Effect of Distance Learning on Iranian EFL Students’ Motivation with a Focus on Gender

Chapelle CA. The spread of computer-assisted language learning. Language Teaching. 2010 43(1), 66-74.

[2] Hutchinson A, Reinking D. Teachers' perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly. 2011 46(4), 312-333.

[3] Golonka EM, Bowles AR, Frank VM, Richardson DL, Freynik S. Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2014 27(1), 70-105.

[4] Strickland B, O’Brien MG. A review of the literature on technology in second and foreign language learning. 2013 Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/yaq7dagt

[5] Dhaif HA. Can computers teach languages? English Teaching Forum. 1989 27(3), 17-19.

[6] Schofield JW. Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

[7] Muir-Herzig RG. Technology and its impact in classroom. Computers and Education. 2003 42(2), 111-131.

[8] Zou B. Teachers' support in using computers for developing students' listening and speaking skills in pre-sessional English courses. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2013 26(1), 83-99.

[9] Wang L Coleman JA. A survey of Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education in China. ReCALL. 2009 21(1), 113-129.

[10] Tsai SC. Integrating English for specific purposes courseware into task-based learning in a context of preparing for international trade fairs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2013 29(1), 111-127.

[11] Dörnyei Z. Teaching and researching motivation: Applied linguistics in action series.London: Longman; 2001.

[12] Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research. 2004 74(1), 59–109.

[13] Alarcon LF. The effect of technology on students' motivation in an EFL classroom in Jujuy [Unpublished master's thesis]. Universidad FASTA; 2015.

[14] Alibakhshi G, Zeinali M, Bakhtiyarvand M. On the impact of using smart boards on improving EFL learners' motivation and learning of phrasal verbs. Technology of Education Journal. 2019 13(2), 401-408.

[15] Bahari A. Mainstream theoretical trends and future directions of L2 motivation studies in classroom and CALL contexts, CALL-EJ. 2020 21(1), 1-28.

[16] Bekele TA. Motivation and satisfaction in internet-supported learning environments: A review. Educational Technology & Society. 2010 13(2), 116-127.

[17] Aljaraideh Y. The Impact of Digital Storytelling on Academic Achievement of Sixth Grade Students in English Language and Their Motivation towards it in Jordan: January Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2020 21(1):73-82 DOI:10.17718/tojde.690345

[18] Ratminingsih NM. ICT-based interactive game in TEYL: Teachers' perception, students' motivation and achievement. 2018 iJET, 13(9), 190-203.

[19] Kustini S, Herlinawati H, Indrasary Y. Students' perception toward the integration of technology to improve multiliteracies competence in EFL classrooms. Research and Innovation in Language Learning. 2020 3(2), 144-157.

[20] Ushida E. The role of students' attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal. 2005 23(1), 49-78.

[21] Gardner RC, MacIntyre PD. On the Measurement of Affective Variables in Second Language Learning. 1993 June https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb00714.

[22] Dornyei Z. Motivation and Motivating in the Foreign Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal. 1994 78, 273-284.

[23] Campbell K, Varnhagen S. When Faculty Use Instructional Technologies: Using Clark's Delivery Model To Understand Gender Differences. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 2002 v32 n1 p31-56.

[24] Ono H, Zavodny M. Gender differences in information technology usage: A US-Japan comparison. Sociological Perspectives. 2005 48(1), 105-133.

[25] Ong CS, Lai JY. Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior. 2006 22(5), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006.

[26] Yaokumah W, Totimeh F, Kumah p. Gender Differences in Preferences and Proclivities for ICT Tools and Online Services. 2018 October DOI:10.4018/978-1-5225-7068-4.ch005 In book: Gender Gaps and the Social Inclusion Movement in ICTChapter: 5.

[27] Guilloteaux MJ, Dörnyei Z. Motivating language learners: A classroom oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly. 2008 42(1). 55–77.

[28] Papi M,  Abdollahzadeh E. Teacher motivational practice, student motivation, and possible L2 selves: An examination in the Iranian EFL context. Language Learning. 2012 62(2), 571–594.

[29] Taguchi T, Magid M, Papi M. The L2 motivational self-system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–96). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 2009.

[30] Asgari M, Salehi H. Impact of Using Web-quests on Learning Vocabulary by Iranian Pre-university Students. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 2018 6(22): 33-46.

[31] Haron H, Abdullah A, Alotaibi N. The Use of WhatsApp in Teaching and Learning English during COVID- 19: Students' Perception and Acceptance; International Journal of Innovation. 2021 April Volume 15, Issue 3.

[32] Aysy S. The Use of Technology and Its Effects on Language Learning Motivation Year. 2020, Volume 4, Issue 1, 86 – 100.

[33] Eady MJ, Lockyer L. Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies, Queensland University of Technology, Australia. 2013 pp. 71.

[34] Tavakoli H, Lotfi AR, Biria R. Effects of CALL-mediated TBLT on motivation for L2 reading Cogent Education. 2019, VOL. 6, NO. 1

 https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1580916.

[35] Koohang A. Students’ Perceptions Toward the Use of the Digital Library. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2004 617-626.