| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,298 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,176 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 23,356,037 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,749,021 |
بررسی موانع پیشروی عملیاتی نمودن برنامه آموزش فلسفه به کودکان و تبیین راهکارهای تحقق آن | ||
| فناوری و دانش پژوهی در تعلیم و تربیت | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 6، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 20، فروردین 1405، صفحه 147-163 اصل مقاله (704.28 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/t-edu.2026.77164.1398 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عباس محمدی* 1؛ محمدرضا سرمدی2؛ مهران فرج اللهی2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری گروه علمی علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی موانع اجرای برنامه آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان (فبک) در ایران و تبیین راهکارهای تحقق آن بود. سوال پژوهش عبارت بود از: 1- موانع و راهکارهای اجرای برنامه فبک در ایران کدامند؟ جامعه آماری پژوهش را کلیه متخصصان حوزه فلسفه برای کودکان، تعلیم و تربیت، اساتید دانشگاه و مدیران آموزش و پرورش در ایران تشکیل دادند. با بهرهگیری از روش نمونهگیری هدفمند و با رعایت معیار اشباع نظری، نمونهای متشکل از ۳۰ نفر (شامل متخصصان فلسفه برای کودکان، متخصصان تعلیم و تربیت و اساتید حوزه و دانشگاه و مدیران آموزش و پرورش) در سال 1403 انتخاب شدند. روش تحقیق، کیفی و از نوع تحلیل محتوای کیفی بود. برای گردآوری دادهها از تحلیل محتوای اسناد (شامل آثار لیپمن، مقالات علمی و اسناد بالادستی آموزش و پرورش) و ابزار مصاحبه نیمهساختاریافته استفاده شد. روایی ابزار مصاحبه از طریق بازبینی محتوا توسط ۱۲ متخصص و تطبیق با مبانی نظری تأمین گردید و پایایی آن نیز با روش توافق بین کدگذاران و بازبینی توسط 12نفر از مشارکتکنندگان تأیید شد. دادههای مصاحبه با روش تحلیل مضمون تحلیل شدند. یافتهها نشان داد عملیاتیسازی برنامه فبک در ایران مستلزم توجه به سه سطح اصول و خطمشیها (شامل تعارض در سیاستها)، راهبردها و اجرای عملیاتی با در نظرگیری محدودیتهاست. این مطالعه نتیجه گرفت که برنامه فبک با بومیسازی هوشمندانه و اصلاح زیرساختهای آموزشی قابلیت اجرا دارد. یافتهها هم برای جامعه دانشگاهی (تدوین چارچوب نظری بومی) و هم برای سیاستگذاران و معلمان (ارائه راهنمای عملی) کاربرد دارد. پیشنهاد میشود سند راهبردی ملی فبک با مشارکت گسترده ذینفعان تدوین و اجرای آزمایشی آن در مدارس منتخب با نظارت مستند مدنظر قرار گیرد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان؛ موانع؛ راهکارها؛ بومیسازی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the Obstacles to Operationalizing the Philosophy Education Program for Children and Explaining the Solutions to Realize It | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Abbas Mohammadi1؛ Mohammadreza Sarmadi2؛ Mehran Farajollahi2 | ||
| 1Phd studentsDepartment of Education, Payame Noor University,Tehran. Iran | ||
| 2Professor of Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this study was to investigate the obstacles to implementing the Philosophy for Children (PFC) program in Iran and to explain the strategies for its implementation. 1- What are the obstacles and solutions to implementing the FBC program in Iran?The statistical population of the study consisted of all experts in the field of philosophy for children, education, university professors, and education managers in Iran. Using a purposive sampling method and observing the theoretical saturation criterion, a sample of 30 people (including philosophy for children experts, education experts, field and university professors, and education managers) In the year 202 was selected. The research method was qualitative and qualitative content analysis. To collect data, content analysis of documents (including Lippman's works, scientific articles, and upstream education documents) and semi-structured interview tools were used. The validity of the interview tool was ensured through content review by 12 experts and alignment with theoretical foundations, and its reliability was confirmed by the agreement method between coders and review by 12 participants. The interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings showed that operationalizing the FBEC program in Iran requires attention to three levels: principles and policies (including policy conflicts), strategies, and operational implementation, taking into account limitations. The study concluded that the FBEC program is feasible with intelligent localization and reform of educational infrastructure. The findings are useful for both the academic community (developing a local theoretical framework) and policymakers and teachers (providing practical guidance). It is suggested that a national strategic document for the FBEC be developed with broad stakeholder participation and its pilot implementation in selected schools with documented monitoring be considered. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Philosophy Program for Children, Obstacles, Solutions, Localization | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadi Haji, O. Hadipour, S. T & Aghili, S. H. (2025). The function of visual arts in the context of photography to enhance critical thinking among high school students with an emphasis on the STEAM educational approach. Technology and Scholarship in Education, 5(2), 39-54/.[In Persian]
Alhashmi, M & Bakali, N. (2023). Islamic Pedagogy and Critical Thinking: Integrating P4C in Muslim Education. International Journal of Educational Development, 98, 102741.
Braun, V & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Daniel, M. F. (2021) "In the Footsteps of Matthew Lipman: Dialogue among Peers and Dialogical Thinking". Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 41(1): 62-79.
Farahani, M. F. (2014). The study on challenges of teaching philosophy for children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2141-2145.
Farmahini Farahani, M. mirza mohammadi, M. H. and kharestani, E. (2008). The Comparative Explanation of the Aims of Teaching Philosophy to Children in Different Countries. Wisdom And Philosophy, 4(16), 45-70. doi: 10.22054/wph.2009.5760.[In Persian]
Fisher, R. (1998). Teaching thinking:Philosophical equiry in the classroom. Contiuum
Gregory, M & Laverty, M. (2021). Philosophy for Children and Islamic Education: A Cross-Cultural Dialogue. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 8(1), 22-40.
Gruioniu,O. (2013).Thephilosophy for children, an ideal tool to stimulate the thinking skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 378-382.
Khadivi, A and Seyed Kalan, S. M. (2022). Phenomenon of Philosophy for Children (p4c) program in primary education of Iran (Policy, strategies and action). Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 16(38), 29-61. doi:10.22034/jpiut.2022.50095.3114 [In Persian]
Khalili, M and Norouzi, R. (2022). Explaining the basics of philosophy for children with an emphasis on Islamic educational teachings and the arrangement of an executive model Explaining the basics of philosophy for children with an emphasis on Islamic educational teachings. Research on Islamic education issues, 30(3), 75-94. [In Persian]
Khoshkhui, M & Aznab, A. (2016). Evaluation of Attention to Elements of Philosophical Thinking in theNational Curriculum Document of the I.R. of Iran. Thinking and Children, 6(12), 37-62. [In Persian]
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press.
Lipman, Mathew. (1980). Philosophy in the Classroom, U.S.A.: Tample University Press.
Lone, J. M. (2022). Philosophy for children. A companion to public philosophy journal, 14(3), 325–336. Maarefvand, Z and Sadeghi, N. (2025). Identifying obstacles to implementing technical and skills training in elementary school and providing solutions for it. Technology and Scholarship in Education, 5(2), 127-143. [In Persian]
Maheri, S. Araghieh, A. Ghaedy, Y. Mehdizadeh, A and Sousahabi, P. (2021). Identifying the challenges of teaching philosophy to children from the perspective of preschool educators (a phenomenological study). Thinking and Children, 12(1), 259-287. doi: 10.30465/fabak.2021.6233.[In Persian]
Marashi, S. M. Bagheri, K & Norouzi, R. (2007). Investigating the impact of the P4C program on students' thinking skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(2), 95-112. [In Persian]
Mohammadpour, A. (2023). Designing a P4C model for Islamic countries. Research in Islamic Education Issues, 11(4), 112-130. [In Persian].
Sanad-e Tahavol-e Bonyadin-e Amuzesh va Parvaresh [The Fundamental Transformation Document of Education]. (2011). Daftar-e Motale’eh va Tadavom-e Sazman-e Tajdid-e Nazar va Roshd-e Amuzesh va Parvaresh [Office for the Study and Sustainability of the Organization for Educational Renovation and Development]. [In Persian]
Sattari, A. (2013). Teaching Thinking to Children and Adolescents. Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]
Shahri, A. Iran, M. Heshmati, V & Parvin. (2023/1402). Asar-bakhshi-ye âmuzesh-e falsafeh barâye kudakân va mahârat-hâye farâshenâkht bar afzâyesh-e sâzgâri-ye ejtemâ’i va kâr-kard-e dânesh-âmuzân-e talâgh [The effectiveness of teaching philosophy for children and metacognitive skills on increasing social adjustment and academic performance of students from divorced families]. Âmuzesh-e Pazhouheshi [Educational Research], 9(34), 49–62. [In Persian]
Shahri, A. Iran, M. Heshmati, V and Parvin. (2023). The effectiveness of teaching philosophy for children and metacognitive skills on increasing social adjustment and academic performance of students from divorced families. Educational Research, 9(34), 49–62. [In Persian]
Shepherd, N & Mhlanga, D. (2014) "Philosophy for children: A Model for Unhu/ Ubuntu Philosophy". International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Vol. 4, Issue 2, Lupane State University.
The Fundamental Transformation Document of Education. (2011). Office for the Study and Sustainability of the Organization for Educational Renovation and Development]. [In Persian]
Wong, B & Chiu, M. M. (2023).The impact of philosophical dialogue on creativity in Singapore. Journal of Philosophy for Children, 12 (2),
Zulkifli, H & Hashim, R. (2020). Philosophy for children (P4C) in improving critical thinking in a secondary moral education class. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(2), 29-45. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 203 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 94 |
||