| تعداد نشریات | 46 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,511 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 20,602,837 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,155,179 |
تحلیل نهادی صنعت گاز مایع (LPG) ایران با تأکید بر ارائه دلالتهایی برای اصلاح زنجیره ارزش صنعت | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهش های اقتصاد صنعتی | ||
| دوره 9، شماره 31، خرداد 1404، صفحه 35-58 اصل مقاله (699.43 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کاربردی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/jier.2025.75316.1503 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهدی صادقی شاهدانی1؛ محمدهادی زاهدی وفا2؛ غلامرضا گودرزی3؛ مهدی رحیمی نسب* 4 | ||
| 1استاد، گروه اقتصاد انرژی، دانشکده معارف اسلامی و اقتصاد، دانشگاه امام صادق علیهالسلام، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد انرژی، دانشکده معارف اسلامی و اقتصاد، دانشگاه امام صادق علیهالسلام، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3استاد، گروه مدیریت عملیات و بهرهوری، دانشکده معارف اسلامی و مدیریت، دانشگاه امام صادق علیهالسلام، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 4دانشجوی دکتری علوم اقتصادی، دانشکده معارف اسلامی و اقتصاد، دانشگاه امام صادق علیهالسلام، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این پژوهش با هدف تحلیل نهادی صنعت گاز مایع ایران و ارائه دلالتهایی برای اصلاح ساختار زنجیره ارزش آن، با بهرهگیری از چارچوب تحلیل و توسعه نهادی (IAD) و رویکرد کیفی انجام شده است. دادههای پژوهش از طریق ۱۴ مصاحبه نیمهساختیافته با خبرگان صنعت گردآوری و با روش تحلیل مضمون مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. یافتهها نشان میدهد که قواعد ناکارآمد، نبود نهاد تنظیمگر مستقل، ضعف در زیرساختهای ذخیرهسازی و صادرات و ناهماهنگی میان بازیگران اصلی، منجر به شکلگیری عرصه کنشی ناپایدار و فرصتسوز در این صنعت شده است. پیامدهای این وضعیت را میتوان در سه سطح اقتصادی (اتلاف منابع، کاهش بهرهوری)، اجتماعی (نابرابری در دسترسی، بیاعتمادی عمومی) و نهادی (تعارض منافع، بازتولید ناکارآمدی) طبقهبندی کرد. در مدل مفهومی استخراج شده، تعامل سه متغیر کلیدی شرایط بیوفیزیکی، ویژگیهای اجتماع، و قواعد رسمی و غیررسمی در شکلگیری کنش نهادی و تولید پیامدهای منفی تبیین شده است. در پایان، مجموعهای از دلالتهای سیاستی برای اصلاح زنجیره ارزش صنعت گاز مایع (LPG) با تأکید بر بازآرایی قواعد نهادی در تخصیص منابع، تأمین مالی و قیمتگذاری، بازطراحی نظام مجوزدهی، مشوقها و ورود به حلقههای پاییندستی، نهادسازی تخصصی در سیاستگذاری، دیپلماسی انرژی و تحلیل بازار، ارتقای نظام نظارت، شفافیت و پاسخگویی در اجرای پروژهها و نهادیسازی حکمرانی تخصصمحور، آیندهنگر و مقاوم در برابر بحرانها پیشنهاد شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| تحلیل نهادی؛ زنجیره ارزش صنعت گاز مایع؛ چارچوب تحلیل و توسعه نهادی (IAD)؛ حکمرانی انرژی؛ دلالتهای سیاستی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Institutional Analysis of Iran's Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Industry with an Emphasis on providing Implications for Reforming the Industry's Value Chain | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mehdi Sadeghi Shahdani1؛ Mohammad Hadi Zahedi Vafa2؛ Gholamreza Godarzi3؛ Mahdi Rahiminasab4 | ||
| 1Professor, Department of Energy Economics, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Economics, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Energy Economics, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Economics, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Operations Management and Productivity, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Management, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4PhD Candidate in Economics, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Economics, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study was conducted with the aim of institutional analysis of Iran's liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) industry and providing implications for reforming its value chain structure, using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework and a qualitative approach. Data were collected through 14 semi-structured interviews with industry experts and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that inefficient rules, the absence of an independent regulatory body, weaknesses in storage and export infrastructure, and poor coordination among key actors have led to the emergence of an unstable and opportunity-wasting action arena within the industry. The consequences of this institutional setting can be categorized into three levels: economic (resource waste, reduced productivity), social (inequality in access, public distrust), and institutional (conflict of interest, reproduction of inefficiency). In the extracted conceptual model, the interaction of three key variables—biophysical conditions, community attributes, and formal and informal rules—is explained in shaping institutional action and generating negative outcomes. In conclusion, a set of policy implications is proposed for reforming the LPG value chain, with emphasis on redesigning institutional rules in resource allocation, financing, and pricing; restructuring licensing systems, incentives, and entry into downstream segments; establishing specialized institutions for policymaking, energy diplomacy and market analysis; and enhancing monitoring, transparency, and accountability in project implementation; and institutionalizing governance that is expert-driven, forward-looking, and resilient to crises. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Institutional Analysis, LPG Industry Value Chain, Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework, Energy Governance, Policy Implications | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abedi Jafari, H., et al. (2011). Foundations of social policymaking. Tehran: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. (In Persian) Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business. Aghajani, H., & Ramazani, A. A. (2018). Challenges of energy governance in Iran. Energy Policy Studies Quarterly, 4(2), 21–50. (In Persian) Andersson, K. P., Gibson, C. C., & Lehoucq, F. E. (2006). Municipal politics and forest governance: Comparative analysis of decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala. World Development, 34(3), 576–595. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.08.009 Argus Media. (2023). Global LPG market outlook. Retrieved from Atsu, E., et al. (2021). Energy Economics, 95, 105065. DOI 10.1016/j.eap.2021.03.013. Azimzadeh Arani, M. (2018). Regulatory institution analysis in Iran’s gas market. Energy Governance Research Journal, 4(2), 91–108. (In Persian) Bardach, E., & Patashnik, E. M. (2020). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving (6th ed.). CQ Press. Basu, K., Madhu, P., & Sharma, A. (2020). Understanding LPG value chain dynamics. Energy Policy Journal, 45(3), 211–226. Bazzaz, F., & Madani, K. (2015). System of Rice Intensification: An alternate agriculture paradigm. Environmental Sustainability, 13, 14–18.
Brutschin, E., & Jewell, J. (2021). Domestic storage and international flexibility: Comparative energy security in the gas sector. Energy Strategy Reviews, 35, 100658. Budya, H., & Yasir Arafat, M. (2011). Providing cleaner energy access in Indonesia through the megaproject of kerosene conversion to LPG. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7575–7586. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.061 Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600. DOI: 10.2307/2082975. Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: An introduction (6th ed.). Routledge. EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). (2022). International Energy Outlook. Esfahani, H. S., & Pesaran, M. H. (2009). The Iranian economy in the twentieth century: A global perspective. Iranian Studies, 42(2), 177–211. Farzanegan, M. R., & Habibpour, M. (2020). Resource rents and economic growth in oil-rich countries: The role of institutional quality. Energy Economics, 91, 104917. Fattouh, B., & Darbouche, H. (2010). North African oil and foreign investment in changing market conditions. Energy Policy, 38(3), 1119–1129. Fattouh, B., & El-Katiri, L. (2015). A brief political economy of energy subsidies in the Middle East and North Africa. OIES Paper MEP 11, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Ghazinoory, S., Divsalar, A., & Soofi, A. S. (2011). A new definition and framework for the development of a national technology strategy: the case of nanotechnology for Iran. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(4), 547–561. Gholamalipour, M. R. (2022). Propylene production: An untapped capacity in the LPG value chain. Tehran: Center for Oil and Gas Value Chain Studies. (In Persian) Grindle, M. S., & Thomas, J. W. (1991). Public choices and policy change: The political economy of reform in developing countries. Johns Hopkins University Press. IEA (International Energy Agency). (2020). The Role of Gas in Today’s Energy Transitions. IEA. (2020). Enhancing resilience of gas markets: The role of storage infrastructure. International Energy Agency. IEA. (2021). Energy policy review of Saudi Arabia 2021. International Energy Agency. IEA. (2021). World Energy Outlook 2021. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2021 10.1787/14fcb638-en Integrated Sustainability and SCM Practices in the LPG Value Chain. (2024). Journal of Sustainable Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 1–15. International Energy Agency [IEA]. (2023). Policy pathways for institutional reform in energy systems. IEA. Karl, T. L. (1997). The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. University of California Press. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430. Kiaei, M. (2007). New structure of the global gas and LNG industry. Oil Research Quarterly. (In Persian) Kroger, A., Kusch, S., & Rommel, J. (2016). Institutions and the success of LPG distribution in developing countries: A comparative study of Indonesia and South Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 33, 72–82. Kroger, A., Rommel, J., & Kusch, S. (2023). Transparency in subsidy monitoring: Evidence from Indonesia. Energy Policy, 176, 113453. Krüger, J., Schilling, J., & Deffner, J. (2016). LPG distribution and institutional challenges in Indonesia: Lessons from a multi-level governance perspective. Energy Policy, 92, 64–72. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge University Press. McGinnis, M. D. (2011). An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom Workshop: A simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 169–183. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. Monaldi, F. (2016). Columbia SIPA. Mousavian, R. (2021). Structural corruption in Iran’s economy: Institutions, processes, and solutions. Tehran: Institute for Economic Studies. (In Persian) Mousazadeh, M. (2016). Jurisprudence of Anfal ownership and utilization of oil and gas resources. Jurisprudence and Economics Quarterly, 3(4), 71–98. (In Persian) National Iranian Gas Company. (2023). Annual report on LPG production and exports. Tehran: Planning and International Affairs Department. (In Persian) North, D. (2013). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance (M. Tabibian, Trans.). Tehran: Farraravan Publishing. (In Persian) North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press. Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27. Ostrom, E. (2015). Understanding institutional diversity (J. Mohseni Zanuri, Trans.). Tehran: Imam Sadiq University. (In Persian) Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. Rahbar, M. H., et al. (2021). Prioritizing contractual structures of LNG projects using ELECTRE-TRI. Strategic Energy Studies Quarterly. (In Persian) Rana, A., Pathania, R., & Gupta, S. (2021). Evolution of LPG sector in India: A 70-year review. Energy Policy, 156, 112405. Rana, S., Mukherjee, D., & Singh, P. (2021). Digital innovation and institutional design in rural LPG adoption in India. Energy Research & Social Science, 79, 102178. Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. (2020). Assessment of LPG production, distribution, and export in Iran. (In Persian) Resistance Economy Analysts Network. (2018). The Energy Path: 33 strategic actions to implement the Resistance Economy in the energy sector. (In Persian) Rodrik, D. (2008). Second-best institutions. American Economic Review, 98(2), 100–104. SarAmad Think Tank. (2018). Governance strategies in the oil and gas industry. Tehran: Andishehvarzan Publishing. (In Persian) Shirijian, S. M., & Faali, M. J. (2019). Development of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry and its opportunities for Iran. Defense Strategy Quarterly, 26(98). (In Persian) Shirijian, S. M., & Faali, M. J. (2019). The future of Iran’s LNG market: Strategy and priority analysis. Iranian Energy Economics Quarterly, 23(1), 115–136. (In Persian) Soleimanpour, A., et al. (2019). A comparative review of the legal powers of the National Iranian Gas Company. (In Persian) Stevens, P. (2010). The resource curse revisited. Chatham House. Stevens, P. (2010). The role of regulators in the U.S. energy sector: Institutional innovation and performance. Energy Economics, 32(4), 875–882. Taheri, M. (2019). Energy policy analysis in Iran: Governance challenges and reform solutions. Public Policy Quarterly, 5(3), 91–110. (In Persian) Tahsili, H., Mehnatfar, Y., & Gorjipour, M. J. (2018). Estimation and forecasting gasoline demand in the transport sector by PLSR method. Journal of Industrial Economics Researches, 2(6), 89–105. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.30473/indeco.2020.38966.1100 Tashkini, A., & Shafiei, A. (2024). Value chain development model of Iran’s textile and clothing industry. Journal of Industrial Economics Researches, 7(26), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.30473/jier.2024.24151.1365 WLPGA. (2022). Global LPG Statistical Review 2022. World LPG Association. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1 |
||