پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,317 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,387 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 24,352,432 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,278,069 |
تحلیل راهبردی وضعیت مراکز آموزش تالابی کشور در راستای بهرهبرداری خردمندانه از تالابها | ||
| فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 3، خرداد 1405، صفحه 9-31 اصل مقاله (927.08 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ee.2025.73654.2815 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| داود امین فنک* 1؛ زینب کهریزی2؛ یونس امین پور3 | ||
| 1دانش آموخته دکتری، گروه ترویج، ارتباطات و توسعه روستایی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه سازههای هیدرولیکی، پژوهشکده مهندسی هیدرولیک و محیطهای آبی، موسسه تحقیقات آب، وزارت نیرو، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تالابها بهعنوان یکی از زیباترین، مهمترین و درعینحال شکنندهترین اکوسیستمهای طبیعت به شمار میروند. در کشورها توسعهیافته دولتها با فـراهم کردن امکانات آموزشی، پژوهشی و تفریحی برای استفاده مردم، زمینههای لازم در جهت حفاظت از تالابها را فـراهم مینماید که یکی از این اقدامات ایجاد مراکز آموزش تالابی میباشد. ایجاد مراکز آموزش تالابی با اینکه بیش از نیم قرن قدمت دارند ولی در کشور ایران این تاریخ کمتر از دو دهه میباشد و وضعیت این مراکز در کشور با اهداف پیشبینیشده فاصله زیادی دارد. بنابراین هدف این پژوهش کاربردی بررسی وضعیت موجود مراکز آموزش تالابی و ارائه راهبردهایی در راستای توسعه این مراکز میباشد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش تعداد 42 نفر از کارشناسان اجرایی مراکز تالابی از سطح کشور بود که بهصورت کارگاهی اقدام به جمعآوری اطلاعات شد. در این پژوهش ابتدا با استفاده از چارچوب تحلیل SWOT به بررسی نقاط ضعف، قوت، تهدید و فرصتهای مراکز تالابی پرداخته شد و در نهایت با استفاده از ماتریس برنامهریزی راهبردی کمی به اولویتبندی راهبردهای قابل قبول پرداخته شد. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که فضای راهبردی مراکز تالابی کشور در ناحیه حداقل- حداکثر (ناحیه سوم) قرار دارد. در این زمینه مهمترین راهبردهای ارائهشده شامل برگزاری تورهای تالابگردی در جهت معرفی مراکز تالابی و تدوین سند ملی آموزش، مشارکت و آگاهی افزایی در راستای ارتقاء جایگاه جوامع محلی در حفاظت از تالابها بودند. نتایج این مطالعه به سیاستگذاران و تصمیمگیران حوضه تالابها بهخصوص در سازمان حفاظت محیطزیست کمک میکند تا شناخت کاملی از وضعیت موجود مراکز تالابی به دست آورند و در راستای بهبود عملکرد این مراکز، اقدام به تدوین یک برنامه منسجم و جامع در سطح ملی نمایند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| احیای تالاب؛ آموزش محیطزیست؛ تحلیل SWOT؛ مراکز آموزش تالابی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Strategic Analysis of the Status of Wetland Education Centers in the Country for the Wise Use of Wetlands | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Davood AminFanak1؛ Zienab Kahrizi2؛ Yones Aminpour3 | ||
| 1Ph.D Graduate, Department of Agricultural Extension, Communication and Rural Development, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran | ||
| 2Ph.D. Student, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Hydraulic, Hydro-Environmental Engineering, Water Research Institute, Ministry of Energy, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Wetlands are among the most beautiful, ecologically significant, yet highly fragile ecosystems. In developed countries, governments facilitate wetland conservation by providing educational, research, and recreational opportunities for public engagement. One of the key initiatives in this regard is the establishment of wetland education centers. Although these centers have existed globally for over half a century, their history in Iran is less than two decades old, and their current status significantly lags behind the envisioned objectives. This applied research aims to assess the existing conditions of wetland education centers and propose strategic measures for their development. The statistical population of this study consisted of 42 executive experts from wetland education centers across the country, and data were collected through participatory workshops. Initially, a SWOT analysis framework was utilized to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of these centers. Subsequently, the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) was employed to prioritize feasible strategic approaches. The findings indicate that the strategic positioning of the country’s wetland education centers falls within the third quadrant (minimum–maximum area), signifying a critical need for intervention. The most significant recommended strategies include organizing wetland ecotourism tours to introduce and promote these centers, formulating a national education, participation, and awareness-raising framework, and enhancing local community engagement in wetland conservation efforts. The results of this study will help policymakers and decision-makers in the wetland sector, especially in the Environmental Protection Organization, to gain a complete understanding of the current status of wetland education centers and develop a coherent and comprehensive plan at the national level to improve their performance. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Wetland Establishment, Environmental Education, SWOT Analysis, Wetland Educational Centers | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abedi, T., & Abedin Zadeh, N. (2021). “Strategic analysis of the CEPA program of Amirkelayeh Wetland using the SWOT-QSPM technique for conservation and sustainable utilization”. Journal of Natural Environment, 74(3), 554–571. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jne.2021.326630.2244 Akbari, R., Ghaderian, M., & Montazeri, M. (2015). “The query around efficiency of SWOT technique with present suggestive comprehensive model for urban issue (Case study: Strategic planning in rural fabric of NaeimAbad, Yazd)”. Hoviatshar, 9(22), 87–98. [In Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17359562.1394.9.22.8.8 Amin Fanak, D., Rezaei, R., & Kahrizi, Z. (2023). “Identification and Analysis of the Barriers to Farmers' Participation in the Revitalization of Lake Urmia Mahabad Sub-Basin”. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 10(3), 51–60. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/jwsd.v10i3.2303-1225 Amin Fanak, D., Rezaei, R., & Zeinalzadeh, K. (2023). “Identification and Explanation of Barriers to Water Resources Protection in the Urmia Lake Basin: A Qualitative Study”. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 54(1), 73–88. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2022.342469.669146 Bayat, P., Saboohi Sabuni, M., Kikha, A., Ahmadpour Borazjani, M., & Karami, E. (2016). “Effectiveness and modification of existing laws and its effect on water sector performance: Application of path analysis”. Agricultural Economics and Development, 24(95), 167–190. [In Persian] Budak, D. B., Budak, F., Zaimoglu, Z., Keke, C. S., & Sucu, M. Y. (2005). “Behaviour and attitudes of students towards environmental issues at faculty of agriculture, Turkey”. Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 1224–1227. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2005JApSc...5.1224B/doi:10.3923/jas.2005.1224.1227 Dehestaniathar, S., Nesari, S., Borzooei, S., & Abolfathi, S. (2021). “Application of natural biodegradable fiber as biofilm medium and carbon source in DEnitrifying AMmonium OXidation (DEAMOX) process for nitrogen removal from wastewater”. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 119, 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.03.019 Department of Environment of Iran. (2024). “Statistics on the number of wetland education centers. Tehran, Iran. [In Persian] Eghbali, J., Kalantari, K., Asadi, A., & Javid, M. J. (2020). “Content analysis of the century of water legislation in Iran”. Water and Irrigation Management, 10(1), 113–129. [In Persian] Gitay, H., Finlayson, C., & Davidson, N. (2011). “A Framework for assessing the vulnerability of wetlands to climate change”. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat; Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Ramsar Technical Report No. 5. Goldman, D., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Shaharabani, D. (2013). “Influence of a non-formal environmental education programme on junior high-school students’ environmental literacy”. International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 515545. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.760034 Hejazi, S. J., Zarei, R., & Goodarzi, M. (2011). “Investigation and evaluation of geographical and environmental impacts of tourism using AHP model (Case study: Shadegan International Wetland)”. Wetlands Quarterly, 3(9), 59–70. [In Persian] Kalantari, K., Shaban, A., Fami, H., Asadi, A., & Movahed Mohammadi, H. (2007). “Investigating factors affecting environmental behavior of urban residents: A case study in Tehran city-Iran”. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2007.67.74 Karanja, J. M., Matsui, K., & Saito, O. (2018). “Problems of public participation in the Ramsar CEPA programme at the Tana Delta, Kenya”. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 26(4), 525–535. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11273-017-9589-0 Let, M., & Pal, S. (2023). “Socio-ecological well-being perspectives of wetland loss scenario: A review”. Journal of Environmental Management, 326,116692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116692 Mitsch, W. J. (2005). “Applying science to conservation and restoration of the world’s wetlands”. Water Science and Technology, 51, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0215 Otte, M. L., & Fang, W. T. (2014). “Drivers of education about wetlands”. In Proceedings of the International Wetlands Conference on Environmental Education (Eds T.-Y. Leu, W.-T. Fang). Taijiang National Park Headquarters, Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC (pp. 18–19). http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1122.7842 Ramsar Secretariat. (2014). “Handbook on the Best Practices for Planning, Design and Operation of Wetland Education Centres”. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Available at: http://www.ramsar.org Rezaei, R., Safa, L., & Amin Fanak, D. (2022). “Identifying and analyzing strategies for developing sustainable agricultural activities in West Azerbaijan and East Azerbaijan provinces to restore Lake Urmia”. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences, 18(1), 1–19. [In Persian] https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20081758.1401.18.1.2.5 Rezaei, S., & Rezaei Moghaddam, K. (2024). “Determinants of local community participation in the restoration of Parishan Wetland”. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences, 20(1), 1–21. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/iaeej.2024.443010.1789 Roy, M. B., Samal, N. R., Roy, P. K., & Mazumdar, A. (2010). “Human wetland dependency and socio-economic evaluation of wetland functions through participatory approach in rural India”. Water Science and Engineering, 3(4), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2010.04.009 Safa, L., Rezaei, R., & Aminfanak, D. (2022). “Developing the strategies to diversify the rural households' livelihoods to revitalize Lake Urmia”. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 53(2), 515–537. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2022.332146.669090 Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). “Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training”. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001 Savari, M., Shabanali Fami, H., Iravani, H., & Asadi, A. (2018). “Collecting the strategies to stabilize the livelihood of small-scale farmers and training common strategies considering sustainability and vulnerability in drought conditions”. Quarterly Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 6(3), 137–156. [In Persian] https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23223057.1397.6.3.10.0 Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I. and García-Álvarez, M. T. 2018. The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of cleaner production, 170: 1565-1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.214 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 207 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 238 |
||