نقشة راه مطالعات نام‌شناسی: از رویکرد سنتّی تا رویکرد شناختی- اجتماعی

Ainiala, T., & Ostman, J-O. (2017). Socio- onomastics: The pragmatics of names.Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Ainiala, T., Saarelma, M., & Sjöblom, P. (2018). Names in focus: An introduction to Finnish onomastics. Suomalaisen Kirjallsuuden Seura.

Allan, K. (2008). Metaphor and metonymy: A diachronic approach. Publications of the Philological Society 42. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Allan, K. (2010). Tracing metonymic polysemy through time: Material for object mappings in the OED. In M. E. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp. 163-196). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.

Anderson, J. (2004). On the grammatical status of names. Language, 80(3), 435-474.

Andryuchshenko, O. K., Suyunova, G. S., & Tkachuk, S. S. (2015). The cognitive aspects of the study of regional onomastics. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8 (10), doi:10.17485/ ijst/2015/v8is (10)/84835..

Baldinger, K. (1964). Semasiologie et

onomasiologie. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 28, 249-272.

Baldinger, K. (1980). Semantic theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Translation of Teoria Semantica. Hacia una semantica moderna. Madrid: Ediciones Alcala 1977).

Barcelona, A. (2011). Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In: R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: towards a consensus view (pp. 7-58). Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Berlin. B. (1978). Ethnobiological classification. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 9-26). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Berlin. B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms, their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Blank A., & Koch, P. (1999). Historical semantics and cognition. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.

Blank, A. (2001). Words and concepts in time: Towards diachronic cognitive onomasiology. metaphorik.de, 1, 6-25.

Blank, A. (2003). Words and concepts in time: Towards diachronic cognitive onomasiology. In R. Eckardt, K. Heusinger, & Ch. Schwarze (Eds.), Trends in linguistics. Words in time. Diachronic semantics from different points of view (pp. 37–66). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter,.

Coates, R. (2013). Onomastics. In C. Chapelle (Ed.) The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 4315–4320). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. 6th ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

Danesi, M. (2004). A basic course in anthropological linguistics. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.

Davidko, N. (2012). What color is business? An onomasiological and semasiological study of business terms containing color words. Studies about Languages, 21, 92-107.

Diller, A. (1994). Thai. In C. Goddard, & A. Wierzbicka (Eds.), Semantics and lexical universals (pp. 149-170). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Fillmore, C. (1977). Scenes and frames semantics. In A Zampolli (Ed.), Linguistic structures processing (pp. 55-81). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.

Fillmore, C. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222-255.

Fillmore, C., & Atkins, B. (1992). Towards a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of risk and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts. New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 75-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Fillmore, C., O’Conner, P., & Catherine, M. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501-538.

Forster, K. I. (2002). Accessing the mental lexicon. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Psychoinguitics. Critical concepts in psychology (pp. 270-296). London/New York: Routledge.

Geeraerts, D, (2008). Prototypes, stereotypes, and semantic norm”. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.) Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 21-44). Berlin, New York: Mouton De Gruyter.

Geeraerts, D. (2002). The scope of diachronic onomasiology. In V. Agel, A. Gardt, U. Hass-Zumkehr & T. Roelcke (Eds.) Das wort. Seine strukturelle und kulturelle dimension (pp. 29-44). Tubingen: Niemeyer.

Geeraerts, D. (2006). Methodology in cognitive linguistics. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: current applications and future perspectives (pp. 21-49). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Geeraerts, D. (2017). Ten lectures on cognitive sociolinguistics. Brill.

Geeraerts, D. Kristiansen, G. & Piersman, Y. (Eds.) (2010). Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 153-179). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Geeraerts, D., Gevaert, C., & Speelman, D. (2011). How anger rose: Hypothesis testing in diachronic semantics. In K. Allan & J. Robinson (Eds.), Current methods in historical semantics (pp. 109-131). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Bakema, P. (1994). The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Gillieron, J., & Roques, M. (1912). Etudes de geographie linguistique. Paris: Champion.

Glynn, D., & Fischer, K. (2010). Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Grondelaers, S., & Geeraerts D. (2003). Towards a pragmatic model of cognitive onomasiology. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven & J. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics (pp. 67-92). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Grondelares, S., Geeraerts, D., & Speelman, D. (2007). A case for a cognitive corpus linguistics. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 149- 169). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Grygiel, M. (2008). From semantic change to conceptual blending: Semantic development of English historical near-synonyms of man/male human being. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo UR.

Hilpert, M. (2007). Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar. In G. Radden, K-M. Kopcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 77-98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Janda, L. (2013). Cognitive linguistics: The quantitative turn. The essential reader. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Kleparski, G. A. (2005). Towards the semantics of Mid.E. Synonyms of MAN. Studia Anglica Resoviensia, 3, 88-95.

Kleparski, G. A., & Borkowska p. (2007). A note on synonymy: Synchronic and diachronic. Studia Anglica Resoviensia, 4, 126-139.

Koch, P. (2004). Metonymy between pragmatics, reference and diachrony. Metaphorik.de, 07, 6-54.

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Lackoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lackoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. NY: Basic Books.

Lackoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Langaker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Leino, A. (2006). Place Names as Constructions. Onoma: Journal of the Int’ Council Onomastic Sciences, 41, 215-235.

Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moreno-Fernandez, F. (2017). A framework for cognitive sociolinguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.

Nerlich, B., & Clarke, D. (2001). Serial metonymy: A study of reference-based polysemisation. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 2(2), 245-272.

Paradis, C. (2011). Metonymization: A key mechanism in semantic change. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. R. de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 61–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Rutkiewicz-Hanczewska, M. (2016). Semantics of proper names. The structure of the mental lexicon of proper names. In C. Hough, D. Izdebska (Eds.) ICOS 2014: Names and their environment, Proceeding of the 25^th Int’ Congress of Onomastic Sciences, Glasgow, 25-29 August 2014, Vol: 4: Theory and Methodology, Socio-Onomastics (pp. 167-187). Glasgow: University of Glasgow.

Sweetser, E. (1991). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, J. R. (2003). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: OUP Oxford.

Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2001). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ullman, S. (1951). The principles of semantics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Glasgow: Jackson, Son and Co.

Ullman, S. (1962). Semantics. An introduction to the science of meaning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Walther, H. (1971). Namenforshung heute. Ihre Ergebnisse und Aufgaben in der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Yousefi Rad, F., Motesharrei, S. M., & Dabirmoghaddam, M. (2019). A conative scioliguistic approach to lexical polysemy, a case study: Persian adjective / šax/. The International Journal of Humanities of Tarbiat Modares University, 26(2), 70-86.

Zauner, A. (1902). Die Romanischen Namen der Korperteile: eine Onoamsiologiche Studie. Romanische Forschungen, 14, 339-530.

Zhang, W., Geeraerts, D., & Speelman, D. (2015). Visualizing onomasiological change: Diachronic variation in metonymic patterns for WOMAN in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(2), 289-330.