تعداد نشریات | 40 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,019 |
تعداد مقالات | 8,736 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 15,580,220 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 10,888,231 |
طراحی الگوی ارزیابی عملکرد استانداران دولت جمهوری اسلامی ایران | ||
مدیریت سازمانهای دولتی | ||
مقاله 9، دوره 10، شماره 4 (پیاپی 40)، آبان 1401، صفحه 135-154 اصل مقاله (1.39 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: اکتشافی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ipom.2022.62340.4518 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
معصومه مؤمنی مفرد1؛ رضا سپهوند* 2؛ سید نجم الدین موسوی3؛ حجت وحدتی4 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه لرستان، خرمآباد، ایران | ||
2استاد، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه لرستان، خرمآباد، ایران. | ||
3دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه لرستان، خرمآباد، ایران | ||
4دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه لرستان، خرمآباد، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف از انجام این مطالعه، طراحی و تبیین الگوی ارزیابی عملکرد استانداران دولت جمهوری اسلامی ایران بوده است. این مطالعه براساس هدف کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت در حیطه مطالعات توصیفی قرار دارد. جامعه کیفی مورد مطالعه در پژوهش حاضر را کلیه استادان دانشگاهی در حوزه مدیریت دولتی و مدیریت استراتژیک و استانداران دولت جمهوری اسلامی ایران به همراه مدیران ارشد وزارت کشور تشکیل دادند. تعداد مشارکتکنندگان در این مطالعه 18 نفر بودهاند. جامعه آماری مطالعه در بخش کمی را خبرگان آگاه به موضوع همچون استانداران دولت جمهوری اسلامی ایران، معاونین و مدیران ارشد استانداریهای دولت ج. ا. ا تشکیل دادند. نمونهگیری با استفاده از روش غیراحتمالی در دسترس صورت گرفت که تعداد 48 نفر از جامعه آماری موردنظر بهعنوان نمونه پژوهش تعیین شدند. یافتههای این مطالعه در بخش کیفی منجر به شناسایی 12 مقوله اصلی شامل دانش جغرافیایی، آگاهی فرهنگی، بلوغ اجتماعی، ادراک سیاسی، رشد اقتصادی، توسعه رفاهی، رضایت ذینفعان، سطح امنیت، سرمایه اجتماعی، مشارکت سیاسی، تعاملات و بهرهوری بهعنوان ابعاد ارزیابی عملکرد استانداران شد. مدلسازی، ابعاد ارزیابی عملکرد را در 5 سطح طبقهبندی نمود که در آن دانش جغرافیایی بهعنوان اثرگذارترین و رضایت ذینفعان، مشارکت سیاسی و بهرهوری بهعنوان اثرپذیرترین ابعاد در نظر گرفته شدند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
عملکرد؛ ارزیابی عملکرد؛ استانداران؛ عملکرد استانداران | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Designing the Performance Evaluation Model of the Governors of the Islamic Republic of Iran | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Masoome Momeni Mofrad1؛ Reza Sepahvand2؛ Seyed Najmedin Mousavi3؛ Hojat Vahdati4 | ||
1Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran. | ||
2Professor, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran. | ||
3Associate Professor, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran. | ||
4Associate Professor, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The purpose of this study was to design and explain the performance evaluation model of the governors of the Islamic Republic of Iran. This study is applied in terms of purpose and is descriptive in terms of method. The qualitative population in the present study consisted of all university professors in the field of public administration and strategic management, the governors of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and senior managers of the Ministry of Interior. The number of participants in this study was 18. The statistical population of the study consisted of a small group of experts such as the governors of the Islamic Republic of Iran, deputies, and senior managers. The research sample was 48 people selected from the statistical population by using the convenience non-probability sampling method. The results of the qualitative part of the study were the identification of 12 main categories including geographical knowledge, cultural awareness, social maturity, political perception, economic growth, welfare development, stakeholder satisfaction, security level, social capital, political participation, interactions, and productivity. The model classified performance evaluation dimensions into 5 levels, in which geographical knowledge was found as the most effective dimention, and stakeholder satisfaction, political participation, and productivity as the most effective dimensions. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Function, Performance Evaluation, Governors, Performance of Governors | ||
مراجع | ||
Asgharizadeh, E, Ehsani, R., & Valipour, F. (2011). Evaluating the performance of managers using 360-degree method and Vickor decision-making technique (Case study of Jihad Agricultural Engineering Research Institute). Industrial Management Studies, 9(23), 21-48. (In Persian) Athar, S., & Wang, Z. (2019). A comprehensive performance evaluation of image quality assessment algorithms. Ieee Access, 7, 140030-140070. Bakeman, R. (2022). KappaAcc: A program for assessing the adequacy of kappa. Behavior Research Methods, 1-6. Bamakan, S. M. H., Motavali, A., & Bondarti, A. B. (2020). A survey of blockchain consensus algorithms performance evaluation criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 154, 113385. Boom, S., Weijschede, J., Melissen, F., Koens, K., & Mayer, I. (2021). Identifying stakeholder perspectives and worldviews on sustainable urban tourism development using a Q-sort methodology. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(4), 520-535. Danaeifard, H. (2008). Theorizing, principles and methodologies. Tehran: Samat. (In Persian) Danaeifard, H., & Kazemi, S H. (2008). Social research methods, quantitative and qualitative approaches. Tehran: Mehraban Nashr. (In Persian) Flach, P. (2019). Performance evaluation in machine learning: the good, the bad, the ugly, and the way forward. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 33, No. 01, pp. 9808-9814). Ghorbani, I., & Kiani, J. (2019). Presenting a model for evaluating the performance of commanders and managers based on the statement of the second step of the revolution (Case study: Disciplinary Command Headquarters of West Azerbaijan Province). Scientific Journal of Law Enforcement Research, Amin University of Law Enforcement Sciences, 21(2), 247-280. (In Persian) Habibi, A., Izadiar, S., & Sarafrazi, A. (2014). Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Rasht: Katibeh Gil Publications. (In Persian) Habibi, A; Izadiar, S; Sarafrazi, A. (2015), Teaching Fuzzy Delphi Technique for Predicting and Screening Indicators, Journal of Management and Economics, 12(3), 79- 92. (In Persian) JAFARI, T., shafiabadi, A., farahbakhsh, K., abbaspour, A., younesi, J. (2020). Designing performance evaluation indicators for managers of Iran State Inspectorate Organization with job counseling approach. Career and Organizational Counseling, 12(43), 9-32. Karimi, R, Noh Ebrahim, A, Hassanpour, A, Musapour, N. (2020). Designing a model for evaluating the performance of faculty members of Farhangian University. Educational Studies, 9(3), 253-284. (In Persian) Marsidin, S. (2020). The Practicality of Principal’s Performance Appraisal Model. In 2nd International Conference Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2020) (pp. 305-309). Atlantis Press. Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. A companion to qualitative research, 1(2), 159-176. Mehrabi, A H; Khanifar ، H; Amiri, Ali Naqi; Zarei Matin, H; Jandaghi, Gholamreza (2012). Introducing the methodology of data-based theory for Islamic research (providing a sample). Organizational culture management. 9(23), 30-5. (In Persian) Mirzaei, KH. (2009). Research and writing correspondence. Tehran: Sociologists Publications. (In Persian) Neustroev, S., Gordashnikova, O., & Zibrov, V. (2020). Designing a Regional Performance Appraisal Model for Administrators of Educational Institutions. Quality-Access to Success, 21(179), 10-14. Niroomand, H., & Rzayat, G. H. (2020). Employee performance appraisal pattern of military organizations. Strategic Defense Studies, 18(82), 289-312. Sanchez-Iborra, R., Sanchez-Gomez, J., Ballesta-Viñas, J., Cano, M. D., & Skarmeta, A. F. (2018). Performance evaluation of LoRa considering scenario conditions. Sensors, 18(3), 772. Selvarajan, T. T., Singh, B., & Solansky, S. (2018). Performance appraisal fairness, leader member exchange and motivation to improve performance: A study of US and Mexican employees. Journal of Business Research, 85, 142-154. Sepahvand, F., Mohammadipour, F., Parvizy, S., Zagheri Tafreshi, M., Skerrett, V., & Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh, F. (2020). Improving nurses’ organizational commitment by participating in their performance appraisal process. Journal of nursing management, 28(3), 595-605. Setiawati, T., & Ariani, I. D. (2020). Influence of performance appraisal fairness and job satisfaction through commitment on job performance. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9(3), 133-151. Shaikh, F. U. A., Luhar, S., Arel, H. Ş., & Luhar, I. (2020). Performance evaluation of Ultrahigh performance fibre reinforced concrete–A review. Construction and Building Materials, 232, 117152. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Principles of Qualitative Research Methodology: Basic Theory, Procedures and Methods. Translated by Buick Mohammadi. Tehran. Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. second edition. (In Persian) Tetiana, H., Karpenko, L. M., Olesia, F. V., Yu, S. I., & Svetlana, D. (2018). Innovative methods of performance evaluation of energy efficiency projects. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 1-11. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 297 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 171 |