| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,308 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,245 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 23,474,683 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,804,557 |
مدل مفهومی نهادینه سازی حسابرسی اجتماعی در سازمانهای بخش عمومی: از شفافیت و پاسخگویی تا پایداری اجتماعی و محیطی | ||
| حسابداری دولتی | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 12، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 25، خرداد 1405، صفحه 167-188 اصل مقاله (531.96 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/gaa.2026.75475.1829 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| جواد علی پور1؛ رضا غلامی جمکرانی* 2؛ سید عباس برهانی3؛ زهره حاجیها4 | ||
| 1گروه حسابداری ءواحد قمءدانشگاه ازاد اسلامیءقمءایران | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه حسابداری، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران | ||
| 3گروه حسابداریءواحد قمءدانشکاه ازاد اسلامیءقمءایران | ||
| 4گروه حسابداریءواحد تهران جنوبءدتنشگاه ازاد اسلامی ءتهران ء ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در عصر جدید حکمرانی عمومی، پاسخگویی اجتماعی و شفافیت اطلاعات عملکرد، از ارکان کلیدی مشروعیت و کارآمدی سازمانهای بخش عمومی به شمار میروند. هدف این پژوهش ارائه مدل حسابرسی اجتماعی در سازمانهای بخش عمومی می باشد. روش پژوهش از نوع کیفی و مبتنی بر رویکرد دادهبنیاد با استفاده از مدل نظاممند اشتراوس و کوربین است. مشارکت کنندگان رویکرد کیفی شامل خبرگان در حوزه حسابداری و حسابرسی بخش عمومی هستند که شامل خبرگان دانشگاهی (6 نفر)، مدیران و حسابرسان بخش عمومی (6 نفر) و نمایندگان نهادهای سیاستگذار و تدوینگر استاندارد (3 نفر) میباشند که مصاحبه با آنان تا حد اشباع نظری دادهها، ادامه داشت. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها از روش داده بنیاد نظاممند استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش منجر به شناسایی شش بُعد کلیدی نهادینهسازی حسابرسی اجتماعی شامل: شفافیت و پاسخگویی، مشارکت اجتماعی، عدالت و انصاف اجتماعی، پایداری اجتماعی و محیطی، اثربخشی و کارایی خدمات عمومی و صداقت و سلامت اداری گردید. همچنین، شرایط علّی، زمینهای و مداخلهگر، راهبردها و پیامدهای مرتبط با استقرار این نظام تبیین شد. نتایج نشان داد که تحقق حسابرسی اجتماعی در بخش عمومی مستلزم چارچوبهای قانونی شفاف، زیرساختهای اطلاعاتی و فناورانه پیشرفته، فرهنگ سازمانی پاسخگو و اراده سیاسی برای شفافسازی عملکرد است. مدل ارائهشده میتواند بهعنوان مبنای سیاستگذاری و طراحی سازوکارهای اجرایی برای ارتقای حکمرانی شفاف، پاسخگو و پایدار در بخش عمومی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| حسابرسی اجتماعی؛ گزارشگری پایداری؛ سازمانهای بخش عمومی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A Conceptual Model for Institutionalizing Social Auditing in Public Sector Organizations: From Transparency and Accountability to Social and Environmental Sustainability | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| javad alipour1؛ Reza Gholami-Jamkarani2؛ Seyyed Abbas Borhani3؛ Zohreh Hajiha4 | ||
| 1Department of Acoountingء Q0ء C ءIalamic Azad Universityء Qomء Iran | ||
| 2Department of Accounting, Qo.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Acoounting ءQ0ءCء Islamic Azad UniversityءQomءIran | ||
| 4Department of Acoountingء ST.C.ء Islamic Azad University ءTehranء Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In the contemporary era of public governance, social accountability and transparency in performance information are considered fundamental pillars for the legitimacy and effectiveness of public sector organizations. This study aims to present a conceptual model of social auditing in public sector organizations. The research adopts a qualitative design based on the grounded theory approach, employing the systematic model proposed by Strauss and Corbin. The qualitative phase involved 15 experts in the field of public sector accounting and auditing, comprising academic scholars (6), senior managers and public sector auditors (6), and representatives of policy-making and standard-setting bodies (3). Interviews were conducted until theoretical saturation was reached. Data analysis followed the systematic grounded theory procedure. The findings identified six key dimensions of institutionalizing social auditing: transparency and accountability, social participation, social justice and equity, social and environmental sustainability, effectiveness and efficiency of public services, and integrity and administrative ethics. In addition, the study elaborated on the causal, contextual, and intervening conditions, as well as strategies and outcomes associated with the implementation of this system. The results indicate that achieving effective social auditing in the public sector requires transparent legal frameworks, advanced information and technological infrastructures, a responsive organizational culture, and political will to enhance performance transparency. The proposed model offers a foundation for policymaking and designing operational mechanisms to advance transparent, accountable, and sustainable governance in the public sector. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Social auditing, sustainability reporting, public sector organizations | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdi, M; Homayoun, S; & Kazemi Olum, M. (2020). Investigating the impact of audit committee characteristics on sustainability reporting levels. Biannual Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 5(9), 369. )In Persian(.
Adams, C. A; Muir, S; & Hoque, Z. (2014). Measuring impacts: A review of sustainability reporting frameworks and guidelines. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(1), 46-67.
Aktas, R; K.Kayalidere, and M. Kargin. (2017), “Corporate Sustainability Reporting andAnalysis of Sustainability Reports in Turkey”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(3), PP. 113-125. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v5n3p113
Babajani, J; Barzideh, F; & Imanzadeh, P. (2019). Evaluating the current state of performance auditing in Iran’s public sector institutions and proposing improvement strategies. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 16(61), 1–26. )In Persian(.
Ball, A; & Grubnic, S. (2007). Sustainability accounting and accountability in the public sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(4), 512–537.
Batra, G. S. (1996). Dynamics of social auditing in corporate enterprises: a study of the Indian corporate sector. Managerial Auditing Journal, 11(2), 36-45.
Bebbington, Jan, and Jeffrey Unermen. 2018. Achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 31: 2–24.
Buallay, A; Fadel, S. M; Al-Ajmi, J. Y; & Saudagaran, S. (2020). Sustainability reporting and performance of MENA banks: is there a trade-off? Measuring Business Excellence, 24(2), 197-221.
Bychkova SM, Karelskaia SN, Abdalova EB, Zhidkova EA. Social responsibility as the dominant driver of the evolution of reporting from financial to non-financial: theory and methodology. Foods and Raw Materials. 2021; 9(1):135-145.
Cannon, J. N; Ling, Z; Wang, Q; Wantanabe, O. V.(2019).10-K Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility and Firms’ Competitive Advantage. European Accounting Review, 29(1), 85-113.
Chawla, A. (2021), "Social audit, accountability and accounting – an Indian perspective", Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 10-26.
da Costa Tavares, M. D. C; & Dias, A. P. (2018). Theoretical Perspectives on Sustainability Reporting: A. Accounting from a cross-cultural perspective, 51.
Dhahri, S; & Omri, A. (2018). Entrepreneurship contribution to the three pillars of sustainable development: What does the evidence really say? World development, 106, 64-77.
Domingues, A. R; Lozano, R; Ceulemans, K; & Ramos, T. B. (2017). Sustainability reporting in public sector organisations: Exploring the relation between the reporting process and organisational change management for sustainability. Journal of environmental management, 192, 292-301.
Dyck, A; Lins, K. V; Roth, L; & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693-714.
Fakhari, H; Malekian, E; & Jafaei Rahni, M. (2017). Explaining and ranking components and indicators of environmental, social, and corporate governance reporting using AHP in Tehran Stock Exchange companies. Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2(4), 153–187. )In Persian(.
Foukerdi, R; & Mohtat, M. (2017). Defining the content of sustainability reports for National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company: Application of balanced scorecard and grey DEMATEL. Industrial Management, 9(4), 735–764. )In Persian(.
Fung, A; Graham, M; & Weil, D. (2007). Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510533
Gebreyesus, S. A. (2022). THE EFFECT OF AUDIT LEGAL FRAMEWORKS ON PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT (THE CASE OF PUBLIC SECTOR ENTITIES IN ETHIOPIA). Journal of Economic Sciences: Theory & Practice, 79(1), 69-79.
GRI (2021). Global Reporting Initiative. Sustainability Reporting Standards. https://www.globalreporting.org
Gunluk-Senesen, G. (2021). Wellbeing gender budgeting to localize the UN SDGs: Examples from Turkey. Public Money & Management, 41(7), 554-560.
Hassas Yeganeh, Y; & Barzegar, G. (2014). Theoretical foundations of corporate social responsibility and its research paradigm in the accounting profession. Management Accounting, 7(3), 109–133. ) In Persian(.
Hassas Yeganeh, Y; & Barzegar, G. (2015). A model for corporate social responsibility and sustainability disclosure and its current status in Tehran Stock Exchange companies. Quarterly Journal of Securities Exchange, 8(29), 91–110. )In Persian(.
Imtiaz Ferdous, M; Adams, C. A; & Boyce, G. (2019). Institutional drivers of environmental management accounting adoption in public sector water organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(4), 984-1012.
IPSASB (2022). Sustainability Reporting in the Public Sector. https://www.ipsasb.org
Jafari, P. (2018). Investigating the relationship between social auditing and improved performance of independent auditors in manufacturing and industrial companies of Fars Province [Master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University, Nurabad Mamasani Branch].)In Persian(.
Kazempour, M; Kashanipour, M; Yazdifar, H; & Hamidizadeh, A. (2020). A framework for ranking corporate social responsibility disclosure. Financial Accounting Research, 12(1), 103–124. )In Persian(. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23223405.1399.12.1.7.9
Khodaeipour, A; & Jafari, M. (2023). Expanding corporate social and environmental responsibility. Green Development Management Studies, 2(1), 101–111. )In Persian(.
Kiaei, S. (2021). The impact of social responsibility on audit contracts [Master’s thesis, Higher Education Institute of Kar, Qazvin]. )In Persian(.
Ma, R.(2023).Construction of a social audit platform based on big data for “industry price, quality and credit”. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 8(2) 1339-1354.
Mahdavikhou, M. Nouraei, M. Chavoshani, M.Ghanbari, M. (2025) A Conceptual framework for developing Sustainability reporting in the public sector. Governmental Accounting, 11(2), 213-230. )In Persian(.
Mahmood, Z. Kouser, R. Ali, W; (2018), Does Corporate Governance Affect Sustainability Disclosure? A Mixed Methods Study. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 207.
Mohammadi, A; Mohammadzadeh Salteh, H; Diyanti Dilemi, Z; & Aghdam Mazraeh, Y. (2020). Presenting a proposed model for the quality of public sector financial reporting in Iran. Governmental Accounting, 6(2), 165-174. )In Persian(.
Moradi, M; & Safikhani, R. (2016). Analysis of public sector accounting research in Iran and future research directions. Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 23(4), 547. )In Persian(.
Maranjory, M; & Alikhani, R. (2014). Disclosure of corporate social and governance responsibilities. Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 21(3), 329–348. ) In Persian(.
Nahitun Naher, Dina Balabanova, Eleanor Hutchinson, Robert Marten, Roksana Hoque, Samiun Nazrin Bente Kamal Tune, Bushra Zarin Islam & Syed Masud Ahmed. (2020) Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region. Health Policy and Planning 35:Supplement_1, pages i76-i96. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa107
Natale, M; & Ford, J. (1994). “The social Audit and Ethics”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(1), 29-33.
O’Dwyer, B; Owen, D; & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.01.002
Papoutsi, A; & Sodhi, M. S. (2020). Does disclosure in sustainability .reports indicate actual sustainability performance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121049.
Parsa, S; Roper, I; Muller-Camen, M; & Szigetvari, E. (2018). Have labour practices and human rights disclosures enhanced corporate accountability? The case of the GRI framework. Accounting Forum, 42(1), 47-64.
Qian, W; Burritt, R. L; & Monroe, G. S. (2018). Environmental management accounting in local government: Functional and institutional imperatives. Financial Accountability & Management, 34(2), 148-165.
Rahim, M. M; & Vicario, V. (2015). Social audit: a mess or means in CSR assessment? In Social audit regulation: Development, challenges and opportunities (pp. 1-13). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Sepasi, S; Rajabzadeh, A; & Rezayat, M. (2016). Designing a social audit model using structural equation modeling. Auditing Knowledge, 16(65), 97–120. )In Persian(. http://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-1414-fa.html
Soleimani Amiri, G; Izadpour, M; & Grami Rad, F. (2020). Content analysis of the scientific-research journal "Empirical Research in Accounting" (2011–2018). Empirical Research in Accounting, 10(1), 121–140. )In Persian(.
Sumiyana, S; Hendrian, H; Jayasinghe, K; & Wijethilaka, C. (2023). Public sector performance auditing in a political hegemony: A case study of Indonesia. Financial accountability & management, 39(4), 691-714.
Sushant, & Laha, M. (2021). Game changer or accounting practice? Gender responsive budgeting in India. Public Money & Management, 41(7), 539-547.
Sysoieva I, Poznyakovska N, Balaziuk O, Miklukha O, Akimova L and Pohrishchuk B 2021 Social innovations in the educational space as a driver of economic development of modern society Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice 3 538-48.
Yáñez, S; Uruburu, Á; Moreno, A; & Lumbreras, J. (2019). The sustainability report as an essential tool for the holistic and strategic vision of higher education institutions. Journal of cleaner production, 207, 57-66.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 169 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 123 |
||