پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,339 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,534 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 25,215,566 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,768,921 |
طراحی مدل حکمرانی دیجیتال مبتنی بر جمع‌سپاری در مرکز ملی فضای مجازی ایران | ||
| مدیریت سازمان‌های دولتی | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 14، شماره 4 (پیاپی 56)، مهر 1405، صفحه 133-152 اصل مقاله (1.21 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: اکتشافی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ipom.2026.74226.5168 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حسین استاد حسین1؛ زهرا مقیمی* 2؛ مریم بیانی3 | ||
| 1گروه مدیریت، واحد گرگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرگان، ایران | ||
| 2گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران | ||
| 3گروه مدیریت، واحد گرگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،گرگان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| چکیده این پژوهش با هدف ارائه مدل حکمرانی دیجیتال با رویکرد جمع سپاری در ایران پرداخته و به دنبال طراحی چارچوبی جامع برای مدیریت فضای مجازی کشور با تأکید بر قابلیت های مشارکتی و بهره‌برداری بهینه از ظرفیت‌های ملی است. این پژوهش با رویکرد کمی و هدف توسعه‌ای انجام شده است. ابتدا، به شناسایی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های حکمرانی دیجیتال از طریق مرور سیستماتیک منابع علمی پرداخته شد. سپس، با استفاده از تکنیک دلفی و مشارکت 15 نفر از خبرگان، مؤلفه‌ها پالایش و تأیید گردید. در مرحله بعدی، مدل پژوهش با مدلسازی ساختاری ارزیابی شد و برای تحلیل داده‌ها از شبکه عصبی مصنوعی و نرم‌افزارهای متلب و اسمارت پی‌ال‌اس استفاده شد. جامعه آماری شامل 690 نفر از مدیران و کارشناسان ارشد مرکز ملی فضای مجازی، موسسات مشاور و زیرمجموعه های تابعه بود که از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌بندی‌شده و پرسشنامه به حجم نمونه 248 نفر توزیع گردید. نتایج نشان داد که مدل حکمرانی دیجیتال با رویکرد جمع سپاری یک مدل چندبعدی است که ابعاد مختلفی همچون زیست بوم دیجیتال، اقتصاد دیجیتال، زیرساخت دیجیتال، حقوقی و قانونی، فرهنگی و اجتماعی و رویکرد جمع سپاری را در بر می‌گیرد. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که مدل حکمرانی دیجیتال با رویکرد جمع سپاری نه تنها از ظرفیت‌های داخلی برای ارتقای حکمرانی دیجیتال استفاده می‌کند، بلکه می‌تواند به‌عنوان یک الگوی بومی و مقاومتی برای کشور عمل کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| حکمرانی دیجیتال؛ حمع‌سپاری؛ فضای مجازی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Designing a Digital Governance Model Based on Crowdsourcing in National Center of Iran's Cyberspace | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| hossein ostad hossein1؛ zahra moghimi2؛ Maryam Bayani3 | ||
| 1Department of Management, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Public Administration, Se.C., Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Management, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction With the continuous advancements in Information and Communication Technology (ICT), digital governance has become a cornerstone of governmental and public development worldwide. This concept, which leverages digital technologies to improve governmental processes and facilitate public services, can enhance transparency, accountability, efficiency, and accessibility of public services (Daoi, 2022). However, implementing effective digital governance can present unique challenges in countries undergoing digital transformation. These challenges encompass technical barriers, organizational resistance, cultural issues, and limitations in human and economic resources. This issue is particularly complex in countries like Iran, operating within specific political, economic, and social conditions. In this context, the National Center for Cyberspace in Iran, as a key institution in the field of digital governance, can play a significant role in guiding and implementing digital models across various sectors of the country. However, to achieve this goal, a digital governance model tailored to Iran’s unique circumstances must be designed. This model should not only consider novel technologies but also address the country’s cultural characteristics and internal capabilities. One approach that can be effective is “crowdsourcing.” Rooted in participatory principles, crowdsourcing relies on concepts such as process design, problem identification, participation, transparency, access to information, issue management, awareness, and the use of appropriate research methods. It can be applied to governance processes, particularly in implementing digital governance, to harness collective intelligence and expertise. The objective of this research is to design a digital governance model based on crowdsourcing at the National Center for Cyberspace in Iran. This model should specifically consider internal capacities, committed human resources, and national needs, while leveraging the principles of crowdsourcing as an effective solution for accelerating the implementation of digital governance. In this model, in addition to focusing on technical and technological aspects, components such as identifying public issues, transparency, and awareness will be considered in the context of digital governance. Numerous researches have been conducted globally and regionally on digital governance, primarily emphasizing the importance of effective implementation and related challenges. For example, research by Arefin et al. (2025) on digitalizing public services in Indonesia indicates that one of the most significant challenges in the digital governance process is aligning digital systems with the cultural and social characteristics of the society (Arefin, Subagja & Hakim, 2025). Furthermore, some researchers emphasize the need for coordination between digital governance and the use of appropriate research methods like case studies and content analysis (Gickova, 2017). In Iran, there is also a strong emphasis on adopting modern management approaches to improve the performance of governmental organizations. Jandighi et al. (2021) found that the processes of identifying important issues and areas requiring public participation are prerequisites for crowdsourcing digital governance. Zolfagharlouzeh & Shahsavari (2019) and Abbasi & Danshfar (2021) have also confirmed this. Therefore, examining digital governance models globally and adapting them to Iran’s local context is particularly important. Studies by Lukes (2022) and Leoni, Maione & Mazara (2023) on evaluating and improving digital governance systems in various countries demonstrate that attention to local and cultural characteristics is essential for the success of this type of governance. Lukes (2022), based on successful digital governance models in developed countries, concluded that digital governance must align with internal needs and capacities within governmental organizations to effectively improve the quality of public services and transparency of governmental processes. Similarly, domestic research emphasizes the importance of localizing digital processes in Iran. Salehi-Pour & Pourian (2021) concluded that successful digital governance requires implementing digital processes considering the specific conditions and characteristics of each organization and country, and leveraging internal capacities in this regard. This can reduce organizational and cultural resistance to digital changes and facilitate digital transformation processes. Therefore, the main question of this research is: What are the dimensions and components of a digital governance model based on crowdsourcing designed for the National Center of Cyberspace in Iran? Mothodology This study, aiming to develop a digital governance model based on crowdsourcing, adopts a quantitative, developmental research approach. The research process consists of four main stages. First, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify dimensions and components related to digital governance. Data were collected through library research, examining both domestic and international credible sources. Second, the Delphi technique was used to refine and validate the identified components. This exploratory stage involved 15 experts—university scholars (PhD in Information Technology Management, Public Administration, and Public Policy) and organizational experts (senior IT and digital policy managers from public and private sectors with at least a Master’s degree and 10 years of relevant experience)—selected via purposive sampling. After three rounds of the Delphi technique, consensus was achieved, and the final components were confirmed. Third, the research model was evaluated using structural equation modeling (SEM). The population included 690 senior managers and experts from the National Center for Cyberspace and its affiliated institutions. A sample size of 248 was determined using Morgan’s table and selected through stratified random sampling. Questionnaires were distributed, and their construct validity was assessed via confirmatory factor analysis, reliability via Cronbach’s alpha, and content validity using the Lawshe method. All items achieved a Lawshe coefficient above 0.62 (exceeding the 0.49 threshold for 15 experts), confirming content validity. Fourth, collected data were analyzed using an artificial neural network (ANN) to identify non-linear relationships for more accurate prediction of research variables. The ANN model, with input, hidden, and output layers, was optimized using the backpropagation error algorithm. Data analysis and hypothesis testing were conducted using MATLAB and SmartPLS software. Findings The digital governance model development involved 35 components across six dimensions: digital ecosystem, digital economy, digital infrastructure, legal & regulatory, cultural & social, and crowdsourcing. “Digital literacy enhancement” was excluded due to low average scores and inconsistent change between phases. “Managerial capability in technology” was excluded due to consistently low scores. All other components were confirmed. The Delphi technique, spanning three rounds, led to the elimination of 7 components, resulting in consensus on 28. Structural equation modeling (SEM) using SmartPLS validated the model on a larger sample. Factor loadings exceeded the threshold, indicating significant relationships. R² values for inner variables were moderate to strong, and path coefficient significance (t) was above 1.96 for all variables. The model’s quality (Q²) and goodness-of-fit (GoF = 0.6737) were strong. Analysis revealed that “legal & regulatory” had the highest impact (t=45.421, factor loading=0.85), followed by “digital economy” (t=33.899, factor loading=0.838) and “digital infrastructure” (t=30.747, factor loading=0.812). “Cultural & social” (t=20.277, factor loading=0.733) and “crowdsourcing” (t=9.037, factor loading=0.574) also showed significant impact. “Citizen empowerment” (t=4.019, factor loading=0.419) had the lowest correlation. Neural network training achieved a 0.0781 stopping criterion after 9 iterations with an average squared error of 10% and a correlation of 0.68. Performance plateaued after the third iteration. The best prediction was achieved when all dimensions were included, with MSE=1.0345e-1 and r=6.9814. Removing any dimension increased error and decreased correlation, highlighting the importance of all components. “Digital economy” demonstrated the highest correlation (r=6.9814) and is crucial for the model. Discussion and Conclusion This study reveals that digital governance based on crowdsourcing requires integrating multiple dimensions: digital ecosystem, digital economy, technology infrastructure, legal and regulatory systems, cultural and social aspects, and a crowdsourcing approach. It emphasizes the roles of government, private sector, and citizens, improving technology and innovation management, enhancing cybersecurity, developing domestic infrastructure, and establishing data governance policies. To achieve sustainable digital governance, international cooperation in digital diplomacy and clear legal frameworks for data independence and security are essential. Citizen participation, transparency, access to information, and public issue management are key components of crowdsourcing, enhancing internal capacity and digital efficiency. Findings align with prior research. Gasco-Hernandez et al. (2022) stress organizational capacity, matching the digital ecosystem dimension. Leoni et al. (2023) highlight data and big data management, consistent with data governance. McLennan and Tiah (2022) emphasize public values, similar to citizen engagement. Kloppenburg et al. (2022) underline data transparency and user participation, aligning with cultural and social aspects. Lukes (2022) identifies technology infrastructure and cybersecurity as critical, also emphasized here. Validation on a larger sample confirmed significant correlations among digital governance dimensions. The most critical finding is the legal and regulatory dimension’s strong impact, consistent with Arefin et al. (2025), who found legal transparency essential for digital service success. This study also aligns with Alghraev (2024), emphasizing data governance and digital regulations in Islamic digital economies. High correlation between cybersecurity and digital infrastructure supports the importance of security, as noted by Noueimi et al. (2022), who identify strong, secure infrastructure as foundational for sustainable digital transformation. The strong link between organization, coordination, and resource allocation with the digital ecosystem matches Ansariani and Dimaro (2018), who highlight human resource management and investment in organizational capacity. The significant correlation between citizen participation and crowdsourcing underscores the role of citizens, also highlighted by Alghraev (2024), who emphasizes social participation and local approaches in Islamic digital economies. The cultural and social dimension’s strong correlation with social networks emphasizes the role of communication technologies, aligning with Arefin et al. (2025), who found increased digital social interaction enhances digital governance effectiveness. Overall, results show that digital governance requires a comprehensive approach integrating technical infrastructure, laws, innovation, social participation, and data management. Alignment with international studies indicates the model’s high implementability, with its unique emphasis on crowdsourcing and citizen participation in Iran. The best performance in predicting digital governance was achieved when all dimensions—digital economy, legal and regulatory, crowdsourcing, digital infrastructure, cultural and social, and digital ecosystem—were included. Removing any dimension increased error and decreased correlation, highlighting the importance of all components. Notably, removing the crowdsourcing dimension caused the highest error increase and correlation decrease, indicating its key role in improving the model. This finding underscores the growing importance of crowdsourcing and digital governance, which offer innovative solutions to challenges in centralized systems. A central institution, involving IT experts, government managers, and civil society representatives, should be established to develop strategic policies and oversee digital governance implementation. This institution should prioritize public values, agile decision-making, and efficiency. Reforming administrative processes and reducing legal barriers using digital technologies and participatory management will accelerate e-service delivery and improve organizational efficiency. Finally, researchers are encouraged to focus on designing intelligent monitoring systems for digital governance using big data and artificial intelligence to enhance transparency, accountability, and reduce digital corruption. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Digital Governance, Crowdsourcing, Cyberspace. | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasi, H., & Daneshfard, K. L. (2021). Citizen participation model in the first stage of public policy formulation (identification of public issues). Interdisciplinary Studies of Strategic Knowledge, 11(42), 270-247. (In Persian) https://isj.iau.ir Aitamurto, T., & Landemore, H. E. (2015). Five design principles for crowdsourced policymaking: Assessing the case of crowdsourced off-road traffic law in Finland. Journal of Social Media for Organizations, 2(1), 1-19.. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSO-02-2015-0001 Ahmadi, F., Mashhadi, A., & Atrian, F. (2021). Evolution in the concept of production governance from traditional governance to modern electronic governance. Legal Studies, 2(6), 31-47. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jpl.2021.315397. Al-Gharawi, R. M. D. (2024). Digital governance and its role in the Islamic economy-Analytical study. American Journal of Social and Humanitarian Research, 5(8), 195-206.https://doi.org/10.31150/ajshr.v5i8.2900 AlNuaimi, B. K., Singh, S. K., Ren, S., Budhwar, P., & Vorobyev, D. (2022). Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.051 Arifin, Z., Subagja, I. K., & Hakim, A. (2025). Digital Governance: Studi Kasus Digitalisasi Pelayanan Publik Terpadu di Kabupaten Serang. Jurnal Sosial Dan Teknologi, 5(1), 1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v5i1.31861. Ancarani, A., & Di Mauro, C. (2018). Successful digital transformations need a focus on the individual. In Digitalisierung im Einkauf (pp. 11-26). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55847-7_2 Beykzad, J., & Jalili, Q. (2021). Pathology of Digital Governance in E-Government. Elites of Science and Engineering, 6(6), 17-33. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/nes.2021.158695 Chung, C. S., Choi, H., & Cho, Y. (2022). Analysis of digital governance transition in South Korea: focusing on the leadership of the president for government innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010002 Dhaoui, I. (2022). E-government for sustainable development: Evidence from MENA countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2070-2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00796-8 Escribano, G., Paredes-Gazquez, J., & San-Martín, E. (2020). The European Union and the good governance of energy resources: Practicing what it preaches?. Energy Policy, 14(7), 871-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.107083 Farzaneh Kondari, N., & Rouhani, S. (2021). Presenting a conceptual framework for judicial digital transformation in line with digital governance. Public Management, 12(4), 695-722. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.30478/md.2021.196214 Feliciano-Cestero, M. M., Ameen, N., Kotabe, M., Paul, J., & Signoret, M. (2023). Is digital transformation threatened? A systematic literature review of the factors influencing firms’ digital transformation and internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113546 Ghahremani, Y., Shabannia, M., & Dashti, A. (2022). Good e-Governance and the Open Government Theory: A Legal Approach. Modern Research in Administrative Law, 5(15), 267 - 296. (In Persian) https://doi.org/0.22059/jnlar.2023.357623. Ghalichkhani, M., Samadi Moghadam, Y., & Fathi Hafashjani, K. (2021). A model for assessing the maturity of digital transformation in industrial organizations based on the design science method. Business Management Studies, 9(37), 135-184. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbm.2021.305984. Gasco-Hernandez, M., Nasi, G., Cucciniello, M., & Hiedemann, A. M. (2022). The role of organizational capacity to foster digital transformation in local governments: The case of three European smart cities. Urban Governance, 40(4), 465-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719598.2022.2033016 Große, C. (2023). A review of the foundations of systems, infrastructure and governance. Safety science, 160, 106060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sast.2023.106060 Gaikwad, P. (2017). Including rigor and artistry in case study as a strategic qualitative methodology. The Qualitative Report, 22(13), 3431-3446. https://doi.org/10.4166/tqr.2017.0592 He, T., Huang, C., Li, M., Zhou, Y., & Li, S. (2020). Social participation of the elderly in China: The roles of conventional media, digital access and social media engagement. Telematics and Informatics, 48, 101347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101347 Jandighi, G., Mirzamani, A., & Khan Mohammadi, H. (2021). Designing a model for crowdsourcing innovative ideas on social media in Iran. Public Policy Quarterly, 7(1), 78-59. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/PPQ.2021.308578 Kloppenburg, S., Gupta, A., Kruk, S. R., Makris, S., Bergsvik, R., Korenhof, P., ... & Toonen, H. M. (2022). Scrutinizing environmental governance in a digital age: New ways of seeing, participating, and intervening. One Earth, 5(3), 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneearth.2022.101671 Khodadadi, A., & Abbaspour, A. (2022). Modeling digital governance in virtual organizations in the public sector. Iranian Political Sociology, 5(12), 3231-3246. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/ijps.2022.338971. Leoni, G., Maione, G., & Mazzara, L. (2023). Digital governance for addressing performance challenges within inter-municipalities. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-3-030-12631-9_13 Lee, H., Tsohou, A., & Choi, Y. (2017). Embedding persuasive features into policy issues: Implications to designing public participation processes. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 591-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.004 Loukis, E. N. (2022). A Methodology for Evaluating and Improving Digital Governance Systems Based on Information Systems Success Models and Public Value Theory. In Scientific Foundations of Digital Governance and Transformation: Concepts, Approaches and Challenges (pp. 245-273). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12565-4_13 MacLean, D., & Titah, R. (2022). A systematic literature review of empirical research on the impacts of e‐government: a public value perspective. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/00361138211047270 Nasiri, H., Alizadeh, F., & Seydi, M.R. (2022). Co-evolution of Industry and Governance Modes: A Case Study of the Governance Experience of the National Computer Games Foundation in the Field of Digital Games. Science and Technology Policy, 15(54), 162-176. (In Persian) http://doi.org/10.22059/ijst.2022.335989. Pirbalai, R., & Khorshid, N. (2022). The Impact of Information Technology and Transformation on the Structure and Function of the United Nations, Iranian Journal of International Politics, 10(2), 33-55. ( (In Persian) https://doi.org/0.22059/ijps.2022.337049. Ricardo Matheus, R., & Marijn J., (2020). A Systematic Literature Study to Unravel Transparency Enabled by Open Government Data: The Window Theory. Public Performance and management Review, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/13256163.2020.1755584 Salehipour Bavarsad, S., & Kazempourian, S. (2022). A new roadmap for achieving digital transformation. Science and Technology Policy 1(34), 5-17. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/ijst.2021.304848. Zolfagharchadeh, M. M., & Shahsavari, Z. (2019). Crowdsourcing of policy and public participation in the public policymaking process: Lessons for Iran. Public Policy, 5(2), 185-205. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/ppolicy.2019.287617.2613 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 390 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 218 |
||
