| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,308 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,245 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 23,474,676 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,804,542 |
ارائه الگویی برای بهبود مدیریت مالی عمومی در ایران | ||
| حسابداری دولتی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 12، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 25، خرداد 1405، صفحه 31-56 اصل مقاله (12.43 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/gaa.2025.76096.1836 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| پروین پورفخریان1؛ شهناز مشایخ* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری گروه حسابداری،دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران ، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه حسابداری، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| موضوع و هدف مقاله: در شرایطی که اقتصاد ایران با مشکلات ساختاری، تورم مزمن و محدودیتهای بینالمللی مواجه است، اصلاح نظام مدیریت مالی عمومی دیگر یک انتخاب بوروکراتیک نیست، بلکه یک ضرورت استراتژیک برای دستیابی به ثبات اقتصادی، رشد پایدار و عدالت اجتماعی محسوب میشود. مدیریت مالی عمومی برای آنکه بهدرستی تحلیل و اصلاح شود، نیازمند چارچوبهای مفهومی و تحلیلی روشن است؛ در این راستا هدف این پژوهش ارائه الگویی برای بهبود مدیریت مالی عمومی در ایران است. روش پژوهش: روش انجام این پژوهش آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) است. در بخش کیفی پژوهش دادههای مورد نیاز با استفاده از تحلیل تم مصاحبههای نیمهساختاریافته با 19 خبره در سازمانهای دولتی و دانشگاهی و اسنادکاوی قوانین و مقررات و مطالعات خارجی گردآوری شد و در بخش کمی، با امتیازدهی به 94 شاخص "چارچوب ارزیابی مخارج عمومی و پاسخگویی مالی" به ارزیابی مدیریت مالی عمومی در ایران پرداختیم. یافتههای پژوهش: پس از امتیازدهی به شاخصهای چارچوب ارزیابی مخارج عمومی و پاسخگویی مالی و همچنین استخراج 81 کد در بخش قوانین و مقررات، 17 کد در بخش مصاحبه با خبرگان و 34 کد در مطالعات خارجی، پنج بُعد ضروری و نیازمند اصلاح در مدیریت مالی عمومی، شامل: چارچوب نهادی و قانونی، برنامهریزی و بودجهریزی، مدیریت ساختار مالی دولت، حسابداری و گزارشگری مالی و نظارت و حسابرسی شناسایی گردید. نتیجهگیری، اصالت و افزوده آن به دانش: یک نظام کارآمد مدیریت مالی عمومی، ستون فقرات حکمرانی خوب است. الگوی پیشنهادی این پژوهش میتواند نقشه راهی برای ارتقاء شفافیت، پاسخگویی و کارایی مدیریت مالی عمومی کشور باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| بودجه؛ پاسخگویی؛ چارچوب ارزیابی مخارج عمومی و پاسخگویی مالی؛ شفافیت؛ مدیریت مالی عمومی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Providing a model for improving public financial management in Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| parvin pourfakhrian1؛ Shahnaz Mashayekh2 | ||
| 1PhD student, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Subject and Purpose of the Article: In a situation where the Iranian economy is facing chronic inflation and international constraints, reforming the public financial management system is no longer a bureaucratic choice, but a strategic necessity to achieve economic stability and sustainable growth. In order to be properly analyzed and reformed, public financial management requires clear conceptual and analytical frameworks; in this regard, the aim of this research is to provide a model for improving public financial management in Iran. Research Methodology: The method of conducting this research is mixed (qualitative-quantitative). In the qualitative part of the research, the required data was collected using thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 19 experts in government and academic organizations and document mining of laws and regulations and foreign studies. In the quantitative part, we evaluated public financial management in Iran by scoring 94 indicators. Research findings: After scoring the indicators of the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment Framework and extracting codes in the laws and regulations section, the expert interview section, and foreign studies, five essential dimensions that require reform in public financial management were identified, including: institutional and legal framework, planning and budgeting, management of the government's financial structure, accounting and financial reporting, and monitoring and auditing. Conclusion, originality, and its addition to knowledge: An efficient public financial management system is the backbone of good governance. The model proposed in this research can be a roadmap for improving the transparency, accountability, and efficiency of the country's public financial management. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Budget, accountability, public expenditure assessment framework and financial accountability, transparency, public financial management | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allen R, Hefmming R, &Potter BH. (2013). Introduction: The meaning, content and objectives of public financialmanagement. In The International Handbook of Public FinancialManagement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Andrews, M; Cangiano, M; Cole, N; de Renzio, P; Krause, P; & Seligmann, R. (2014). This is PFM. (Working Paper No. 285). Center for International Development at Harvard University.
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/cid/files/publications/faculty-working-papers/285_Andrews_This+is+PFM.pdf
Babajani, J; Ghorbanizadeh, V; Bulu, G; & Doost Jabarian, J. (2002). Assessing the current state of financial transparency in the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and providing solutions to improve it. Two Quarterly Journals of Value and Behavioral Accounting. Volume 8, No. 15. (In Persian)
Doi: 10.61186/aapc.8.15.1
Bisogno, M. & Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2021), “Budget transparency and governance quality: A cross-country analysis”, Public Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 10, pp. 1610-1631. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1916064
Borzuzadeh-Zavareh, M. (2002). Development in the Public Finance System and Financial Reporting in Iran. Auditor. No. 122. pp. 70-75. (In Persian).
https://www.hesabras.com/Content/media/article/Tahavol,.%20Dr.%20M.%20Borzozadeh_-1.pdf
Caiden, N. 1980. “Budgeting in Poor Countries: Ten Common Assumptions Re-examined. Public Administration Review 40(1): 40–6.
https:// socialsciencelibrary. org/political-science/ public-administration/efficiency/ commerce-and-economic-policy/budgeting-in-poor-countries-ten-common-assumptions-re-examined/
Pretorius, C; & Pretorius, N.(2009), Review of Public Financial Management Reform Literature. London: DFID.
CIPFA, (2014). Public Financial Management a whole system approach. https://www.cipfa.org › files › pfm_wsa_vol1.
De Renzio, P. (2013). Assessing and Comparing the Quality of Public Financial Management Systems. In R. Allen et al. (Eds.), International Handbook of PFM. DOI: 10.1057/9781137315304_37
Dorotinsky, W; & Watkins, J. (2013). Government Financial Management Information Systems. In R. Allen et al. (Eds.), International Handbook of PFM. DOI: 10.1057/9781137315304_37
Emraei, H; & Azar, A. (2001). Providing an effective model for monitoring and evaluating public sector financial performance in performance-based budgeting, Financial Accounting and Auditing Research. 13(52), 53-86. (In Persian).
Joseph, A. F. (2023). Budget Credibility and Global Surprises in Ghana: A Critical Reflection through PEFA Framework. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 12, 89–97. DOI: 10.53615/2232-5697.12.89-97
Karimi, M. A; Kordestani, G; & Bigler, K. (2023). Identifying the Challenges of the Public Financial Management System. Empirical Studies of Financial Accounting. Year 20, Issue 77, pp. 141-182. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2023.73050.2446
Kordestani, G; Aghamohammad, M; & Kazemi, H. (2021). Identifying the Dimensions of the Modern Public Financial Management Model. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research. Volume 13, Issue (4). pp. 142-267. (In Persian). Doi: 10.30495/faar.2021.687686
Lulaj, E. (2019). Transparency and accountability in the public budget: Empirical study in local governments – municipalities. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(4).
http://www.ijern.com/journal/2019/April-2019/06.pdf
Moulana, M; & Saraghi, B. T. (2013). Where's Our Money Going? Challenges Of Budget Transparency and Accountability in Indonesia.
https://onthinktanks.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/indonesia-budget-transparency_communicating-complex-ideas-book.pdf
North, D.C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–1125(1). https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.5.1.97
Parker, L. D; Jacobs, K. & Schmitz, J. (2019). New Public Management and the rrise of public sector performance audit: Evidence from the Australian Case”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), PP. 280-306.
PEFA Secretariat. (2016). Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework. PEFA Secretariat.
https://www.pefa.org/sites/pefa/files/resources/downloads/PMFEng-finalSZreprint04-12_1.pdf
Perry, J. L; & Buckwalter, N. D. (2010). The Public Service of the Future. Public Administration Review.;70 (Supplement s1):238-245.
Rahmani, A; Molnazari, M; Qayoumi, A; Mahmoudkhani, M; Behbahaninia, P. S; Parsai, M; Ghadirian‑Arani, M. H; & Khadivar, A. (2022). Designing a financial management and accounting maturity model for public sector reporting units. Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 29(2), 287–310. (In Persian)
Sarmast Shooshtari, M; Eskandari, J; & Rasouli, S. M. H. (2023). Investigating the necessity and requirements of improving the transparency of financial events in economic governance during the Seventh Development Plan. Quarterly Journal of Parliament and Strategy, 30(115), 301–333. (In Persian).
Tkachenko, L. (2022). Public Finance Management: Essence, Problems, and Development Prospects. IntechOpen.
Visser, C. B. & Erasmus, P.W. (2013). The management of public finance (K. McGillivray Ed.10 ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press Southern Africa.
https://www.econbiz.de/Record/the-management-of-public-finance-a-practical-guide-erasmus-pieter-wilhelmus/10004613635
Wehner, J; & de Renzio, P. (2013). Designing Fiscal Institutions: The Political Economy of PFM Reforms. In R. Allen et al. (Eds.), International Handbook of PFM.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 194 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 194 |
||