پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,264 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,909 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 22,310,504 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,992,004 |
طرحریزی دیپلماسی ورزشی در ایران براساس تحلیل اهمیت – عملکرد | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهشهای کاربردی در مدیریت ورزشی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 14، 4 (بهار 1405) - شماره پیاپی 56، فروردین 1405، صفحه 1-24 اصل مقاله (2.03 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/arsm.2026.75360.3982 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محیا کریمی1؛ مریم مختاری دینانی2؛ عباس نظریان مادوانی* 3؛ عباس رضایی پندری4 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه الزهرا(س)، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه الزهرا (س)، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 4استادیار، گروه تحقیق در عملیات، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پژوهش حاضر با هدف طرحریزی دیپلماسی ورزشی در سازمانهای ورزشی ایران انجام شد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل تمامی خبرگان، کارشناسان و صاحبنظران بخش ستادی سازمانهای کلان ورزشی جمهوری اسلامی ایران بودند که از بین آنها نمونه پژوهش به شیوه هدفمند انتخاب شد. ابزار پژوهش پرسشنامه محققساختهای است که با روش مطالعات کتابخانهای تهیه شد و پس از تأیید روایی محتوایی، مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. با استفاده از روش DNAP، روابط شبکهای مؤلفهها تعیین و وزن مؤثر هر مؤلفه از ماتریس همبستگی کامل براساس مفهوم اساسی ANP محاسبه شد. یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد که ابعاد دیپلماسی ورزشی در سازمانهای ورزشی کشور شامل 5 بعد «انسجام درونی»، «بهبود و ترویج»، «اعتمادسازی بینالمللی»، «بستری برای گفتگو» و «تصویرسازی بینالمللی» است که دو بعد اول در دسته ابعاد علت (اثرگذار) و بقیه ابعاد در دسته ابعاد معلول (تأثیرپذیر) قرار گرفتند. همچنین، تحلیل IPA نشان داد که ابعاد «انسجام درونی» و «بهبود و ترویج» در دسته ابعاد دارای اهمیت پایین و عملکرد بالا (نیازمند اقدام اصلاحی فوری)، بعد «تصویرسازی بینالمللی» در دسته ابعاد دارای اهمیت بالا و عملکرد بالا (نیازمند تداوم)، بعد «اعتمادسازی بینالمللی» در دسته ابعاد دارای اهمیت بالا و عملکرد پایین (عدم نیاز به اصلاح فوری) و بعد «بستری برای گفتگو» در دسته ابعاد دارای اهمیت و عملکرد پایین قرار داشت. براساس نتایج به دست آمده در پژوهش حاضر، پیشنهاد میشود مدیران عالی ورزش کشور، علاوهبر توجه به ابعاد و مؤلفههای شناسایی شده در این پژوهش، شرایطی را مهیا نمایند تا با ارتقای نشاط و شادکامی اجتماعی، ارتقای همبستگی ملی و هویتبخشی ملی، بهبود روابط سیاسی و حقوقی، بهبود شرایط اجتماعی و فرهنگی و ترویج صلح و دوستی، بسترهای بهبود و ارتقای دیپلماسی ورزشی در سازمانهای ایران را فراهم نمایند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| دیپلماسی ورزشی؛ سازمانهای ورزشی؛ اعتمادسازی بینالمللی؛ انسجام درونی؛ بستری برای گفتگو؛ بهبود و ترویج؛ تصویرسازی بینالمللی؛ تحلیل اهمیت – عملکرد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Mapping Iran Sports Diplomacy Based on Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mahya Karimi1؛ Maryam Mokhtari Dinani2؛ Abbas Nazarian Madavani3؛ Abbas Rezaei Pandari4 | ||
| 1MS.c Graduated, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Shahid Rajaei Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 4Department of Operations Research, Faculty of Management and Economiy, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Today, sports have become an important aspect of the political influence of governments. Sports are a tool for international affairs that countries can use to strengthen relationships around the world. As a key component of soft power, sports can be an effective tool in determining diplomatic relations. Many policymakers and experts believe that sports diplomacy is an easy, safe, and gentle tool for improving international relations (Min and Choi, 2019). As an element of public diplomacy, also called soft power, sports have a significant contribution to peacebuilding (Leite Junior & Rodrigues, 2020). The results of the study by Raeissadat et al. (2022) indicate that sports competitions can provide a context for convergence and cooperation. In a study, Garamvölgyi & Dóczi (2021) introduced the Hungarian sports diplomacy approach with a focus on the use of sports in public diplomacy. Emphasizing the investment of large amounts of public funds by the government to attract and organize international sports competitions, they stated that by institutionalizing sports in public diplomacy, Hungary has become a pioneering country in Central and Eastern Europe that can be an example for other governments and nations in the region. Dichter (2020) introduced the FIFA World Cup as a space for numerous diplomatic opportunities for men, players, youth or women and examined the link between the world's most popular sport and global diplomacy in national and transnational contexts. Søyland (2020) showed in a study that the country has been able to use its sport in the best way to gain global appeal and soft power, and Qatar's domestic policies have worked well in this regard despite criticism. Won and Chiu (2020) compared the functions of sports diplomacy in Taiwan and South Korea and showed that Taiwan's geopolitical situation has a negative impact on hosting international sports events compared to mainland China. Despite the effective role of sports diplomacy in increasing the identity, pride, and national cohesion of countries, presenting a favorable image of them in the international arena, and reducing political isolation, unfortunately, Iranian sports organizations have not taken an effective step in this regard and have not utilized the potential of sports to expand international interactions. This is despite the efforts made to impose economic and political sanctions on the Islamic Republic of Iran in recent years, the field of sports can be an effective way to present a true and favorable image of Iran in the international arena. Since in Iran, various organizations and executive bodies are active in the development of sports at the championship and professional levels, and the reflection of their activities can lead to presenting a favorable image of Iran's sports diplomacy at the national, regional and global levels, in order to develop sports diplomacy in Iran, each of the sports organizations and executive bodies must play a role and participate in the development of sports diplomacy. To achieve this, it is necessary to first determine the performance of each of these bodies and then, considering the status of each of them and their performance in the development of sports diplomacy, take steps to strengthen the dimensions of sports diplomacy in that specific body. Therefore, the question arises: what are the dimensions of sports diplomacy? And how is the performance of Iranian sports organizations in utilizing the capacities of sports diplomacy? Also, in order to develop the sports diplomacy efforts of Iranian sports organizations, in which of the dimensions does it need to be corrected or made fundamental changes? Therefore, the present work aims at mapping sport diplomacy in Iranian sport organizations. Mothodology The present study is descriptive-survey in nature and method, and field research in terms of data collection. The statistical population was composed of all professionals, experts, and authorities of major sport organizations of Iran, from whom the research sample was selected in a purposeful manner. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire that was prepared using the library study method and was used after confirming content validity by CVI method. By conducting library studies, a list of 25 components of sports diplomacy in Iranian sports organizations was identified, which were organized into 5 main dimensions: "internal cohesion", "improvement and promotion", "international trust-building", "platform for dialogue", and "international imagery”. Using DNAP method, the network relationships of components determined and the effective weight of each component calculated from the complete correlation matrix based on the basic concept of ANP. Findings The description of the demographic characteristics of the experts participating in the study shows that in terms of gender, most of the experts were male (79.92%). In terms of education, most of them had a PhD (73.26%). In terms of age, most of them were between 41 and 50 years old (46.22%). Also, most of the experts had work experience between 21 and 30 years (59.94%). Results revealed five dimensions of sport diplomacy in the organizations including "internal cohesion","improvement and promotion", "international trust-building", "platform for dialogue", and "international imagery"; the first two of which were also categorized as causal (effective) dimensions, while the rest were of influential dimensions. The IPA analysis showed that "internal coherence" and "improvement and promotion" belong to the category of low-importance, high-performance dimensions requiring immediate attention. "International imagery" was also categorized as high-importance, high-performance dimension (requiring continuation). "International trust building" belongs to the high-importance, low-performance category (not requiring immediate attention); "platform for dialogue" also belongs to the low-importance, low-performance category. Discussion and Conclusion The study of the relationships and importance of the dimensions of sports diplomacy in Iranian sports organizations showed that the dimensions of "internal cohesion", "improvement and promotion" are in the category of cause dimensions (influencing) and the dimensions of "international trust-building", "platform for dialogue", and "international imagery” are in the category of effect dimensions (influencing). In addition, the dimension of "internal cohesion" was the most influential and the dimension of "international trust-building" was the most influential dimension in terms of relationship. In terms of importance, the dimension of "international imagery” was the most important and the dimension of "platform for dialogue" was the least important dimension of sports diplomacy in the country's sports organizations. In the dimension of internal cohesion (the most effective dimension of sports diplomacy), the components of “national solidarity”, “social vitality and happiness”, and “elimination of discrimination and deprivation” are in the category of influential components, and the component of “national solidarity” is the most influential component. In other words, if the national solidarity component is improved, other components of the internal cohesion dimension will be improved and, as a result, the scope for sports diplomacy in sports organizations will increase. In addition to the internal cohesion dimension, the improvement and promotion dimension also constituted another influential dimension on other dimensions of sports diplomacy. The improvement and promotion dimension consists of the components of “improving political and legal relations”, “improving social and cultural conditions”, “promoting peace and friendship”, and “promoting moral standards and concepts”, among which, the components of “improving social and cultural conditions” and “promoting moral standards” and concepts are included in the category of influential components. The results indicates that the component of “improving social and cultural conditions” is the most influential component in this dimension. In other words, if the component of “improving social and cultural conditions” is promoted, the other components of the improvement and promotion dimension are also promoted, and as a result, the field of sports diplomacy in sports organizations also increases. Other findings of the present study showed that the dimensions of “international trust-building”, “platform for dialogue” and “international imagery” are in the category of affected dimensions. In fact, it can be stated that these dimensions are the result of promoting the dimensions of “internal coherence” and “improvement and promotion”. In addition, the findings of the present study showed that the dimension of "international trust-building" is the most influential dimension of sports diplomacy and among its components, the component of lobbying and leveraging sports constitutes the most influential component. Finally, the findings of this section showed that in terms of importance, the dimension of "international imagery" constituted the most important dimension of sports diplomacy in the country's sports organizations. In fact, it can be said that the most important goal of sports diplomacy is "international imagery" or, in other words, improving the country's image; because by improving the state of international imagery, it is expected that the country's cultural and media communications and interactions will be improved, a favorable image of the country will be created on the international stage, and the attractiveness and soft power of sports symbols will also increase. Considering the findings of the present study, which shows that the dimension of "improvement and promotion" and its components are among the influential dimensions in the sports diplomacy of the country's sports organizations, it is suggested that, more than other components of this dimension, the issue of improving the country's social and cultural conditions should be placed at the top of the government's programs so that by promoting it, the ground for improving sports diplomacy and ultimately obtaining its numerous benefits for the country can be prepared. Based on the results, it is suggested that the country's top sports managers, in addition to paying attention to the dimensions and components identified in this study, provide conditions to improve and promote sports diplomacy in Iranian organizations by promoting social vitality and happiness, promoting national solidarity and national identity, improving political and legal relations, improving social and cultural conditions, and promoting peace and friendship. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Sport Diplomacy, Importance Performance Analysis, Sport Organizations, International Imagery, Internal Cohesion | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdi, K., Talebpour, M., Fullerton, J., Ranjkesh, MJ., & Jabbari Nooghabi, H. (2018). Converting Sports Diplomacy to Diplomatic Outcomes: Introducing a Sports Diplomacy Model. International Area Studies Review, 21(4), 365–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865918808058 Abdi, K., Talebpour, M., Fullerton, J., Ranjkesh, MJ., & Jabbari Nooghabi, H. (2019). Identifying Sports Diplomacy Resources as Soft Power Tools. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(3), 147–55. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00115-9 Abdi, K., Talebpour, M., Ranjkesh, M., & Jabbari Nooghabi, H. (2021). The Modeling of Soft Power Implementation Throughout Sport Diplomacy. Sport Management Studies, 13(66), 263-296. (In Persian) Apollo, M., Mostowska, J., Legut, A., Maciuk, K., & Timothy, D. J. (2023). Gender Differences in Competitive Adventure Sports Tourism. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 42, 100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100604 Berg, B K. ( 2021). The Immense Potential of Sport Diplomacy. Findings in Sport, Hospitality, Entertainment, and Event Management. Vol. 1. Brownell, S. (2013). The Olympic Public Sphere: The London and Beijing Opening Ceremonies as Representative of Political Systems. In International Journal of the History of Sport, 30,1315–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2013.793180 Chiu, WY., Tzeng, GH., & Li, HL. (2013). A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve E-store business. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37(January), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.06.017 Dichter, H.L. (2020). Soccer Diplomacy International Relations and Football since 1914. Edited by Peter J. Beck. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdv7x Dichter, H.L., & Beck, P.J., (2022). Soccer Diplomacy: International Relations and Football since 1914, Sport in History, 42 (1), 154-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460263.2021.2024975 Dixon, Marlene A., Arden, J., Anderson, Robert E., Baker, Pamela HB. Esherick, C. (2019). Management in Sport for Development: Examining the Structure and Processes of a Sport Diplomacy Initiative. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 19(3/4), 268. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2019.099787 Ebrahimipour, H., Mokhtari Dinani, M., & Rezaei Pandari, A. (2021). Influential Social Marketing Interventions in Physical Activity Promotion. Health Education, 121(6), 569-83. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-04-2021-0058 Esherick, C., Baker, RE., Jackson, S., & Sam, M. (2018). Case Studies in Sport Diplomacy. FiT Publishing. Ettinger, A. (2023). Saudi Arabia, Sports Diplomacy and Authoritarian Capitalism in World Politics. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 531-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2206402 Garamvölgyi, B., Bardocz-Bencsik, M., & Dóczi, T. (2022). Mapping the Role of Grassroots Sport in Public Diplomacy. Sport in Society, 25(5), 889–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2020.1807955 Garamvölgyi, B., & Dóczi, T. (2021). Sport as a Tool for Public Diplomacy in Hungary. Physical Culture and Sport, 90(1), 39-49. https://10.2478/pcssr-2021-0012 Gauthier, R. (2019). Constructing Statehood through Sport: Football, Kosovo, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire Canadien de Droit International 56 (October): 220-257. https://doi.org/10.1017/CYL.2019.4 Chu, R.K.S., & Choi, T. (2000). An Importance-Performance Analysis of Hotel Selection Factors in the Hong Kong Hotel Industry: a Comparison of Business and Leisure Travelers. Tourism Management, 21(4), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00070-9 Grix, J. (2013). Sport Politics and the Olympics. Political Studies Review, 11(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12001 Jafabeigi, Sh., Nouri, M.S., & Moharramzadeh, M. (2025). Structural Model of International Competence and Diplomacy of Sports Managers in the Country. Research in Sport Management and Marketing, 6(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.22098/rsmm.2022.10495.1091 Jarvie, G. (2024). Sport, Soft Power and Cultural Relations. Journal of Global Sport Management, 9(4), 670-687. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2021.1952093 Kang, Y., & Houlihan, B. (2021). Sport as a Diplomatic Resource: the Case of South Korea, 1970-2017. Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2021.1877169 Knight, J. (2023). Knowledge Diplomacy: the Role of International Higher Education, Research and Innovation in International Relations. International Encyclopedia of Education, 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.02035-2 Leite Junior, E., & Rodrigues, C. (2020). Belt, Road and Ball: Football as a Chinese Soft Power and Public Diplomacy Tool. In the Belt and Road Initiative (pp. 61-83). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. Li, M., Pitts, B.G., & Quarterman, J. (2008). Research Methods in Sport Management, UNKNO. Min, D., & Choi, Y. (2019). Sport Cooperation in Divided Korea: An Overstated Role of Sport Diplomacy in South Korea. Sport in Society, 22(8), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2018.1536120 Mohammadhassan, F., Honari, H., Farahani, A., Safania, A.M., Bagherian Farahabadi, M. (2023). Proposing Development Model of Diplomacy through Sport. Sport Management, 15(1), 19-35. (In Persian) DOI: 10.22059/jsm.2020.299042.2425 Moradi Siasar, G.H., & Bakhtiyari Babapiri, A. (2025). Comprehensive sports diplomacy model for Iran's Police. New Approaches in Sports Mmanagement, 13(48), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.22034/ntsmj.2024.2030426.1027 Mousset, K., Violette, L., & Épron, A. (2023). The Failure to Co-host the Seoul 1988 Summer Olympics: A Diplomacy “of Small Steps” Influenced by International Opinion (1985–88). Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 387-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2239821 Murray, S., & Pigman, GA. (2014). Mapping the Relationship Between International Sport and Diplomacy. Sport in Society, 17(9), 1098–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2013.856616 Murray, S. (2013). Sports Diplomacy in the Australian Context: A Case Study of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Sports Law and Governance Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6399 Murray, S. (2018). Sports Diplomacy Origins, Theory and practice. 1st Edition, Routledge. Murray, S. (2012). The Two Halves of Sports-Diplomacy. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 23(3), 576-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2012.706544 Nouri, D., Ghadimi, B., & Shojaei, M. (2018). Designing a Model of Iranian Football Diplomacy Based on Field Theory. Strategic Studies in Sports and Youth, 17(41), 113-136. (In Persian) Ozsari, A., Fisekcioglu, İ. B., Cetin, M. C., & Temel, A. S. (2018). Sport Diplomacy as Public Diplomacy Element. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 6(3), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.14486/IntJSCS765 Pandari, A. R. (2024). A New Framework for Sustainable Development Policymaking Based on Importance–Performance Analysis. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 8(5), 1615-1627. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-024-00448-w Pigman, G. (2014). International Sport and Diplomacy’s Public Dimension: Governments, Sporting Federations and the Global Audience. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 25(1), 94-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2014.873613 Podoler, G. (2024). Sports-Heritage Diplomacy and Inter-Korean Relations: Possibilities and Challenges. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 17(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2024.2378142 Raeissadat, M T., Mottaghi, A., Sajjadi, N., & Rabiei, H. (2022). The Geopolitics of Sport and Diplomacy of Neighborhood Relations in the 2022 World Cup in Qatar (Case Study: Iran and the Persian Gulf Arab States). Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(4), 334–52. Rezaei Pandari, A., Azar, A., Taghavi, A., & Moghbel Baarz, A. (2015). A Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Model for Service Supply Chains Management Performance Measurement (Case Study: Insurance Industry). Industrial Management Perspective, 4(4), 75-93. (In Persian) Rofe, J. S., & Postlethwaite, V. (2021). Scholarship and Sports Diplomacy: The Cases of Japan and the United Kingdom. Diplomatica, 3(2), 363–85. https://doi.org/10.1163/25891774-03020005 Sabzi, Z., Shariati Feizabadi, M., & Saboonchi, R. (2021). Role of Sport Diplomacy in Developing Interactions of Iran and USA. Journal of Sport Management, 12(4), 1119-1140. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jsm.2020.284611.2294 Said, A. (2019). Qatar’s Bid for the World Cup: the Role of Sport in International Relations. Bachelor's thesis, University of Malta. Søyland, H. S. (2020). Qatar's Sports Strategy: A Case of Sports Diplomacy or Sportswashing? (Doctoral Dissertation), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portgual. Trunkos, J., & Heere, B. (2017). Sport Diplomacy: A Review of How Sports Can be Used to Improve International Relations. In. FIT Publishing. Vidal-Vilaplana, A., Gregori-Faus, C., Parra-Camacho, D., & González-Serrano, M. H. (2023). Analysis of Sport Management Subjects in University Sports Sciences Degrees in Spain. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100771 Won, D., & Chiu, W. (2020). Politics, Place and Nation: Comparing the Hosting of Sport Events in Korea and Taiwan. Sport in Society, 23(1), 142–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2018.1555911 Yen, G.-F., & Tsao, H.-C. (2020). Reexamining Consumers’ Cognition and Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility via a DANP and IPA Method. Sustainability, 12(2), 1-26. Zhaoa, Ch., & Knijnik, J. (2021). Women’s Tennis Diplomacy: Australia–China Cultural relations and Li Na as a Sports Celebrity Diplomat of the Australian Open. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(2), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2021.1928732 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 8 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 14 |
||
