پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 48 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,235 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,613 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 21,414,416 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,409,274 |
ارائه چارچوب شمولیت اجتماعی در ورزش همگانی با رویکرد فراترکیب | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهشهای کاربردی در مدیریت ورزشی | ||
| دوره 14، 2 (پاییز 1404) - شماره پیاپی 54، مهر 1404، صفحه 191-214 اصل مقاله (1.24 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/arsm.2025.72454.3918 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| فرزاد غفوری* | ||
| دانشیار، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه شمولیت اجتماعی از مولفههای حیاتی ورزش همگانی به شمار میرود و ترویج آن به مسئلهای مهم برای سیاستگذاران ملی و سازمانهای ورزشی تبدیل شده است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی مفاهیم و مقولات چارچوب شمولیت اجتماعی در ورزش همگانی و با استفاده از روش کیفی فراترکیب انجام شده است. بدین منظور پس از جستجوی منابع مرتبط با حوزه شمولیت اجتماعی در ورزش همگانی، 399 منبع اولیه یافت شد و از میان آنها تعداد 35 منبع انتخاب و مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج حاصل از فراترکیب مطالعات حوزه شمولیت اجتماعی در ورزش همگانی در 4 مقوله اصلی شمولیت فضایی، عملکردی، ارتباطی و قدرت طبقهبندی و چارچوب شمولیت اجتماعی در ورزش همگانی ارائه شد. براساس این چارچوب شمولیت اجتماعی در ورزش همگانی شامل دو مرحله است؛ در اولین مرحله فاصلههای اجتماعی و اقتصادی از بین میرود و نزدیکی (شمولیت فضایی) از طریق گسترش مسیرهای در دسترس به وسیله مؤلفههای اقتصادی، محیط فیزیکی و اجتماعی-فرهنگی ایجاد میشود. بر این اساس مرحله اول، نقطه ورود به شمولیت اجتماعی و بسیار ضروری است. مرحله دوم نیز برای شمولیت اجتماعی کامل لازم است؛ که این مرحله شامل ابعاد قدرت، عملکردی و ارتباطی شمولیت اجتماعی است که با توسعه شمولیت اجتماعی به هم پیوسته و ترکیب میشوند. چارچوب ارائه شده هم فرایندهای دگرگونکننده و هم چند بعدی را نشان میدهد که به غیرشرکتکنندههای طرد شده کمک میکند تا در ورزش همگانی شرکت کنند و شرکتکنندگان را نیز تشویق میکند تا بهطور کاملتری درگیر شوند و از مزایای بیشتری بهره ببرند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ورزش همگانی؛ شمولیت اجتماعی؛ طرد اجتماعی؛ فراترکیب | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Providing the Framework of Social Inclusion in Community Sport: A Meta-Synthesis | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ghafouri Farzad | ||
| Associate Professor, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Social inclusion has become a cornerstone of contemporary community sport policy, positioning it as a critical lever for national policymakers and sports organizations. This prominence arises from the belief that community sport is an effective and affordable vehicle for achieving broader social objectives, particularly the integration and empowerment of marginalized groups like vulnerable youth. Community sport, characterized by its flexible, adaptable, and people-centered nature, aims to lower participation barriers. It is often viewed as a means to address social, political, and cultural inequalities, going beyond mere "fair play." Despite its potential, many groups still face discrimination and social exclusion in sports-a process defined as long-term deprivation leading to separation from mainstream sporting activities. The antidote to this exclusion is the active promotion of social inclusion. Representing "social membership," social inclusion is an action that emphasizes acceptance and participation in society, serving to improve quality of life and reduce isolation. It is an ideal pursued by governments to prevent the marginalization of specific social groups, grounded in values of equity and social justice. Marivoet (2014) defines social inclusion in community sport as the "existence of real equal opportunities in access to sport" for all. However, a clear gap exists in the literature. While studies have highlighted the role of sport in social empowerment and identified factors influencing exclusion, a comprehensive framework conceptualizing social inclusion in community sport has been lacking. Existing models often prioritize talent identification over social objectives or overlook the social role of sport altogether. Therefore, this research sought to synthesize existing knowledge to answer the question: "What is the framework of social inclusion in community sport?" Methodology This study adopted a qualitative meta-synthesis approach, which fundamentally differs from quantitative meta-analyses that focus on statistically aggregating numerical data. Rather than seeking statistical aggregation, meta-synthesis serves as an integrative interpretive method designed to analyze and synthesize findings across a collection of qualitative studies addressing a specific research topic. The core objective of this methodology is to generate a novel and holistic understanding that transcends the individual contributions of the primary studies, thereby often culminating in the development of new conceptual models that offer a more comprehensive perspective than any single study could provide. To ensure a systematic and rigorous research process, the study meticulously followed the seven-step model established by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007). The research journey commenced with the crucial stage of formulating the precise research questions, which were: "What are the concepts and categories of social inclusion in community sport?" and "What is its framework?". This was followed by a comprehensive systematic literature review, involving extensive searches across major international databases such as Scopus and Web of Science, as well as relevant Iranian scientific databases, using a targeted set of keywords including "social inclusion," "community sport," and "social exclusion in sports." The initial search yielded 377 potentially relevant sources. From this pool, a refined selection process was undertaken, applying strict criteria pertaining to relevance, accessibility, content depth, and methodological quality, which ultimately resulted in 35 articles being chosen for in-depth analysis. The subsequent phase involved a thorough extraction of information, where the selected studies underwent detailed content analysis to identify and extract themes and concepts related to social inclusion, which were then recorded as primary codes. The analytical process then advanced to synthesizing these findings, whereby the extracted codes were systematically grouped into coherent and similar concepts, forming the foundational building blocks from which the main categories of the framework were derived. Throughout this process, quality control was paramount. Rigor was maintained through comprehensive documentation of all procedures, the application of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for evaluating the qualitative studies, and the establishment of content validity (CVR) through consultation with a panel of expert judges. The final step involved the coherent presentation of the synthesized findings, culminating in the articulation of the proposed framework for social inclusion in community sport. Findings The meta-synthesis yielded a comprehensive framework for understanding social inclusion in community sport, conceptualized as a progressive two-stage process that moves from basic access to transformative empowerment. The foundational first stage, termed Spatial Inclusion, serves as the crucial gateway to participation, functioning as a non-negotiable prerequisite without which deeper forms of inclusion remain unattainable. This initial stage focuses on overcoming fundamental barriers by systematically diminishing social, cultural, and economic distances through the creation of accessible pathways. It manifests through three interconnected forms of proximity: Socio-Cultural Proximity, achieved through diversity-based policies, culturally sensitive facilitation, and the active elimination of stereotypes and linguistic barriers that often alienate marginalized groups; Physical Environment, encompassing not only accessible facilities but also safe and enjoyable training conditions, qualified coaching methodologies, and essential logistical support systems such as childcare services that enable participation; and Economic Proximity, facilitated through strategic reduction of costs, thoughtful consideration of family economic status, and the promotion of economic justice principles within program design. This spatial dimension represents more than mere physical access-it constitutes the essential ecosystem that either enables or constrains initial engagement, creating the foundational conditions upon which all subsequent inclusion processes depend. Upon establishing this crucial foundational access, the inclusion process advances to a more complex second stage comprising three deeply interconnected dimensions that collectively enable full social integration. Functional Inclusion initiates this deeper engagement by focusing on personal development through the systematic enhancement of knowledge, skills, and competencies. This dimension manifests through three distinct yet related pathways: building Human Capital through the development of transferable social skills, leadership capabilities, and strategic networking abilities; developing Sports Capital through the acquisition of technical sporting skills, physical literacy, and health-related knowledge; and fostering a robust sense of Self-Worth evidenced by enhanced self-esteem, strengthened self-efficacy, and increased life satisfaction. Operating simultaneously and synergistically, Relational Inclusion addresses the essential emotional and affiliative aspects of inclusion by cultivating a profound sense of social acceptance and belonging. This dimension evolves through multiple layers: establishing a fundamental sense of Safety and Well-being that encompasses physical security, psychological safety, and equal opportunity access; nurturing positive Social Relations characterized by deepening trust, reciprocal support mechanisms, and genuine community belonging; and affirming a positive Social Identity through consistent social validation, moral support networks, and recognition within the community. The most transformative dimension, Power Inclusion, represents the culmination of the inclusion process through its fundamental redistribution of control and authority within the sporting context. This dimension achieves genuine empowerment through three strategic pathways: developing personal Agency by granting participants the capacity to influence activities, exercise independent action, and effectively resist discrimination; promoting Active Citizenship through meaningful involvement in decision-making processes and fostering civic responsibility that enhances community cohesion; and strategically expanding Social Networks to create bridging capital that connects the sports environment with wider community resources, establishing vertical connections across different social strata. Together, these three dimensions-functional, relational, and power-form an integrated progression that represents a journey from initial access through capability development and relational bonding to ultimate empowerment, creating a comprehensive pathway from marginalization to meaningful integration within community sport. Discussion and Conclusion This research makes significant theoretical and practical contributions by proposing a comprehensive framework that conceptualizes social inclusion in community sport as a transformative, two-stage process. The framework's theoretical advancement lies in its synthesis of previously fragmented research into an integrated model that transcends singular focus on specific marginalized groups, instead illuminating the fundamental processes underlying inclusion itself. By systematically organizing these processes into spatial, functional, relational, and power dimensions, the framework establishes a sophisticated conceptual architecture that enables researchers to conduct more nuanced comparative studies across diverse cultural contexts and political environments. Furthermore, it generates testable hypotheses regarding the sequential relationships between different inclusion dimensions and their cumulative impact on achieving sustainable social integration, thereby opening new avenues for empirical investigation and theoretical development in the field of sport sociology and social policy. The framework's practical utility manifests through its capacity to inform more sophisticated and effective intervention strategies. It provides practitioners with a comprehensive diagnostic instrument that moves beyond conventional approaches focused predominantly on physical accessibility or financial barriers. The model guides sports organizations through a multidimensional assessment process, ensuring that programming addresses not only initial entry barriers but also the complex developmental, relational, and empowerment requisites essential for meaningful inclusion. This sophisticated understanding facilitates the design of integrated interventions that progressively advance from basic spatial access through skill development and community bonding toward authentic power sharing and co-decision making. Such an approach cultivates genuine social and cultural diversity that transcends token representation, creating environments where historically marginalized groups can truly thrive as equal participants. Moreover, by conceptualizing community sport as a microcosm for broader societal transformation, the framework represents a substantial advancement toward realizing comprehensive social justice objectives. The intricate processes of dismantling exclusionary structures and constructing inclusive communities within sports settings provide transferable insights for addressing parallel challenges throughout society. This suggests that the principles of progressive inclusion—moving systematically from basic access through capability development to meaningful empowerment—can inform and enhance social justice initiatives across multiple domains of civic engagement and public policy, potentially serving as a replicable model for social transformation beyond the sporting context. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Community sport, Social inclusion, Social exclusion, Meta-synthesis | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abedi Jafari, A., & Amiri, M. (2019). Meta-Synthesisas a Method for Synthesizing Qualitative Researches. Journal of Methodology of Humanities, 25(99), 73-78. (In Persian) DOI: 10.30471/mssh.2019.1629 Afrouzeh, A., Sajjadi, N., Hamidi, M., & Sadeghi, R. (2021). Afghanistani Refugees’ Lived Experience of Sports Participation Barriers. Research on Educational Sport, 12(37), (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22089/res.2021.9631.1980. Allain, R. (2000). Proximity and thought on the city. ESO, Works and documents, 14, 7- 12. Andrews, J. P., & Andrews, G. J. (2003). Life in a secure unit: The rehabilitation of young people through the use of sport. Social Science & Medicine, 56(3), 531-550.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00053-9 Atherley, K. M. (2006). Sport and Community Cohesion in the 21st Century: Understanding linkages between sport, social capital and the community. Department of Sport and Recreation Western Australia, University of Western Australia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17455871.2007.00440.x Bailey, R. (2008). Positive youth development through sport. In N. L. Holt (Ed.), Youth sport and social inclusion (pp. 85-96). London: Routledge. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487-511). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351018142 Coalter, F. (2007). A wider social role for sport: Who's keeping the score? Abingdon, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014615 Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Suppl.), 95-120. https://doi.org/10.3917/inno.pr2.0176 Collins, M. F., Collins, M., & Kay, T. (2014). Sport and social exclusion. Routledge. Cordier, R., Milbourn, B., Martin, R., Buchanan, A., Chung, D., & Speyer, R. (2017). A systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social inclusion. PloS one, 12(6), e0179109.. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179109 Cortis, N., Sawrikar, P., & Muir, K. (2007). Participation in sport and recreation by culturally and linguistically diverse women, consultation report: For the Australian Government Office for Women, Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/866 Crowley, J. (1999). The politics of belonging: Some theoretical considerations. The politics of belonging: Migrants and minorities in contemporary Europe, 15(41). Cunningham, G.B. (2019). Diversity and inclusion in sport organizations: A multilevel perspective (4th Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429504310 Doherty, A., & Misener, K. (2008). Community sport networks In M. Nicholson & R. Hoye (Eds.), Sport and social capital (pp. 113-142). Oxford,UK: ButterworthHeinemann. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080569727 Donnelly, P., & Coakley, J. (2002). The role of recreation in promoting social inclusion. Toronto, Canada: Laidlaw Foundation. Donnelly, P., & Harvey, J. (1996). Overcoming systemic barriers to access in active living. Report prepared for Fitness Branch, Health Canada and Active Living Canada. Centre for Sport Policy Studies Working Paper, (1). Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Basingstoke. UK: MacMillian. Driscoll, K., & Wood, L. (1999). Sporting capital: Changes and challenges for rural communities in Victoria. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University, Victorian Centre for Applied Social Research. Ghafouri, F., Memarzadeh, M. S., & Alavi, S. (2019). Determining the Contribution and Role of the Executive Organizations in Development of community Sport. Applied Research of Sport Management, 8(1), 11-32. DOI: 10.30473/arsm.2019.5843. (In Persian) Fozonkhah, P., Shahbazi, M., & Monazami, A. (2021). Identifying strategic disadvantages of developing sport for all: experts point of views. Applied Research of Sport Management, 10(2), 101-110. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.30473/arsm.2021.8237. Geddes, A. (1999). The politics of belonging: migrants and minorities in contemporary Europe (p. 227). Ashgate Published. Ghadrdan, R., Hasanbeigi, H., & Tabesh, S. (2020). Investigating barriers to athletic and non-athlete disability participation in sports activities (Case study: Qazvin). Journal of Nurse and Physician Within War, 7(24), 49-56. Ghafouri, F., Ghamati, S., Zar, A., & Alavi, S. )2021). Identify the Place of Education in the Process of People's Tendency towards Sport for All. j.health, 12(2), 265-275. Gholi Poor M, Ghafouri F. (2022). Designing a model of sports leisure during the COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-synthesis. Humanistic approach to sport and exercise studies (HASES), 2(1), 93-110. DOI: 10.52547/hases.2.1.93 Gholi Poor, M., & Keshkar, S. (2021). An Educational Program Pattern in Sports to Achieve Gender Equality and Violence Prevention against Women. Sport Management Studies, 13(68), 1-29. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22089/smrj.2020.9095.3080 Gholi Poor, M., Ghafouri, F., Shahlaee Bagheri, J., Shabani Bahar, G. R., & Preuss, H. (2025). Multilevel Factors Affecting the Social Inclusion of Women in Sports. Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society, 15(60), 106-124. (In Persian) DOI: 10.30495/jzvj.2024.32343.4057 Gholipoor, M., Ghafouri, F., & Preuss, H. (2025). Dimensions of social inclusion of older adults in leisure-time physical activity: development of a scale. Leisure/Loisir, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2025.2461771 Glazzard, J. (2011). Perceptions of the barriers to effective inclusion in one primary school: Voices of teachers and teaching assistants. Support for learning, 26(2), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679604.2011.01478.x Houlihan, B. (2011). England’, in M. Nicholson, R. Hoye and B. Houlihan (eds) Participation in Sport: International Policy Perspectives. London: Routledge. Hylton, K., & Totten, M. (2008). Community sport development. In K. Hylton & P. Bramham (Eds.), Sport development: Policy, process and practice (pp. 77-117). London: Routledge. Javaheri, A., Raghfar, H., & Abazari, Y. (2021). A Critical Analysis of Theories of Gender Equality in Sport and the Challenges Ahead. Sociological Review, 27(2), 111-131. (In Persian) DOI: 10.22059/jsr.2021.81420 Marivoet, S. (2014). Challenge of Sport towards Social Inclusion and Awareness-Raising Against Any Discrimination. Physical Culture and Sport, 63(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2014-0017 Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370 - 396. Maxwell, H. (2012). An exploration of social inclusion in Australian community sport: The case of Muslim women. University of Technology Sydney (Australia). Meisner, B. A., Weir, P. L., & Baker, J. (2013). The relationship between aging expectations and various modes of physical activity among aging adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(4), 569-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.02.07 Morgan, H., and A. Parker. (2021). Sport-Based Interventions and Social Inclusion: Insights on the ‘Power of Sport. In Handbook of Social Inclusion: Research and Practices in Health and Social Sciences, edited by P. Liamputtong, 1739–1757. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89594-5_99 Mori, K., Morgan, H., Parker, A., & Lindsey, I. (2024). Placing community at the heart of community sport development: introducing the community sport development framework (CSDF). Sport in Society, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2024.2355647 Nicholson, M., & Hoye, R. (2008). Sport and social capital. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann. Palmer, C. (2009). Soccer and the politics of identity for young Muslim refugee women in South Australia. Soccer & Society, 10(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970802472643 Ponciano Núñez, P. D., Portela-Pino, I., & Martínez-Patiño, M. J. (2023). Understanding the characteristics of community youth sports programs interventions: A systematic review and recommendations. Sage Open, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231179206 Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of the American community. New York City: Simon and Schuster. Putnam, R. D. (2015). Our kids: The American dream in crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1086/682277 Refaie Shirpak, K., Guruge, S., & Chinichian, M. (2010). Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative research in Health Sciences. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology, 6 (1), 51-57. (In Persian) http://irje.tums.ac.ir/article-1-94-en.html Ring, N. A., Ritchie, K., Mandava, L., & Jepson, R. (2011). A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews. Saffari, M., & Qarra, M.A. (2017). Factors inhibiting the participation of the elderly in sports and active recreation. Journal of sport management and motor behavior. 13(26), 129-140. (In Persian) Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York and London: Springer. Schaillée, H., Haudenhuyse, R., & Bradt, L. (2019). Community sport and social inclusion: International perspectives. Sport in Society, 22(6), 885-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1565380 Sherlock, T. (2024). The role of community sports programs in promoting social cohesion. International Journal of Arts, Recreation and Sports, 3(5), 15-27.
Sheykhyoosefi, R., Azizian Kohan, N., Moharramzadeh, M., & Naghizadeh Baghi, A. (2024). Designing a model for the use of new technologies in the development of sport for all in Iran: a grounded theory. Applied Research of Sport Management, 12(4), 53-64. (In Persian) 10.30473/arsm.2024.69743.3829. Silver, H. (2010). Understanding social inclusion and its meaning for Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 45(2), 183-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.18394655.2010.tb00174.x Skinner, J., Zakus, D. H., & Cowell, J. (2008). Development through sport: Building social capital in disadvantaged communities. Sport Management Revie, 11(3), 253-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S14413523(08)70112-8 Sohrabi, B., Azami, A., Yazdani, H.R. (2001). The Pathology of the Research of Islamic Management based on Meta Analysis. Public Administration Perspective, 2(6), 9-14. (In Persian) Spaaij, R. , Magee, J. and Jeanes, R. (2014). Sport and social exclusion in global society, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203066584 Spaaij, R., Broerse, J., Oxford, S., Luguetti, C., McLachlan, F., McDonald, B., ... & Pankowiak, A. (2019). Sport, refugees, and forced migration: A critical review of the literature. Frontiers in sports and active living, 1, 47. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00047 Talebpour, A., Nazari Azad, M., & Kashani, M. (2019). Sociological Analysis of Gender Inequality in Sport (The Perspective of Female National Hero Athlete). Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society, 10(40), 289-316. (In Persian) Theeboom, M., Schaillée, H., Roose, R., Willems, S., Bradt, L., & Lauwerier, E. (Eds.). (2021). Community sport and social inclusion: enhancing strategies for promoting personal development, health and social cohesion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429340635 Thorjussen, I. M, & Sisjord, M. K. (2020): Inclusion and exclusion in multi-ethnic physical education: an intersectional perspective. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 11(1), 50-66, DOI: 10.1080/25742981.2019.1648187 Townsend, J. A; Puymbroeck, M. V & Zabriskie, R. B. (2017). The Core and Balance Model of Family Leisure Functioning: A Systematic Review, Leisure Sciences, 39(5), 436-456. DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2017.1333057 Turconi, L., Shaw, S., & Falcous, M. (2022). Examining discursive practices of diversity and inclusion in New Zealand Rugby. Sport Management Review, 25(4), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.2014182 VaFaye Moghaddam, A., Farzam. F., Razavi, M. H., & Afshari, M. (2017). Analysis of the development factors of public sports based on the foundation data theory. Sports Management Studies, 10(52), 43-72. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22089/smrj.2017.3818.1745. Van der Veken, K., Lauwerier, E., & Willems, S. (2020). To mean something to someone: Sport-for-development as a lever for social inclusion. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1119-7 Vettenburg, N., Walgrave, L., & Van Kerckvoorde, J. (1984). Jeugdwerkloosheid, delinquentie en maatschappelijke kwetsbaarheid: een theoretisch en empririsch onderzoek naar de veronderstelde band tussen werkloosheid en delinquentie bij 17-19 jarigen. Gouda Quint. Walseth, K. (2006). Sport and belonging. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 41(3), 447-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690207079510 Walsh, K., Scharf, T., Van Regenmortel, S., & Wanka, A. (2021). Social exclusion in later life: interdisciplinary and policy perspectives (p. 450). Springer Nature. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48209 Weiss, O. (2001). Identity reinforcement in sport: Revisiting the symbolic interactionist legacy. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 36, 393-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/101269001036004002 Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 11 - 17. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 50 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 30 |
||
