پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,261 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,847 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 22,204,549 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,929,166 |
از سیاست تا عمل در تحول دیجیتال آموزشعالی: ارائه یک نقشه راه جامع مبتنی بر فراترکیب | ||
| فناوری و دانش پژوهی در تعلیم و تربیت | ||
| دوره 5، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 18، دی 1404، صفحه 139-146 اصل مقاله (626.84 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/t-edu.2025.75341.1307 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فرمند فرزین* 1؛ زهرا جامه بزرگ2 | ||
| 1دکتری تکنولوژی آموزشی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علومتربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران. مدیر هسته پژوهشی بومی گرایی طراحی یادگیری و تولید رسانههای دیجیتال مبتنی بر فرهنگ ایرانی. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تحول دیجیتال آموزشعالی با چالش کلیدی «شکاف میان سیاست و عمل» روبروست که اغلب به پذیرش پراکنده و ناهماهنگ فناوری در دانشگاهها منجر میشود. این پژوهش با هدف ارائه یک نقشه راه جامع برای عبور از این شکاف و هدایت راهبردی تحول دیجیتال با تمرکز بر فناوریهای هوشمند (مانند هوشمصنوعی) و همگرا (NBIC) انجام شدهاست. این نقشه راه با بهرهگیری از روش فراترکیب کیفی (سندلوسکی و با روسو، ۲۰۰۷) و تحلیل ۶۲ منبع معتبر (۲۰۱۴-۲۰۲۵) شامل مقالات علمی از پایگاههای دادهای مانند Scopus و Web of Science، گزارشهای سیاستی نهادهای بینالمللی و رتبهبندیهای جهانی تدوین شدهاست. یافتهها در چهارچوب یک بسته سیاستی یکپارچه سازماندهیشدهاند که بر چهار رکن اصلی استوار است: ۱) معیارهای کلیدی موفقیت بهعنوان مبانی راهبردی (شامل زیرساخت فناورانه، آمادگی سازمانی، توانمندسازی انسانی و عدالت آموزشی)؛ ۲) راهکارهای اجرایی بهعنوان مسیر عملیاتی (شامل توسعه زیرساخت، آموزش مستمر، نوآوری در برنامهریزی درسی و همکاریهای راهبردی)؛ ۳) چارچوب اخلاقی-حقوقی برای تضمین حکمرانی مسئولانه (با تأکید بر حریم خصوصی، شفافیت و عدالت الگوریتمی) و ۴) شاخصهای ارزیابی جامع برای سنجش پیشرفت و نتایج (شامل عملکرد فنی، نتایج آموزشی و رقابتپذیری جهانی). نوآوری اصلی این مدل در ارائه یک ساختار یکپارچه، چرخهای و مبتنی بر شواهد است که با پیوند دادن مستقیم هر راهکار به معیارهای موفقیت و شاخصهای ارزیابی، ابزاری قدرتمند در اختیار سیاستگذاران و مدیران دانشگاهی قرار میدهد تا گذار از سیاستگذاری پراکنده به عمل یکپارچه را ممکن ساخته و مؤسسات خود را به جایگاهی راهبردی و آیندهنگر سوق دهند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| تحول دیجیتال؛ آموزشعالی؛ نقشه راه سیاستی؛ فناوری هوشمند؛ فناوری همگرا | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| From Policy to Practice in the Digital Transformation of Higher Education: A Comprehensive Roadmap Based on a Meta-Synthesis | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Farmand Farzin1؛ Zahra Jamebozorg2 | ||
| 12. PhD in Educational Technology, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. Director of the Research Core on Nativeism, Learning Design, and Digital Media Production Based on Iranian Culture | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The digital transformation of higher education faces the key challenge of a "gap between policy and practice, " which often leads to the sporadic and uncoordinated adoption of technology in universities. This research is intended to present a comprehensive roadmap to bridge this gap and strategically guide digital transformation with a focus on smart technologies (such as Artificial Intelligence) and converging technologies (NBIC). Utilizing the qualitative meta-synthesis method (Sandelowski & Barroso) and analyzing over 50 authoritative sources (2014–2025), including scholarly articles, policy reports, and global rankings, this study develops the roadmap. The roadmap is built upon four main, interdependent pillars, including key success criteria as strategic foundations, executive strategies as the operational path, an ethical-legal framework to ensure responsible governance, and comprehensive evaluation indicators to measure progress and outcomes. The primary innovation of this model lies in its cyclical and dynamic structure, which transforms the roadmap into a learning and adaptive tool by continuously using evaluation results to refine strategies. By providing a practical and evidence-based path, this research offers a powerful tool for policymakers and university administrators to enable the transition from fragmented policymaking to integrated practice, positioning their institutions for a strategic and forward-looking future. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Digital Transformation, Higher Education, Policy Roadmap, Smart Technology, Converging Technologies | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al-Emran, M. Elsherif, H. M & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93–102.
Baker, J. (2018). Technology integration in education: Policy and practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 1055–1069.
Baker, R. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(3), 492–505.
Baker, R. S & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology (pp. 1–25). Springer.
Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Tony Bates Associates.
Bates, A. W & Sangra, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Bennett, S & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the 'digital natives' debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331.
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Bisri, A. Putri, A & Rosmansyah, Y. (2023). A systematic literature review on digital transformation in higher education: Revealing key success factors. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(14), 164–187.
Budnyk, O & Kotyk, M. (2020). Use of information and communication technologies in the inclusive process of educational institutions. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 7(1), 15–23.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
Cheung, S. K. S. Kwok, L. F. Phusavat, K & Um, T. (2021). Shaping the future learning environments with smart elements: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 16.
Communications Regulatory Authority of Iran. (2024). Home. Retrieved from https://www.cra.ir/
Dabbagh, N & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.
Dehbi, A. Bakhouyi, A. Khaddar, A. M & Talea, M. (2025). Education and smart technologies: towards a new pedagogical paradigm. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 14(1).
Ertmer, P. A & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
Firdausi, N. Fithriyah, N. N. Ummah, R. Abidin, M. A. Nirwana, R. Achmad, W & Kuswanto, F. (2024). Integrating smart education in basic education: a systematic review of roles and challenges. International Conferences on Information Science and System.
Fredricks, J. A. Blumenfeld, P. C & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Freigang, S. Schlenker, L & Köhler, T. (2018). A conceptual framework for designing smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 5, 27.
Garrison, D. R & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Gonzalez, T. (2021). Higher education response to COVID-19: A global perspective. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 4(1), 1–20.
Haerani, R. Rahman, T. K. A & Fatah, A. (2024). Framework for assessing the performance of hierarchical organizations in adoption of higher education information system. ICMRSI.
Harris, J & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 4087–4095.
Hartati, S. Sumarto, S. Nurdin, D & Suryana, A. (2023). Taking up the challenges faced by higher education institutions in technology to create smart campus. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(4).
Khalil, M. K & Ebner, M. (2019). MOOCs completion rates and the role of social presence. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–18.
Kirkwood, A & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is 'enhanced' and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
Luckin, R. Holmes, W. Griffiths, M & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
McGreal, R. (2013). Quality assurance guidelines for open educational resources. Commonwealth of Learning.
Melliti, M & Henchiri, M. (2024). Advancing autonomy in tunisian higher education: exploring the role of technology in empowering learners. Educational Technology Quarterly.
Ministry of Information and Communications Technology of Iran. (2023). Home. Retrieved from https://www.ict.gov.ir/
Mokenela, P. J. (2019). Developing a pedagogical framework for blended distance learning at the national university of lesotho [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of South Africa.
Peters, M. A. Jandrić, P & Hayes, S. (2018). The role of technology in higher education: A global perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(4), 301–309.
Motallebinejad, A. Fazeli, F & Navaii, E. (2023). A systematic review of the promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers. Technology and Scholarship in Education, 3(1), 23-44. [In Persian]. doi: 10.30473/t-edu.2023.68819.1101
Plan and Budget Organization of Iran. (2023). Home. Retrieved from https://www.mporg.ir/
QS World University Rankings. (2023). QS World University Rankings 2023. Quacquarelli Symonds Limited.
QS World University Rankings. (2024). QS World University Rankings 2024. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/world-university-rankings/2024
Mnh, S.J. R. Can, R. & M, M. (2021). Industry 4.0 implementation and triple bottom line sustainability: an empirical study on small and medium manufacturing firms. Heliyon, 7(8), e07753.
Seale, J. (2014). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice. Routledge.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? John Wiley & Sons.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1010–1018.
Statistical Center of Iran. (2023). Home. Retrieved from https://www.amar.org.ir/
Sulasula, J. (2023). Exploring the viability of smart public universities in the philippines zamboanga peninsula region. OSF Preprints.
Times Higher Education. (2023). World University Rankings 2023. Times Higher Education.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.
V, N & Guţu, I. (2023). The role of leadership and digital transformation in higher education students’ work engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 5124.
Vice-Presidency for Science & Technology. (2023). Home. Retrieved from https://www.isti.ir/
World Bank. (2024). Iran overview. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iran/overview
Yang, J. Sun, Y. Lin, R. (2024). Strategic framework and global trends of national smart education policies. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1183.
Zandi, S. Rezaei, M. Omidvar, B & Shobeiri, S. M. (2025). Reforming the Environmental Education Ranking System in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of the GreenMetric Index and Proposal of a Model. Technology and Scholarship in Education, 5(3), 23-39. [In Persian]. doi: 10.30473/t-edu.2025.75062.1294
Zawacki-Richter, O. Marín, V. I. Bond, M & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Current trends and future directions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 43 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 21 |
||