پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,317 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,387 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 24,351,429 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,276,791 |
نقش بهزیستی اجتماعی در تقویت رفتارهای زیستمحیطی شهروندان بالای 18 سال شهر اصفهان | ||
| فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 3، خرداد 1405، صفحه 71-92 اصل مقاله (722.36 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ee.2026.74206.2830 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عظیمه السادت عبداللهی* ؛ حسن رضا یوسفوند؛ محمود رضا شاهسواری | ||
| استادیار، گروه جامعهشناسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه پیامنور، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این پژوهش با هدف بررسی رابطه میان بهزیستی اجتماعی و رفتارهای زیستمحیطی در میان شهروندان بالای 18 سال شهر اصفهان انجام شده است. با استفاده از رویکرد کمی و روش پیمایشی، دادهها از 400 نفر از طریق پرسشنامههای استاندارد کیز (1998) و شولتز (2001) جمعآوری شدند. جامعه آماری ساکنان بالای 18 سال اصفهان در سال 1403 بود که با روش نمونهگیری خوشهای چندمرحلهای انتخاب شدند. یافتهها نشان داد که بهزیستی اجتماعی، شامل انسجام اجتماعی (59/0)، اعتماد اجتماعی (71/0)، حمایت اجتماعی (74/0) و احساس تعلق (42/0)، تأثیر معنیداری بر رفتارهای زیستمحیطی (مسئولانه، جمعی، پیشگیرانه و پایدار) دارد. مدل معادلات ساختاری (SEM) نشان داد که ۹۰ درصد از واریانس رفتار زیستمحیطی توسط این متغیرها توضیح داده میشود. نتایج با نظریههای سرمایه اجتماعی، اعتماد اجتماعی، و دلبستگی مکانی همراستا بود و نقش حمایت اجتماعی بهعنوان قویترین پیشبین تأیید شد. این مطالعه پیشنهاد میکند که تقویت بهزیستی اجتماعی از طریق شفافیت نهادی، شبکههای محلی، و کمپینهای فرهنگی میتواند رفتارهای پایدار را در شهرهایی با چالشهای زیستمحیطی مانند اصفهان ترویج دهد. محدودیتهایی نظیر تکیه بر دادههای کمی و عدم بررسی عوامل کیفی نیز مطرح شدند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| بهزیستی اجتماعی؛ رفتار زیستمحیطی؛ انسجام اجتماعی؛ اعتماد اجتماعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Role of Social Well-Being in Enhancing Environmental Behaviors Among Citizens Aged 18 Over in Isfahan | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Azimeh Al-Sadat Abdollahi؛ Hassanreza Yousefvand؛ Mahmoudreza Shahsavari | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Payame Noor University Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study examines the relationship between social well-being and environmental behaviors among citizens over 18 years old in Isfahan, Iran, a city confronting severe environmental issues, including the Zayandeh Rud drought, air pollution, and excessive waste production. Employing a quantitative survey method, data were collected from 400 participants using standardized questionnaires by Keyes (1998) for social well-being and Schultz (2001) for environmental behaviors, both tailored to the Iranian context. The target population, approximately 1.6 million adults in Isfahan in 2024, was sampled via a multi-stage cluster sampling approach to ensure demographic and geographic diversity. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis demonstrated that social well-being, comprising social cohesion (β=0.59), social trust (β=0.71), social support (β=0.74), and sense of belonging (β=0.42), significantly predicts environmental behaviors, categorized as responsible (e.g., recycling), collective (e.g., community cleanups), preventive (e.g., energy conservation), and sustainable (e.g., public transport use). Social support emerged as the most potent predictor, driving behaviors like water conservation and waste reduction by fostering emotional and practical encouragement. Social trust also played a critical role, enhancing confidence in institutions and neighbors, thus promoting compliance with environmental policies. Social cohesion and sense of belonging further supported collective and sustainable actions, respectively, by strengthening community ties and emotional attachment to the local environment. The model explained 90% of the variance in environmental behaviors, aligning with theories of social capital (Putnam, 2000), social trust (Fukuyama, 1995), place attachment (Scannell & Gifford, 2010), and planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991). Indirect effects highlighted the mediating roles of social support (42.18%) and sense of belonging (19.32%), amplifying the influence of social cohesion and trust. These findings underscore that robust social networks and institutional trust are vital for fostering sustainable practices in urban settings like Isfahan. The study proposes policy interventions, including enhancing institutional transparency through regular environmental reports, establishing local networks for recycling and sustainability education, and launching cultural campaigns, such as annual Zayandeh Rud festivals, to boost community engagement and environmental stewardship. Limitations include the reliance on quantitative data, which may overlook cultural or motivational nuances, and the lack of intra-city geographical analysis. Future research should integrate qualitative approaches, such as in-depth interviews, and conduct comparative studies with cities like Tehran or Yazd to enhance generalizability. This study highlights the critical role of social well-being in promoting environmental behaviors, offering a comprehensive framework for urban policymakers to address Isfahan’s environmental challenges through socially driven strategies, with potential applicability to other cities facing similar issues. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Social Well-Being, Environmental Behavior, Social Cohesion, Social Trust | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahi, A., & Sadeghi, H. (2024). Environmental attitudes, knowledge, and energy consumption behavior: A case study of citizens of Isfahan city. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 29–42. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30473/ee.2023.65153.2559 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.01.001 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01242 Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In R. E. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 482–524). Greenwood Press. Durkheim, É. (1893). The division of labor in society. Alcan. Environmental Organization (2022). Environmental Organization Programs. [In Persian] https://www.pana.ir Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press. Habibi, S., & Salehi, S. (2023). Villagers and environmental behaviors: A qualitative study on the state of environmental socialization in the villages of western Gilan. Rural Research, 14(2), 264–285. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2023.92916 Habibi, S., & Salehi, S. (2024). Investigating the impact of cultural activities of village councils on environmental behaviors in the villages of western Gilan (Talesh region). Geography and Development, (75), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2024.46971.3588[In Persian] Isfahan Municipality (2022). Isfahan Municipality 1402 Budget in Plain Language. Isfahan Municipality Human Capital Planning and Development Deputy. [In Persian] https://plan.isfahan.ir/sites/isfct/files/digital_asset_files/plan Isfahan Province Water and Wastewater Company (2022). Approval of the proposed 1402 budget of Isfahan Province Water and Wastewater Company at the General Assembly of Shareholders. [In Persian] https://www.abfaesfahan.ir Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065 Mahjoubi Dariakenari, M., Rezaei, A., & Salehi, S. (2019). Comparison of environmental behaviors among ethnic groups: A case study of Azeri, Talesh, and Gilak ethnicities in Gilan and Ardabil provinces. Applied Sociology, 30(3), 47–62. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2019.113028.1485 Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press. Park, J., & Kim, S. (2020). Place attachment and natural resource conservation. Ecological Economics, 169, Article 106487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106487 Pazokinejad, Z., & Salehi, S. (2014). Analysis of social factors affecting students’ environmental attitudes and performance. Applied Sociology, 25(3), 71–88. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.1001.1.20085745.1393.25.3.5.6 [In Persian] Pretty, J., Peacock, J., & Hine, R. (2007). Green exercise: The benefits of activities in green places. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(3), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.11.002 Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. Salehi, S., & Emamgholi, L. (2012). Cultural capital and environmental attitudes and behaviors: A case study in Kurdistan province. Cultural Studies and Communication, 8(28), 91–120. [In Persian] https://sid.ir/paper/118207/en Salehi, S., Niazi Komleh, A., & Bayani, F. (2022). A sociological study of the effect of protection motivation on environmental behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Studies and Research in Iran, 11(4), 1009–1032. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2022.328866.1230 Salehi, S., & Shateri, P. (2024). Assessing the participation level of environmental NGO actors with an environmental culture approach. Journal of Waqf and Charitable Studies, 2(1), 51–72. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22108/ecs.2023.139156.1070 Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006 Schmidt, K., & Weber, P. (2019). Social norms and pro-environmental actions. Environment and Behavior, 51(5), 484–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518781234 Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227 Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 Tahmasebi, S., Zahedi Mazandarani, M. J., & Salehi, S. (2023). Meta-theoretical modeling of the constructivist-interpretive paradigm in explaining environmental issues. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 16(1), 5–36. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2024.5136.4911 Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole. Thompson, R., & Green, L. (2010). Social capital and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.003 Zhang, H., & Liu, Q. (2021). Trust and sustainable consumer behavior. Sustainability, 13(6), Article 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13060305 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 530 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 158 |
||