| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,320 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,431 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 24,406,117 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,320,786 |
Identification of Criteria for Implementing Outdoor Education: A Systematic Review | ||
| فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 4، شهریور 1405، صفحه 105-133 اصل مقاله (688.93 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ee.2026.75968.2893 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Shahvali Falak1؛ Afsaneh Abdoli* 2؛ Ehsan Geraei3 | ||
| 1M.Sc. Student in Educational Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Information and Knowledge Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Outdoor education, as an innovative approach to experiential learning integrated with the natural environment, plays a pivotal role in enhancing students' cognitive, physical, and social skills. However, challenges in implementing this method within educational systems—including a lack of standardized criteria and contextual factors—have hindered its full potential. This systematic review aims to identify key criteria for the effective implementation of outdoor education by examining the existing literature. This research is a qualitative systematic review with a thematic analysis and interpretive qualitative synthesis approach. A comprehensive search was conducted across the Web of Science, Scopus, and ERIC databases up to November 2024, using relevant keywords (e.g., outdoor education, implementation criteria, field-based learning), which initially identified 785 records. Inclusion criteria, framed by the PICOS framework, comprised peer-reviewed English-language articles focusing on the implementation, criteria, or challenges of outdoor education at primary and secondary levels, encompassing any relevant research design. Exclusion criteria encompassed studies involving preschool or higher education, purely opinion-based pieces, grey literature, or those lacking an emphasis on implementation factors. Following the removal of duplicates (n=2) and a two-stage screening process (title/abstract and full-text review) conducted independently by two researchers—with discrepancies resolved through consensus or consultation with a third assessor—62 articles were ultimately included for analysis. Validity was ensured through peer debriefing and adherence to the PRISMA 2020 checklist, while reliability was established using Gibbs' (2007) procedures. The findings highlighted six primary criteria: pedagogical (45 studies; with the strongest emphasis on active learning and curriculum alignment), organizational (35 studies; managerial support and stakeholder collaboration), human resources (29 studies; teacher competence and student engagement), socio-psychological and evaluation (21 studies each), and environmental (16 studies; accessibility and safety). The major challenges identified included financial-logistical barriers (24 studies), institutional-managerial obstacles (23 studies), human-related issues (19 studies), pedagogical difficulties (16 studies), and environmental-safety concerns (16 studies). These results offer a practical framework for educational policymakers: by prioritizing teacher professional development, strengthening institutional support, and fostering local community collaboration, implementation challenges can be overcome, thereby transforming outdoor education into an effective tool for enhancing environmental literacy, learning motivation, and student well-being in Iran. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Implementation Criteria؛ Outdoor Education؛ Systematic Review | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identification of Criteria for Implementing Outdoor Education: A Systematic Review | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Shahvali Falak1؛ Afsaneh Abdoli2؛ Ehsan Geraei3 | ||
| 1M.Sc. Student in Educational Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Information and Knowledge Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Outdoor education, as an innovative approach to experiential learning integrated with the natural environment, plays a pivotal role in enhancing students' cognitive, physical, and social skills. However, challenges in implementing this method within educational systems—including a lack of standardized criteria and contextual factors—have hindered its full potential. This systematic review aims to identify key criteria for the effective implementation of outdoor education by examining the existing literature. This research is a qualitative systematic review with a thematic analysis and interpretive qualitative synthesis approach. A comprehensive search was conducted across the Web of Science, Scopus, and ERIC databases up to November 2024, using relevant keywords (e.g., outdoor education, implementation criteria, field-based learning), which initially identified 785 records. Inclusion criteria, framed by the PICOS framework, comprised peer-reviewed English-language articles focusing on the implementation, criteria, or challenges of outdoor education at primary and secondary levels, encompassing any relevant research design. Exclusion criteria encompassed studies involving preschool or higher education, purely opinion-based pieces, grey literature, or those lacking an emphasis on implementation factors. Following the removal of duplicates (n=2) and a two-stage screening process (title/abstract and full-text review) conducted independently by two researchers—with discrepancies resolved through consensus or consultation with a third assessor—62 articles were ultimately included for analysis. Validity was ensured through peer debriefing and adherence to the PRISMA 2020 checklist, while reliability was established using Gibbs' (2007) procedures. The findings highlighted six primary criteria: pedagogical (45 studies; with the strongest emphasis on active learning and curriculum alignment), organizational (35 studies; managerial support and stakeholder collaboration), human resources (29 studies; teacher competence and student engagement), socio-psychological and evaluation (21 studies each), and environmental (16 studies; accessibility and safety). The major challenges identified included financial-logistical barriers (24 studies), institutional-managerial obstacles (23 studies), human-related issues (19 studies), pedagogical difficulties (16 studies), and environmental-safety concerns (16 studies). These results offer a practical framework for educational policymakers: by prioritizing teacher professional development, strengthening institutional support, and fostering local community collaboration, implementation challenges can be overcome, thereby transforming outdoor education into an effective tool for enhancing environmental literacy, learning motivation, and student well-being in Iran. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Implementation Criteria, Outdoor Education, Systematic Review | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdul, K. (2018). Nature and scope of outdoor education in the city-state of Singapore. Thesis of Doctor of Education, Scotland, the University of Edinburgh. Almqvist Nielsen, L. (2023). Prehistoric history in Swedish primary school education: pupils’ expression of empathy after visiting a cultural heritage site. Education 3-13, 53(3), 378-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2191631 Armstrong, H. G. (2005). Environmental education in Tobago s primary schools: a case study of coral reef education. Revista de biología tropical, 53, 229-238. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/449/44920889024.pdf Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orion, N. (2009). A design based research of an earth systems based environmental curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75256 Beauchamp, A. A., Lacoste, Y., Kingsbury, C., & Gadais, T. (2022). When are you taking us outside? An exploratory study of the integration of the outdoor learning in preschool and primary education in Quebec. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 955549. https://doi.org10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955549 Bentsen, P., & Jensen, F. S. (2012). The nature of udeskole: outdoor learning theory and practice in Danish schools. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 12(3), 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2012.699806 Berman, D., & Davis-Berman, J. (2006). The promise of wilderness therapy. In Connecting with the essence [Conference proceedings] (pp. 34-45). Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press. Calhoun, A. J., McGarry, M. A., & Reeve, A. (2003). Wetland connections: linking university researchers and high school teachers to advance science education and wetland conservation. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(4), 387-397. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-51.4.387 Carrier, S. J., Thomson, M. M., Tugurian, L. P., & Stevenson, K. T. (2014). Elementary science education in classrooms and outdoors: Stakeholder views, gender, ethnicity, and testing. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2195-2220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.917342 Carrier, S. J., Tugurian, L. P., & Thomson, M. M. (2013). Elementary science indoors and out: Teachers, time, and testing. Research in Science Education, 43, 2059-2083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9347-5 Cenić, D. S., Đukić, T. B. M., Stojadinović, A. M., & Stošić, A. D. S. (2023). Outdoor education: perspectives of teachers and students in the context of school in nature as an innovative approach in education. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 11(3), 497-510. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-3-497-510 Cheesmond, J., & Yates, J. (1979). A research report of the outdoor education programme in Lothian Region Secondary Schools 1978/1979. Edinburgh: Lothian Region and Dunfermline College of Education. Cheng, S. K. T., & Ho, K. K. (2011). A reflective learning taxonomy for an educational tour. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11, 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-011-9124-7 Constible, J. M., McWilliams, R. G., Soldo, E. G., Perry, B. E., & Lee Jr, R. E. (2007). An immersion professional development program in environmental science for inservice elementary school teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(1), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-55.1.72 Cramer, J. R. (2008). Reviving the connection between children and nature through service-learning restoration partnerships. Native Plants Journal, 9(3), 278-286. https://doi.org/10.2979/NPJ.2008.9.3.278 Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research desing: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (Vol. 54). United State of America: Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 D’Ascenzo, M. (2022). Nature and education. The historical heritage of open-air schools in Italy. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 9(2), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/ete.559 Dahl, L., Standal, O. F., & Moe, V. F. (2018). Norwegian teachers’ safety strategies for Friluftsliv excursions: Implications for inclusive education. Journal of adventure education and outdoor learning, 19(3), 256-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1525415 De Vos, P., & Wilkinson, L. (1980). Earthkeeping, Christian Stewardship of natural resources. (No Title). Dewey, J. (1938). The need of a theory of experience. Experience and education, 25-31. Fägerstam, E. (2012). Space and Place Perspectives on outdoor teaching and learning. Linkopings Universitet (Sweden). Finnerty, C., & Murphy, F. (2023). Being well’: the master key to unlocking competencies? How outdoor and adventure activities contribute to the development of children within a competency-based curriculum. Education 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2239252 Freire, P. (1970). The adult literacy process as cultural action for freedom. Harvard educational review, 40(2), 205-225. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.40.2.q7n227021n148p26 Garner, M. A. (2012). Connecting with nature: The effects of organized camp experiences and early-life outdoor experiences on children's environmental consciousness. East Carolina University. (Master's Thesis, East Carolina University). Retrieved from the Scholarship. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage qualitative research kit. London: Sage. Goralnik, L., Kelly, S. M., O’Connell, K., Nelson, M. P., & Schulze, M. (2020). Forest discovery: place relationships on an environmental science, arts and humanities (eSAH) field trip. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 37(2), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2020.28 Hattie, J., Marsh, H. W., Neill, J. T., & Richards, G. E. (1997). Adventure education and Outward Bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference. Review of educational research, 67(1), 43-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170619 Higgins, P. (2009). Into the big wide world: Sustainable experiential education for the 21st century. Journal of Experiential Education, 32(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590903200105 Hu, R., & Mou, S. (2025). Outdoor Education for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 17(8), 3338. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083338 Humberstone, B., & Stan, I. (2011). Outdoor learning: primary pupils' experiences and teachers' interaction in outdoor learning. Education 3-13, 39(5), 529-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2010.487837 Jackson, N. L., Cerrato, M. L., & Elliot, N. (1997). Geography and fieldwork at the secondary school level: An investigation of anthropogenic litter on an estuarine shoreline. Journal of Geography, 96(6), 301-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221349708978811 Jansson, M., Mårtensson, F., & Vogel, N. (2024). Developing outdoor spaces for work and study—an explorative place-making process. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 6, 1308637. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2024.1308637 Johnson, D., & Wattchow, B. (2004). Their words / their voices: Student's perspectives of the camp mallana outdoor education experience. Monash university research repository conference proceedings. Australia: La Trobe University. Jordet, A. (2007). The local environment as a classroom – a study of the pedagogy of outdoor school from the perspective of education theory and experience-based learning. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Education. Oslo: Oslo University. Kahn Jr, P. H. (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children's affiliation with nature. Developmental review, 17(1), 1-61. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1996.0430 Kelly, O., Buckley, K., Lieberman, L. J., & Arndt, K. (2022). Universal Design for Learning-A framework for inclusion in Outdoor Learning. Journal of outdoor and environmental education, 25(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-022-00096-z Kemp, N. (2019). Views from the staffroom: Forest school in English primary schools. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 20(4), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2019.1697712 Kervinen, A., Uitto, A., & Juuti, K. (2018). How fieldwork-oriented biology teachers establish formal outdoor education practices. Journal of Biological Education. 54(2), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1546762 Kwan, T., & Chan, E. (2004). Using theory of learning and awareness to bring about learning through a school-based environmental field project. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 13(4), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724040408668453. Lee, E. Y., De Lannoy, L., Li, L., De Barros, M. I. A., Bentsen, P., Brussoni, M., ... & Tremblay, M. S. (2022). Play, learn, and teach outdoors—network (PLaTO-Net): terminology, taxonomy, and ontology. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01294-0 Liu, H. L. (2017). Planning wetland ecology-based outdoor education courses in Taiwanese junior high schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3261-3281. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00716a Mahooti Rad, P., & Mousavi, M. H. (2019). Investigating the impact of outdoor spaces in school environments and their effects on students. Shabak Journal, 5(7), 71–78. [In Persian] https://sid.ir/paper/524023/fa Mann, J., Gray, T., Truong, S., Brymer, E., Passy, R., Ho, S., ... & Cowper, R. (2022). Getting out of the classroom and into nature: a systematic review of nature-specific outdoor learning on school children's learning and development. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 877058. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.877058. Mann, J., Gray, T., Truong, S., Sahlberg, P., Bentsen, P., Passy, R., ... & Cowper, R. (2021). A systematic review protocol to identify the key benefits and efficacy of nature-based learning in outdoor educational settings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031199 Marchant, E., Todd, C., Cooksey, R., Dredge, S., Jones, H., Reynolds, D., ... & Brophy, S. (2019). Curriculum-based outdoor learning for children aged 9-11: A qualitative analysis of pupils’ and teachers’ views. PloS one, 14(5), e0212242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212242 Marques, L., Praja, J., & Thompson, D. (2002). Practical Work in Earth Sciences Education: an experience with students in the context of a National Science Programme in Portugal. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514022000030426 McCabe, S. M., Munsell, J. F., & Seiler, J. R. (2014). Forest field trips among high school science teachers in the southern Piedmont. Natural Sciences Education, 43(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2013.01.0001 Molyneux, T. M., Zeni, M., & Oberle, E. (2022). Choose your own adventure: Promoting social and emotional development through outdoor learning. Early childhood education journal, 51(8), 1525-1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01394-3 Neve, N., & Keith-Marsoun, S. K. (2017, June). The invention bootcamp, a four-week summer course for high school underrepresented students in a university setting. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28983 Neville, I. A., Petrass, L. A., & Ben, F. (2021). The impact of an outdoor learning experience on the development of English creative writing skills: An action research case study of year 7 and 8 secondary school students in Australia. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(2), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.1983445 Novotná, V., Zítek, Š., Procházková, R., Machová, K., & Svobodová, I. (2024). The Effect of Farm-Animal-Assisted Education on Memory Retention in Elementary School Children: An Exploratory Study. Anthrozoös, 38(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2024.2389644 Nundy, S., Dillon, J., & Dowd, P. (2009). Improving and encouraging teacher confidence in out-of-classroom learning: The impact of the Hampshire Trailblazer project on 3–13 curriculum practitioners. In Outdoor Learning Research (pp. 148-160). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270802291889 Oyovwi, E. O. (2020). Outdoor School Activities Strategy for Enhancing Student’ s Academic Achievement and Retention in Science in Delta South Senatorial District. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0009 Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The journal of environmental education, 31(4), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598649 Pelfini, M., Bollati, I., Pellegrini, L., & Zucali, M. (2016). Earth Sciences on the field: educational applications for the comprehension of landscape evolution. Rend Online Soc Geol It 40: 56–66. https://doi.org/10.3301/ROL.2016.72 Petrikova, G. (2003). A drainage basin in environmental and geographical education: A case study of the Kretinka Drainage Basin. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040308667520 Pignato, S., Patania, V., Manzo, G., & Coppola, R. (2021). Stage of nature and motor knowledge in the primary school. Teaching physical education in an open environment. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21, 606-611. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.s1070 Pitiporntapin, S., Butkatanyoo, O., Piyapimonsit, C., Thanarachataphoom, T., Chotitham, S., & Lalitpasan, U. (2023). The development of a professional development model focusing on outdoor learning resources to enhance in-service teachers’ STEM literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 44(2), 489-496. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2023.44.2.19 Polley, S., & Pickett, B. (2003). The nature and scope of outdoor education in South Australia: A summary of key findings. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 7(2), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400775 Priest, S., & Gass, M. A. (2005). Effective leadership in adventure programming (2nd edn) (Champaign, Human Kinetics). Puhek, M., Perše, M., & Šorgo, A. (2012). Comparison between a real field trip and a virtual field trip in a nature preserve: knowledge gained in biology and ecology. Journal of Baltic science education, 11(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/12.11.164 Rahmawati, Y., & Koul, R. (2016). Fieldwork, co-teaching and co-generative dialogue in lower secondary school environmental science. Issues in Educational Research, 6(1), 147-164. file:///C:/Users/surface/Downloads/IIERpublished.pdf Ratinen, I., Sarivaara, E., & Kuukkanen, P. (2023). Finnish student teachers’ ideas of outdoor learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(2), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.1984962 Remmen, K. B., & Frøyland, M. (2015). What happens in classrooms after earth science fieldwork? Supporting student learning processes during follow-up activities. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.967114 Remmen, K. B., & Iversen, E. (2022). A scoping review of research on school-based outdoor education in the Nordic countries. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(4), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2027796 Rivera, M. A. J., Lawton, B. E., & Chyrssostomidis, C. (2011, September). Reef Missions: Engaging students in science and the marine environment using an autonomous underwater vehicle. In OCEANS'11 MTS/IEEE KONA (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS.2011.6106933 Robbins, A. (2015). Synthesizing the outdoor education literature to create a definition and list of primary objectives (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wyoming). Rohman, A. A. N., Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2020, June). The Influence of outdoor learning models on critical thinking ability. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1567, No. 3, p. 032093). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032093 Sahrakhiz, S., Harring, M., & Witte, M. D. (2017). Learning opportunities in the outdoor school–empirical findings on outdoor school in Germany from the children’s perspective. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(3), 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2017.1413404 Saltzman, J., & Paytan, A. (2007). Engaging first grade students in a geoscience campus field trip. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(4), 326-332. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-55.4.326 Scott, C. M., & Matthews, C. E. (2011). The “Science” behind a successful field trip to the zoo. Science Activities, 48(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2010.496814 Sedawi, W., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Reiss, M. J. (2021). Regenerating our place: Fostering a sense of place through rehabilitation and place-based education. Research in Science Education, 51, 461-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09903-y Shume, T. (2016). Teachers' Perspectives on Contributions of a Prairie Restoration Project to Elementary Students' Environmental Literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12), 5331-5348. http://www.ijese.net/makale_indir/IJESE_710_article_57ad9b11a856e.pdf Slee, V., & Allan, J. F. (2019). Purposeful outdoor learning empowers children to deal with school transitions. Sports, 7(6), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7060134. Stan, I., & Humberstone, B. (2011). An ethnography of the outdoor classroom–how teachers manage risk in the outdoors. Ethnography and Education, 6(2), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2011.587360 Svobodová, H., Durna, R., Mísařová, D., & Hofmann, E. (2020). A proposal of a concept of outdoor education for primary and lower secondary schools–the case of the Czech Republic. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 21(4), 336-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2020.1830138 Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 Thomas, T. G. (2020). Place-based inquiry in a university course abroad: lessons about education for sustainability in the urban outdoors. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(5), 895-910. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2019-0220 Uçuş, S. (2015) Evaluation Of Life Sciences Curricula In Turkish Elementary Education Regarding Outdoor Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, Special Issue for INTE. https://www.tojet.net/special/2015_8_1.pdf Usher, J. (2023). Conceptual framework for the participation of children in local area planning decision-making processes through primary geography education. Irish Educational Studies, 42(4), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2260998 Utaberta, N., Mydin, M. O., Ismail, N., & Ismail, S. (2015). In The Search of Green School Design in Malaysia: An Outdoor Learning Experience of Rainbow Troop and Toto Chan. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 75(9). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5216 Van Dijk-Wesselius, J. E., Van Den Berg, A. E., Maas, J., & Hovinga, D. (2020). Green schoolyards as outdoor learning environments: Barriers and solutions as experienced by primary school teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2919. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02919 Velempini, K., & Martin, B. (2019). Place-based education as a framework for tourism education in secondary schools: A case study from the Okavango Delta in Southern Africa. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 25, 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100197 Whincup, V. A., Allin, L. J., & Greer, J. M. (2021). Challenges and pedagogical conflicts for teacher-Forest School leaders implementing Forest School within the UK primary curriculum. Education 3-13, 51(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1942948 Wilhelmsson, B., Lidestav, G., & Ottander, C. (2012). Teachers’ intentions with outdoor teaching in school forests: Skills and knowledge teachers want students to develop. Nordic studies in science education, 8(1), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.357 Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia, the Human Bond with Other Species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts), 157 p. Winje, Ø., & Løndal, K. (2021). Wow! is that a birch leaf? In the picture it looked totally different’: a pragmatist perspective on deep learning in Norwegian ‘uteskole. Education 3-13, 51(1), 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1955946 Wiratman, A., Mustaji, M., & Widodo, W. (2019, February). The effect of activity sheet based on outdoor learning on student’s science process skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, No. 2, p. 022007). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022007 Wolf, C., Kunz, P., & Robin, N. (2022). Emerging themes of research into outdoor teaching in initial formal teacher training from early childhood to secondary education–A literature review. The Journal of environmental education, 53(4), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2022.2090889 Wolsink, M. (2016). Environmental education excursions and proximity to urban green space–densification in a ‘compact city’. Environmental Education Research, 22(7), 1049-1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1077504 Yang, D., Wang, Z., Xu, D., & Deng, Z. (2014). A small-scale survey of the views and attitudes of junior high school teachers in China toward geographical fieldwork. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(3), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.927171 Yang, D., Wang, Z., Xu, D., Wang, C., & Deng, Z. (2013). Chinese junior high school students' perceptions of geographic fieldwork: A case study. Journal of Geography, 112(4), 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2012.732600 Yilmaz, S., Vural, H., & Yilmaz, H. (2022). Effects of botanical gardens on student environmental perception. Ecological Informatics, 73, 101942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101942 Zink, R., & Boyes, M. (2006). The nature and scope of outdoor education in New Zealand schools. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 10, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400826 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 7 |
||