پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,308 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,245 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 23,474,683 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,804,559 |
تدوین مدل مفهومی حمایت سازمانی از روانشناسی ورزش: پژوهش کیفی مبتنی بر نظریهپردازی دادهبنیاد | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهشهای کاربردی در مدیریت ورزشی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 15، 1 (تابستان 1405) - شماره پیاپی 57، تیر 1405، صفحه 39-54 اصل مقاله (878.42 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/arsm.2026.77253.4038 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| امیر دانا* | ||
| دانشیار، گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در ورزشهای معاصر، بهزیستی روانشناختی نقش مهمی در عملکرد ورزشکاران دارد، اما اثربخشی آن به میزان حمایت سازمانی وابسته است؛ موضوعی که در بستر ورزش ایران کمتر بررسی شده است. هدف این پژوهش، توسعه یک مدل جامع حمایت سازمانی برای روانشناسی ورزش بر اساس تجربیات و ادراکات ذینفعان کلیدی بود. پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و از طریق مصاحبههای نیمه ساختاریافته عمیق با ۱۲ نفر از روانشناسان ورزشی، مربیان و مدیران ورزشی انجام شد. دادهها با روش تحلیل مضمون و کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی تحلیل شدند. نتایج منجر به شناسایی پنج بعد اصلی شامل عوامل علی، زمینهای، مداخلهگر، راهبردها و پیامدها شد. یافتهها نشان داد مشارکت رهبری، حمایت ساختاری و سیاستی و تخصیص منابع از عوامل کلیدی در اجرای مؤثر روانشناسی ورزش هستند، در حالی که محدودیتهای زمانی، موانع فرهنگی، ضعف ارتباطات و سیاستهای متناقض از موانع اصلی محسوب میشوند. راهبردهای پیشنهادی شامل مدلسازی رهبری، مشارکت مربیان، ادغام روانشناسان در ساختار تیم، توسعه سیاستها، مشارکت ورزشکاران، مدیریت منابع و آموزش بود. پیامدهای اجرای این راهبردها شامل ارتقای بهزیستی و عملکرد ورزشکاران، انسجام تیمی، افزایش مشارکت در برنامههای مهارتهای ذهنی و توسعهسازمانی است. این مدل چارچوبی کاربردی برای ادغام پایدار روانشناسی ورزش در سازمانهای ورزشی ارائه میدهد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| حمایت سازمانی؛ روانشناسی ورزش؛ بهزیستی؛ تحقیق کیفی؛ ورزش رقابتی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Developing a Conceptual Model of Organizational Support for Sport Psychology: A Qualitative Study Based on Grounded | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Amir Dana | ||
| Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education, Ta.C., Islamic Azad university, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
Introduction Psychological well-being has become a fundamental component of athletic performance in contemporary sport, alongside physical conditioning and technical skills. However, the effectiveness of sport psychology interventions is highly dependent on the level of organizational support provided by sport institutions. In many developing and transitional sport systems, including Iran, organizational structures, leadership practices, and cultural norms often limit the systematic integration of psychological services. Despite growing recognition of mental skills training, few comprehensive models exist that explain how organizational factors facilitate or hinder sport psychology implementation. The present study aimed to design a conceptual model of organizational support for sport psychology within Iranian sport organizations. By exploring the experiences and perceptions of sport psychologists, coaches, and managers, this research sought to identify causal, contextual, and intervening factors, as well as effective strategies and outcomes, in order to provide a holistic framework for sustainable psychological support in competitive sport settings. Mothodology This study adopted a qualitative research design based on grounded theory methodology using the Strauss and Corbin approach. The research was applied in nature and focused on developing a practical model for organizational support in sport psychology. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders in Iranian sport organizations. Participants were selected using purposive sampling to ensure rich and relevant information. The sample consisted of 12 experts, including four sport psychologists, four professional coaches, and four sport managers, all with extensive experience in elite and professional sport. Participants’ ages ranged from 27 to 37 years, with professional experience between 5 and 12 years. Most held doctoral degrees, ensuring high academic and professional credibility. Sampling continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Interviews lasted between 60 and 90 minutes and were conducted individually in a confidential environment. The main guiding question focused on identifying organizational factors that support sport psychology, followed by questions regarding barriers, strategies, and outcomes. All interviews were audio-recorded with participants’ consent and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis followed three systematic stages: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. During open coding, initial concepts were extracted from the transcripts. Axial coding was used to organize these concepts into broader categories, while selective coding integrated the categories into a coherent theoretical model. To ensure trustworthiness, credibility, transferability, and confirmability were addressed. Member checking was conducted by returning transcripts and codes to participants. Peer debriefing involved collaboration with experts and independent coders. Reliability was assessed through re-coding procedures and Cohen’s Kappa coefficient using SPSS. These strategies enhanced the rigor and validity of the qualitative findings. Findings Data analysis generated more than 185 initial codes, which were systematically organized into five major dimensions: causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences. These dimensions formed the basis of the final organizational support model for sport psychology. Causal conditions primarily included leadership support, structural support, resource prioritization, and policy support. Leadership involvement emerged as the most influential factor. Leaders who actively participated in psychological programs, modeled positive attitudes, and emphasized mental skills created a supportive environment that legitimized sport psychology. Structural support, such as employing qualified psychologists and integrating them into team planning, enhanced accessibility and trust. Resource prioritization and formal policies further strengthened organizational commitment. Contextual conditions consisted of organizational culture, team environment, type and level of sport, resource availability, and governance structures. A culture that valued mental health encouraged athlete engagement, while negative attitudes discouraged participation. Team dynamics, competition pressure, and sport type influenced the nature and intensity of psychological needs. Limited financial and physical resources constrained service delivery, even in supportive organizations. Intervening conditions included time constraints, cultural barriers, resource limitations, communication gaps, leadership-policy inconsistencies, and athlete perceptions. Intensive training schedules often reduced opportunities for mental skills training. Cultural stigma surrounding psychological help, especially among male athletes, hindered utilization. Weak coordination among managers, coaches, and psychologists further reduced program effectiveness. Several strategies were identified to enhance organizational support. These included leadership participation, coach involvement, integration of psychologists into teams, policy and program development, athlete participation, resource management, and educational initiatives. Leaders promoted psychological services through workshops and role modeling. Coaches reinforced mental skills during training. Psychologists adapted interventions to team culture and provided continuous feedback. Clear policies, transparent budgeting, and awareness programs supported long-term sustainability. The implementation of these strategies produced multiple positive outcomes. Athletes reported improved psychological well-being, reduced stress, increased resilience, and greater confidence. Performance stability, concentration, and decision-making under pressure improved. Team cohesion and communication strengthened, leading to enhanced collective commitment. Engagement in mental skills programs increased, and organizations demonstrated improved readiness, accountability, and capacity for sustainable development. Discussion and Conclusion The findings demonstrate that organizational support for sport psychology is a multidimensional and systemic process influenced by leadership, culture, structure, and resources. Consistent with organizational support theory, visible leadership commitment plays a central role in shaping athlete attitudes and engagement. The study highlights that psychological interventions cannot function effectively in isolation; rather, they must be embedded within organizational policies and daily practices. Cultural barriers and time constraints remain major challenges in Iranian sport, requiring targeted educational and managerial interventions. The proposed model extends existing literature by integrating causal, contextual, and strategic dimensions into a unified framework tailored to developing sport systems. Practically, the model provides managers, coaches, and policymakers with evidence-based guidance for institutionalizing psychological services. Future research should examine the quantitative impact of this model across different sport types and competitive levels. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Organizational Support, Sport Psychology, Athlete Well-being, Leadership, Qualitative Research, Performance Enhancement | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alimardani, M., Keshavarz, L. & Farahani, A. (2023). Determine super-efficiency and identify undesirable output factors the Olympic Federations of Iran. Applied Research of Sport Management, 12(3), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.30473/arsm.2023.48150.3028 Anthony, D. R., Gucciardi, D. F., & Gordon, S. (2016). A meta-study of qualitative research on mental toughness development. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 9(1), 160-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2016.1146787 Bentzen, M., Lemyre, P. N., & Kenttä, G. (2014). The process of burnout among professional sport coaches through the lens of self-determination theory: A qualitative approach. Sports Coaching Review, 3(2), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2015.1035050 Chandler, C., Eubank, M. R., Nesti, M. S., & Tod, D. (2016). Personal qualities of effective sport psychologists: Coping with organisational demands in high performance sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 47(4), 297-317. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2014-0003 Esmailie, S., Ghasemi, H. & Farahani, A. (2024). Development of the Distributed Ledger Technology Application Model in the Management of Iranian Professional Sports Clubs. Applied Research of Sport Management, 13(2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.30473/arsm.2024.65516.3751 Fan, X., & Jianwei, F. (2025). Strategic Organisational Support for Stress and Burnout: Insights from Rural Teachers' Stress Profiles. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1580573. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1580573 Farahani, A., Ghorbani Ghahfarokhi, L., Sadr, M.M., & Mirmohammadian Toutkaleh, S.F. (2025). Identifying the Factors that Determine the Alignment of Information Technology with Organizational Strategies in Iranian Sports Federations. Applied Research of Sport Management, 14(1), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.30473/arsm.2025.71972.3907 Fasey, K. J., Sarkar, M., Wagstaff, C. R., & Johnston, J. (2022). Understanding organizational resilience in elite sport: An exploration of psychosocial processes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 62, 102236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102236 Feddersen, N. B., Champ, F., & Littlewood, M. A. (2025). The Sport Psychology Canvas: Designing, adapting, and documenting Sport Psychology provisions in men’s football academies in England. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2024.2446206 Fletcher, D., & Wagstaff, C. R. (2009). Organizational psychology in elite sport: Its emergence, application and future. Psychology of sport and exercise, 10(4), 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.03.009 Fletcher, D., Rumbold, J. L., Tester, R., & Coombes, M. S. (2011). Sport psychologists’ experiences of organizational stressors. The Sport Psychologist, 25(3), 363-381. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.25.3.363 Fogaça, J. L., Quartiroli, A., & Wagstaff, C. R. (2024). Professional development of sport psychology practitioners: From systematic review to a model of development. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 70, 102550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102550 Horn, T. S. (2008). Advances in sport psychology. Human kinetics. Keegan, R., Stoljarova, S., Kessler, L., & Jack, S. (2022). Psychological support for the talent pathway: Qualitative process evaluation of a state sport academy’s psychology service. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 34(3), 665-690. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10413200.2020.1833378 Livingston, L. A., & Forbes, S. L. (2016). Factors contributing to the retention of Canadian amateur sport officials: Motivations, perceived organizational support, and resilience. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 11(3), 342-355. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1747954116644061 Mansouri, H., Pyun, D. Y., Md Husin, M., Gholami Torkesaluye, S., & Rouzfarakh, A. (2024). The influences of authentic leadership, meaningful work, and perceived organizational support on psychological well-being of employees in sport organizations. Journal of Global Sport Management, 9(3), 575-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2022.2155981 McCormack, H. M., MacIntyre, T. E., O’Shea, D., Campbell, M. J., & Igou, E. R. (2015). Practicing what we preach: Investigating the role of social support in sport psychologists’ well-being. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1854. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01854 Oja, B. D., Gordon, B. S., & Hazzaa, R. N. (2023). Navigating psychological membership in sport organizations: Exploring sport employees’ identities. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 35(2), 202-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2021.2021563 Poucher, Z. A., Tamminen, K. A., Caron, J. G., & Sweet, S. N. (2020). Thinking through and designing qualitative research studies: A focused mapping review of 30 years of qualitative research in sport psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(1), 163-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2019.1656276 Slack, T., & Parent, M. M. (2006). Understanding sport organizations: The application of organization theory. Human Kinetics. Stewart, P., Fletcher, D., Arnold, R., & McEwan, D. (2024). Exploring perceptions of performance support team effectiveness in elite sport. Sport Management Review, 27(2), 300-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2023.2284987 Ströbel, T., Maier, C., & Woratschek, H. (2018). How to reduce turnover intention in team sports? Effect of organizational support on turnover intention of professional team sports athletes. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 8(2), 98-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-05-2017-0032 Wagstaff, C., Fletcher, D., & Hanton, S. (2012). Positive organizational psychology in sport: An ethnography of organizational functioning in a national sport organization. Journal of applied sport psychology, 24(1), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2011.589423 Woodman, T., & Hardy, L. (2001). A case study of organizational stress in elite sport. Applied Sport Psychology, 13(2), 207-238. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/104132001753149892 Yu, L., & Cheng, L. (2024). The work stress, occupational burnout, coping strategies and organizational support of elite sports coaches in Sichuan Province: the mediating role of organizational support. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1437234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1437234 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 105 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 5 |
||
