پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 48 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,240 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,658 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 21,747,764 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,643,119 |
اعتباریابی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامة جهتگیری منفی نسبت به مسائل در بیماران مبتلا به مالتیپل اسکلروزیس | ||
| روانشناسی سلامت | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 55، آذر 1404، صفحه 73-84 اصل مقاله (1.47 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/hpj.2025.73892.6207 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مریم شاه مرادی پیله رود1؛ مجید ضرغام حاجبی* 2؛ مالک میرهاشمی2 | ||
| 1. . دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه: مفهومِ جهتگیری منفی نسبت به مسئله با مولفههایی مانندِ ارزیابی مسائل به مثابة تهدید، ادراک از عدم خودکارآمدی و ترس از اعتماد به توانشهای فردی برای حل مسئله، بدبینی نسبت به پیامدهای فرایندِ حل مسئله و عدم تحمل ناکامی، بر نگرش منفی افراد نسبت به مسائل، دلالت دارد. این پژوهش با هدف تحلیل روانسنجی نسخة فارسی پرسشنامة جهتگیری منفی نسبت به مسئله در بیماران اسکلروز چندگانه، انجام شد. روش: در این پژوهش هبستگی، 350 بیمار (194 مرد و 156 زن) از بین مراجعه کنندگان به مرکز تصویربرداری کوثر و انجمن اماس ایران، واقع در شهر تهران، به کمک روش نمونهگیری دردسترس انتخاب و به مقیاس عدم تحمل ابهام (فرستون و همکاران، 1994)، پرسشنامه جهتگیری منفی نسبت به مشکل (رابیچاوود و دوگاس، 2005) و پرسشنامه اجتناب شناختی (سکستون و دوگاس، 2004)، پاسخ دادند. یافتهها: نتایج تحلیل عامل تاییدی از ساختار تکعاملی نسخة فارسی پرسشنامة جهتگیری منفی نسبت به مسئله در بیماران اسکلروز چندگانه، به طور تجربی حمایت کرد. همچنین، همبستگی مثبت و معنادار بین جهتگیری منفی نسبت به مسئله با اجتناب شناختی و عدم تحمل ابهام، از روایی ملاکی پرسشنامه، حمایت کرد. ضریب همسانی درونی پرسشنامه با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ 945/0 به دست آمد. نتیجهگیری: در مجموع، نتایج این پژوهش ضمن دفاع از بسندگی نقشة مفهومی معطوف بر ساختاری تکوجهی برای جهتگیری منفی نسبت به مسئله، از مشخصههای فنی روایی و پایایی نسخة فارسی پرسشنامة جهتگیری منفی نسبت به مسئله در بیماران اسکلروز چندگانه، به طور تجربی، دفاع کرد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| اعتباریابی؛ جهتگیری منفی نسبت به مسئله؛ اسکلروز چندگانه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Validation of the Persian Version of the Negative Problem Orientation Questionnaire in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Maryam Shahmoradi Pilehrood1؛ Majid Zarghamhajebi2؛ Malek Mirhashemi2 | ||
| 11. Ph.D. Student in Psychology, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University of Qom, Qom, Iran. | ||
| 2Associated Professor, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University of Qom, Qom, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a common and chronic disease of the central nervous system that leads to the destruction of neuron myelin, causing disturbances in movement, speech, memory, and other bodily functions. The exact cause of this disease is still unknown, but genetic and environmental factors play a role in its development. MS is three times more common in women than men and typically occurs between the ages of 20 and 50. The progression of the disease is unpredictable, and it can either progress rapidly or in periodic episodes. Patients with MS face anxiety and uncertainty about their future. A negative orientation towards problems, especially in the face of stress caused by the disease, leads to a reduced ability to solve problems and increased worry among patients. This study examines psychological tools, particularly the Negative Problem Orientation questionnaire, in MS patients, with the aim of validating the Persian version of this questionnaire. Method: This study was a descriptive correlational research conducted on 350 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who visited various centers in Tehran in 2022. The patients were categorized based on the duration of their illness (ranging from less than 5 years to over 20 years). The tools used included the Ambiguity Tolerance Scale and the Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire, which were translated into Persian using the back-translation method. Data analysis was performed through confirmatory factor analysis using various model fit indices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the Persian version of the Negative Problem Orientation Questionnaire in MS patients. Results: The results of the confirmatory factor analysis empirically supported the unidimensional structure of the Persian version of the Negative Problem Orientation Questionnaire in multiple sclerosis patients. Additionally, a significant positive correlation between negative problem orientation, cognitive avoidance, and ambiguity tolerance supported the construct validity of the questionnaire. The internal consistency of the questionnaire, measured by Cronbach's alpha, was found to be 0.945. This study analyzed the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Negative Problem Orientation Questionnaire in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. The results confirmed the unidimensional structure of the questionnaire, supporting its construct validity. Significant positive correlations between negative problem orientation, ambiguity intolerance, and cognitive avoidance further supported the tool's validity. Additionally, the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) confirmed the tool’s reliability. Conclusion: The findings highlighted that MS patients' negative problem orientation is linked to higher levels of ambiguity intolerance and cognitive avoidance, which aligns with previous studies. Limitations included the lack of additional psychometric tests like convergent and divergent validity and the absence of gender-based analysis in the factor structure. Despite these, the study provided strong evidence for the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the questionnaire for assessing negative problem orientation in MS patients. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Validation, Negative Problem Orientation, Multiple Sclerosis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user’s guide: SPSS. (240-260). Chicago: Small Waters Corporation. Asna-Ashari, Sh., Mohammadkhani, Sh., & Hassanabadi, H. (2017). Cognitive model of anxiety in cancer patients: The role of cognitive and metacognitive variables. Journal of Health Psychology, 6(21), 66–85. [in Persian] 20.1001.1.23221283.1396.6.21.5.7 Borthwick, C., Penlington, C., & Robinson, L. (2024). Associations between adult attachment, pain catastrophizing, psychological inflexibility and disability in adults with chronic pain. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-023-09989-7. Bottesi, G., & Ghisi, M. (2017). Evaluating negative problem orientation: Italian validation of the Negative Problem Orientation Questionnaire, Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 23 (3), 275-288. Buhr, K., & Dugas, M. J. (2002). The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 40(8), 931-945. DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00092-4 El‑Maaty, A. A. A., Sherifi, S. S. E., El‑Gilany, A. H., Zehry, H. I., Salim, A. A., Rohiem, M. F., & Ismael, A. F. (2024). Arabic translation, content validity and reliability of the Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire‑19 (MSISQ‑19). The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 60, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00817-9 Esfahani, A. A., Pourshahbaz, A., & Dolatshahi, B. (2024). Structural relations of illness perception, fatigue, locus of control, self-efficacy, and coping strategies in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 24, 1354-1365. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18807-0 Esrafian, F., Farahani, H., & Bagheri Shikhangfasha, F. (2025). Structural modeling of the relationship between emotional regulation and mindfulness with emotion regulation as a mediator in patients with multiple sclerosis. Quarterly Journal of Health Psychology, 13(1), 83–98. .[in Persian].10.22070/cpap.2023.16191.1227 Freeston, M. H., Rheaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M. J., &Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 791-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90048-5 Guarnaccia, G. B., Njike, V. Y., Dutton, A., Ayettey, R. G., Treu, J. A., Comerford, B. P., 0& Sinha, R. (2023). A pilot, randomized, placebo‑controlled study of mindfulness meditation in treating insomnia in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurology, 23, 263-278. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03309-0 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed., pp. 125–857). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Hanna, M., & Strober, L. B. (2020). Anxiety and depression in Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Antecedents, consequences, and differential impact on well-being and quality of life. Multiple Sclerosis Related Disorders, 44, 102261. DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102261 Horenstein, A., Rogers, A. H., Bakhshaie, J., Zvolensky, M. J., & Heimberg, R. G. (2019). Examining the role of anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty in the relationship between health anxiety and likelihood of medical care utilization. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 43, 55–65.doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102660 Jellinger, K. A. (2024). Depression and anxiety in multiple sclerosis. Review of a fatal combination. Journal of Neural Transmission, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-024-02792-0. Khosh, H., Sadeghi Firoozabadi, V., Dehghani, M., Khatibi, A., Naser Moghadassi, A., & Abdolmanafi, V. (2025). The relationship between treatment adherence and depression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients: The moderating role of executive functions. Quarterly Journal of Health Psychology, 13(3), 99–114. .[in Persian] https://civilica.com/doc/1860827 Khoshbavar Rostami, S., Baradaran, M., & Ranjbar Nosheri, F. (2025). The Role of Pain Catastrophizing, Perceived Tension and Experiential Avoidance in Loneliness of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Quarterly Journal of Health Psychology, 13(1), 143–155.[in Persian] https://www.magiran.com/p2755676 Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practices of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd Eds.). New York: Guilford. Kodosaki, E., Watkins, W. J., Loveless, S., Kreft, K. L., Richards, A., Anderson, V., Hurler, L., Robertson, N. P., Zelek, W. M., & Tallantyre, E. C. (2024). Combination protein biomarkers predict multiple sclerosis diagnosis and outcomes. Journal of Neuroinflammation, 21, 52-67. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-024-03036-4 Kusec, A., Murphy, F. C., Peers, P. V., & Manly, T. (2024). Measuring intolerance of uncertainty after acquired brain injury: Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale–12. Assessment, 31(4) 794–811. DOI: 10.1177/10731911231182693 Landmark, L., Sunde, H. F., Fors, E. A., Kennair, L. E. O., Sayadian, A. Backelin, C., & Reme, S. E. (2024). Associations between pain intensity, psychosocial factors, and pain-related disability in 4285 patients with chronic pain. Scientific Reports, 14, 13477. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64059-8 Lleraa, S. J., & Newman, M. G. (2023). Incremental validity of the contrast avoidance model: A comparison with intolerance of uncertainty and negative problem orientation. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 95: 102699.DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102699 Meyers, L. S., Gamest. G., & Goarin, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research, design and interpretation. Thousand oaks. London. New Deihi, Sage publication. 9781506329765 Pennington, C. R., Oxtoby, M. C. S., & Shaw, D. J. (2023). Social Cognitive Disruptions in Multiple Sclerosis: The role of executive (dys)function. Neuropsychology, 38 (2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000917 Pourhaji, F., Jamali, J., Mahdizadeh Taraghdar, M., Peyman, N., & Tehrani, H., (2024). Design and validation of a Questionnaire on the factors influencing self-care behaviors in patients with Multiple sclerosis (QFASMS). BMC Neurology, 24, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03522-x Rivel, M., Achiron, A., Stern, Y., Zeilig, G., & Defrin, R. (2024). Emotional burden among MS patients: associations between specific chronic pain diagnoses and psychological features. Journal of Neurology, 271:688–698. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-12048-8 Robichaud, M., & Dugas, M. J. (2005). Negative problem orientation (Part I): Psychometric properties of a new measure. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 391–401. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.02.007 Sexston, K. A., Dugas, M. J. (2004). An investigation of the factors leading to cognitive avoidance in worry. Poster presented at the annual convention of the association for advancement of behavior therapy, New Orleans, LA. Shahnawaz, M., Nabi, W., Nabi, S., Afaq, M., Paul, M. A., War, F. A., & Shah, N. N. (2024). Relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and symptom severity in Covid-19 patients: the mediating role of illness perception and Covid‑19 fear. Current Psychology, 43, 13945–13952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03577-y Sparaco, M., Miele, G., Abbadessa, G., Ippolito, D., Trojsi, F., Lavorgna, L., & Bonavita, S. (2022). Pain, quality of life, and religiosity in people with multiple sclerosis. Neurological Sciences, 43, 3247–3254. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05759-1 Sturgeon, J. A., Zubieta, C., Kaplan, C. M., Pierce, J., Arewasikporn, A., Slepian, P. M., Hassett, A. L., & Trost, Z. (2024). Broadening the scope of resilience in chronic pain: Methods, social context, and development. Current Rheumatology Reports, 26, 112–123. DOI: 10.1007/s11926-024-01133-0 Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. (p.934), Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Xiao, H., Lin, R., Wu, Q., Shen, S., & Yan, Y. (2020). Negative Problems Orientation Questionnaire for Chinese Adolescents: Bifactor model and measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:608676.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.608676 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 10 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 5 |
||