اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات41
تعداد شماره‌ها1,105
تعداد مقالات9,457
تعداد مشاهده مقاله17,069,018
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,962,169
Khodarahmi, Somayeh, Hafezi, Hossein, Farajolahi, Mehran, Sarmadi, Mohammadreza. (1402). Construction, validity and reliability of online teaching satisfaction model in virtual course professors. فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 5(2), 9-24. doi: 10.30473/idej.2023.67949.1157
Somayeh Khodarahmi; Hossein Hafezi; Mehran Farajolahi; Mohammadreza Sarmadi. "Construction, validity and reliability of online teaching satisfaction model in virtual course professors". فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 5, 2, 1402, 9-24. doi: 10.30473/idej.2023.67949.1157
Khodarahmi, Somayeh, Hafezi, Hossein, Farajolahi, Mehran, Sarmadi, Mohammadreza. (1402). 'Construction, validity and reliability of online teaching satisfaction model in virtual course professors', فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 5(2), pp. 9-24. doi: 10.30473/idej.2023.67949.1157
Khodarahmi, Somayeh, Hafezi, Hossein, Farajolahi, Mehran, Sarmadi, Mohammadreza. Construction, validity and reliability of online teaching satisfaction model in virtual course professors. فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 1402; 5(2): 9-24. doi: 10.30473/idej.2023.67949.1157

Construction, validity and reliability of online teaching satisfaction model in virtual course professors

Quarterly of Iranian Distance Education Journal
دوره 5، شماره 2، فروردین 2024، صفحه 9-24    اصل مقاله (310.51 K)
نوع مقاله: scientific-research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/idej.2023.67949.1157
نویسندگان
Somayeh Khodarahmi1؛ Hossein Hafezi* 2؛ Mehran Farajolahi3؛ Mohammadreza Sarmadi3
1Ph.D. Student in Distance Education Planning, Department of Educational Sciences,, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University(PNU), P. O. Box: 19395-4697, Tehran, Iran.
3Prof., Department of Educational Sciences,, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
The purpose of this research was to construct, validate and determine the reliability of online teaching satisfaction model among virtual course professors. For this purpose, an attempt has been made to design a questionnaire based on the model of Bolliger and Vasilik (2009) to measure the satisfaction of professors with online teaching. In order to create, compile and standardize such a questionnaire, the literature related to satisfaction with online teaching, which was available in the form of articles and books, was carefully reviewed. Finally, the definitions and concepts of satisfaction with online teaching were designed as 30 questions with 5 options using the "Likert scoring" method in the form of measuring the satisfaction of professors with online teaching. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated through Cronbach's alpha and retest and construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis. The formal and content validity of the questions was examined by asking the opinions of 19 expert professors in the field of online teaching, and its reliability was also tested on 50 professors of online courses in the "retest" method and at a time interval of 5 weeks. , 0.72 was calculated. Then the questionnaire was implemented on 350 professors of the virtual courses of Payam-Noor University and by using factor analysis with "rotational" method of "Varimax" type, 3 factors with characteristic value higher than 5 were determined as follows: "Satisfaction" from the organization", "student satisfaction" and "self satisfaction". Therefore, the reliability coefficients were between 0.68 and 0.89 for all subscales and 0.78 for the whole questionnaire by the test-retest method. The internal consistency coefficients for all subscales were between 0.62 and 0.75 and for the whole questionnaire was 0.93. In general, the validity and reliability coefficients obtained for the questionnaire were satisfactory. The designed questionnaire is distinguished from other questionnaires in the field of online teaching satisfaction for two reasons. First, this questionnaire covers areas of satisfaction that are related to organizational, student, and self-satisfaction. Second, each of its questions is derived from a defined index, and this issue makes the professors' "satisfaction with online teaching" based on a theoretical framework. Finally, it can be said that according to the reliability and validity results, this questionnaire is a relatively suitable tool for measuring the threshold of "satisfaction with online teaching" of online course professors at Payam Noor University. Obviously, building a scale to measure an existing structure is extremely difficult and time-consuming if done correctly; For example, studying the history of the formation of well-known tests in the world, which are highly reliable and valid.
کلیدواژه‌ها
online teaching satisfaction questionnaire؛ construction؛ accreditation؛ trust؛ online professors
عنوان مقاله [English]
ساخت، اعتبار و اعتمادیابی الگوی رضایت تدریس برخط در اساتید دوره‌های مجازی
نویسندگان [English]
سمیه خدارحمی1؛ حسین حافظی2؛ مهران فرج اللهی3؛ محمدرضا سرمدی3
1دانشجوی دکتری، برنامه ریزی آموزش از دور، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
2استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، ص. پ. 4697-19395، تهران، ایران.
3استاد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
چکیده [English]
هدف این پژوهش ساخت، اعتبار و اعتمادیابی الگوی رضایت تدریس برخط در اساتید دوره های مجازی بود. بدین منظور تلاش شده است تا بر اساس مدل بولیگر و واسیلیک(2009) پرسشنامه ای برای سنجش رضایتمندی از تدریس برخط اساتید طراحی شود. برای ساخت چنین پرسشنامه ای، ادبیات مربوط به رضایتمندی از تدریس برخط با دقت تمام مرور شد. در نهایت، تعاریف و مفاهیم رضایتمندی از تدریس برخط به صورت 30 سؤال 5 گزینه ای به روش «نمره گذاری لیکرت» در قالب سنجش رضایتمندی از تدریس برخط طراحی گردید. پایایی پرسشنامه از طریق ضریب آلفای کرانباخ و بازآزمایی و اعتبار سازه از طریق تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. روایی صوری و محتوایی سؤالات از طریق نظرخواهی از 19 نفر از اساتید مورد بررسی قرار گرفت و پایایی آن نیز از طریق اجرا بر روی 50 نفر از اساتید دوره های برخط به روش «بازآزمایی» و به فاصلة زمانی 5 هفته،72/0 محاسبه شد. سپس پرسشنامه بر روی 350 نفر از اساتید دوره های مجازی دانشگاه پیام نور اجرا شد و با استفاده از تحلیل عوامل با روش «چرخشی» از نوع «واریماکس» 3 عامل با مقدار ویژة بالاتر از 5 به شرح ذیل مشخص گردید: «رضایتمندی از سازمان»، «رضایتمندی از دانشجو» و «رضایمندی از خود». بنابراین ضرایب پایایی به وسیله روش بازآزمایی برای همه خرده مقیاس ها بین 68/0 تا 89/0 و برای کل پرسشنامه 78/0 بود. ضرایب همسانی درونی برای همه خرده مقیاس ها بین 62/ 0 تا 75/0 و برای کل پرسشنامه 93/0 بود. در کل، ضرایب اعتبار و پایایی به دست آمده برای پرسشنامه رضایت بخش بود.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
پرسشنامه رضایتمندی تدریس برخط, ساخت, اعتباریابی, اعتمادیابی, اساتید برخط
مراجع
 

References

  • Allen, M, J; Yen, W. M. (1374). An introduction to measurement theories (psychometrics). Translated by Ali Delavar. Tehran: Samit Publications.(in persian)
  • Alhabeeb, A., and Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers and Education, 127, 1-12
  • Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-based MBA Courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54.
  • Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and StructuralCharacteristics, Student Learning and Satisfaction with Web-based Courses – An Exploratory Study of two On-line MBA Programs. Management Learning, 33(3), 331-347.
  • Ashrafi, Sakineh and Heydaranjad, Froman. (1400). Analyzing the readiness of learners to participate in mass free online courses (mock). Quarterly Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 12(1 (consecutive 45)), 45-66.(in persian)
  • Baroudi, S., & Shaya, N. (2022). Exploring predictors of teachers’ self-efficacy for online teaching in the Arab world amid COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 50(9),1-18.
  • Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance education, 30(1), 103-116.
  • Darrin Thomas (2021). The Relationship among Academic Dishonesty, E-learning Readiness, and Procedural Justice. Human Behavior, Development and Society, ISSN 2651-1762, 22(3).
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., &Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
  • Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1), 1920090.
  • Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.
  • Farsi, Zahra; Aliari, Shahla; Ahmadi, Yazdan; Afaghi, Efat and Sajjadi, Azam (1400). Survey of satisfaction with the quality of academic course and virtual education during the covid-19 pandemic among nursing students of Ajah University of Medical Sciences in the second semester of 2018-2019. Journal of Military Medicine. 23 (2): 174-185.(in persian)
  • Gunn H(2016). Virtual libraries supporting student learning. School Libraries Worldwide. 8, 27-37.
  • Hermans, C. M., Haytko, D. L., & Mott- Stenerson, B. (2009). Student Satisfaction in Web-enhanced Learning Environments. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 1, 82-100, Retrieved from: http://aabri.com/manuscripts/09147.pdf
  • Hong, J. C., Lee, Y. F., & Ye, J. H. (2021). Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personality and individual differences, 174, 110673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110673
  • Horvat, A., Dobrota, M., Krsmanovic, M., & Cudanov, M. (2015). Student perception of Moodle
  • learning management system: A satisfaction and significance analysis. Interactive Learning
  • Environments, 23(4), 515–527.
  • Ketabchi, E., Mortazavi, M., & Moeini, A. (2008). Evaluation of User Satisfaction in Center of Elearning- University of Tehran. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, Washington DC, USA, 12-14 Dec 2008 ,536-539. CA: IEEE Computer Society
  • Khorasani, Absolt and Dosti, Homan (2010). Evaluating the level of satisfaction and the importance of factors affecting the effectiveness of e-learning from the perspective of employees (case study: Saman Bank), Scientific Research Quarterly Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, Volume 1, Number 4, Summer 2019, Pages 58-37.(in persian)
  • Klein, Paul. (1380). An easy guide to factor analysis. Translated by Seyed Jalal Sadr al-Sadat and Asghar Minaei. Tehran: Samit Publications .(in persian)
  • Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The internet and higher education, 20, 35-50.
  • Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating Students’ Perceived Satisfaction, Behavioral Intention, and Effectiveness of e-Learning: A Case Study of the Blackboard System. Computers & Education, 51, 864-873.
  • Magnusson, D. (1356). Theoretical foundations of psychological tests. Translated by Mohammad Naghi Brahni. Tehran: Tehran University Press.(in persian)
  • Outarkhani, Ali and Delavari, Vahid (2012). Measurement of students' satisfaction with electronic educational systems, Commercial Management Perspectives Quarterly, 10(4), 53-78 .(in persian)
  • Oye ND, Iahad AN, Madar MG, Rahim Ab(2012). The impact of E-learning on students’ performance in tertiary institutions. International Journal of Computer Networks and Wirless Communication (IJCNWC); 2(2(,121-130.
  • Selim, H. M. (2007). E-learning Critical Success Factors: An Exploratory Investigation of Student Perceptions. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 2(2), 157-182.
  • Siemens, J.C., Smith, S., Fisher, D., Thyroff, A. and Killian, G., 2015. Level up! The role of progress feedback type for encouraging intrinsic motivation and positive brand attitudes in public versus private gaming contexts. Journal of interactive marketing, 32, 1-12.
  • Siemens, L., Althaus, C., Stange, C., Seaborne, K. and Doner, S., (2010). June. Privacy, Security and Confidentiality on Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments: The University of Victoria Experience. In Congress 2010-Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education.
  • Sharifi, Hassan Pasha. (1377). Principles of psychometrics and psychoanalysis. Tehran: Rushd Publications.(in persian)
  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What Drives a Successful e-Learning? An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183-1202.
  • Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2011). Using SERVQUAL to Assess the Quality of e-Learning Experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1272-1283.
  • Vahedi, Majid (2019). The effect of e-learning readiness on self-regulated learning strategies and students' behavioral intention to learn online: the mediating role of motivational beliefs. Bimonthly Scientific-Research Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 13 (2):142-133.(in persian)
  • Wu, J. H., Tennyson, D. R., & Hsia, T. H. (2010). A Study of Student Satisfaction in a Blended e-Learning System Environment. Computers & Education, 55, 155-164.
 

 

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 168
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 217


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب