| تعداد نشریات | 46 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,511 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 20,602,837 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,155,179 |
بررسی ویژگی های روانسجی مقیاس ذهنیسازی هیجانی خود و دیگران در دانشجویان | ||
| شناخت اجتماعی | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 26، آذر 1403 | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/sc.2025.75429.3089 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| هانیه اوجاقی زاده1؛ سجاد بشرپور* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| 2استاد، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف از این پژوهش بررسی ویژگیهای روانسنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس ذهنیسازی هیجانی خود و دیگران (کسپر و همکاران، 2024) در بین دانشجویان ایرانی بود. ذهنیسازی هیجانی به توانایی درک و تفسیر رفتار خود و دیگران بر اساس حالات ذهنی نظیر احساسات، افکار و باورها اشاره دارد، و سنجش دقیق آن در پژوهشهای روانشناسی اهمیت زیادی دارد. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کلیه دانشجویان دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی در سال تحصیلی ۱۴۰۳–۱۴۰۴ بود. نمونهای به حجم ۲۷۲ نفر (۱۵۰ دختر و ۱۲۲ پسر) از طریق نمونهگیری تصادفی خوشهای چندمرحلهای انتخاب شد. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل مقیاس ذهنیسازی هیجانی، مقیاس تنظیم شناختی هیجان (گارنفسکی و همکاران، 2006) و پرسشنامه سلامت عمومی (گلدبرگ، 1972) بود. دادهها با نرمافزارهای SPSS27 و AMOS24 تحلیل شدند. تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی نشان داد که سه عامل خود، دیگران و ترک ارتباط قابلاستخراج است و درمجموع 61 درصد از واریانس نمرات را تبیین میکند. شاخصهای تحلیل عاملی تاییدی نشاندهنده برازش قابل قبول مدل سهعاملی مقیاس بود (34/2=X2/df؛93/0GFI=؛ 87/0AGFI=؛ 93/0IFI=؛ 88/0NFI=؛ 92/0CFI= و 07/0=RMSEA). نتایج همبستگی پیرسون حاکی از وجود ارتباط آماری معنادار بین خردهمقیاسهای این مقیاس با مقیاس تنظیم شناختی هیجان و سلامت عمومی بود. همچنین، آلفای کرونباخ برای خردهمقیاسها در بازه 79/0 تا 87/0 به دست آمد (05/0P<). بنابراین، میتوان نتیجه گرفت این مقیاس از روایی و پایایی مناسبی برای استفاده در دانشجویان ایرانی برخوردار است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ذهنی سازی هیجانی؛ روایی؛ پایایی؛ ویژگیهای روانسنجی؛ دانشجویان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Psychometric Properties of the Emotion Mentalizing Scale for Self and Others in University Students | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| hanieh ojaghizadeh1؛ Sajjad Basharpoor2 | ||
| 11. Ph.D Student of Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. | ||
| 2Prof, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Aim: he present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Self and Other Emotional Mentalization Scale (Kasper et al., 2024) among Iranian university students. Emotional mentalization refers to the ability to understand and interpret one's own and others' behaviors based on internal mental states such as emotions, thoughts, and beliefs. Accurate assessment of this construct is essential in psychological research. Methods: The statistical population included all students at the University of Mohaghegh Ardabili during the 2023–2024 academic year. A total of 272 students (150 females and 122 males) were selected using a multistage cluster random sampling method. The participants completed the Emotional Mentalization Scale, the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garnefski et al., 2006), and the General Health Questionnaire (Goldberg, 1972). Data were analyzed using SPSS27 and AMOS24 software. Results: Exploratory factor analysis identified three core components: Self, Others, and Communication, which together explained 61% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor model with acceptable fit indices (χ²/df = 2.34, RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = 0.92). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.79 to 0.87, and 0.89 for the total scale, indicating good internal consistency. Significant correlations were also observed between the subscales and the two external measures, supporting convergent validity (p < .05). Conclusion: the findings demonstrate that the Persian version of the Emotional Mentalization Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for use in psychological research among Iranian student populations. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Emotional Mentalization, Validity, Reliability, Psychometric Properties, University Students | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39, 263-278. [link] Ballespi, S., Vives, J., Alonso, N., Sharp, C., Salvadora Ramirez, M., Fonagy, P., & Barrantes-Vidal, N. (2019). To know or not to know: Mentalization as a protection from somatic complaints. PLoS One, 14, e0215308. [link] Cohen RJ, Swerdlik ME, Phillips SM. Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement, 9th ed. Mountain View, CA, US: Mayfield Publishing Co; 2018. xxviii, 798 p. [link] Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2018). Attachment, mentalizing, and the self. In J. Livesley & R. Larstone (Eds.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 123–140). New York, London: The Guilford Press. [link] Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2011). Psychoanalyse und die Psychopathologie der Entwicklung. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. [link] Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York: Other Press. [link] Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2015). Affektregulierung, Mentalisierung und die Entwicklung des Selbst. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. [link] Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2002). Manual for the use of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). Leiderdorp, The Netherlands: DATEC. [link] Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. [link] Ghaemi, A., Kheiri, Y., Yazdani, S., & Shalchi, B. (2024). Psychometric properties of the Yamaguchi Emotional Vulnerability Scale in the Iranian population. Journal of Disability Studies, 14, 69–89. (Persian) [link] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.Top of Form Handerson, M. M., & Verhak, P. M. (1990). Determinants of the help-seeking process: Goldberg and Huxley first level and first filter. Psychological Medicine, 25, 95-104. [link] Hosgoren Alıcı, Y., Hasanli, J., Saygılı, G., & Koçak, O. M. (2023). The importance of mentalization, coping mechanisms, and perceived stress in the prediction of resilience of healthcare workers. Psychology, health & medicine, 28(9), 2635–2646. [link] Jurist, E. (2018). Minding emotions: Cultivating mentalization in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press. [link] Kasper, L. A., Hauschild, S., Berning, A., Holl, J., & Taubner, S. (2024). Development and validation of the Mentalizing Emotions Questionnaire: A self-report measure for mentalizing emotions of the self and other. PLoS One, 19(5), e0300984. [link] Kelly, M. M., Tyrka, A. R., Price, L. H., & Carpenter, L. L. (2008). Sex differences in the use of coping strategies: Predictors of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Depression and Anxiety, 25(10), 839-846. [link] Khosrojerdi, Z., & Heidari, M. (2024). Investigating the psychometric properties of the Parent-Child Version of the Competency-Based Parenting Scale. Quarterly Journal of Applied Psychology, 18(2), 86–106. (Persian) [link] Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press. [link] Luyten, P., Campbell, C., Allison, E., & Fonagy, P. (2020). The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16. [link] Németh, N., Matrai, P., Hegyi, P., Czeh, B., Ctopf, L., Hussain, A., & Simon, M. (2018). Theory of mind disturbances in borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 270, 143–153. [link] Newbury-Helps, J., Feigenbaum, J., & Fonagy, P. (2017). Offenders with antisocial personality disorder display more impairments in mentalizing. Journal of Personality Disorders, 31, 232–255. [link] Nolen-Hoeksema S. (2012). Emotion regulation and psychopathology: the role of gender. Annual review of clinical psychology, 8, 161–187. [link] Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). [link] Pasha, S., Hosseinian, S., & Pardelan, N. (2024). Construction and validation of a native scale of successful transition of students from university to work. Quarterly Journal of Applied Psychology, 18(1), 131–154. (Persian) [link] Price, C. J., & Crowell, S. E. (2016). Interoceptive awareness skills for emotion regulation: Theory and approach of Mindful Awareness in Body-Oriented Therapy (MABT). Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 798. [link] Rakoczy, H. (2022). Foundations of theory of mind and its development in early childhood. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(4), 223–235. [link] Reynold J, Santos A. Cronbach’s alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. The journal of extension. 1999;37(7):35-6. [link] Sabour, S., Zarbakhsh, M., & Khounekeshi, A. (2023). Structural model of borderline personality disorder symptoms based on childhood trauma and emotion dysregulation with the mediating role of mentalization. Applied Family Therapy, 4(3), 337–354. (Persian) [link] Samani, S., & Jokar, B. (2007). Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Journal of Social and Human Sciences of Shiraz University, 26(1), 65–76. . (Persian) [link] Schwarzer, N.-H., Nolte, T., Fonagy, P., & Gingelmaier, S. (2021). Mentalizing and emotion regulation: Evidence from a nonclinical sample. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 30(1), 34–45. [link] Shamseddini, S., Ahmadi, A., & Mousavi, S. (2021). Standardization of the Aging Life Satisfaction Index (ALSI). Applied Psychology, 3(59), 477–495. . (Persian) [link] Tahmasebi Ashtiani, E., Vatankhah Amjad, F., Karim Gholipour, N., & Soleimani, H. (2022). The effectiveness of mentalization-based therapy on insecure attachment, fear of intimacy, and suicidal thoughts in individuals with major depressive disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 10(2), 85–97. . (Persian) [link] Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 2-30. [link] Taubner, S. (2015). Konzept Mentalisieren: Eine Einführung in Forschung und Praxis. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag. [link] Tollenaar, M. S., & Overgaauw, S. (2020). Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women. Heliyon, 6(8). [link] Yaghoubi, H., Karimi, M., Omidi, A., Barooti, A., & Abedi, M. (2012). Validation and factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) among students. Behavioral Sciences Journal, 6(2), 153–160. (Persian) [link] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 15 |
||