پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,131 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,681 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,634,631 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,307,204 |
طراحی و اعتباریابی مدل آموزش پایداری در صلاحیت‌های دروس ریاضی دوره ابتدایی | ||
| فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار | ||
| دوره 10، شماره 2، اسفند 1400، صفحه 19-31 اصل مقاله (1.3 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ee.2022.62013.2449 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سیده زهرا شمسی پاپکیاده* 1؛ محمدرضا سرمدی2؛ الهه امینی فر3 | ||
| 1دکتری آموزش محیط‌زیست، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استاد، فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه ریاضی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مسئله اصلی در این پژوهش، طراحی و اعتباریابی مدل آموزش پایداری در صلاحیت‌های دروس ریاضی دوره ابتدایی می‌باشد، آموزشی که با ظرفیت‌سازی و ایجاد برنامه‌ای جامع به‌منظور تعادل بخشی ابعاد پایداری در دروس ریاضی به‌عنوان یک زمینه تربیتی به‌منظور پرورش و نظم فکری و بالا بردن قدرت اندیشه و استدلال منطقی همراه با رشد قوه خلاقیت ذهنی برای رسیدن به جامعه پایدار طرح و حل مسئله است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نوع تحقیقات کیفی- کمی (آمیخته) با رویکرد اکتشافی است. ابتدا به روش مطالعه اسنادی مهم‌ترین مؤلفه‌های آموزش پایداری دروس ریاضی شناسایی و استخراج گردید. مقوله‌های شناختی، ارزیابی و عملکردی با 26 مقوله فرعی در صلاحیت‌های ریاضی در آموزش پایداری انتخاب و مدل پیشنهادی ارائه گردید. برای اعتباریابی عناصر اصلی مدل پرسشنامه‌ای با 112 گویه طراحی شد. روایی محتوایی (CVR) و پایایی آن با آلفای کرونباخ تأیید شد و در اختیار 38 نفر از متخصصان و خبرگان قرار گرفت. اعتباریابی مدل پیشنهادی از طریق مدل معادلات ساختاری PLS انجام شد. بر اساس یافته‌های به‌دست‌آمده بعد عملکردی بالاترین سهم را در تبیین مدل برخوردار شد. «توسعه دانش و مهارت در رابطه با جوامع و محیط» در تبیین بعد شناختی، «توسعه مهارت‌های حل مسئله» در بعد ارزیابی و «طراحی روش‌هایی کارآمد برای رفع نیازهای شخصی و رفع نابرابری‌ها» در بعد عملکردی، بالاترین سهم را در بین دیگر مؤلفه‌های هر بعد دارند. همچنین نشان داده شد مدل ساختاری آموزش پایداری صلاحیت‌های دروس ریاضی دوره ابتدایی از برازش مناسبی برخوردار است؛ بنابراین می‌توان نتیجه‌گیری کرد گنجاندن مفاهیم پایداری در برنامه‌های درسی در دروس ریاضی با رویکردی میان‌رشته‌ای می‌تواند در به‌کارگیری راهبردهایی نوآورانه در فرایند یادگیری و توجه به حل مسئله و طرح مسئله در دنیای واقعی مؤثر باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آموزش پایداری؛ اعتباریابی؛ صلاحیت؛ دروس ریاضی؛ دوره ابتدایی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Designing and Validating a Sustainability Education Model in the Competencies of Primary School Math Lessons | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seyedeh Zahra Shamsi1؛ Mohammadreza sarmadi2؛ Elahe Aminifar3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. in , Environmental Education, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Philosophy of Education, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Shahid Rajaee Teacher | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The main issue in the present study is the design and validation of a sustainability education model in the competencies of primary school mathematics courses, an education that build capacity and create comprehensive programs to balance the dimensions of sustainability in mathematics lessons as an educational field to cultivate and discipline and increase the power of thought and logical reasoning along with the growth of mental creativity to achieve a sustainable society with a plan and problem-solving capability. This research is applied in terms of purpose and is a qualitative-quantitative research (mixed) with an exploratory approach. First, the most important components of math lessons stability training were identified and extracted by documentary study method. Cognitive, evaluation and functional categories with 26 sub-categories in mathematical competencies in sustainability education were selected and the proposed model was presented. A questionnaire model with 112 items was designed to validate the main elements. Content validity (CVR) and its reliability were confirmed by Cronbach's alpha and provided to 38 experts. The validation of the proposed model was performed through the PLS structural equation modelling. Based on the findings, the functional dimension had the highest share in explaining the model. Development of knowledge and skills related to communities and environment in " explaining the cognitive dimension," "developing problem solving skills" in the evaluation dimension and" designing effective methods to meet personal needs and inequalities" in the functional dimension, had the highest shares among the other studied components. It also showed that the structural model of sustainability education in primary mathematics courses had a good fit. Therefore, it can be concluded that the inclusion of sustainability concepts in the curriculum in mathematics courses with an interdisciplinary approach can be effective in applying innovative strategies in the learning process and paying attention to problem solving and problem statement in the real world. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Sustainability education, Validation, Competency, Math lessons, Primary course | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akinmola, E.A, (2014). Developing mathematical problem solving ability: a panacea for a sustainable development in the 21st century, International Journal of Education and Research, Vol 2, No 2, 1-8.
Amin, M. S., Permanasari, A., Setiabudi, S. (2018). “Strengthen the student environmental literacy through education with low carbon education teaching materials”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-6, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032011.
Anggraeni, Y. Abdulhak, I. Rusman, R. (2019). The Development of Mathematics Curriculum to Increase the Higher Order Thinking Skills in The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Era, The 1st Workshop on Multimedia Education, Learning, Assessment and its Implementation in Game and Gamification in conjunction with COMDEV 2018, Medan Indonesia, 26th January 2019, WOMELA-GG, WoMELA-GG 2019, January 26-28, Medan, Indonesia, 3-10.
Baker-Gibson, J. K.; (2016), Integration of Environmental Education in the Mathematics Curriculum: Impact on Student Performance and Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours, Caribbean Journal of Education (CJE), Vol. 38 No. 1. 51-72.
Bazargan, A. (2009). Mixed research methods: a superior approach to digging into the problems of the education system and solving them, Efficient schools, No. 7, 12-16. [In Persian]
Bedolla-Solano, R., Bedolla-Solano, J. J., Miranda Esteban, A., Adame, O.S. (2020). “Promotion of Sustainability with University Students”, International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 45-62.
Calixto, R. (2018), “An Experience in Environmental Education with University Students”, Journal of Sustainability Education, 18, 1-15.
Cebrián, G.; Junyent, M.; Mulà, I. (2020). Competencies in education for sustainable development: Emerging teaching and research developments. Sustainability, 12, 579.
Chandra Kundu, S. (2018). Mathematical Modeling as A Tool for Sustainable Development, International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1624-1626.
Clioud, J. (2017). Education for a Sustainable Future: Benchmarks for Individual and Social Learning‖. published by The Journal of Sustainability Education.
Cloud, J. (2014). The Essential Elements of Education for Sustainability (EfS) Editorial Introduction from the Guest Editor, Journal of Sustainability Education, Vol. 6, 1-9.
Decamps, A.; Barbat, G.; Carteron, J. C.; Hands, V., & Parkes, C. (2017). Sulitest: A collaborative initiative to support and assess sustainability literacy in higher education. International Journal of Management Education, 15, 138-152.
Edwards, J. (2016). Socially-critical Environmental Education in Primary Classrooms the Dance of Structure and Agency, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Erzengin, O.U., Kete, E.C. (2017). “A study on developing an environmental behavior and attitude scale for university students”. Journal of education and instructional Heather studies in the world, No.2, pp: 49-56.
Fien, J. (2004). Education for sustainability, Studying society and environment: a guide for teachers, 3rd edition / R. Gilbert (ed.), pp. 184-200.
Firoozfar, I., Faghihi, A., Erfani, N., (2020). “Develop Model of Environmental Ethics Based on Caring Thinking through Critical Thinking for the Second Grade of High School Students in Hamadan”, Quarterly Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, Vol. 9, No.1, 25-40. [In Persian]
Giangrande, N.; White, R.M.; East, M.; Jackson, R.; Clarke, T.; Saloff Coste, M.; Penha-Lopes, G. A. (2019) competency framework to assess and activate education for sustainable development: Addressing the UN sustainable development goals 4.7 challenge. Sustainability, 11, 2832.
Haan, G. (2010). The development of ESD-related skills in supporting institutional frameworks. Int. Rev. Educ, 56, 315–328.
Habibi, M. (2014). Environment Education in Mathematics Classroom: As an Effort to Develop the Critical Thinking Skills and for Environmental Sustainability Concerning, Proceeding of International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, 18-20 May 2014.
Heather L. R., Eduardo S. B., Meta Robinson, J. (2010). Teaching Environmental Literacy Across Campus and Across the Curriculum, Indiana University Press.
Joutsenlahti, J. Perkkilä, P. (2019). Sustainability Development in Mathematics Education: A Case Study of What Kind of Meanings Do Prospective Class Teachers Find for the Mathematical Symbol “ ”?, Sustainability,11(457), 1-15.
Lafferty, W.M., (2001). Introduction. In: W.M. Lafferty, ed. Sustainable communities in Europe. London: Earthscan, 1–15.
Malekinia, E., Bazargan, A., Feizi, S. (2017). “Presenting an Operational Model for Sustainability Evaluation of Higher Education Institutions: University of Tehran as a Case of Study”, Quarterly Research on Educational Leadership and Management, Vol. 3, No 10, 53-85. [In Persian]
Mauluah, L., Marsigit, A., Nur Wangid, M., (2021). Islamic Environmental Ethics in the Math Learning: Does It Make Sense?, World Wide Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development (WWJMRD), 7(6): 19-27.
Mensah, J., (2019). “Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review”, Cogent Social Sciences, 5:1, 1653531.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.
Pacheco, J.A.B., Álvarez, M.M.T., Álvarez, M.T.G. (2020). “Sustainable Development in the Economic, Environmental, and Social Fields of Ecuadorian Universities”, Sustainability, 12, 7384, 1-21; doi:10.3390/su12187384
Paul, I., Abraham, C. (2020). “Designing and Experimenting Short Learning Objects (Slos) on Environmental Sustainability: A Practical Platform to Enhance Awareness among Higher Secondary School Students”, Our Heritage UGC Care Listed Journal, Vol. 68, No. 1, 13454-13465.
Rehmeyer J. (2010). Mathematical and Statistical Challenges for Sustainability. Report of a Workshop held November 15-17.
Rieckmann, M. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: Which key competences should be promoted through teaching and university education? Futures, 44, 127–135.
Scott, W., Gough, S. (2003). Sustainable development and learning: Framing the issues. London: Routledge.
Shutaleva, A., Nikonova, Z., Savchenko, I., Martyushev, N. (2020). “Environmental Education for Sustainable Development in Russia”, sustainability, 12, 7742, 1-26. doi:10.3390/su12187742
Sri Yuniarti, Y. Hasan, R. Ali, M. (2019). Competencies of Education for Sustainable Development Related to Mathematics Education in Senior High School, IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1179, 1-8, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012075.
Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the federalstates/ countries in the Federal Republic of Germany/ Conference of Ministers of Education (2003): Educational standards in mathematics for the secondary school leaving certificate. Bonn.
Sterling, S. (2001) Sustainable Education Re-Visioning Learning and Change (Schumacher Briefings no. 6). Bristol, UK: Green Books.
Tilbury, D., Wortman, D. (2004). Engaging people in sustainability. Cambridge: Commission on Education and Communication, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
UNECE. (2012). Learning for the Future: Competences in Education for Sustainable Development; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: Geneva, Switzerland.
Vintere, A. (2017). Implementation of education for sustainable development strategy in mathematics education through stakeholder cooperation. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(9), 90–100.
Wang, G. Zhou, X. Cui, H. (2019). Exploring Education for Sustainable Development in a Chinese Kindergarten: An Action Research. ECNU Review of Education, 2, 4, 497-514.
Wiek, A.; Lauren, W.; Charles, L.R. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustain. Sci, 6, 203–218.
Williams, S., Robinson, J. (2020). “Measuring sustainability: An evaluation framework for sustainability transition experiments”, Environ. Sci. Policy, 103, 58–66.
Wintz, P. Joong, P. Wintz, G. (2020). Integrating of Environmental Education into the Mathematics Curriculum: Effects on Pupils’ Performance and Environmental Awareness, The Journal of Education and Humanities, Vol. 3, 99-123.
Zeidmane, A. Rubina, T. (2019). Mathematics education for sustainable agriculture specialists, Agronomy Research, 17(1), 295–306, https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.19.007.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 601 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 586 |
||