پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,113 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,525 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,187,800 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,030,685 |
کارآمدترین روش ترویج فرهنگ استفاده از منابع طبیعی بر اساس روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی (AHP) | ||
| فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 11، شماره 2، بهمن 1401، صفحه 137-149 اصل مقاله (1.3 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ee.2022.59342.2373 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ثریا کرمی1؛ محمدرضا بهرامیان2؛ طیبه بساکی* 3؛ صدیقه غنائی4؛ محمد علی نجات5 | ||
| 1استادیار، گروه علوم کشاورزی ، دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم و مهندسی محیط‌زیست، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه علوم کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 4مربی پژوهشی، موسسه تحقیقات جنگل‌ها و مراتع کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 5مربی، گروه علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف از این مطالعه شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی روش‌های ترویج فرهنگ صحیح استفاده از منابع طبیعی است. بدین منظور بر اساس نظر خبرگان در حوزه منابع طبیعی 8 معیار اصلی و 12 شاخص فرعی برای طراحی پرسشنامه انتخاب گردید. سپس بر اساس اطلاعات حاصل از پرسشنامه که توسط متخصصین حوزه منابع طبیعی تکمیل گردید، وزن دهی و رتبه‌بندی شاخص‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار اکسپرت چویز و روش تحلیل سلسه‌مراتبی که یکی از تکنیک‌های معتبر در حوزه تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره است انجام گردید. یافته‌های تحقیق حاضر حاکی از آن است که از بین 8 معیار، معیارهای «تسهیل یادگیری مشارکتی»، «رشد تفکر انتقادی» و «وجود تعامل» به ترتیب از اهمیت بیشتری برخوردارند. تجزیه‌وتحلیل نهایی نشان داد سه معیار اشاره‌شده در بستر روش‌های مشارکتی، کارآمدترین شیوه جهت ترویج فرهنگ استفاده از منابع و محیط‌زیست می‌باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره؛ منابع طبیعی؛ فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Most Efficient Method of Promoting the Culture of Using Natural Resources Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Soraya Karami1؛ Mohammad Reza Bahrameian2؛ Tayebeh Basaki3؛ Sadigheh Ghanaei4؛ Mohammad Ali Nejat5 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Science, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2M.S. Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Arak University, Arak, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Science, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Research Institute of Forest and Rangeland, Agriculture Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran | ||
| 5Faculty member of Department of Agricultural Science, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this study is to identify and rank the methods of promoting the culture of using natural resources. For this purpose, based on the opinion of experts in the field of natural resources, 8 main criteria and 12 sub-indicators were selected for designing the questionnaire. Then, based on the information obtained from the questionnaire, which was completed by experts in the field of natural resources, weighting and ranking of indicators were performed using EXPERT CHOICE software and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, which is one of the valid techniques in the field of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). The research findings indicate that among the eight criteria, the criteria of "facilitating participatory learning", "development of critical thinking" and "existence of interaction" are more important, respectively. The final analysis showed that the three criteria mentioned in the context of participatory methods are the most effective way to promote the culture of resource use and the environment. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Natural Resources, Analytic Hierarchy Process | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abedi Sarvestani, A. & Zamani, G.H. (2006). “Communication methods in promoting natural resources (Case study: Fars)”. Journal of Science, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 13 (5), 125-138. [In Persian]
Ali, S. A., & Ahmad, A. (2019). “Mapping of mosquito-borne diseases in Kolkata Municipal Corporation using GIS and AHP based decision making approach”. Spatial Information Research, 27(3), 351-372.
Bahurmoz, A. M. (2006). “The analytic hierarchy process: A methodology for win-win management”. Economics and Administration, 20(1).
Boroushaki, S. & Malczewski, J. (2008). “Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS”. Computers & Geosciences, 34(4), 399-410.
Carter, A.G., Creedy, D. K., & Sidebotham, M. (2017). “Critical thinking skills in midwifery practice: Development of a self-assessment tool for students”. Midwifery, 50, 184-192.
Dado, M. & Bodemer, D., (2017). “A review of methodological applications of social network analysis in computer-supported collaborative learning”. Educational Research Review, " 159-180.
Dyer, J. S. (1990). “Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”. Management Science, 36(3), 249-258.
Giljum, S., Burger, E., Hinterberger, F., Lutter, S., & Bruckner, M. (2011). “A comprehensive set of resource use indicators from the micro to the macro level”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(3), 300-308.
Huang, M. Y., Tu, H. Y., Wang, W. Y., Chen, J. F., Yu, Y. T.,& Chou, C. C. (2017). “Effects of cooperative learning and concept mapping intervention on critical thinking and basketball skills in elementary school”. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 207-216.
Karami, S. M., Rajabi,M., Azadi, A.,& Ahmadi, A. (2016). “Attitude of high school students to the importance and preservation of natural resources (Case Study: Khorramabad city, Iran)”. Environmental Science and Technology, 21(6), 257-270. [In Persian].
Ke, F., & Carafano, P. (2016). “Collaborative science learning in an immersive flight simulation”. Computers & Education, 103, 114-123.
Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F. K., Steevens, J., Ferguson, E., & Pleus, R. C. (2007). “Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials”. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(4), 543-554.
Mahmoudi, J., Mahdavi, S. K., & Lotfi, S. (2014). “The study of the effective factors upon participation of beneficiaries about conservation, rehabilitation and utilization of ranges, case study: Roodbar Khoortab watershed area, city of Nour”. Journal of Conservation and Utilization of Natural Resources, 2(1), 15-32. [In Persian].
Meng, C., Xu, D., Son, Y. J., Kubota, C., Lewis, M., & Tronstad, R. (2014). “An integrated simulation and AHP approach to vegetable grafting operation design”. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 102, 73-84.
Milfont, T. L.& Duckitt, J. (2010). “The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes”. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 80-94.
Mirzahossein, H., Sedghi, M., Habibi, H. M., & Jalali, F. (2020). “Site selection methodology for emergency centers in Silk Road based on compatibility with Asian Highway network using the AHP and ArcGIS (case study: IR Iran)”. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 5(3), 1-14.
Moffett, A., Dyer, J. S., & Sarkar, S. (2006). “Integrating biodiversity representation with multiple criteria in North-Central Namibia using non-dominated alternatives and a modified analytic hierarchy process”. Biological Conservation, 129(2), 181-191.
Nasiri, J., Naghavi, M. R., Alizadeh, H., Moghadam, M. R. F., Mashouf, A., & Nabizadeh, M. (2015). “Modified AHP-based decision-making model toward accurate selection of eligible maintenance media for production of taxanes in Taxus baccata callus culture”. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 37(6), 110.
Saaty, T. (1980). “The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making”. In Kobe, Japan (pp. 1-69).
Saaty, T. L. & Ozdemir, M. S. (2003). “Why the magic number seven plus or minus two”. Mathematical and computer modelling, 38(3-4), 233-244.
Sabzehzari, M., Zeinali, M., & Naghavi, M. R. (2020). “Alternative sources and metabolic engineering of Taxol: Advances and future perspectives”. Biotechnology Advances, 43, 107569.
Salehpour, J. A., Rasooli, F., Sarreshtehdari, A., Mosaffaie, J., & Kia, K. M. (2020). “Prioritization of preventing social indices affecting on peoples' participation in natural resources plans using AHP method and nonparametric tests”. Watershed Engineering and Management, 12 (1), 330-339. [In Persian].
Sarkar, S. & Garson, J. (2004). “Multiple criterion synchronisation for conservation area network design: the use of non-dominated alternative sets”. Conservation and Society, 433-448.
Shobeiri, S. M. & Shamsi, S. Z. (2015). “Internal quality assessment program Master of Education degree from the perspective of teachers, students and educational experts Payam Noor University”. Research in School and Virtual Learning, 3(9), 83-94. [In Persian].
United Nations Environment Programme. (2012). “GEO5: Global Environment Outlook: Summary for Policy Makers.” Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
Vejdani, H., Rostami, SH., Taleshi, M., Ali Akbari, A.,& Jomeh Pour, M. (2018). “Investigating Range Conservation Strategies with participatory approach and combining AHP & SWOT method, Case study: Hamedan Province”. Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert Research, 26 (6), 800-808. [In Persian].
Zare, H. & Nahroanian, P. (2017). “The effect of critical thinking on self-directed problem solving styles”. Quarterly Journal of Cognitive Science, 19(2), 85-96.
Zeki A. (2015). “The effects of micro-teaching on the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service teachers”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (6), 140-153. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 624 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 326 |
||