پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,282 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,081 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 22,936,163 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,485,157 |
تحلیل عوامل درونزا و برونزا بر روند توسعه کالبدی –اجتماعی مسکن روستایی (مورد مطالعه : ناحیه سیستان) | ||
| برنامه ریزی توسعه کالبدی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 12، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 40، اسفند 1404، صفحه 1-18 اصل مقاله (1.47 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/psp.2026.77530.2804 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| سیروس قنبری* | ||
| گروه جغرافیای روستایی،دانشکده جغرافیا وبرنامه ریزی محیطی،دانشگاه سیستان وبلوچستان،زاهدان،ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| توسعه کالبدی و اجتماعی پایدار مسکن روستایی به عنوان یکی از ارکان اصلی شکلگیری و حفظ حیات جوامع محلی، همواره یکی از دغدغههای اصلی سیاستگذاران توسعه منطقهای بوده است. در این میان، ناحیه سیستان به دلیل ویژگیهای اقلیمی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی منحصر به فرد خود، نمونهای بارز از مناطقی است که روند توسعه مسکن در آن تحت تأثیر نیروهای متضاد و پیچیدهای قرار دارد. این پژوهش با هدف اصلی تحلیل و سنجش عوامل درونزا و برونزا مؤثر بر روند توسعه کالبدی و اجتماعی مسکن روستایی در این ناحیه انجام پذیرفته است تا درک عمیقتری از مکانیسمهای مؤثر بر کیفیت زندگی روستایی فراهم آورد و در نهایت، راهبردهای بهینهسازی مداخلات توسعهای ارائه دهد. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و با بهکارگیری روش ترکیبی (کیفی-کمی) و رویکرد توصیفی-تحلیلی انجام شده است. جامعه آماری در دو گروه متخصصان (۲۰ نفر با نمونهگیری هدفمند تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری) و ساکنان محلی (۱۷۰ نفر با نمونهگیری در دسترس) تعریف شد. با استفاده از روش تئوری زمینهای، عوامل درونزا (شامل دانش بومی سازگار با اقلیم، الگوهای فرهنگی-خانوادگی، نظام معیشتی و اقتصادی محلی و سرمایه اجتماعی) و عوامل برونزا (شامل سیاستهای کلان، مخاطرات طبیعی و تغییرات اقلیمی، تحولات اقتصادی، نفوذ الگوهای فرهنگی-کالبدی و زیرساختهای خارجی) شناسایی شدند. بر اساس نتایج آزمون t تکنمونهای از دیدگاه جوامع محلی، مخاطرات طبیعی و تغییرات اقلیمی با بالاترین میانگین (۷۷/۳) به عنوان تأثیرگذارترین عامل بر توسعه مسکن شناخته شد که نشاندهنده درک مستقیم ساکنان از تهدیدات محیطی است. پس از آن، عوامل اقتصادی شامل نظام معیشتی محلی (۶۰/۳) و تحولات اقتصادی کلان (۶۱/۳) به عنوان موانع اصلی مالی در سرمایهگذاری و نگهداری مسکن مورد تأکید قرار گرفتند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| عوامل درونزا و برونزا؛ توسعه کالبدی-اجتماعی؛ مسکن روستایی؛ سیستان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis of Endogenous and Exogenous Factors on the Process of Physical-Social Development of Rural Housing (Case Study: Sistan region) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Sirous Ghanbari | ||
| Department of Rural Geography, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Planning, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Sustainable physical and social development of rural housing, as one of the main pillars of the formation and maintenance of the life of local communities, has always been one of the main concerns of regional development policymakers. In the meantime, Sistan Region, due to its unique climatic, social and economic characteristics, is a clear example of regions where the housing development process is influenced by contradictory and complex forces. This research has been conducted with the main aim of analyzing and measuring endogenous and exogenous factors affecting the physical and social development process of rural housing in this region in order to provide a deeper understanding of the mechanisms affecting the quality of rural life and, ultimately, to provide strategies for optimizing development interventions. The present research is applied in terms of its purpose and has been conducted using a mixed method (qualitative-quantitative) and a descriptive-analytical approach. The statistical population was defined in two groups: experts (20 people with purposive sampling until theoretical saturation was reached) and local residents (170 people with accessible sampling). Using the grounded theory method, endogenous factors (including indigenous knowledge adapted to the climate, cultural-family patterns, local livelihood and economic system, and social capital) and exogenous factors (including macro policies, natural hazards and climate change, economic developments, the influence of cultural-physical patterns, and foreign infrastructure) were identified. Based on the results of the one-sample t-test from the perspective of local communities, natural hazards and climate change were identified as the most influential factor on housing development with the highest mean (3.77), which indicates the direct perception of residents of environmental threats. After that, economic factors including local livelihood system (3.60) and macroeconomic developments (3.61) were emphasized as the main financial obstacles in housing investment and maintenance. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Endogenous and Exogenous Factors, Physical-Social Development, Rural Housing, Sistan | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aggarwal, A. K. (2018). Rural entrepreneurship development ecosystem–an emerging paradigm of rural socio-economic development. Available at SSRN 3184127. Berdenoord, J. (2017). Sustainable Building Materiald for Low-cost Housing and the challenges Facing their Technologival developments: Exampels and Lessons Regarding Bamboo, Earth-Block Technologies, Building Blockes of Recycled Materials, and Improved Concrete Panels, J Archit Eng Tech, 6, P: 187. Biczkowski, M. (2020). LEADER as a mechanism of neo-endogenous development of rural areas: the case of Poland. Miscellanea Geographica, 24(4), 232-244. Bosworth, G., Annibal, I., Carroll, T., Price, L., Sellick, J., & Shepherd, J. (2016). Empowering Local Action through Neo-Endogenous Development; The Case of LEADER in E ngland. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(3), 427-449. Bourne, I.S. (1981). A Geography of Housing, Prentice-Hall, New York. Cater, J. & Trevor, J. (1989). Social Geography, Routledge, and London. Dahlman, C. (2016). A new paradigm for rural development. Gallent, N. Hamiduddin, I. Stiriling, Ph. & Wu, M. (2022). Village Housing: Constraints and opportunities in rural England. Publisher: UCL Press.ISBN: 9781800083035. Ghasemi-Siani, M., Afrahte, H., Riahi, V., Azizpour, F. (2018). Explaining the structural-functional changes in rural settlement and housing, a case study: Ban-Rood and Jolga district of Isfahan city. Scientific and research journal of physical development planning. 6(10), 47-64. (In Persian) Giannetti, B. F., Demétrio, J. C., Agostinho, F., Almeida, C. M & Liu, G. (2018). Towards, more sustainable social housing projects: Recognizing the importance of using local resources. Recognizing the importance of using local resources, Building and Environment, 127, 203- 187. Gkartzios, M., & Lowe, P. (2019). Revisiting neo-endogenous rural development. In The Routledge companion to rural planning (pp. 159-169): Routledge. Guinjoan, E., Badia, A., & Tulla, A. F. (2016). The new paradigm of rural development. Theoretical considerations and reconceptualization using the rural web. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 71, 495-500. Gusmanov, R. U., Kuznetsova, A. R., Stovba, E. V., & Avzalov, M.R. (2019). Newparadigm of the economic development of the regional rural territories. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Haque, M. O., Munzarin, B. U. T., & Saikia, S (2020). Implementation of Alternative Affordable Materials in Sustainable Rural Housing Design. Guwahati, University of Melbourne. High, C., & Nemes, G. (2007). Social learning in LEADER: Exogenous, endogenous and hybrid evaluation in rural development, Sociologia Ruralis, 47(2), 103-119. Mandal. R.B. (2001). Introduction to Rural Settlements, concept polishing company, New Delhi. Martin, S. Fernando, R, & Mazarrón, I. (2010). Study of thermal environment inside rural houses of Navapalos (Spain): The advantages of reuse buildings of high thermal inertia. Construction and Building Materials, 24 (5), 666-676 National Rural Housing Coalition. (2015). The Mutual Self-Help Housing Program Reflecting 50 Years of succeess. Ngcobo, N. (2018). The Impact of Rural Housing Policy on the SocioEconomic Status of ouseholds: A Case Study of Vulindlela Rural Housing Project, Supervisor: Dr. L. Chipungu, School of Built Environment and Development Studies. Olmedo, L., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (2023). A Substantive View of Social Enterprises as Neo-endogenous Rural Development Actors. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1-13. Pokhylenko, N. (2023). Overview of conceptual basis and models of rural development. Economic Synergy, 1 (1), 246-269. Pourdihimi, Sh. (2011). Culture and Housing. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment. 134 (30), 3-18. (InPersian) Pourghafar Maghfirat, M. R., Pourramazan, I., Molaei Hashjin, N., Amar, T. (1404). Explaining the factors affecting the changes in the rural housing pattern (case study: villages in Fouman County). Rural Extension and Development Research. Published online on 4 October 1404. (In Persian) Pourtaheri, M., Fathali, Z., & Rokneddin Eftekhari, A. (2017). Spatial analysis of sustainable rural housing model. Case study: villages of Mazandaran province. Spatial planning and arrangement, 21 (1). 95-131. (In Persian) Qu, M., & Zollet, S. (2023). Neo-endogenous revitalisation: Enhancing community resilience through art tourism and rural entrepreneurship. Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 105-114. Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. Handbook of rural studies, 1, 278-291. Sadeghi, Z., Azizpour, F., Tahmasebi, A., Sartipipour, M. (2014). Analysis of the attitudes of key actors on the factors affecting the unsustainability of rural housing development (case study: villages on the banks of the Zayandeh River in Falavarjan). Village and Sustainable Development of Space. 5 (3). 1-19. (In Persian) Saeedi, A. (2011). Structural-Functional Dynamics: A Systematic Approach in Spatial-Spatial Studies, Geography (Scientific-Research Journal, Iranian Geographical Society). 9(29), 1-12. (In Persian) Saeedi, A. (2012). Structural-functional dynamics: An alternative approach in spatial planning, Quarterly Journal of Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 1(1), 1-18. (In Persian) Salavarzizadeh, M., Sheikhi, H., Hatami, Sh. (1400). Identifying and analyzing key factors affecting the development of social housing with emphasis on foresight (Case study: Ilam city). Geography and Regional Urban Planning. 11 (39). 199-224. (In Persian) Sameh, R. & Jafariha, R. (2023). Analyzing physical traits of rural housing in order to achieve its architectural pattern (Case study: Hezaveh village, Markazi Province). Journal of Research & Rural Planning, 12(1), 77-93. Short, J. R., (2006). Urban Theory Acritical Assessment, Routledge, New York. Shucksmith, M. (2010). Disintegrated rural development? Neoendogenous rural development, planning and place-shaping in diffused power contexts. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(1), 1-14. UN-Habitat. (2012). Sustainable housing for sustainable citirs: A policy framework for developing countries, UN Habitat. Ward, N., Atterton, J., Kim, T.-Y., Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., & Thompson, N. (2005a). Universities, the knowledge economy and'neo-endogenous rural development'. CRE Discussion Paper. Woods, M. (2007). Engaging the global countryside: globalization, hybridity and the constitution of rural place. Progress in Human Geography, 31(4), 485-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507079503 Yeganeh, B., Einali, J., & Manbari, P. (2019). Analysis of factors affecting livelihood-oriented housing developments in peri-urban areas, case study: settlements in Mujezat rural district, Zanjan city. Journal of Peri-urban Space Development. 3 (2). 105-126. (In Persian) Zumaya, J. Q., & Motlak, J. B. (2021). Sustainable Housing Indicators and Improving the Quality of Life: The Case of Two Residential Areas in Baghdad City. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environ
mental Science, 754(1), 012002.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2 |
||