| تعداد نشریات | 48 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,235 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,613 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 21,414,423 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,409,280 |
پایداری محیطی در فضاهای دانشگاهی: بسط راهبردهای پیشرو با مدلسازی ساختاری-تفسیری | ||
| فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 1، مهر 1404، صفحه 9-24 اصل مقاله (705.38 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ee.2025.71522.2745 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ایمان سعیدی* 1؛ هانیه شکری2 | ||
| 1استادیار، گروه علوم و مهندسی محیطزیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیطزیست، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی کارشناسی، گروه علوم و مهندسی محیطزیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیطزیست، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف اصلی این تحقیق شناسایی شاخصهای پایداری محیطزیستی و سپس ارائه یک مدل از ارتباطات بین این شاخصها در محیطهای دانشگاهی است. ابتدا مرور جامع از متون علمی مرتبط با پایداری محیطزیستی در دانشگاهها انجام شد. سپس، با استفاده از روش دلفی فازی، نظرات خبرگان در زمینه منابع طبیعی و محیطزیست جمعآوری گردید تا معیارهای مؤثر در ایجاد پایداری شناسایی شوند. پرسشنامهای طراحی شد که در آن خبرگان به ارزیابی تأثیر هر شاخص بر پایداری محیطزیست پرداختند. پس از تحلیل دادهها، مدلسازی ساختاری-تفسیری برای تعیین روابط بین شاخصها بکار گرفته شد. نتایج نشان داد که مجموعاً 13 شاخص بهعنوان مبنا در خلق پایداری محیطی در محدوده مطالعاتی دارای اثر میباشند. شاخصهای مشارکت دانشجویان و کارمندان، حمایت از طرحهای تحقیقاتی و سیاستگذاری محیطزیستی، در سطح اول مدل ساختاری-تفسیری قرار دارند. سطح دوم مدل نیز به شاخصهای استفاده از گیاهان بومی، استفاده از مصالح پایدار، کاهش مصرف انرژی ساختمانها و کاهش میزان تولید زباله اختصاص دارد. بر مبنای نتایج این تحقیق، سطح سوم و چهارم نقش مقابله با مخاطرات احتمالی چه در بحث انرژی و یا بلایای طبیعی را دارند، بهطوریکه در این سطوح مؤلفههای صرفهجویی در مصرف آب و آمادگی در مواجه با بلایای طبیعی معرفی شده است و در سطح سوم نیز صرفهجویی در مصرف انرژی ارائه شده است. در سطح پنجم مؤلفههای استفاده مجدد از پسماند و منابع انرژی تجدید پذیر قرار دارد و سطح آخر مدل نیز کنترل و نظارت جای دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| دانشگاه سبز؛ آموزش محیطزیست؛ روش دلفی؛ سیاستگذاری محیطزیستی؛ توسعه پایدار؛ محوطههای دانشگاهی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Environmental Sustainability in University Campuses: Extending Forward-Looking Strategies through Interpretive–Structural Modeling | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Iman Saeedi1؛ Hanieh Shokri2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran | ||
| 2Undergraduate Student, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The main objective of this research is to identify environmental sustainability indicators and then provide a model of the relationships between these indicators in academic environments. Initially, a comprehensive review of the scientific literature related to environmental sustainability in universities was conducted. Then, using the fuzzy Delphi method, the opinions of experts in the fields of natural resources and the environment were gathered to identify the criteria effective for establishing sustainability. A questionnaire was designed in which experts evaluated the impact of each indicator on environmental sustainability. After data analysis, Interpretive–Structural Modeling (ISM) was employed to determine the relationships between the indicators. The results indicated that a total of 13 indicators serve as a basis for creating environmental sustainability within the study area. The indicators of student and staff participation, support for research projects, and environmental policy-making are positioned at the first level of the ISM. The second level of the model includes the indicators of using native plants, utilizing sustainable materials, reducing building energy consumption, and decreasing waste production. Based on the findings of this research, the third and fourth levels relate to addressing potential risks regarding both energy issues and natural disasters. At these levels, components for water conservation and preparedness for natural disasters are introduced, while energy conservation is presented at the third level. At the fifth level, the components of waste reuse and renewable energy sources are included, and the final level of the model consists of control and monitoring mechanisms. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Green University, Environmental Education, Delphi Method, Environmental Policy-Making, Sustainable Development, University Campus | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Azar, A., Khosravani, F., & Jalali, R. (2019). “Soft operational research: Problem structuring approaches.” Tehran: Industrial Management Organization. [In Persian] Darabi, H., & Saeedi, I. (2019). “The Design of Resilient Green Spaces towards Adapting with Climate Change, Case Study Behesht Boulevard, Borujerd.” Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 21(9), 209–219. [In Persian] Darabi, S., Azizi, N., Salimi, J., & Shirabegi, N. (2019). “Elements and Dimensions of Sustainability in Iran’s Higher Education System, and Comparison of Public and Non-Governmental Academic Approaches.” Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 2(3), 12–26. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.29252/ijes.2.3.12 Disterheft, A., da Silva Caeiro, S. S. F., de Miranda Azeiteiro, U. M., & Leal Filho, W. (2012). “Implementing Sustainability at the Campus–Towards a Better Understanding of Participation Processes within Sustainability Initiatives.” Journal of Environmental Reseach, 20(5), 20–29. Finlay, J., & Massey, J. (2012). “Eco‐campus: Applying the ecocity model to develop green university and college campuses.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371211211836 Fissi, S., Romolini, A., Gori, E., & Contri, M. (2021). “The path toward a sustainable green university: The case of the University of Florence.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123655 Gholami, H., Bachok, M. F., Saman, M. Z. M., Streimikiene, D., Sharif, S., & Zakuan, N. (2020). “An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green campus operations: Towards higher education sustainability.” Sustainability, 12(1), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010363 Glaser, B. G. (1965). “The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis.” Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843 Goodarzi, M., Haghtalab, N., Saeedi, I., & Moore, N. J. (2019). “Structural and functional improvement of urban fringe areas: toward achieving sustainable built–natural environment interactions.” Environment, Development and Sustainability, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00511-4 Güneş, S. G., Şahin, S., C., A., Yıldırım Kaya, N., & E., I. (2014). “The Importance of Creating Sustainable Campuses In Higher Education.” In 3rd International Congress on Urban and Environmental Issues and Policies Published by Aksaray University. Habibi, A., Jahantigh, F. F., & Sarafrazi, A. (2015). “Fuzzy Delphi Technique for Forecasting and Screening Items.” Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 5(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7307.2015.00036.5 Johnson, L., & Castleden, H. (2011). “Greening the campus without grass: using visual methods to understand and integrate student perspectives in campus landscape development and water sustainability planning.” Area, 43(3), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01001.x Lau, S. S. Y., Gou, Z., & Liu, Y. (2014). “Healthy campus by open space design: Approaches and guidelines.” Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(4), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.06.006 Leal Filho, W., Will, M., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Farinha, C. S., Orlovic Lovren, V., Avila, L. V., Platje, J., Sharifi, A., & Vasconcelos, C. R. P. (2021). “Towards a common future: revising the evolution of university-based sustainability research literature.” International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(6), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1881651 Leung, L. (2015). “Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research.” Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306 Peters, T., & D’Penna, K. (2020). “Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations.” Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17), 7064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177064 Pouranjenar, G., Salarzehi, H., Tabavar, A. A., & Yaghoubi, N. M. (2022). “Exploring the Antecedents and Consequences of a Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly University Based on a Mixed Approach.” Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 10(3), 9–27. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.30473/ee.2022.60444.2408 Prasad, U. C., & Suri, R. K. (2011). “Modeling of continuity and change forces in private higher technical education using total interpretive structural modeling (TISM).” Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 12(3), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396605 Ribeiro, J. M. P., Hoeckesfeld, L., Dal Magro, C. B., Favretto, J., Barichello, R., Lenzi, F. C., Secchi, L., De Lima, C. R. M., & De Andrade, J. B. S. O. (2021). “Green Campus Initiatives as sustainable development dissemination at higher education institutions: Students’ perceptions.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127671 Saeedi, I., & Goodarzi, M. (2020). “Rainwater harvesting system: a sustainable method for landscape development in semiarid regions, the case of Malayer University campus in Iran.” Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(2), 1579–1598. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0218-8 Sarikhani, Y., Shojaei, P., Rafiee, M., & Delavari, S. (2020). “Analyzing the interaction of main components of hidden curriculum in medical education using interpretive structural modeling method.” BMC Medical Education, 20, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02094-5 Sugiarto, A., Lee, C.-W., & Huruta, A. D. (2022). “A systematic review of the sustainable campus concept.” Behavioral Sciences, 12(5), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12050130 Too, L., & Bajracharya, B. (2015). “Sustainable campus: engaging the community in sustainability.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2013-0080 Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). “Pearls, pith, and provocation: Validity in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522–537. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 74 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 54 |
||