 7، دوره 8، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 31، شهریور 1404، صفحه 93-111 اصل مقاله (731.38 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/il.2025.74762.1694 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
مریم صبوری1؛ سعید غنی آبادی* 2؛ سیدمحمدرضا عادل2؛ محمد داودی2 | ||
1گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه مراغه، مراغه، آذربایجان شرقی | ||
2گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری، سبزوار، استان خراسان رضوی | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: این مطالعۀ قومنگارانه به بررسی تأثیر همتایان بر جامعهپذیری زبانآموزان در آموزشگاه های زبان انگلیسی و به کارگیری راهبردهای ادبورزی در طول همهگیری کووید-19 میپردازد. روش تحقیق: ابزارهای جمعآوری داده شامل مشاهدۀ کلاسی، مصاحبههای نیمه ساختاریافته، یادداشتهای پژوهشگران، فایلهای صوتی ضبطشده و یادداشتهای روزانۀ زبانآموزان میشود. برای تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها، از نرم افزار تحلیلی MAXQDA pro-2020 که بر اساس تحلیل محتوای کیفی مستقیم است استفاده شده است. یافته ها: بر اساس هفت اصل جامعهپذیری زبان (لی و بوکولتز ، 2015)، نتایج نشان داد که 11 زیرمجموعه شامل سازگاری رفتاری در فضای مجازی، خلق زبان مشترک گروهی، تقسیم دانش به شیوههای نوین، شبکههای حمایتی دیجیتال، توسعه هویت اجتماعی، ادب منفی تقویت شده، چرخش راهبردی، ادب مثبت دیجیتال، طنز تعدیل کننده، تعدیل سلسله مراتب و بازبینی ادب ورزی را میتوان بازشناسی کرد. نتیجه گیری: در نتیجه، همتایان در جامعهپذیری زبانآموزان بسیار تأثیرگذار هستند. علاوه بر این، زبانآموزان ایرانی از راهبردهای ادبورزی مثبت و منفی در تعامل با معلم و همتایان خود استفاده کردند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
جامعهپذیری همتایان؛ راهبردهای ادبورزی؛ جامعهپذیری زبان؛ قومنگاری شبکهای؛ کلاسهای مجازی؛ زبانآموزان زبان انگلیسی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Peer Socialization and Implementation of Politeness Strategies by Iranian EFL Learners in an English Institution: a Netnographic Research | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Maryam Sabouri1؛ Saeed Ghaniabadi2؛ Seyed Mohammad Reza Adel2؛ Mohammad Davoudi2 | ||
1Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities, Maragheh University, Maragheh, East Azerbaijan Province | ||
2Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Razavi Khorasan Province | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Goal: This ethnographic study attempted to investigate the effect of peers on the EFL learners’ language socialization (LS) and implementation of politeness strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology: The data-gathering instruments include class observation, semi-structured interviews, researcher notes, audio-recorded files, and student journals. To analyze data, they ran MAXQDA analytic pro-2020 based on direct qualitative content analysis. Results: According to the seven principles of LS (Lee & Bucholtz, 2015), the results revealed eleven sub-categories: Behavioral adaptation in cyberspace, creating a common group language, sharing knowledge in new ways, digital support networks, developing social identity, reinforced negative politeness, strategic rotation, positive digital politeness, modulating humor, modulating hierarchy, and reviewing politeness. Conclusion: In conclusion, peers are very influential in the learners’ LS. Besides, Iranian EFL learners employed positive and negative politeness strategies in interacting with their teachers and peers. The implication of the study is for the researchers to become familiar with executing a netnography in virtual setting. Furthermore, this study have an implication for parents, teachers, and learners in that they should be so careful about the relation of the learners and peers and how much they can effect on their learning process. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Peer socialization, Politeness strategies, EFL learners, Language socialization, Netnography, Virtual classes | ||
مراجع | ||
Abbasi, Z., & Kelari, F. (2020). International Students' Attitudes Toward Online Courses and Social Media in Persian Language Learning: Before and After COVID-19. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3(4), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.30473/il.2020.53184.1365 Ahangar, A. A., & Zeynali Dastuyi, S. (2018). Apology speech act realization in the Sarawani Balochi dialect: A case study of female university students. Studia Linguistica, 72(1), 39-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12056 Ahn, M. (2019). Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Politeness Strategies in Korean Internet Discourse. Discourse and Cognition, 26, 49-66. Aleksandra, T. D. (2018). Using technology to prevent peer (cyber) bullying and antisocial behavior. International Journal of Pedagogy, Innovation and New Technologies, (5 (1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.2137 Arundale, R. B. (2021). Toward a pragmatics of relating in conversational interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.018 Bagherifar, A., Poudineh Hajipour, A., Javadi, M. & Najari, M., (2017). Investigation of ethics and politeness in the educational environment and interaction between students and assistants, teachers and trainers, Fifth National Scientific Research Congress for the Development and Promotion of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Sociology and Social Cultural Sciences of Iran, Tehran. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. Down, L., Lambert, C., & McPherson-Kerr, C. (2006). Violence in Jamaican schools and the implications for teacher education. In R. Davies & L. Down (Eds.), Broadening the Vision for Teacher Education in the Caribbean (pp 139-160). Institute of Education Publication Series. Duff, P. A. (2020). Language Socialization in Classrooms Findings, Issues, and Possibilities. In M. J. Burdelski & K. M. Howard (Eds.), Language socialization in classrooms: Culture, interaction, and language development, (pp. 249-274). Cambridge University Press. Endedijk, H. M., Ramenzoni, V. C., Cox, R. F., Cillessen, A. H., Bekkering, H., & Hunnius, S. (2015). Development of interpersonal coordination between peers during a drumming task. Developmental Psychology, 51(5), 714-721. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038980 Fusch, P., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Sustainable Social Change, 10(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.5590/JOSC.2018.10.1.02 Gasa, H. P., Mkhize, S., Shumba, K., Cinini, S. F., & Gopal, N. D. (2022). Risk factors of substance abuse among university students: an exploratory study. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 11, 15-27. Goodwin, M. H., & Kyratzis, A. (2011). Peer language socialization. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 365-390). Wiley- Blackwell. Hafner, C. A., & Yu, C. (2020). Language socialization in digitally mediated collaborative writing: Evidence from disciplinary peer and teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 51(1), 14-32. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033688220901347 Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage. Isabella, R. A., Munthe, E. J. B., Sigalingging, D. J. N., Purba, R., & Herman, H. (2022). Learning how to be polite through a movie: A case on brown and levinson’s politeness strategies. Indonesian EFL Journal, 8(2), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v8i2.6438 Izadi, A. (2022). Intercultural Politeness and Impoliteness: A Case of Iranian Students with Malaysian Professors. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2022.17801 Khakzad Esfahlan, F., & Boroumand, M. (2020). Gender and socioeconomic status: A pragmatic analysis of politeness strategies used by Iranian EFL students in Persian and English requests. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1803-1820. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.851003 Koohzad, A., Ghonsooly, B., Ghapanchi, Z., & Gholami, R. (2019). Relationship between students' gender and their use of politeness strategies in the" results and discussions section" of PhD dissertations. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 75-95. http://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1475 Koutlaki, S. A. (2002). Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: tae'arof in Persian. Journal of pragmatics, 34(12), 1733-1756. Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA. Springer International Publishing. Kulick, D., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2004). Language socialization. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A. companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 349–368). Blackwell. Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44–65. Laursen, B., & Veenstra, R. (2021). Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: A summary and synthesis of recent empirical research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 889-907. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12606 Lee, J. S., & Bucholtz, M. (2015). Language socialization across learning spaces. In N. Markee (Ed), Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction (pp. 319-336). Wiley Blackwell. Leech, G. (2006) Politeness: Is there an East – West divide? Journal of Politeness Research 3(2), 167– 206. https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.009 Liang, C. T., Rocchino, G. H., Gutekunst, M. H., Paulvin, C., Melo Li, K., & Elam-Snowden, T. (2020). Perspectives of respect, teacher–student relationships, and school climate among boys of color: A multifocus group study. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(3), 345. Liu, M., Chen, X., Fu, R., Li, D., & Liu, J. (2023). Social, academic, and psychological characteristics of peer groups in Chinese children: Same-domain and cross-domain effects on individual development. Developmental Psychology, 59(1), 57. Makarova, V., & Pourmohammadi, E. (2019). Gender factor in the expression of politeness in Farsi. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(4), 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1604327 Masjedi, N., & Paramasivam, S. (2018). Complaint and politeness strategies used by Iranian speakers of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(4), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.38 Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures, and software solution. Klagenfurt. Mitnik, R., Recabarren, M., Nussbaum, M., & Soto, A. (2009). Collaborative robotic instruction: A graph teaching experience. Computers & Education, 53(2), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.010. Muhammad, G. (2024). Brown and levinson’s politeness strategy used to answer sensitive questions by Indonesian young adults. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 4(5), 3191-3202. Norouzi, H., Mohammadpour, A. & Karimi, Z. (2012). Evolution in social interaction patterns in learning English through virtual methods. Quarterly Journal of Language Education, 15(4), 23-45. Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (2011). The theory of language socialization. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 1–21). Wiley- Blackwell. Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (2017). Language socialization: An historical overview. In Language socialization (pp. 1-14). Springer, Cham. Oke J. N. & Schreibman L. (1990). Training social initiations to a high-functioning autistic child: Assessment of collateral behavior change and generalization in a case Ou, W. M. & Gu, M. M. (2021). Language socialization and identity in intercultural communication: experience of Chinese students in a transnational university in China. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(3), 419-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1472207 Paugh, A. (2011). Local theories of child rearing. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 150–168). Wiley- Blackwell. Piaget J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. Routledge & Keegan Paul. Pourmohammadi, E. (2018). The use of “TAAROF”: The generation and gender factors in Iranian politeness system (Doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan). Reeves, S., Peller, J., Goldman, J., & Kitto, S. (2013). Ethnography in qualitative educational research: AMEE Guide No.80. Medical Teacher, 35(8), 1365-1379. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.804977 Reiter, R. M. (2000). Linguistic politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A contrastive study of requests and apologies. John Benjamins Publishing. Rezaee, F., Rahbar, B., & Oroji, M. (2022). Evaluation of the speaker's politeness based on unequal social status and the gender of the audience with equal social status in the university environment. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 14(45), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.22051/jlr.2021.33081.1927 Sabouri, M., Ghaniabadi, S., Adel, S. M. R., & Davoudi, M. (2024). The Role of Agency and Identity in the Language Socialization of Iranian EFL Learners during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Ethnographic Study. Language Related Research, 15(5), 57-83. Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge University Press. Singh, A., & Verma, R. (2021). Peer relation and socialization process among children with special needs. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 12(7), 42489-42493. https://doi.org/10.24327/ijrsr.2021.1207.6104. Soleimanifar, S. (2024). The power of taarof in Iranian culture and various utilization. TMP Universal Journal of Research and Review Archives, 3(2). Suh, S. (2020). An examination of the language socialization practices of three Korean American families through honorifics. Bilingual Research Journal, 43(1), 6-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2020.1713922 Veenstra, R., & Laninga-Wijnen, L. (2022). Peer network studies and interventions in adolescence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.015 Wang, L., & Jokikokko, K. (2024). Teacher and peer interaction in lower age novice-newcomer’s L2 learning and socialisation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(6), 2048-2063. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2039163 Yin, R. K. (2003). Designing case studies. In L. Maruster & M. J. Gijsenberg (Eds.), Qualitative Research Methods (pp.359-386). University of Groningen.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 74 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 64 |