پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,131 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,681 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,623,099 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,301,678 |
بررسی تاثیر عوامل محیطی و فردی بر توانمندسازی استادان و کارکنان حوزه‌های علمیه شهر تبریز در اشتراک دانش آنلاین | ||
| پژوهش های کتابخانه های دیجیتالی و هوشمند | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 8، شماره 1 (پیاپی 29)، فروردین 1400، صفحه 49-62 اصل مقاله (1.47 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/mrs.2022.61196.1488 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهرا احمدی* 1؛ ثریا ضیایی2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف پژوهش: از آنجایی که موضوع اشتراک دانش آنلاین یکی از محوری‌ترین نیازها در سازمان‌های دانش محور است. پس پژوهش حاضر با هدف تأثیر عوامل فردی و محیطی بر توانمندسازی استادان و کارکنان حوزه‌های علمیه شهر تبریز در اشتراک آنلاین دانش انجام شد. روش‌شناسی پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر، کاربردی و شیوه انجام گرفتن آن همبستگی، بود. جامعه آماری، شامل کلیة استادان و کارکنان حوزه‌های علمیه شهر تبریز به تعداد 162 نفر بودند که در سال 1400 در شهر تبریز مشغول بودند. با استفاده از جدول مورگان 114 نفر از این استادان و کارکنان به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس به‌عنوان آزمودنی‌های این پژوهش انتخاب شدند. ابزار اندازه‌گیری پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه‌های محقق‌ساخته عوامل فردی و محیطی بر اشتراک دانش، پرسشنامه توانمندسازی کارکنان در اشتراک آنلاین بود که اعتبار آن‌ها با استفاده از روش روایی محتوا و پایایی آن با ضریب آلفای کرونباخ تأیید شد. رابطه بین متغیرها با ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و پیش‌بینی توانمندسازی اشتراک آنلاین دانش از طریق عوامل فردی و محیطی با محاسبه رگرسیون اندازه‌گیری شد. یافته‌ها یافته‌ها نشان داد که بین عوامل فردی و عوامل محیطی با توانمندسازی در اشتراک آنلاین رابطه همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌داری وجود دارد. ضریب همبستگی چندگانه برابر 57/0 و ضریب تعیین برابر 32/0 است. بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: پایین بودن میانگین مواردی همچون لذت بردن از کمک به دیگران، پاداش، منافع دوجانبه، از دست دادن قدرت و هنجارهای ذهنی، اعتماد) در بین استادان و کارکنان حوزه‌های علمیه شهر تبریز را می‌توان این‌گونه تبیین نکرد که استادان و کارکنان، دانش و مهارت تخصصی کمتری برای اشتراک و تبادل دانش با همدیگر به‌صورت آنلاین داشته‌اند | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها: عوامل محیطی و فردی؛ توانمندسازی؛ اشتراک دانش آنلاین؛ حوزه علمیه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the Impact of Environmental and Personal Factors on the Empowerment of Teachers and Lecturers of Tabriz Theological School in Online Knowledge Sharing | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahra Ahmadi1؛ Soraya Ziaei2 | ||
| 1Ph.D Candidate, Department of Knowledge and Information Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Information Science and Knowledge Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Purpose: Online knowledge sharing is one of the most central needs in Knowledge-oriented organizations, so the present study was conducted with the aim of influencing individual and environmental factors on the empowerment of professors and staff of seminaries in Tabriz in online sharing knowledge Methodology: The present study was applied and the method of doing it was correlation. The statistical population included all teachers and staff of seminaries in Tabriz, 162 people who were working in Tabriz in 1400. Using Morgan table, 114 of these professors and staff were selected as the research statistical population of this study, so they were selected by available sampling method. The research measurement tools included researcher-made questionnaires of individual and environmental factors on knowledge sharing, employee empowerment questionnaire in the field of online sharing. So, the validity of which was confirmed by using content validity method and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The relationship between variables with Pearson correlation coefficient and predicting online knowledge sharing empowerment was measured by individual and environmental factors by calculating regression. Findings: The results of this study indicated that there is a positive and significant correlation between individual and environmental factors with empowerment in online sharing. Multiple correlation coefficient is 0.57 and coefficient of determination is 0.32. Conclusion: Low average of items such as (enjoyment of helping others, rewards, mutual benefits, loss of power and mental norms, trust) among the professors and staff of seminaries in Tabriz can be explained as follows. Professors and staff have less specialized knowledge and skills to share and exchange knowledge with each other online. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Environmental and Individual Factors, Empowerment, Online knowledge Sharing, Seminaries | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abrams, L. C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(4), 64-77. Ahmadi, A., Malek Aorzaman, A., & Shykhlar, M. (2017). The effect of knowledge management practices on employees' psychological empowerment. Journal of Development & Evolution Mnagement, 1396(28), 11-22. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior-Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179-211. Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of experimental social psychology, 22(5), 453-474. Akhavan, P., Hosseini, S. M., Abbasi, M., & Manteghi, M. (2015). Knowledge-sharing determinants, behaviors, and innovative work behaviors: An integrated theoretical view and empirical examination. Aslib journal of information management., 67(5), 562-591. Al‐Alawi, A. I., Al‐Marzooqi, N. Y., & Mohammed, Y. F. (2007). Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: critical success factors. Journal of knowledge management. ent. Al-Busaidi, K. A., Olfman, L., Ryan, T., & Leroy, G. (2007). Revealing the antecedents and benefits of KMS use: An exploratory study in a petroleum company in Oman. ICDSS 2007 Proceedings, 15. Al-Husseini, S., & Elbeltagi, I. (2018). Evaluating the effect of transformational leadership on knowledge sharing using structural equation modelling: the case of Iraqi higher education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(4), 506-517. Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2020). The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 217-227. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice. Journal of knowledge management. Asgari, N., Ansari, M., Rashidi, M., & Sorani A. (2020) Promoting innovative performance and sales through customer knowledge management. Innovation management in defense organizations, 3(9), 79-96. (In Persian) Babcock, P. (2004). Shedding light on knowledge management. HR Magazine, 49(5): 46-51. Bakker, M., Leenders, R. T. A., Gabbay, S. M., Kratzer, J., & Van Engelen, J. M. (2006). Is trust really social capital? Knowledge sharing in product development projects. The Learning Organization, 13(6), 594-605. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Borges, R. (2013). Tacit knowledge sharing between IT workers: The role of organizational culture, personality, and social environment. Management Research Review.. Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. (2007). How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management—The social interaction perspective. International journal of information management, 27(2), 104-118. Chennamaneni, A., Teng, J. T., & Raja, M. K. (2012). A unified model of knowledge sharing behaviours: theoretical development and empirical test. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(11), 1097-1115. Chiang, H. H., Han, T. S., & Chuang, J. S. (2011). The relationship between high‐commitment HRM and knowledge‐sharing behavior and its mediators. International Journal of Manpower., 32(5/6), 604-622. Gongla, P., & Rizzuto, C. R. (2001). Evolving communities of practice: IBM Global Services experience. IBM systems journal, 40(4), 842-862. Hau, Y. S., Kim, B., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. G. (2013). The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 356-366. Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.-H., & Chang, C.-M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), 153-169. Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2002). Diagnosing and fighting knowledge-sharing hostility. Organizational dynamics, 31(1), 60-73. Jafari, M., Akhavan, P., Eshaqi, S. (2018). The effects of personal and environmental factors on the process of knowledge sharing with the role of education moderator. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 5(16), 21-46. (In Persian) Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2001). Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 151-183. Kanter, R. M. (1989). The new managerial work. Harvard Business Review, 66(6): 85-92. Kashanipour, M., Karami, Gh., Khanifar, H., & Shabani, K. (2019). Investigation of Independent Auditors' Warning of Mistakes: Application of Planned Behavior Theory. Quarterly Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 4(8), 63-91. (In Persian) Kim, P. B., Lee, G., & Jang, J. (2017). Employee empowerment and its contextual determinants and outcome for service workers: A cross-national study. Management Decision, 55(5), 1022-1041. Lin, M. J. J., Hung, S. W., & Chen, C. J. (2009). Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 929-939. Menon, S. (2001). Employee empowerment: An integrative psychological approach. Applied psychology, 50(1), 153-180. Minbaeva, D. B., Mäkelä, K., & Rabbiosi, L. (2012). Linking HRM and knowledge transfer via individual‐level mechanisms. Human Resource Management, 51(3), 387-405. Mujtahid, F. (2019). Investigating the effect of empowerment on online knowledge sharing (Case study: paramedics and physicians). Msc Thesis, Industrial Management, Project Management, Takestan Institute of Higher Education. (In Persian) Nguyen, T. M. (2019). Do extrinsic motivation and organisational culture additively strengthen intrinsic motivation in online knowledge sharing? An empirical study. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 50(1), 75-93. Nicomram, H., & Pazuki, P. (2015). Reward management and profit sustainability. Accounting Management, 71, 24-62. (Iin Persian) Pee, L. G., & Lee, J. (2019). Intrinsically motivating employees online knowledge sharing understanding the effects of job design. Internationnal Journal of Infirmation Management, 35(6), 679-690 Pee, L. G., & Min, J. (2017). Employees’ online knowledge sharing: the effects of person-environment fit. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 432-453. Perez, V., & Cruz, N, (2017). The mediating role of affective commitment in the rewards–knowledge transfer relation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(6), 1167-1185. Sadeghi, S. (2014). Assessing the factors affecting the empowerment of Bank Mellat employees (Maragheh constituency). Msc thesis, Faculty of Humanities, Payame Noor University, Tehran Province. (In Persian) Salehi Sadeghiani, J., Bineshian, M., & Parchami Sarghein, M. (2019). Investigating the moderating role of "learning" in the relationship between "individual factors" and "stimulating knowledge sharing" (Case study: Shahed University). business management (In Persian) Spreitzer, G. M. (1997). Toward common ground in defining empowerment. In: R. W. Woodman, & W. A. Pasmore (eds.) Research in Organizational Change and Development, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT: 31-62. Teh, P.-L., & Yong, C.-C. (2011). Knowledge sharing in IS personnel: organizational behavior's perspective. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(4), 11-21. Thomas, K. W., & Tymon, W. G. (1994). Does empowerment always work: Understanding the role of intrinsic motivation and personal interpretation. Journal of Management systems, 6(2), 1-13. Tsai, M. T., Chen, K. S., & Chien, J. L. (2012). The factors impact of knowledge sharing intentions: the theory of reasoned action perspective. Quality & Quantity, 46(5), 1479-1491. Van den Hooff, B., Schouten, A. P., & Simonovski, S. (2012). What one feels and what one knows: the influence of emotions on attitudes and intentions towards knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 148-158. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, 20(2), 115-131. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35-57 Wickramasinghe, N. (2007). Knowledge-Based Enterprise: Theories and Fundamentals. IGI Global. Wu, Y., & Zhu, W. (2012). An integrated theoretical model for determinants of knowledge sharing behaviours. Kybernetes. Zhang, X., De Pablos, P. O., & Xu, Q. (2014). Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 491-498.. Zheng, T. (2017). A literature review on knowledge sharing. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(03), 51. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 145 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 163 |
||