پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 49 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,340 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,556 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 25,267,372 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,800,491 |
تدوین مدل ساختاری تأثیر فرهنگ سازمانی بر پذیرش فناوری در میان مدیران ادارات ورزش و جوانان استان‌های عراق | ||
| مدیریت سازمان‌های دولتی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 14، شماره 4 (پیاپی 56)، مهر 1405، صفحه 1-18 اصل مقاله (1.28 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ipom.2025.75531.5232 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| وجیهه جوانی* 1؛ تیسیر حقی اسماعیل الجبوری2؛ یعقوب بدری آذرین3 | ||
| 1دانشیار، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزش، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزش، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران. | ||
| 3استاد، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزش، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی تأثیر فرهنگ سازمانی ورزشی بر پذیرش فناوری در میان مدیران ادارات ورزش و جوانان استان‌های عراق، با نقش میانجی نوآوری انجام شده است. این مطالعه از نظر هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ روش‌شناسی، توصیفی-پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را شامل مدیران و کارشناسان ارشد ادارات ورزش و جوانان در 19 استان عراق تشکیل می‌دهند. داده‌ها با استفاده از پرسشنامه‌ای ترکیبی 48 سؤالی، متشکل از سه پرسشنامه استاندارد فرهنگ سازمانی دنیسون، مدل پذیرش فناوری (TAM) و نوآوری هورت جمع‌آوری شد. از نرم‌افزار اسمارت‌پی‌ال‌اس 3 برای تحلیل داده‌ها استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که فرهنگ سازمانی ورزشی و نوآوری بر پذیرش فناوری توسط ادارات ورزش و جوانان استان‌های عراق تأثیر معناداری دارند. همچنین، فرهنگ سازمانی ورزشی بر نوآوری اثرگذار است. این یافته‌ها نقش کلیدی فرهنگ سازمانی و نوآوری را در روند پذیرش فناوری در نهادهای ورزشی آشکار می‌سازد. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که ارتقای فرهنگ سازمانی و تقویت روحیه نوآوری، گام‌های ضروری برای تسهیل و تسریع پذیرش فناوری در سازمان‌های ورزشی به شمار می‌روند. بنابراین پیشنهاد می‌شود مدیران و سیاست‌گذاران حوزه ورزش، برنامه‌های توسعه‌ای خود را با تمرکز بر این عوامل طراحی کنند. همچنین، انجام مطالعات بیشتر در زمینه‌های مرتبط می‌تواند به درک عمیق‌تر این روابط و ارائه راهکارهای عملی برای بهبود عملکرد سازمان‌های ورزشی کمک کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| پذیرش فناوری؛ فرهنگ سازمانی ورزشی؛ مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری؛ نوآوری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Developing a Structural Model of the Impact of Organizational Culture on Technology Acceptance Among Managers of Sports and Youth Departments in Iraqi Provinces | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Vajiheh Javani1؛ Taisir Haqi Ismail Al-Geburi2؛ Yaghub BadriAzarin3 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| 2Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction In today's rapidly evolving environment, understanding why individuals and organizations accept or resist new technologies has become a central research concern, particularly as organizations continue to expand their investment in information technology (Koens & Sentmeir, 2020). Davis, Bagozzi, and Warshaw (1992) define technology adoption as the implementation of hardware and software within an organization aimed at enhancing productivity, competitive advantage, and the speed and accessibility of information processing. Numerous theories have since evolved, often as extensions of one another (Momani & Jamous, 2017), including the Theory of Reasoned Action, the Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1980), and the Technology Acceptance Model, which replaces attitude toward behavior with perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Although sport industry leaders increasingly view digital technology as a driver of fundamental innovation rather than merely incremental efficiency (Porto, 2020), organizational culture, despite its well-documented influence on innovation and competitive advantage (Akpa, Asikhia, & Nneji, 2021; Aboramadan et al., 2021; Gleeson, 2015; Eskiler et al., 2016)—remains rarely examined as a determinant of technology acceptance. Sport organizations are widely urged to restructure and embrace innovation to professionalize their operations (Winand & Anagnostopoulos, 2016), spanning social, technological, commercial, and organizational domains (Tjønndal, 2017; Hoeber et al., 2015; Askin, 2021). Technology adoption is shown to improve productivity, communication, and performance monitoring in sport organizations (Key et al., 2024; Mohammadi & Aysannejad, 2018), yet challenges such as financial constraints, skill gaps, and resistance to change persist (Best et al., 2021), amid ongoing innovations such as augmented reality and AI-based coaching (Marinho & Neiva, 2018). Given this gap, the limited attention paid to organizational culture as a determinant of technology acceptance among sport managers, the present study develops a structural model of the impact of organizational culture on technology acceptance among managers of sport and youth departments across Iraqi provinces. Findings are expected to deepen understanding of the interaction between organizational culture and technology acceptance in sport settings, and to offer managers and policymakers practical guidance for building innovation-supportive organizational cultures and facilitating digital transformation in sport organizations. Mothodology This study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of methodology. The statistical population comprised managers and senior experts of Sport and Youth Departments across 19 Iraqi provinces, working at various managerial levels (senior managers, middle managers, and responsible experts). Data were collected using a composite questionnaire consisting of three standardized instruments: the Denison Organizational Culture Questionnaire, the Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire, and the Hurt Innovation Questionnaire (1977). To adapt the questionnaire to the research topic, the opinions of five academic experts in sport management and information technology were first obtained. Based on expert opinions and the Content Validity Ratio, items scoring below 0.6 were removed, resulting in a final questionnaire comprising 48 items. Data collection was conducted over a three-month period through an online questionnaire distributed via social media and specialized groups of sport managers. Following Hooman's (2005) recommendation of a minimum sample size of 5 to 15 observations per variable in structural equation modeling, the minimum required sample size was estimated at 240 participants (5 × 48). Prior to selecting the analytical method, the distribution of the data was examined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the results of which indicated that the assumption of normal distribution was not confirmed. Given the presence of latent variables in the model and the non-normal distribution of the data, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed for data analysis. This method is preferred over other covariance-based approaches, as it is component-based and is well-suited to non-normally distributed data, smaller sample sizes, and situations involving multicollinearity. To ensure the effectiveness of the 48-item composite questionnaire, its validity was assessed through cross-loadings of items, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The reliability of the questionnaire was also examined using composite reliability and Cronbach's alpha. All analyses were performed using SmartPLS 3 software. Findings The reliability and convergent validity indices for the fifteen research variables, including organizational culture and its dimensions, innovation and its dimensions, and technology acceptance and its dimensions, were all found to fall within acceptable ranges. Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.701 (behavioral intention to use) to 0.906 (perceived ease of use), all exceeding the acceptable threshold of 0.7. Composite reliability values ranged between 0.833 and 0.941, well above the standard threshold of 0.7, confirming the satisfactory reliability of the measurement instrument. Furthermore, the average variance extracted (AVE) for all variables ranged from 0.627 to 0.841, exceeding the benchmark value of 0.5, thereby confirming the acceptable convergent validity of the research constructs. These results collectively indicate that the measurement instrument used in this study demonstrates strong reliability and convergent validity across all constructs. Following the completion of the analyses related to the measurement model, this stage proceeds to the evaluation of the structural model, which represents the relationships among the latent variables. The conceptual model tested is presented in Figure 1. The numbers displayed on the connecting paths represent the standardized coefficients, or path coefficients, derived from the regression analyses between the variables. Based on the results presented in Table 6 and the significance of the path coefficients, it was determined that sport organizational culture (path coefficient = 0.556) and innovation (path coefficient = 0.401) significantly influence technology acceptance among managers of Sport and Youth Departments in Iraqi provinces. In addition, sport organizational culture (path coefficient = 0.587) significantly influences innovation. In this study, the Variance Accounted For (VAF) index was used to measure the strength of the indirect effect through the mediating variable. This index, which ranges between 0 and 1, indicates that the closer its value is to 1, the stronger the indirect effect. VAF measures the ratio of indirect effects to the total effect and was calculated using Formula (1). In this research, the VAF value was obtained as 0.639. This finding indicates that more than 63% of the effect of sport organizational culture on technology acceptance among managers of Sport and Youth Departments in Iraqi provinces is explained indirectly, through the mediating variable of innovation. Discussion and Conclusion The results of this study reveal that both sport organizational culture and innovation significantly influence technology acceptance among managers of Sport and Youth Departments in Iraqi provinces. Establishing a supportive organizational culture and fostering innovation within these organizations can substantially enhance managers' acceptance of technology. Consistent with these findings, Nichols, Cuen, and Omar (2008) found that risk-tolerant organizational environments encourage sport leaders to adopt new technologies to improve performance and efficiency, while Best, Sibson, and Morgan (2024) noted that such adoption yields benefits including increased productivity, improved communication, and expanded remote-work capabilities. Conversely, conservative, change-resistant cultures can pose serious barriers to technology acceptance, as highlighted by Marques, Cianfrone, and Kellison (2020), who identified prior conditions, perceived technology characteristics, and situational structures such as trust and cost as key determinants of leaders' innovation-adoption decisions. The findings also confirm that sport organizational culture directly shapes innovation. Cultures emphasizing risk-taking, creativity, flexibility, and support for new ideas foster higher innovation levels, encouraging employees and managers to think creatively and implement novel ideas, whereas cultures rooted in traditionalism and power-orientation tend to suppress innovation—consistent with Eskiler et al. (2016) and Kajor, Razavi, and Taghipourian (2017). Innovation was further shown to mediate the relationship between organizational culture and technology acceptance, acting as a bridge that encourages managers in innovation-valuing environments to adopt new technologies more readily, particularly given the competitive challenges sport organizations face. This aligns with Reddy et al. (2020), who noted that early technology adopters can gain first-mover advantages and shape industry standards. However, this relationship is shaped by additional factors, including perceived technology characteristics, implementation costs, complexity, employee resistance, and leadership style, with transformational leadership shown to further promote information technology adoption (Bunjak, Bruch, & Černe, 2022). These findings suggest that sport managers should simultaneously cultivate innovative cultures and create favorable conditions for technology adoption, forming multidisciplinary teams and aligned strategies to build a dynamic ecosystem where innovation and technology continuously reinforce one another, ultimately enhancing performance, productivity, and stakeholder experience. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Innovation, Sports Organizational Culture, Structural Equation Modeling, Technology Acceptance | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abane, J. A., Adamtey, R., & Ayim, V. O. (2022). Does organizational culture influence employee productivity at the local level? A test of Denison's culture model in Ghana’s local government sector. Future Business Journal, 8(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-022-00145-5 Aboramadan, M., Albashiti, B., Alharazin, H., & Zaidoune, S. (2020). Organizational culture, innovation and performance: a study from a non-western context. Journal of Management Development, 39(4), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-06-2019-0253 Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predictiing social behavior. Englewood cliffs. Akpa, V. O., Asikhia, O. U., & Nneji, N. E. (2021). Organizational culture and organizational performance: A review of literature. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management, 3(1), 361-372. https://doi.org/10.35629/5252-0301361372 Baird, K., Su, S., & Tung, A. (2018). Organizational culture and environmental activity management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2006 Bajaj, H. (2009). Organizational culture in bank mergers & acquisitions. Indian journal of industrial relations, 229-242. Batavani, Foroughi Pour, Soleimani, & Aghaei. (2023). The Effect of Organizational Culture on the Productivity of Elite Karate Practitioners in Isfahan Province with the Mediating Role of Innovation. Strategic Studies in Sports and Youth, 22(59), 309-328. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/ssys.2022.1753.2241 Best, A., Sibson, R., & Morgan, A. (2024). Technology adoption and use in not-for-profit sport: A case study of an Australian state sporting association. Managing Sport and Leisure, 29(2), 273-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2021.2020678 Bonecki, M. (2016). Open innovation model within public research and innovation programs. Public Philosophy & Democratic Education, 5(2), 171-88. https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2016.5.2.29 Bunjak, A., Bruch, H., & Černe, M. (2022). Context is key: The joint roles of transformational and shared leadership and management innovation in predicting employee IT innovation adoption. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102516 Casida, J. J. (2008). Linking nursing unit's culture to organizational effectiveness: A measurement tool. Nursing Economics, 26(2), 106. Chakraborty, T., & Nag, K. (2018). Sports entrepreneurship: Ontology based review through digital marketing. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 10(3), 57–71 Escamilla-Fajardo, P., Núñez-Pomar, J., & Parra-Camacho, D. (2019). Does the organizational climate predict the innovation in sports clubs?. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 8(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-03-2019-104 Eskiler, E., Geri, S., Sertbas, K., & Calik, F. (2016). The effects of organizational culture on organizational creativity and innovativeness in the sports businesses. The Anthropologist, 23(3), 590-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891978 Ghinea, V. M. (2016). Organizational Culture Dynamics Modelling of the Organizational Culture Dynamics. Quality-access to success, 17(150), 97. Glisson C 2015. The role of organizational culture and climate in innovation and effectiveness. Human Service Organizations: Management. Leadership and Governance, 39(4), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1087770 Handari Wahyuningsih, S., Sudiro, A., Afnan Troena, E., & W Irawanto, D. (2019). Analysis of organizational culture with denison’s model approach for international business competitiveness. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(1), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.13 Hoeber, L., Doherty, A., Hoeber, O., & Wolfe, R. (2015). The nature of innovation in community sport organizations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(5), 518-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2015.1085070 Ibrahim, R., Leng, N. S., Yusoff, R. C. M., Samy, G. N., Masrom, S., & Rizman, Z. I. (2017). E-learning acceptance based on technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 9(4S), 871-889. . https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v9i4S.50 Jan, M. A., Shah, S. M. A., & Khan, K. U. (2014). The impact of culture on innovation: the moderating role of human capital. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 4(2), 607. https://doi.org/10.5296/ ijafr.v4i2.6871 Khan, I. U., Yaseen, Z., & Muzaffar, M. (2020). Exploring The Role of Employees Impediments in Determining The Employees Performance. Academic Journal of Social Sciences (AJSS ), 4(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.54692/ajss.2020.04021041 Kirin, S., Gavrić, G., & Kirin, S. (2019). Organizational culture in Serbian companies according to the Denison model. Economic Analysis, 52(1), 97-108. Kojour, A. S., Razavi, S. M. H., & Taghipouryan, M. J. (2017). The role of the organizational climate in the process innovation at sport organizations (Some evidence from the Sports and Youth Departments of Mazandaran Province). International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 6(3), 23-31. Kunz, R. E., & Santomier, J. P. (2020). Sport content and virtual reality technology acceptance. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 10(1), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-11-2018-0095 Lubis, F. R., & Hanum, F. (2020). Organizational Culture. Proceedings of the 2nd Yogyakarta International Conference on Educational Management/Administration and Pedagogy (YICEMAP 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201221.020 Marinho, D. A., & Neiva, H. P. (2018). Introductory Chapter: The Challenges of Technology in Sports. Use Technol. Sport Emerg. Chall. https://doi.org/ 10.5772/intechopen.80740 Marquez, A., Cianfrone, B. A., & Kellison, T. (2020). Factors affecting leaders’ adoption of innovation: The case of digital ticketing in the high school athletic space. Sports Innovation Journal, 1, 152-171. https://doi.org/10.18060/24342 Mohammadi, S., & Isanejad, O. (2018). Presentation of the extended technology acceptance model in sports organizations. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 6(1), 75-86. Momani, A. M., Jamous, M. M., & Hilles, S. M. S. (2017). Technology Acceptance Theories. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2017040101 Nickels, D. W., Kwun, O., & Omar, A. (2008). The effect of organizational culture on e-commerce adoption. SWDSI Proceedings, paper S, 512, 276-283. Osokin, N. A. (2021). A meta-organizational approach to facilitating innovations in professional sports organizations. Strategic decisions and risk management, 12(1), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2021-1-58-67 Porto, A. E. (2020). Adopting e-learning technologies in higher educational institutions: The role of organizational culture, technology acceptance and attitude. Review of Social Sciences, 5(1), 01-11. https://doi.org/10.18533/rss.v5i1.143 Qi, Y., Sajadi, S. M., Baghaei, S., Rezaei, R., & Li, W. (2024). Digital technologies in sports: Opportunities, challenges, and strategies for safeguarding athlete wellbeing and competitive integrity in the digital era. Technology in Society, 77, 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102496 Rambe, P., & Dzansi, D. Y. (2016). Informal distributed leadership in technology adoption. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 8(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2016.1147200 Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., & Umer, A. (2017). Facebook is a source of social capital building among university students: evidence from a developing country. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(3), 295-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116667357. Ready, D. A., Cohen, C., Kiron, D., & Pring, B. (2020). The new leadership playbook for the digital age. MIT Sloan Management Review, 0_1-18. Schwarz, E. C., & Hunter, J. D. (2018). Advanced theory and practice in sport marketing (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351667630 Silva, P. (2015). Davis' technology acceptance model (TAM)(1989). Information seeking behavior and technology adoption: Theories and trends, 205-219. Taherdoost, H., Mohamed, N., & Madanchian, M. (2024). Navigating technology adoption/acceptance models. Procedia computer science, 237, 833-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.172 Tjønndal, A. (2017). Sport innovation: Developing a typology. European Journal for Sport and Society, 14(4), 291-310 https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2017.1421504. Varmaghani, M., Shabani Bahar, G., Majidi Parast, M., & Erfani, N. (2023). Developing a Relational Model Between Strategic Orientation and Organizational Innovation with Entrepreneurial Orientation in Iran's Ministry of Sports and Youth. Strategic Studies in Sports and Youth, 22(62), 173-189. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/ssys.2022.1085.1762 Weerasinghe, S., & Hindagolla, M. C. B. (2018). Technology acceptance model and social network sites (SNS): a selected review of literature. Global Knowledge. Memory and Communication, 67(3), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-09-2017-0079 Winand, M., & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2017). Get ready to innovate! Staff’s disposition to implement service innovation in non-profit sport organisations. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(4), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2017.1308418 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 134 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 68 |
||
