پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,164 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,043 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 18,778,331 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,034,077 |
Outbreak News Affects the Attention in Everyday Life: A Cross-sectional Study | ||
| Iranian Journal of Health Psychology | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 6، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 16، تیر 2023، صفحه 81-90 اصل مقاله (281.35 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: research | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ijohp.2023.64573.1260 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Taghi Kheirkhah* 1؛ Hamze Moazzen1؛ Zahra Mirchi2؛ Atefeh Nezamolslami3؛ Moslm Kord1؛ Mehran Mokarami4؛ Shahriar Gharibzadeh1؛ Majid Saffarinia5 | ||
| 1Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. | ||
| 3Department of Psychology, Roozbeh Psychiatry Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 4Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 5Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Objective: Capture of attention occurs when a goal-irrelevant salient stimulus appears in the field of attention. The COVID-19 pandemic seems to be salient enough to capture a great proportion of one’s attention resources. The purpose of this study was to explore how the novelty of outbreak news affects attention in everyday life. Methods: 162 participants were recruited using an online invitation and divided into two samples (early and late sections). The research variables were the salience of news, intrusive thoughts, endogenous attention, and knowledge of COVID-19, which were examined and compared between the two measurements using one-way MANOVA. Additionally, a correlation analysis was performed to reveal a model of relationships between variables. Results: It was found that despite the increase in infected cases, intrusive thoughts and attentional capture decreased over time. To describe the relationship between the salience of news and attentional capture a conceptual model was presented. Conclusion: In addition to the other physical properties of a stimulus, novelty also contributes to stimulus salience. In everyday life, novel situations can trigger intrusive thoughts and attentional capture. Nonetheless, it cannot be sustained after the novelty has worn off. The proposed model can be useful to understand further similar situations. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Everyday Attention؛ Attentional Capture؛ Salience؛ COVID-19؛ Disease Outbreak | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| اخبار مرتبط با شیوع بیماری، توجه در زندگی روزمره را تحت تاثیر قرار می‌دهد: یک مطالعه‌ی مقطعی | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| محمدتقی خیرخواه1؛ حمزه مؤذن1؛ زهرا میرچی2؛ عاطفه ناظم الاسلامی3؛ مسلم کرد1؛ مهران مکرمی4؛ شهریار قریب زاده1؛ مجید صفارنیا5 | ||
| 1Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. | ||
| 3Department of Psychology, Roozbeh Psychiatry Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 4Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 5Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| هدف: تصرف توجه زمانی رخ می‌دهد که یک محرک برجسته‌ی غیروابسته به هدف در میدان توجه ظاهر شود. همه‌گیری کووید-19 به‌قدر کافی برجسته بود تا سهم بزرگی از ظرفیت توجهی افراد را به تصرف خود درآورد. هدف از مطالعه‌ی حاضر پاسخ به چگونگی تاثیر تازگی اخبار مرتبط با شیوع بیماری بر توجه در زندگی روزمره بود. روش: 162 شرکت‌کننده با استفاده از یک دعوتنامه‌ی برخط به پژوهش ورود پیدا کردند و به دو نمونه‌ی مقاطع مقدم و مؤخر تقسیم شدند. متغیرها شامل برجستگی اخبار، افکار مزاحم، توجه درون‌زاد و دانش کووید-19 با استفاده از تحلیل واریانس چند متغیره، بین دو اندازه‌گیری (مقاطع) مقایسه شدند. افزون بر این، به منظور دستیابی به مدلی از روابط بین متغیرها از تحلیل همبستگی استفاده شد. یافته‌ها: مشخص شد که در گذر زمان، علی‌رغم افزایش موارد ابتلا، از میزان افکار مزاحم و تصرف توجه کاسته می‌شود. همچنین به منظور توصیف رابطه‌ی میان برجستگی اخبار و تصرف توجه یک مدل مفهومی معرف شد. نتیجه‌گیری: افزون بر دیگر خصایص فیزیکی محرک، تازگی نیز می‌تواند در برجستگی محرک اثرگذار باشد. در زندگی روزمره، موقعیت‌های جدید می‌تواند آغازگر افکار مزاحم و تصرف توجه باشد. با این وجود با از دست رفتن تازگی، این پدیده نمی‌تواند ماندگار باشد. مدل پیشنهادی می‌تواند در فهم شرایط مشابه آتی سودمند باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| توجه روزمره, تصرف توجه, برجستگی, کووید-19, شیوع بیماری | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14(5), 427–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01458 Aktar, E., Van Bockstaele, B., Pérez-Edgar, K., Wiers, R. W., & Bögels, S. M. (2019). Intergenerational transmission of attentional bias and anxiety. Developmental Science, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12772 Albery, I. P., Spada, M. M., & Nikčević, A. V. (2021). The COVID-19 anxiety syndrome and selective attentional bias towards COVID-19-related stimuli in UK residents during the 2020–2021 pandemic. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 28(6), 1367–1378. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2639 Asplund, C. L., Todd, J. J., Snyder, A. P., Gilbert, C. M., & Marois, R. (2010). Surprise-Induced Blindness: A Stimulus-Driven Attentional Limit to Conscious Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1372–1381. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020551 Bar-haim, Y., Lamy, D., Bakermans-kranenburg, M. J., & Ijzendoorn, M. H. Van. (2007). Threat-Related Attentional Bias in Anxious and Nonanxious Individuals : A Meta-Analytic Study. 133(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1 Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.857 Byrne, J. H. (2017). Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. In Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2015-1-01759-8 Cannito, L., Di Crosta, A., Palumbo, R., Ceccato, I., Anzani, S., La Malva, P., Palumbo, R., & Di Domenico, A. (2020). Health anxiety and attentional bias toward virus-related stimuli during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73599-8 Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind. In Neuron (Vol. 58, Issue 3, pp. 306–324). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017 Ernst, D., Becker, S., & Horstmann, G. (2020). Novelty competes with saliency for attention. Vision Research, 168, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.01.004 Fabio, R. A., & Caprì, T. (2019). Automatic and controlled attentional capture by threatening stimuli. Heliyon, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01752 Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Attention and Encoding. In Social Cognition. From Brains to Culture (pp. 119–168). SAGE Publications Inc. Foley, N. C., Jangraw, D. C., Peck, C., & Gottlieb, J. (2014). Novelty enhances visual salience independently of reward in the parietal lobe. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(23), 7947–7957. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4171-13.2014 Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(7), 999–1010. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194829 Ghazizadeh, A., Griggs, W., & Hikosaka, O. (2016). Ecological origins of object salience: Reward, uncertainty, aversiveness, and novelty. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10(AUG). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00378 Gibb, B. E., Mcgeary, J. E., & Beevers, C. G. (2016). Attentional biases to emotional stimuli: Key components of the RDoC constructs of sustained threat and loss. In American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics (Vol. 171, Issue 1, pp. 65–80). Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32383 Hester, R., Dixon, V., & Garavan, H. (2006). A consistent attentional bias for drug-related material in active cocaine users across word and picture versions of the emotional Stroop task. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 81(3), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.07.002 Kaiser, B. N., Haroz, E. E., Kohrt, B. A., Bolton, P. A., Bass, J. K., & Hinton, D. E. (2015). “Thinking too much”: A systematic review of a common idiom of distress. In Social Science and Medicine (Vol. 147, pp. 170–183). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.044 Kim, S., & Rehder, B. (2011). How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: An eyetracking study. Memory and Cognition, 39(4), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0050-3 Laurens, K. R., Kiehl, K. A., Ngan, E. T. C., & Liddle, P. F. (2005). Attention orienting dysfunction during salient novel stimulus processing in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 75(2–3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2004.12.010 Li, S., & Li, X. (2022). The Relationship Between Attentional Bias, Anxiety Sensitivity, and Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: Evidence From the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.832819 Liao, H. I., Yeh, S. L., & Shimojo, S. (2011). Novelty vs. Familiarity principles in preference decisions: Task-context of past experience matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(43). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00043 Mazza, M. G., Palladini, M., De Lorenzo, R., Magnaghi, C., Poletti, S., Furlan, R., Ciceri, F., Rovere-Querini, P., & Benedetti, F. (2021). Persistent psychopathology and neurocognitive impairment in COVID-19 survivors: Effect of inflammatory biomarkers at three-month follow-up. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 94, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2021.02.021 Michael, G. A., & Gálvez-García, G. (2011). Salience-based progression of visual attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 224(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.024 Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2005). Attentional bias in generalized anxiety disorder versus depressive disorder. In Cognitive Therapy and Research (Vol. 29, Issue 1, pp. 29–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-1646-y Öhman, A. (2007). Has evolution primed humans to “beware the beast”? In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 104, Issue 42, pp. 16396–16397). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707885104 Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231 Pratt, J., Radulescu, P. V., Guo, R. mu, & Abrams, R. A. (2010). It’s alive! Animate motion captures visual attention. Journals.Sagepub.Com, 21(11), 1724–1730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610387440 Sunny, M. M., & von Mühlenen, A. (2013). Attention capture by abrupt onsets: Re-visiting the priority tag model. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(DEC), 958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00958 Taghrir, M., Borazjani, R., medicine, R. S.-A. of I., & 2020, undefined. (2020). COVID-19 and Iranian medical students; a survey on their related-knowledge, preventive behaviors and risk perception. Aimjournal.Ir, 23(4), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.34172/aim.2020.06 Theeuwes, J., & Van der Burg, E. (2013). Priming makes a stimulus more salient. Journal of Vision, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.21 Vasiljevic, M., Weick, M., Taylor-Gooby, P., Abrams, D., & Hopthrow, T. (2013). Reasoning about extreme events: A review of behavioural biases in relation to catastrophe risks. 28. Vecera, S. P., Cosman, J. D., Vatterott, D. B., & Roper, Z. J. J. (2014). The control of visual attention. Toward a unified account. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 60, pp. 303–347). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800090-8.00008-1 Weierich, M. R., Treat, T. A., & Hollingworth, A. (2008). Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 22(6), 985–1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701597601 Wells, A., & Davies, M. I. (1994). The thought control questionnaire: A measure of individual differences in the control of unwanted thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(8), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)90168-6 Wittmann, B. C., Daw, N. D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2008). Striatal Activity Underlies Novelty-Based Choice in Humans. Neuron, 58(6), 967–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.027 Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture: Evidence From Equiluminant Visual Objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.1.95 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 207 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 178 |
||