
تعداد نشریات | 41 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,184 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,192 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 19,148,942 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,260,072 |
عصب حکمرانی: بررسی نقطه تلاقی علوم اعصاب و حاکمیت شرکتی | ||
عصب روان شناسی | ||
دوره 10، شماره 37، مرداد 1403 | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/clpsy.2025.72782.1763 | ||
نویسنده | ||
محمد نظری پور* | ||
دانشیار، گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه (س) قم، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: حاکمیت شرکتی نقش بسزائی در تامین منافع سهامداران و سایر ذینفعان دارد. در همین راستا، عصب حکمرانی با بهکارگیری علوم مختلف تلاش دارد به شرکتها در موفقیت سازمانی و تامین منافع تمامی ذینفعان کمک کند. بنابراین هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی نقش عصب حکمرانی بهعنوان نقطه تلاقی علوم اعصاب و حاکمیت شرکتی است. روش: بهلحاظ روش، پژوهش حاضر توصیفی-همبستگی و از نوع مدلیابی معادلات ساختاری است. جامعه آماری شامل مدیران شرکتهای تولیدی، و حجم نمونه آماری 171 نفر بود. دادههای مورد نیاز از طریق پرسشنامه و به روش نمونهگیری گلوله برفی گردآوری شد. تجزیهتحلیل دادهها با استفاده از مدلیابی معادلات ساختاری انجام شد. یافتهها: بنابر نتایج پژوهش هر چهار متغیر مستقل (عصب حسابداری، عصب اقتصادی، عصب اخلاقی و طبیعت انسانی) بر عصب حکمرانی اثرگذار بودند. بدین معنا که عصب حسابداری نقش مهمی در تصمیمگیریهای اقتصادی مدیران دارد. عصب اقتصادی کمک میکند تا مدیران بتوانند از منابع کمیاب استفاده بهینه و حداکثری کنند. عصب اخلاقی نقش بسزائی در تبیین تصمیمات اخلاقی مدیران دارد. شناخت و درک صحیح طبیعت انسانی میتواند مانع بروز رفتارهای غیراخلاقی و سوء مدیریتی شود. نتیجهگیری: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد عصب حکمرانی با ارائه دیدگاههای جدید و کارآمد میتواند باعث بهبود رویههای حاکمیت شرکتی و قضاوتهای تجاری شود. درمجموع مطالعه مغز انسان و عوامل موثر بر آن میتواند نقش بسزایی در درک بهتر فرآیندهای تصمیمگیری سازمانی ایفا کند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
عصب حکمرانی؛ عصب حسابداری؛ عصب اقتصادی؛ عصب اخلاقی؛ طبیعت انسانی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Neuro-Governance: Exploring the Intersection of Neuroscience and Corporate Governance | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Mohammad Nazaripour | ||
Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Purpose: Corporate governance plays a crucial role in protecting the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. In this context, neuroscience seeks to assist companies in attaining organizational success and safeguarding the interests of all stakeholders by utilizing insights from various scientific disciplines. Consequently, the aim of this research is to explore the role of neuro-governance at the intersection of neuroscience and corporate governance. Method: This study is practical in nature and is classified as descriptive-exploratory correlational research. The population comprises managers from manufacturing companies, with a sample size of 171 participants. Data were collected through a questionnaire, utilizing the snowball sampling method. The study was carried out during the third quarter of 2024, and the data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Findings: The research findings demonstrate that all four independent variables—neuro-accounting, neuro-economics, neuro-ethics, and human nature—have a significant impact on neuro-governance. Neuro-accounting plays a vital role in guiding managers' financial and economic decision-making processes, while neuro-economics assists managers in optimizing the allocation of scarce resources. Neuro-ethics are essential for understanding and explaining the ethical decisions made by managers, and a thorough comprehension of human nature can aid in preventing unethical behavior and misconduct within organizations. Conclusion: The results of this research indicate that neuro-governance can improve corporate governance practices and business decision-making by providing new and more effective approaches. Overall, examining the human brain and the factors that influence it can significantly contribute to a deeper understanding of organizational decision-making processes. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Neuro-Governance, Neuro-Accounting, Neuro-Economics, Neuro-Ethics, Human Nature | ||
مراجع | ||
Abreu, J. L. (2010). Neuroeconomics: A Basic Review. Revista Daena: International Journal of Good Conscience, 5(1). http://www.spentamexico.org/v5-n1/5(1)175-184.pdf Adina, R. (2002). Neuroethics for the new millennium: Commentary. Neuron, 35, 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00763-8 Ahmad, Z. A. (2010). Brain in business: the economics of neuroscience. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 17(2), 1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216154/ Anand, S., Mishra, K., Verma, V. and Taruna, T. (2023). Financial literacy as a mediator of personal financial health during COVID-19: A structural equation modelling approach. Emerald Open Research, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-04-2023-0006 Arulanandam, B. V. (2020). An exploratory study on current corporate governance among practitioners in Malaysian public listed companies-an introduction to quantum governance. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 13077-1397. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V2418/PR281296 Banda, M. (2023). Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Analysis. Corporate Governance, 14(17). https://doi.org/10.7176/RJFA/14-17-05 Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological bulletin, 126(6), 925. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925 Beauregard, J. (2019). Philosophical Neuroethics: A Personalist Approach. Natl. Catholic Bioethics Q. 18, 269–290 Berthoz, S., Grèzes, J., Armony, J. L., Passingham, R. E., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Affective response to one's own moral violations. Neuroimage, 31(2), 945-950. –950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.039 Blavatskyy, P. (2020). Expected discounted utility. Theory and Decision, 88(2), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-019-09718-3 Borgia, F. (2005). Corporate governance & transparency role of disclosure: how prevent new financial scandals and crimes. American University Transnational Crime and Corruption Center School of International Service, 1-59. Brocas, I. (2012). Information processing and decision-making: evidence from the brain sciences and implications for economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(3), 292-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.06.004 Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2004). Neuroeconomics: Why economics needs brains. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 555-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00377.x Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Avon Books, a Division of the Hearst Corporation Dickhaut, J. W., Basu, S., McCabe, K. A., & Waymire, G. B. (2009a). Neuro-Accounting, part I: The primate brain and reciprocal exchange. Part I: The Primate Brain and Reciprocal Exchange. Brooklyn, NY: SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1336526 Dickhaut, J. W., Basu, S., McCabe, K. A., & Waymire, G. B. (2009b). Neuro-Accounting, part II: Consilience between accounting principles and the primate brain. Part II: Consilience between Accounting Principles and the Primate Brain. Brooklyn, NY: SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1336517 Dickhaut, J., Basu, S., McCabe, K., & Waymire, G. (2010). Neuroaccounting: Consilience between the biologically evolved brain and culturally evolved accounting principles. Accounting Horizons, 24(2), 221-255. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.2.221 Eslinger, P. J., & Damasio, A. R. (1985). Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: patient EVR. Neurology, 35(12), 1731-1731. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.35.12.1731 Etzioni, A. (1988). The Moral Dimension: Towards a New Economics. New York, NY: The FreePress. Farmer, D. J. (2006). Neuro-Gov: neuroscience and governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28(4), 653-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2006.11029560 Farmer, D. J. (2007). Neuro‐Gov: Neuroscience as Catalyst. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1412.002 Farmer, D. J. (2008). Invited essay: epistemic pluralism and neuroscience. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30(3), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2008.11029643 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (p. 197). Springer Nature. Hamza, M. (2018). The impact of corporate governance on auditors' independence and audit fees: An empirical study of Jordanian insurance companies listed on Amman Stock Exchange. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 10(4), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v10n4p171 Hang, Y., Sarfraz, M., Khalid, R., Ozturk, I., & Tariq, J. (2022). Does corporate social responsibility and green product innovation boost organizational performance? A moderated mediation model of competitive advantage and green trust. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 5379-5399. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2026243 Hauser, M. (2006). Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York, NY: Ecco/HarperCollins Publishers Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing, 277-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014 Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2019). The neuro-philosophical case for an evolutionary turn in neuroeconomics. Brooklyn, NY: SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402426 Ivascu, L., Pavel, C. D., Sarfraz, M., Arulanandam, B. V., & Tan, H. Y. (2022). An exploratory study on corporate governance from neuro-governance lenses in the Malaysian context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 911907. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911907 Glannon, W. (2017). The evolution of neuroethics. Debates about Neuroethics: Perspectives on its development, focus, and future, 19-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54651-3_3 Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(12), 517-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9 Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872 Grover, S. L., & Hui, C. (1994). The influence of role conflict and self-interest on lying in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 295-303. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25072533 Kalenscher, T., & Pennartz, C. M. (2008). Is a bird in the hand worth two in the future? The neuroeconomics of intertemporal decision-making. Progress in neurobiology, 84(3), 284-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.11.004 Kalenscher, T. (2009). Decision-Making and Neuroeconomics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0021397 Le Garrec, G. (2018). Fairness, social norms and the cultural demand for redistribution. Social Choice and Welfare, 50, 191-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1080-6 Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In Advances in experimental social psychology, 34, 199-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.004 Masli, A. M. (2018). The Role of the audit committee as a corporate governance mechanism: The case of the banking sector in Libya. Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3906663 Mendez, M. F. (2006). What front temporal dementia reveals about the neurobiological basis of morality. Medical hypotheses, 67(2), 411-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2006.01.048 Moll, J., Eslinger, P. J., & Oliveira-Souza, R. D. (2001). Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task: preliminary functional MRI results in normal subjects. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 59, 657-664. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2001000500001 Moore, D. A., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Conflict of interest and the intrusion of bias. Judgment and Decision making, 5(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500002023 Mudrik, L. (2009). Sandra Aamodt and Sam Wang, Welcome to your brain: Why you lose your car keys but never forget how to drive and other puzzles of everyday life. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(2), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.2.11mud Namazi, M., Ebrahimi, F. (2017). Investigating the effect of individual and social constructs on the perceived moral intensity by accountants. Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2(4), 97-121. (IN Persian) Nazaripour, M. Zakizadeh, B. (2023). The role of neuroaccounting in financial and budget decisions-making. Journal of Neuropsychology, 9(33), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.30473/CLPSY.2024.69293.1718 (In Persian) Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill Patterson, D. M., & Pardo, M. S. (Eds.). (2016). Philosophical foundations of law and neuroscience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743095.001.0001 Platt, M. L., & Huettel, S. A. (2008). Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty. Nature neuroscience, 11(4), 398-403. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2062 Randall, E., & Schumacker, E., & Lomax, R.G. (2015). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modelling. 4th Edition, Routledge, London, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749105 Rasool, S. F., Samma, M., Wang, M., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). How human resource management practices translate into sustainable organizational performance: the mediating role of product, process and knowledge innovation. Psychology research and behavior management, 1009-1025. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S204662 Rasool, S. F., Wang, M., Zhang, Y., & Samma, M. (2020). Sustainable work performance: the roles of workplace violence and occupational stress. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(3), 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030912 Rasool, S. F., Wang, M., Tang, M., Saeed, A., & Iqbal, J. (2021). How toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: The mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(5), 2294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052294 Reynolds, S. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.737 Reynolds, S. J., Leavitt, K., & DeCelles, K. A. (2010). Automatic ethics: the effects of implicit assumptions and contextual cues on moral behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 752. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019411 Rifki, O., & Ono, H. (2021). Fairness norm through social networks: a simulation approach. Computational Social Networks, 8, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40649-021-00100-4 Saltaji, I. M. (2018). Corporate governance: a general review. Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 13, 56-63. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ath/journl/v50sy2018i4p56-63.html Salvador, R., & Folger, R. G. (2009). Business ethics and the brain: Rommel Salvador and Robert G. Folger. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20091911 Sarfraz, M., Shah, S. G. M., Ivascu, L., & Qureshi, M. A. A. (2022). Explicating the impact of hierarchical CEO succession on small‐medium enterprises' performance and cash holdings. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(2), 2600-2614. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2289 Serra, D. (2021). Decision-making: from neuroscience to neuroeconomics—an overview. Theory and Decision, 91(1), 1-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-021-09830-3 Shah, S. G. M., Sarfraz, M., & Ivascu, L. (2021). Assessing the interrelationship corporate environmental responsibility, innovative strategies, cognitive and hierarchical CEO: a stakeholder theory perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2061 Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sense-making-intuition model. Academy of management review, 32(4), 1022-1040. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26585677 Steele, L. M., Rees, R., & Berry, C. M. (2023). The role of self-interest in unethical pro-organizational behavior: A nomological network meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109 (3). https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001139 Tabibnia, G., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Fairness and cooperation are rewarding: evidence from social cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1412.001 Tehran Stock Exchange. (2022). Corporate governance guidelines for publishers registered with the Tehran Stock Exchange. Octobor 10, 2022. (In Persian) Teixeira, J. F., & Carvalho, A. O. (2024). Corporate governance in SMEs: a systematic literature review and future research. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(2), 303-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2023-0135 Thagard, P. (2007). The moral psychology of conflicts of interest: Insights from affective neuroscience. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(4), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633105520957638 Tiep Le, T., & Nguyen, V. K. (2022). The impact of corporate governance on firms’ value in an emerging country: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility and organisational identification. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2018907. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.2018907 Trettenbrein, P. C. (2015). Neuroscience and human nature: Review of The Altruistic Brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00307 Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of management Review, 11(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.2307/258313 Turluev, R., & Hadjieva, L. (2021). Neural networks in corporate governance systems. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 93, p. 03016). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219303016 Zwart, T., & Mündlein, K. (2013). Business and the Brain: Discourses on Neuroscience in Business in the Management Consulting Industry. Lund: Lund University School of Economics and Management. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 18 |