
تعداد نشریات | 41 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,170 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,079 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 18,878,078 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,097,121 |
تبیین مؤلفههای طراحی منظر شهر روزمره با رویکرد تجربه انسان از زیبایی شناسی (موردپژوهی: شهر بابل) | ||
برنامه ریزی توسعه کالبدی | ||
دوره 11، شماره 3، آذر 1403، صفحه 109-124 اصل مقاله (2.31 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/psp.2025.72754.2743 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
المیرا رفیع زاده ملکشاه1؛ زهرا سادات سعیده زرآبادی* 2؛ اسماعیل شیعه3 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری ، گروه شهرسازی ، واحد تهران غرب ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تهران ، ایران | ||
2دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
3استاد ، گروه شهرسازی ، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی ، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران ، تهران ، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
با مروری بر ادبیات نظری طراحی منظر شهر، رویکرد "زیبایی شناسی"، به عنوان یکی از تأثیرگذارترین ارزشها در رسیدن به مطلوبیت منظر شهر شناخته شد. این تجربه زیبایی در منظر روزمره شهر، فرآیندی است که نیاز به قضاوت، ارزشگذاری و رفتار متقابل مردم با مکانشان را میطلبد. پس باید به نظر مردم رجوع کرد و اهمیت داد. هدف پژوهش، تبیین مدلی از مؤلفههای مؤثر بر طراحی منظر شهر روزمره با تأکید بر رویکرد زیبایی شناسی از دیدگاه تجربه شهروندان به عنوان کاربران اصلی محیط زندگیشان می باشد. بدین منظور، با در نظرگرفتن الگوواره عمل گرایی، ابتدا به روش کیفی داده بنیاد، با نمونه آماری 9 نفر متخصص و 41 نفر از شهروندان بابل، تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته انجام شد. دادهها را از طریق نرم افزار مکس کیودا تحلیل کرده و بر اساس پارادایم داده بنیاد، مدل کیفی از متغیرهای طراحی منظر شهر با تجربه زیبایی شناسی شهروندان به دست آمد. در ادامه، برای رسیدن به آنچه در واقعیت، کاربرد دارد، این بار به ارزیابی کمی مدل پژوهش اقدام شد. در این مرحله، پرسش نامه برای نمونه آماری 384 نفر از شهروندان بابل طرح شد. با روش حداقل مربعات جزئی تعمیم یافته، دادههای کمی در نرم افزار اسمارت پی ال اس، تحلیل یافت. نتیجه حاکی از آن است، خروجی دادهها در مدل کیفی و سپس اعتبارسنجی کمی آن، دارای رابطه ای معنی دارند. مقدار P-value صفر در روابط بین متغیرها، معناداری مدل را نیز تایید می کند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
طراحی منظر شهر؛ زیبایی شناسی؛ عمل گرایی؛ دیدگاه تجربه مردم | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Landscape Design with an Experiential Aesthetic Approach (Case Study: Babol) | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Elmira Rafizadeh Malakshah1؛ Zahra Sadat Saeideh Zarabadi2؛ Esmaeil Shieh3 | ||
1Ph.D. Student, Department of Urban Development, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Associate professor, Department of urban development, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Professor. Department of Urban Development, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
By reviewing the theoretical literature on urban landscape design, aesthetics was identified as one of the most influential factors in achieving desirable urban landscapes. The aesthetic experience in the everyday urban landscape is a process that requires judgment, evaluation, and mutual interaction between citizens and their environment. Therefore, attention to citizens' opinions is essential. The aim of this research is to develop a model of the components affecting the design of the everyday urban landscape, emphasizing aesthetics from the perspective of citizens' experiences as the primary users of their living environment. To achieve this goal, using a pragmatist approach, qualitative data were initially collected through a grounded theory method. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of 9 experts and 41 citizens of Babol until theoretical saturation was reached. The data were analyzed using MAXQDA software, and based on the grounded theory paradigm, a qualitative model of urban landscape design variables, emphasizing citizens' aesthetic experiences, was developed. Subsequently, to examine the practical application of the model, a quantitative evaluation was conducted. Quantitative data were analyzed using the generalized partial least squares method and SmartPLS software, with a sample of 384 citizens of Babol completing questionnaires. The results showed a significant relationship between the qualitative model and its quantitative validation. A P-value of zero in the relationships between variables confirms the model's significance. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Urban Landscape Design, Aesthetics, Pragmatism, Citizens' Experience | ||
مراجع | ||
Acar, C. Acar, H. & Eroglu, E. (2007). Evaluation of ornamental plant resources to urban biodiversity and cultural changing: A case study of residential landscapes in Trabzon city .Turkey: Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.030 Al-Ghiyadh M. A. K. & Al-Khafaji S. J. N. (2021). The Role of Urban Planning and Urban Design on Safe Cities. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1058, No. 1, p. 012065). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757- 899X/1058/1/012065. Aminzadeh, B. (2016). Values in urban landscape design. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (in Persian) Atik, M. Canay Işıklı, R. Ortaçeşme, V. & Yıldırım, E. (2017). “Exploring a Combination of Objective and Subjective Assessment in Landscape Classification: Side Case from Turkey.” Applied Geography 83 (June): 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.004 Chin,W.W., 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), pp.295- 336. Cumming T. L. Shackleton R. T. Förster J. Dini J. Khan A. Gumula, M. & Kubiszewski, I. (2017). Achieving the national development agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through investment in ecological infrastructure: A case study of South Africa. Ecosystem Services, 27(May), 253–260.https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecoser.2017.05.005. Daniel, T.C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4. Dabbagh, E. & Dabbagh, P. (2022). The Role of Management and Planning in Urban Landscape Aestethic: A Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2022 Vol. 7, Issue 7, ISSN No. 2455-2143, Pages 22-28. https://www.ijeast.com/papers/22-28,%20Tesma0707,IJEAST.pdf Dearden, P. (1987). Consensus and a Theoretical Framework for Landscape Evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management 24 (January): 267–278. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258725135_Dearden_P_1987_Consensus_and_a_theoretical_framework_for_landscape_evaluation_Journal_of_Environmental_Management_24_267-278 Dramstad, W. E. Tveit, M. S. Fjellstad, W. J. & Fry, G. L. (2006). Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and urban planning, 78(4), 465-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006 de Val, G. D. L. F. Atauri, J. A. & de Lucio, J. V. (2006). Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 77(4), 393-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.05.003 Ebner, M., Schirpke, U., & Tappeiner, U. (2022). Combining multiple socio-cultural approaches–Deeper insights into cultural ecosystem services of mountain lakes? Landscape and Urban Planning, 228, 104549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104549 Ervin H. Zube, E.H. Sell, J.L. & Taylor, J.G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory, Landscape Planning, Volume 9, Issue 1, 1982, Pages 1-33, ISSN 0304-3924, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0. Frank, S., Fürst,C. Koschke, L. Witt, A. & Makeschin, F. (2013). Assessment of Landscape Aesthetics—Validation of a Landscape Metrics-Based Assessment by Visual Estimation of the Scenic Beauty. Ecological Indicators 32 (September): 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.026 Gobster, P.H., Ribe, R.G. & Palmer, J.F. (2019). Themes and trends in visual assessment research: Introduction to the Landscape and Urban Planning special collection on the visual assessment of landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103635.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019. 103635. Kalivoda, O., J. Vojar, Z. Skřivanová, & Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in Landscape Preference Judgments: The Effects of Landscape Visual Aesthetic Quality and Respondents’ Characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management 137 (May): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009 Karasov, O., Avelino Batista Vieira, A. Külvik, M. & I. Chervanyov. (2020). Landscape Coherence Revisited: GIS-Based Mapping in Relation to Scenic Values and Preferences Estimated with Geolocated Social Media Data. Ecological Indicators 111 (April): 105973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105973 Kerebel, A., Gélinas, N. Déry, S.Voigt, B. & A. Munson. (2019). Landscape Aesthetic Modelling Using Bayesian Networks: Conceptual Framework and Participatory Indicator Weighting. Landscape and Urban Planning 185 (May): 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.001 Keshtkaran, R., Habibi, A., & Sharif, H.R. (2017). Aesthetic Preferences for Visual Quality of Urban Landscape in Derak High-Rise Buildings (Shiraz). Journal of Sustainable Development, 10, 94. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v10n5p94 Kline, R.B., 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. Lothian, A. (1999). Landscape and the Philosophy of Aesthetics: Is Landscape Quality Inherent in the Landscape or in the Eye of the Beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning 44 (4): 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5 Mansouri, M. A., & Shad Ghazvini, P. (2022). The Aesthetic Experience of Urban Art Analysis of four experiences in Tehran based on the John Dewey's Valuation Theory. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 15(39), 139-150. (in Persian). https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_158070.html?lang=en Markovic, S. (2012). Components of aesthetic experience: Aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. I-Percept. 2012, 3, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0450aap Mundher, Riyadh, Shamsul Abu Bakar, Suhardi Maulan, Mohd Johari Mohd Yusof, Ammar Al-Sharaa, Azlizam Aziz, & Hangyu Gao .(2022). Aesthetic Quality Assessment of Landscapes as a Model for Urban Forest Areas: A Systematic Literature Review. Forests 13, no. 7: 991.https://doi.org/10.3390/f13070991 Nijhuis, S., Van Lammeren, R., & van der Hoeven, F. (2011). Exploring the visual landscape: advances in physiognomic landscape research in the Netherlands (Vol. 2). TU Delft. http://dx.doi.org/10.7480/rius.2 Nohl,W. (2001). Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception-preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54, 223–237. Page, J. (2022). Aesthetic Understanding. Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 59 (1):48-68. https://philpapers.org/rec/PAGAU Pakzad, J (2013). An intellectual history of urbanism. Tehran: Armanshahr.(Original work published 2010) (in Persian) Plieninger, T., D. van der Horst, C. Schleyer, and C. Bieling. (2014). Sustaining ecosystem services in cultural landscapes. Ecology and Society 19(2): 59.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06159-190259 Purici Ş., & Mareci Sabol H. (2022). From Beautification to Ennobling: The Exterior Mural Mosaics from Suceava of the Socialist Era. Societies, 12(4),107.https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12040107. Schirpke, U., Mölk, F., Feilhauer, E., Tappeiner, U., & Tappeiner, G. (2023). How suitable are discrete choice experiments based on landscape indicators for estimating landscape preferences?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 237, 104813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104813 Taber, K.S., 2018. The use of cronbach's Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science eduation. Research in Science Eduation, 48(6),pp. 1273-1296. Wang, R., J. Zhao, & Z. Liu. (2016). Consensus in Visual Preferences: The Effects of Aesthetic Quality and Landscape Types. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20 (December): 210–217. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.005. Williams, A.T. (2019). The Concept of Scenic Beauty in a Landscape. In: Rangel-Buitrago, N. (eds) Coastal Scenery. Coastal Research Library, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78878-4_2 Zhu, Z. He, Q. & Zhu, X. (2022). Spatial Analysis for the Landscape Visual Aesthetic Quality of Urban Residential Districts Based on 3D City Modeling. Sustainability 2022, 14(18), 11500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811500 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 27 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 14 |