پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,308 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,245 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 23,476,179 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,805,213 |
طراحی مدل رهبری قوتمدار در دانشگاه پیام نور با راهبرد دادهبنیاد | ||
| مدیریت سازمانهای دولتی | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 14، شماره 2 (پیاپی 54)، فروردین 1405، صفحه 225-246 اصل مقاله (1.7 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: اکتشافی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ipom.2026.73733.5136 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فرشید اصلانی* 1؛ مرضیه محمدی2 | ||
| 1استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| براساس پژوهشهای روانشناسی مثبت، زمانی که کارکنان به جای تمرکز بر نقاط ضعف خود، بر نقاط قوتشان متمرکز شوند، به احتمال بیشتری به سطوح بهینه عملکرد در کار دست پیدا میکنند. پژوهش حاضر ارائهدهندهی الگوی رهبری قوتمدار در دانشگاه پیام نوراست. این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی – اکتشافی مبتنی بر رویکرد دادهبنیاد است. ابزار جمعآوری دادهها، مصاحبه نیمهساختاریافته است. نمونه آماری شامل 15 نفر از خبرگان، شامل خبرگان علمی و اجرایی مدیریتی بود که به روش نمونهگیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. برای تحلیل دادههای کیفی پژوهش، از نرمافزارMAXQDA 2020 استفاده شد. 29 کد فرعی از پاسخ خبرگان، استخراج شد. بررسی مضامین مصاحبههای انجام شده و سازماندهی مقولههای فرعی نشان داد، رهبری قوت مدار به عنوان پدیده محوری ناشی از شرایط علّی مانند آموزش، روحیه همکاری، ویژگیهای شخصیتی و قوت مداری شکل خواهد گرفت. کنشهای ارتقای مهارتها، ارزشیابی و تیم محوری در مدل رهبری قوت مدار، پیامدهایی مانند توسعه سازمانی، خلاقیت، رضایت شغلی و مشارکت سازمانی را در پی خواهد داشت. هرچند در این الگو، عوامل زمینهای نظیر ساختار، فرهنگ و محیط سازمانی و شرایط مداخلهگر، روابط را تحت تاثیر قرار خواهند داد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| سبک رهبری؛ رهبری قوتمدار؛ نظریه دادهبنیاد؛ دانشگاه پیام نور | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Designing a Strengths-Based Leadership Model at Payame Noor University with a Grounded Theory Strategy | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Farshid Aslani1؛ Marzieh Mohammadi2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Public Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2MSc. Department of Public Manegement, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Leadership is the cornerstone of all organizational achievements (Ly, 2024) and is recognized as a key component of organizational success (Klein, Wallis, & Cooke, 2013; Subramanian & Banihashemi, 2024). While diverse leadership styles have been proposed for effective organizational management (Van Jaarsveld, Mentz, & Ellis, 2019), traditional styles often fall short in today's fast-paced and complex world, limiting collaboration, creativity, and individual growth by applying a uniform approach that ignores individual differences among employees (Tang, 2019). Consequently, a shift in leadership style can significantly enhance organizational performance (Nguyen, Hang, Hiep, & Flynn, 2023).Research in positive psychology demonstrates that every individual possesses a unique set of strengths which, when identified and utilized, can lead to superior performance (Peterson & Seligman, 2004; Meyers & van Woerkom, 2017; Wood et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2023). Engagement in activities aligned with one's strengths boosts performance, learning, and well-being (Harzer & Ruch, 2013, 2014; Pezirkianidis et al., 2023; Stavropoulou et al., 2024; Van Woerkom et al., 2016; Clifton & Nelson, 1995). Strengths-based interventions guide individuals toward meaningful and purposeful behaviors, fostering personal and organizational growth (Peterson & Seligman, 2004; Stavropoulou et al., 2024; van Woerkom et al., 2022).Strengths-based leadership, defined as a unique style of positive leadership focusing on the strengths of both leaders and followers (Ding & Yu, 2020a), operates on the belief that focusing solely on weaknesses yields average performance, whereas leveraging individual capabilities leads to higher achievement (Soria, Werner, Roholt, & Capeder, 2019; Clifton & Harter, 2003). Such leaders experience greater autonomy, job satisfaction, and performance, positively influencing organizational culture (Linley, Woolston, & Biswas-Diener, 2009; Linley et al., 2011; Hubley, Gottlieb, & Durrant, 2022; Lavoie-Tremblay et al., 2024). They foster employee strengths and manage weaknesses constructively by redesigning jobs and creating supportive environments (Aguinis, Gottfredson, & Joo, 2012; Ge et al., 2024; van Woerkom et al., 2024), based on the premise that individuals are intrinsically motivated to flourish (Meyers & van Woerkom, 2017; Pezirkianidis et al., 2020), with their greatest growth potential lying in their strengths (Buckingham & Clifton, 2001; Burkus, 2011; Clifton & Harter, 2003), leading to a greater sense of meaningfulness (Harzer & Ruch, 2013).Universities, given their specific mission, must regularly evaluate their performance. Identifying strengths through evaluation helps create effective strategies for planning and achieving strategic goals (Rashidi & Rashidi, 2022). Leadership in universities is complex and distinct, requiring specific skills and competencies due to diverse objectives, social responsibilities, and traditional values (Rahimzadeh Kalaleh et al., 2021). As key institutions for knowledge production and human capital development, universities need leaders who can adapt to their complex, dynamic structure, particularly in interactions with faculty and students (Hosseini, Enayati, & Niyaz Azari, 2024). Research indicates that the performance of large institutions like universities is intertwined with leadership skills, where leaders play a pioneering role in guiding success and organizational excellence (Rony et al., 2023; Young, 2023; Khadivi et al., 2025). Given that an efficient and capable workforce is the most valuable resource of any university (Parasteh et al., 2023; Alimohammadi, Rezaei Zadeh, & Haqiqat Monfared, 2024), and university performance depends heavily on the capability of its staff, especially faculty members (Hofmeyr, 2023; Saki et al., 2024), identifying and implementing an appropriate leadership style is essential (Rony et al., 2023). This can be achieved through strengths-based leadership, which allocates tasks according to employees' capabilities, stimulates teamwork, and creates complementary competencies to mitigate the impact of weaknesses (Wang et al., 2023). Such leadership enhances job satisfaction, improves interpersonal relationships, and increases organizational effectiveness (Niemiec, 2018). The need for this approach is particularly critical at Payame Noor University (PNU), a vast institution characterized by geographical dispersion and structural complexity. PNU faces challenges including a distance education system that reduces teacher-student interaction and impacts teaching quality, an over-reliance on theoretical education neglecting practical skills, and increasing workload pressure on staff and faculty leading to potential burnout and turnover. These challenges necessitate capable, strategic leadership to guide and improve the university's educational and organizational conditions. Therefore, this study aims to identify the key components of strengths-based leadership within PNU's context and develop a model using the Grounded Theory strategy, addressing a significant research and organizational gap. The main research question is: What model explains strengths-based leadership at Payame Noor University? Mothodology This study employed a qualitative approach using the Grounded Theory strategy (Strauss & Corbin, 1998). The participants were 15 experts from Payame Noor University, selected through purposive sampling. The criterion for determining the sample size was theoretical saturation, achieved by the eighth interview; however, fifteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted to ensure data richness. Participants were selected based on their employment in managerial positions and/or membership in the academic faculty of management and behavioral sciences departments at PNU, ensuring deep experience and awareness of the research context. To ensure research quality and trustworthiness, principles of credibility, confirmability, transferability, and dependability were adhered to (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Credibility was enhanced through member checking (where findings were shared with participants for feedback) and peer review by qualitative methodology experts. Confirmability was achieved by meticulously documenting all stages of data coding, analysis, and interpretation, ensuring the process was traceable. The use of MAXQDA 2020 software aided in transparent and systematic analysis. Transferability was supported by providing detailed characteristics of the participants allowing readers to assess the potential for transferring findings to similar contexts. Dependability was ensured through accurate recording of the research process and methodical reporting.Data collection was conducted through semi-structured, in-depth interviews. The interview protocol included open-ended questions developed based on the literature and research objectives, covering topics such as the concept of strengths-based leadership, causal conditions, contextual factors, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences. Interviews lasted 60-90 minutes and were recorded with participant consent.Data analysis followed the systematic grounded theory procedure outlined by Strauss and Corbin (1992, 1998), involving three coding stages: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, facilitated by MAXQDA 2020. Findings The analysis of the interview data led to the extraction of 29 sub-codes. The core category emerging from the data was Strengths-Based Leadership, identified as the central phenomenon. The analysis resulted in a paradigm model consisting of six main categories and 29 subcategories: Causal Conditions:These are the factors that influence the emergence of strengths-based leadership. Ten causal conditions were identified: Training, Effective Communication, Talent Development, Autonomy, Organizational Trust, Motivation, Continuous Feedback, Spirit of Cooperation, Strengths-Based Mindset, and Personality Traits of leaders. Contextual Conditions:These are the general environmental factors that influence the strategies. Four contextual conditions were identified: Organizational Goals, Organizational Structure, Organizational Culture, and Organizational Environment. Intervening Conditions:These are specific conditions that can hinder or facilitate the strategies. Four intervening conditions were identified: Organizational Politicization, Organizational Crisis, Managerial Weakness, and Resistance to Change. Phenomenon (Core Category):Strengths-Based Leadership. This was characterized by five key dimensions: Focusing on Strengths, Empowering Employees, Creating Motivation and Team Spirit, Strengthening Skills and Positive Attributes, and a tendency towards a Participative Leadership Style. Strategies/Actions:These are the actions taken by leaders in response to the phenomenon. Three core strategies were identified: Skills Enhancement, Evaluation (focused on strengths), and Team-Centricity. Consequences:These are the outcomes of implementing the strategies. Seven consequences were identified: Organizational Development, Creativity and Innovation, Job Satisfaction, Team Spirit, Dominance (influence based on expertise and acceptance), Organizational Performance, and Organizational Participation. The axial coding process integrated these categories into a coherent paradigm model ,illustrating the dynamic relationships. For instance, causal conditions like training foster the adoption of strengths-based leadership. Leaders then employ strategies like skills enhancement. The success of these strategies is affected by the organizational context (e.g., a supportive culture helps) and intervening conditions (e.g., resistance to change can hinder progress). The effective implementation of strategies leads to positive consequences like increased job satisfaction and organizational development. Selective coding yielded core propositions, such as: "Causal conditions influence the adoption of strengths-based leadership," and "The strategies of the strengths-based leadership model lead to positive organizational outcomes." Conclusion and Discussion This study successfully designed a contextualized model for strengths-based leadership at Payame Noor University. The findings indicate that strengths-based leadership, as a transformative approach centered on leveraging individual and collective capacities, can effectively address the specific challenges faced by PNU, such as geographical dispersion, workload pressure, and the need for improved educational quality.The model highlights that the implementation of this leadership style is not isolated but is driven by foundational causal conditions like continuous training, effective communication, and organizational trust. Leaders must actively pursue strategies focused on enhancing skills, implementing constructive evaluation systems, and fostering teamwork. However, the path is moderated by intervening conditions like resistance to change and organizational politicization, which require proactive management through transparent leadership and participatory change processes. The potential outcomes—ranging from improved job satisfaction and creativity to enhanced organizational performance—underscore the significant value of adopting this model. The findings align with previous national and international studies on the positive impacts of strengths-based and empowering leadership on performance, job engagement, and professional development (e.g., Pouralef, 2024; Doosti et al., 2024; Ghanbari & Mohammadi, 2023; van Woerkom et al., 2024; Wang & Ding, 2024). For successful implementation at PNU and similar educational institutions, the study proposes several recommendations based on the model's components: This research contributes to the field by providing an empirically-grounded model tailored to the context of a large, decentralized university, moving beyond theoretical discussion to offer an actionable framework. Future research could conduct comparative studies in different organizational contexts, investigate the impact of this model on variables like stress reduction and psychological well-being, and explore the dynamics of leader-follower interactions within a strengths-based framework in greater depth. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Leadership Style, Strengths-Based Leadership, Grounded Theory, Payame Noor University | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2012). Delivering effective performance feedback: the strengths-based approach. Business Horizons, 55(2), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.004 Alimohammadi, M., Rezaei Zadeh, M., & Haqiqat Monfared, J. (2024). Designing and validating a third-generation human resource education model in Iranian medical universities. Journal of Iranian Association of Management Sciences, 19(73), 29–56. (In Persian)https://doi.org/10.100/jiams.2024.8798.7694 Amini, M., Mulavizada, S., & Nikzad, H. (2019). The impact of autocratic, democratic and laissez-fair leadership style on employee motivation and commitment: A case study of afghan wireless communication company (Awcc). Journal of Business and Management, 21, 45–50. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2106014550 Amiri, N., Rahim, R., & Ahmed, G. (2020). Leadership styles and organizational knowledge management activities: A systematic review. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 22(3), 250–275. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.49926 Arriagada-Venegas, M., Ariño-Mateo, E., Ramírez-Vielma, R., Nazar-Carter, G., & Pérez-Jorge, D. (2022). Authentic leadership and its relationship with job satisfaction: The mediator role of organizational dehumanization. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 18(4), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.6125 Asgari, H., & Zandi, R. (2023). Examining the impact of empowering leadership on self-leadership of employees. 9th National Congress on Recent Findings in Management and Industrial Engineering with an Emphasis on Empowerment and Competitive Intelligence, Tehran. (In Persian) Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095 Berkowitz, D., & Krause, G. (2020). How bureaucratic leadership shapes policy outcomes: Partisan politics and affluent citizens’ incomes in the American states. Journal of Public Policy, 40(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X18000405 Bolaji, J. (2024). Strengths based leading: Leveraging character strengths to improve staff well-being. [Publisher information, if available]. Breevaart, K., & de Vries, R. (2021). Followers’ HEXACO personality traits and preference for charismatic, relationship-oriented, and task-oriented leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09671-6 Buckingham, M., & Clifton, D. O. (2001). Now, discover your strengths. New York, NY: Free Press / Gallup Press. Burkus, D. (2011). Building the strong organization: Exploring the role of organizational design in strengths-based leadership. Journal of Strategic Leadership, 3(1), 54–66. Chivayi, N.(2023). The impact of human resource management on innovation performance through the mediating role of empowering leadership. Human Resources and Capital Journal, 3(1), 33-57. Clifton, D. O., & Harter, J. K. (2003). Investing in strengths. In A. K. S. Cameron, B. J. E. Dutton, & C. R. E. Quinn (Eds.). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 111-121). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. Clifton, J., & Harter, J. K. (2021). Wellbeing at work: How to build resilient and thriving teams. Gallup Press. Clifton, D. O., & Nelson, P. (1995). Soar with your strengths: A simple yet revolutionary philosophy of business and management. Dell. Daniels, E., Hondeghem, A., & Dochy, F. (2019). A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educational Research Review, 27, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.003 Díaz, E. S. P. (2023). Evolution of leadership and its impact on knowledge management: Knowledge in the history of leadership. In Leadership and organizational sustainability: The knowledge management approach (1st ed., pp. 140–157). Taylor and Francis. Ding, H., & Quan, G. (2021). How and when does follower’s strengths-based leadership relate to follower innovative behavior: The roles of self-efficacy and emotional exhaustion. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.473 Ding, H., & Yu, E. (2020a). Follower strengths-based leadership and follower innovative behavior: The roles of core self-evaluations and psychological well-being. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 36(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a8. Ding, H., & Yu, E. (2020b). Subordinate-oriented strengths-based leadership and subordinate job performance: The mediating effect of supervisor–subordinate guanxi. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(8), 1107–1118. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2019-0414. Ding, H., & Yu, E. (2021a). Followers’ strengths-based leadership and strengths use of followers: The roles of trait emotional intelligence and role overload. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110300 Ding, H., Liu, J., & Yu, E. (2024). How and when do strengths work? The effect of strengths-based leadership on follower career satisfaction. Personnel Review, 53(6), 1392-1407. Ding, H., Yu, E., & Li, Y. (2020). Strengths-based leadership and its impact on task performance: A preliminary study. SouthAfrican Journal of Business Management, 51 (1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v51i1.1832 Doosti, A., Ashrafi, M., Khorrami, Z., & Ameri, F. (2024). The impact of strengths-based leadership on work motivation in a multi-source study. 18th National Conference on Management Research and Humanities Studies in Iran, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian) Drath, W. H. (2001). The deep blue sea: Rethinking the source of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Egitim, S. (2024). Promoting gender-inclusive leadership perceptions among Japanese university students: A nine-week critical inquiry-based action learning program. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7, 100362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100362 Espejo-Pereda, J. E., García-Salirrosas, E. E., Villar-Guevara, M., & Fernández-Mallma, I. (2025). Leadership Styles in Non-Profit Institutions: An Empirical Study for the Validation and Reliability of a Scale in the Latin American Context. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020130 Ghanbari, S., & Mohammadi, P. (2023). The role of empowering leadership of school principals in teachers' professional development with the mediating role of organizational learning. Applied Educational Leadership, 4(2), 23-40. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22098/ael.2023.11797.1182 Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Xiong, R., Liu, S., & Yu, H. (2024). Leadership or Self-Based Strengths for Sustainable Careers? The Compensatory Effect via Adaptability. Academy of Management Journal, 1, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.17718abstract Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2013). The application of signature character strengths and positive experiences at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 965-983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9364-0 Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2014). The role of character strengths for task performance, jobdedication, interpersonal facilitation, and organizational support. HumanPerformance, 27(3), 183-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2014.913592. Hazzam, J., & Wilkins, S. (2023). The influences of lecturer charismatic leadership and technology use on student online engagement, learning performance, and satisfaction. Computers and Education, 200, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104809 Hofmeyr, A. S. (2023). Rethinking the concept of global human resources in the Japanese higher education context. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.1855572 Hosseini, N. K., Enayati, T., & Niyaz Azari, K. (2024). A comparative study of leadership styles in Islamic Azad Universities of Iran and universities in Canada. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 7(2), 2917–2935. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/ijce.2023.378509.1459 Hubley, P., Gottlieb, L. N., & Durrant, M. (2022). Influencing Work Culture: A Strengths-Based Nursing Leadership and Management Education Program. Nursing Leadership (1910-622X), 35(1). https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2022.26752 Huynh, T. N., & Hua, N. (2020). The relationship between task-oriented leadership style, psychological capital, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Evidence from Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 17(4), 583–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-03-2020-0036 Khadivi, A., Rahmani, H., Haqiqat, H., & Arifnejad, S. (2025). Designing a competency model for the managers of Farhangian University. Public Administration Management, 17(1), 257-284. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jipa.2024.379635.3541. Klein, A.S., Wallis, J., & Cooke, R.A. (2013). The impact of leadership styles on organisational culture and firm effectiveness: An empirical study. Journal of Management & Organisation, 19 (3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2013.34 Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Press. Loucky, J., & Ware, J. (2016). Flipped instruction methods and digital technologies in the language learning classroom. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0824-3 Lavoie-Tremblay, M., Boies, K., Clausen, C., Frechette, J., Manning, K., Gelsomini, C., ... & Gottlieb, L. N. (2024). Nursing leaders’ perceptions of the impact of the Strengths-Based Nursing and Healthcare Leadership program three months post training. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 6, 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100190 León, F., & Morales, O. (2018). Effects of people-oriented leadership and subordinate employability on call center withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a7 Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications. Linley, A., Nielsen, K., Wood, A., Gillett, R., & Biswar-Diener, R. (2011). Using signature strengths in pursuit of goals: Effects on goal progress. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5, 6–15. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2010.5.1.6 Linley, A., Woolston, L., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). Strengths coaching with leaders. International Coaching Psychology Review, 4, 20-31. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-05739-005 Linley, P., Govindji, R., & West, M. (2007). Positive psychology approaches to public services leadership: An introduction to strengths-based leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 3(4), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/17479886200700029 Ly, B. (2024). Inclusion leadership and employee work engagement: The role of organizational commitment in Cambodian public organization. Asia Pacific Management Review, 29(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.06.003 Meyers, M. C., & van Woerkom, M. (2017). Effects of a strengths intervention on general and work-related well-being: The mediating role of positive affect. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(3), 671-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9745-x Nateghi, A. A. (2022). Investigating the impact of transparency and accountability on organizational trust. The 1st National Conference on Promoting Transparency and Its Role in Administrative Health and Combating Corruption, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian) Nedelko, Z., & Potocan, V. (2021). Sustainability of organizations: The contribution of personal values to democratic leadership behavior focused on the sustainability of organizations. Sustainability, 13(8), 4207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084207 Nguyen, N. P., Hang, N. T. T., Hiep, N., & Flynn, O. (2023). Does transformational leadership influence organisational culture and organisational performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging country. IIMB Management Review, 35(4), 382-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2023.10.001 Niemiec, R. M. (2018). Strengths-based leading: Leveraging character strengths to improve staff well-being. VIA Institute on Character. https://www.viacharacter.org Northouse, G. P. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications. O’Brien, J., Murphy, D., Draper, J., Forde, C., & McMahon, M. (2016). School leadership. Liverpool University Press. Parasteh, F., Abdollahi, M., Jahaniyan, R., & Karimi, H. (2023). Designing an academic education system based on knowledge-based economy. Human Resource Excellence, 4(2), 34–54. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/hrx.2023.382419.1467 Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). All those years ago: The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared Leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. Pezirkianidis, C., Galanaki, E., Raftopoulou, G., Moraitou, D., & Stalikas, A. (2023). Adult friendship and wellbeing: A systematic review with practical implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1059057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059057 Pezirkianidis, C., Karamanlis, A., & Charalambous, V. (2020). Character strengths interventions. In A. Stalikas, V. Yotsidi, & E. Karakasidou (Eds.), Conquering wellbeing: Positive interventions, technical exercises and activities (pp. 47-101). Topos. Pouralef, K. (2024). Leadership based on strengths and job enthusiasm of employees: A multi-source study. The 16th National Conference on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities, Psychology and Counseling, Shirvan, Iran. (In Persian) Rahimzadeh Kalaleh, A., Ghiyasi Nedoushan, S., Rahimian, H., Khorsandi Tazkouh, A., & Ahmadi, F. (2021). A systematic review of effective leadership in medical sciences universities. Research in Educational Systems, 5(1), 0-10. (In Persian) Rashidi, Z., & Rashidi, H. (2022). A model for ranking educational groups in Iranian universities. Civilica. (In Persian) Rath, T., & Conchie, B. (2008). Strengths-based leadership: Great leaders, teams, and why people follow. Gallup Press. Rony, Z., Lestari, T. S., Ismaniah, & Yasin, M. (2023). The complexity of leadership competence in universities in the 21st century. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2276986. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2276986 Saki, M., Khorshidi, A., Faghih Aram, B., Hejazi, A., & Rezaei, M. (2024). Designing a model for empowering faculty members of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences with a mixed approach. Management, Education and Development in the Digital Age, 1(4), 38–55. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.61838/medda.1.4.3 Singh, A., Lim, W., Jha, S., Kumar, S., & Ciasullo, M. (2023). The state of the art of strategic leadership. Journal of Business Research, 158, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113676 Soria, K. M., Werner, L., Roholt, C. V., & Capeder, A. (2019). Strengths-based approaches in co-curricular and curricular leadership: Opportunities to magnify students’ thriving. Journal of Leadership Education, 18(1), 116-132. Stavropoulou, E., Pezirkianidis, C., Kounenou, K., & Stalikas, A. (2024). A Pilot strength-based group counselling intervention on career calling and well-being. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.26262/hjp.v21i1.9693 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. Subramanian, S. N., & Banihashemi, S. (2024). Towards Modern Leadership Styles in the Context of the Engineering Sector. Project Leadership and Society, 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2024.100133 Tang, K. N. (2019). Leadership and Change management. Singapore: Springer Singapore. van Dierendonck, D., & Patterson, K. (2025). Servant leadership: An introduction. In Servant leadership: Developments in theory and research (pp. 3-14). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. Van Jaarsveld, L., Mentz, P. J. (K.), & Ellis, S. (2019). Implementing the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) in a challenging context: Results from a large-scale quantitative study. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(4), 604–613 Van Woerkom, M., Bauwens, R., Gürbüz, S., & Brouwers, E. (2024). Enhancing person-job fit: who needs a strengths-based leader to fit their job?. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 154, 104044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104044 Van Woerkom, M., Meyers, M., & Bakker, A. (2022). Considering strengths use in organizations as a multilevel construct. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr. 2020.100767 Van Woerkom, M., Mostert, K., Els, C., Bakker, A., de Beer, L., & Rothmann, S., Jr. (2016). Strengths use and deficit correction in organizations: Development and validation of a questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(6), 960–975. https://doi.org/10. 1080/1359432X.2016.1193010 Wang, F., & Ding, H. (2024). How to Elicit Organizational Citizenship Behavior? The Role of Strengths-Based Leadership. Journal of Career Development, 08948453241256129. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453241256129 Wang, J., van Woerkom, M., Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., & Xu, S. (2023). Strengths-based leadership and employee work engagement: A multi-source study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 142, 103859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103859 Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2010.08.004 Young, M. (2023). The development of educational leaders: History and contemporary practice in the United States. In International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed., pp. 370–380). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.05050-8. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 270 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 74 |
||
