پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,269 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,971 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 22,473,360 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,146,408 |
شناسایی و تدوین مؤلفههای سیستم ارزیابی برنامههای توسعه جمهوری اسلامی ایران | ||
| مدیریت سازمانهای دولتی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 14، شماره 2 (پیاپی 54)، فروردین 1405 | ||
| نوع مقاله: اکتشافی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ipom.2025.75775.5245 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمدحسین حاجی آبادی1؛ مجید مختاریانپور* 2؛ علیاصغر پورعزت3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی -گرایش مدیریت توسعه و تطبیقی-، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3استاد، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران . | ||
| چکیده | ||
| برنامههای توسعه موتور محرک و پیشرفت در بسیاری از کشورها بوده است اما شواهد و بررسیها در طول بیش از هفت دهه طراحی و اجرای برنامههای توسعه و عمرانی در ایران بیانگر این مهم است که در اجرای برنامههای توسعه، سهم شکستها بسیار بیشتر از موفقیتها بوده است این برنامهها اغلب فاقد سیستم ارزیابی دقیق و جامع هستند که بتواند بهطور مؤثر میزان تحقق اهداف و اثربخشی آنها را مورد بررسی قرار دهد. عدم وجود یک سیستم منظم و هماهنگ برای ارزیابی این برنامهها، موجب میشود که نتایج و دستاوردهای آنها بهطور شفاف و مستند قابل ارزیابی نباشد و ازاینرو تصمیمگیریهای آتی برای بهبود وضعیت اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی کشور با چالشهای زیادی روبهرو گردد. در این راستا، پژوهش حاضر با هدف تدوین مؤلفههای سیستم ارزیابی برنامههای توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی جمهوری اسلامی ایران انجام شده است و به دنبال پاسخ به این مسئله است که چگونه میتوان مؤلفههای مؤثر و شاخصهای مناسب برای ارزیابی برنامههای توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی کشور را شناسایی و تدوین کرد تا این برنامهها بهطور کارآمد و هدفمند به اهداف کلان کشور نزدیکتر شوند. بهعبارتدیگر، این پژوهش به دنبال شناسایی عناصر سازندۀ ارزیابی برنامههای توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی جمهوری اسلامی ایران است. بهمنظور دستیابی به این هدف، روند پژوهشهای صورت گرفته از سال 1976 تا اوایل سال 2025 با استفاده از تحلیل کتابسنجی و با کمک نرمافزار وس ویور مورد سنجش قرار گرفت. در این پژوهش، شاخصهای ارزیابی برنامههای توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی جمهوری اسلامی ایران مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت و در چهار خوشۀ شفافیت و حکمرانی خوب (شامل شفافسازی، نظارت مستقل، شفافیت دولتمردان، جلوگیری از فساد و ناکارآمدیها)، تحلیل و فناوری (تحلیل داده محور، نقش فناوری، دادهکاوی، شبیهسازی و سامانههای آنلاین)، مشارکت و جامعه مدنی (نقش مردم، اجماع جامعه، مطالبهگری عمومی، نظارت مشارکتی) و ارزیابی و خطمشیگذاری (برنامهریزی دقیق، سیاستهای بالادستی، فرایند سیستماتیک ارزیابی، تدوین گزارشهای تلفیقی) خوشهبندی شد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ارزیابی برنامههای توسعه؛ توسعه اقتصادی؛ توسعه اجتماعی؛ توسعه فرهنگی؛ متنکاوی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Formulation of the Components of the Evaluation System for the Development Programs of the Islamic Republic of Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohamadhossein Hajiabadi1؛ Majid Mokhtarianpour2؛ Aliasghar pourezzat3 | ||
| 1Ph.D Candidate, Department Public Administration, -Comparative and Development Management-, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Public Administration, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Development programs are widely regarded as engines of progress across nations; however, Iran’s experience over more than seven decades reveals that failures in implementation have far outweighed successes. A central challenge lies in the absence of a systematic and comprehensive evaluation framework capable of assessing both goal attainment and program effectiveness. Without a coordinated and transparent system, the results and impacts of development initiatives remain undocumented, hindering evidence-based decision-making for future economic, social, and cultural reforms. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying and formulating the core components of an evaluation system for Iran’s development programs. The research addresses the critical question of how effective elements and appropriate indicators can be designed to ensure that such programs operate more efficiently and are better aligned with the country’s strategic objectives. To achieve this aim, the study employed bibliometric analysis of research published between 1976 and early 2025, using VOSviewer software. The analysis categorized evaluation indicators into four major clusters: (1) transparency and good governance (including disclosure, independent oversight, governmental accountability, and anti-corruption measures); (2) analysis and technology (data-driven assessment, technological innovation, data mining, simulation, and online platforms); (3) participation and civil society (public involvement, social consensus, civic demands, and participatory monitoring); and (4) evaluation and policy-making (rigorous planning, alignment with higher-level policies, systematic evaluation processes, and integrative reporting). The findings highlight the necessity of a structured evaluation system that strengthens accountability, enhances evidence-based governance, and brings development programs closer to achieving Iran’s long-term national goals. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Development program evaluation, Economic development, Social development, Cultural development, Text mining | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdoli, N. (2022). Designing a Model of Economic - Social Development of Iran with Metasynthesis Approach. Governance and Development Journal (GDJ), 2(2), 55-96. (In Persian) DOI: 10.22111/JIPAA.2023.360595.1076 Aghasi-Zadeh, F. (2022). Review and Analysis of the Damages and Challenges of Development Planning in the Past Seventy Years of Iran. Center for Development and Foresight Research, Plan and Budget Organization of Iran. (In Persian) Al Wahid, S. A., Mohammad, N., Islam, R., Faisal, M. H., & Rana, M. S. (2024). Evaluation of Information Technology Implementation for Business Goal Improvement under Process Functionality in Economic Development. Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing, 12(2), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdaip.2024.122017 Alvani, S.M., Seyed Vakili, R., Kosar, Z., & Asli Beygi, F. (2019). Planning Integrated Management System of the Sustainable Development of the Country. Human Sciences Development, 1, 147-178. DOI: 10.22047/hsd.2019.182163 Arvin, M. (1999). Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why. The Journal of Development Studies, 35(6), 162. Bamberger, M. (2000). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research in development projects. World Bank Publications. Bi, X., Yu, B., Buysse, J., & Zou, W. (2024). Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Livestock Environmental Regulation Policies Based on the Policy Modeling Consistency Index Model. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 22(4), 342–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105062 Bolan, R. S. (1967). Emerging views of planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 33(4), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366708977924 Bruce, K., Vandelanotte, J., & Gandhi, V. (2025). Emerging Technology and Evaluation in International Development. Artificial Intelligence and Evaluation. Emerging Technologies and Their Implications for Evaluation, 13–36. . https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003512493 Canton, H. (2021). International Fund for Agricultural Development-IFAD. In The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2021 (pp. 330–332). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003179900 Chen, H. T. (2012). Theory-driven evaluation: Conceptual framework, application and advancement. Springer. . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19009-9_2 Chenery, H. B., Schultz, T. P., Srinivasan, T. N., Strauss, J., & Behrman, J. R. (1988). Handbook of development economics (Vol. 4). Elsevier. Chianca, T. (2008). The OECD/DAC criteria for international development evaluations: An assessment and ideas for improvement. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation. 5(9), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v5i9.167 Estrella, M., & Gaventa, J. (1998). Who counts reality? Participatory monitoring and evaluation: A literature review. Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. (2016). Impact evaluation in practice. World Bank Publications. Goldar, Z., Amiri, M., Gholipour Sooteh, R., & Moazami, M. (2017). Designing a conceptual framework for stakeholder engagement in public policy-making. Journal of Audit Science, 17(66), 81-106. (In Persian) Grindle, M. S. (2017). Politics and policy implementation in the Third World. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1m323qj Hamideh, F. (2019). Social Sustainability Assessment in Iranian Development Programs Based on the Strategic Sustainable Development Framework. Journal of Applied Studies in Social Sciences and Sociology, 4(13), 41-55. (In Persian) Iman, M. T., & Noshadi, M. R. (2013). Paradigmatic Evaluation of the Economic, Social, and Cultural Development Plans of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Research Institute of Hawzah and University. (In Persian) Issa, L., Mezher, T., & El Fadel, M. (2024). Can network analysis ascertain SDGs interlinkages towards evidence-based policy planning? A systematic critical assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 104, 107295.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107295 Kamali, Y. (2023). Identifying and ranking the challenges of evaluating development policies in Iran (five-year development plans). Majlis and Rahbord, 30(11), 91-125. (In Persian) DOI: 10.22034/MR.2022.5393.5150 Kamali, Y., Sheikhzadeh Jooshani, S., & Hosein Askari, F. (2022). Challenges of Formulation of Development Policies in Iran (Five-year Development Programs). Quarterly Journal of Program & Development Research, 2(8), 95-126. (In Persian) Doi: 10.22034/pbr.2022.306819.1168 Kashef, M., & Abootalebi, M. (2022). Improving the development planning in Iran. Program a Development Research, 3(2), 151-178. (In Persian) DOI: 10.22034/pbr.2022.341274.1220 Kirkpatrick, C. H., & Weiss, J. (1996). Cost-benefit analysis and project appraisal in developing countries. Edward Elgar Publishing. Krishna, A. (2004). Escaping poverty and becoming poor: Who gains, who loses, and why? World Development, 32(1), 121–136. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.08.002 Lerner, R. M. (2018). Concepts and theories of human development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203581629 Li, Y. (2024). Policy Evaluation and Pathway Optimization for High-Quality Development of National Auditing: A Study Based on Grounded Theory and the PMC Model. Advances in Economics and Management Research, 12(1), 570–570. https://doi.org/10.56028/aemr.12.1.570.2024 Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (Eds.). (2012). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (Vol. 6). Springer Science & Business Media. Miller, L. (2025). Integrating Human, Social, and Sustainable Development: An Integrative Approach to Realizing the Goals that Social Action Aims to Achieve. Ethics International Press. Nasri, Z., & Heydarpour, M. (2024). Analysis and evaluation of development programs in Iran from the perspective of human development experts. International Journal of Nations Research, 9(97), 7-30. (In Persian) Nations, U. (2012). The millennium development goals report 2012. Millennium Development Goals Report. Nshimyimana, B., & Rabie, B. (2024). Assessment of the Results-basedMonitoring and EvaluationPolicy Frameworks in Namibia. Administratio Publica, 32(2), 138-163. https://doi.org/10.61967/adminpub/2024.32.2.9 Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage. Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2016). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods. Routledge. Qasim, A. W. (2013). United Nations development programme (UNDP). Human development report 2013. Pakistan Development Review, 52(1), 95–96. Rajabpour, H. (2024). Unstable Development: The Rise and Fall of Inclusive Development in Iran. Tehran: Nahadgara (Affiliated with the Institute for Religion and Economy Studies). (In Persian) Ranta, E. (2021). Development: A multidimensional concept. In Research handbook on democracy and development (pp. 45–59). Edward Elgar Publishing. Ravallion, M. (2001). The mystery of the vanishing benefits: An introduction to impact evaluation. The World Bank Economic Review, 15(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.1.115 Rezaei, S. (2015). Iran’s Economic Dependence on Oil: Challenges and Strategies for Reduction. Economic Security, 20(3), 17–30. (In Persian) Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2003). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage publications. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Sage. Soltani, A.M. (2023). Evaluability of the National Five-year Development Plans of the Islamic Republic of Iran; The Engine for The Implementation. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 9(2), 128-143. (In Persian) DOI: 10.22059/JPPOLICY.2023.93612 Streeten, P. (1981). From growth to basic needs. In Development perspectives (pp. 323–333). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05341-4_18 Teymouri, E. (2022). A Historical Review of Development Paradigms. Pooyesh-e Fekri-e Towsee (Development Thought Movement). (In Persian) Udeh, C. A., Daraojimba, R. E., Odulaja, B. A., Afolabi, J. O. A., Ogedengbe, D. E., & James, O. O. (2024). Youth empowerment in Africa: Lessons for US youth development programs. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 1942–1958. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.2479 Whitacre, D. (2025). A program evaluation of the new choices workforce development program: An appreciative inquiry approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 108, 102507.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102507 White, H. (2009). Theory-based impact evaluation: Principles and practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1(3), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439340903114628 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 338 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 195 |
||