
تعداد نشریات | 41 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,189 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,225 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 19,272,951 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,315,070 |
سنجش و تحلیل فضایی زیستپذیری اقتصادی در کلانشهر تهران | ||
فصلنامه علمی پژوهش های بوم شناسی شهری | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 16، شماره 1 (پیاپی 38)، فروردین 1404، صفحه 101-116 اصل مقاله (1.1 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/grup.2023.68212.2792 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
اسماعیل صفرعلیزاده1؛ رباب حسین زاده* 2؛ مجید اکبری3 | ||
1استادیار، گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، دانشگاه پیامنور، تهران، ایران. | ||
2استادیار، گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران | ||
3دکتری، گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
زیستپذیری یک ضرورت اقتصادی برای شهرها محسوب میشود و در ادبیات توسعه پایدار مبتنی بر تئوری مطلوبیت و اثربخشی اقتصادی است که در استفاده از منابع کمیاب کاربرد دارد. هدف مطالعه حاضر سنجش و تحلیل فضایی زیستپذیری اقتصادی کلانشهر تهران انجام گرفته است. پژوهش از لحاظ هدفگذاری کاربردی و از لحاظ روششناسی توصیفی- تحلیلی است. دادههای موردنیاز با مراجعه به اسناد و مدارک موجود و سالنامه آماری منتشر شده از سوی مرکز آمار ایران و سازمان فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات شهرداری تهران بهدست آمده است. نوآوری پژوهش در پرداختن به بعد اقتصادی زیستپذیری است. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات از مدل ماباک و از آزمونهای کجی و کشیدگی، یو مان ویتنی، میانگین رتبهای در نرمافزار SPSS وARC GIS استفاده شد. با توجه به نتایج بهدست آمده، از نظر زیستپذیری اقتصادی، مناطق 6، 2 و 1 به ترتیب با کسب بیشترین امتیاز در جایگاه اول تا سوم و مناطق 22، 16 و 9 با کسب کمترین امتیاز در جایگاه بیستم تا بیست و دوم قرار گرفتند. همچنین فضای غالب زیستپذیری اقتصادی بر مناطق 22 گانه کلانشهر تهران پهنه نامطلوب است. نتایج نشان داد که کلانشهر تهران فاقد وحدت زیستپذیری اقتصادی است و این ناهمگونیهای فضایی بین مناطق شمالی با سایر مناطق تهران خیلی زیاد است. بهطوری که این تفاوت میانگین رتبهای برای مناطق نیمه جنوبی 17/16، نیمه مرکزی 8، نیمه شرقی 60/16 و غربی 29/15 است. بیشترین تفاوت زیستپذیری اقتصادی مناطق نیمه شمالی با مناطق نیمه جنوبی و کمترین آن با مناطق نیمه مرکزی است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
زیستپذیری؛ زیستپذیری اقتصادی؛ ماباک؛ توسعه پایدار؛ کلانشهر تهران | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Spatial Measurement and Analysis of Economic Viability in Tehran Metropolis | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Esmaeil Safaralizadeh1؛ Robab Hoseinzadeh2؛ Majid Akbari3 | ||
1Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Ph.D. Department of Geography and Urban planning, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Livability is considere an economic necessity for cities, and in the literature of sustainable development, based on the theory of economic usefulness and effectiveness. this articlel aim is measuring and spatially analyzing the economic viability of Tehran metropolis. The research is applied in terms of targeting and descriptive-analytical in terms of methodology. The required data obtained by referring to the available documents and official statistics published by the Iran Statistics Center and the Information and Communication Technology Organization of Tehran Municipality. The innovation of the research is in dealing with the economic dimension of livability. in order to analyze the data and information, the Mabak model and skew and kurtosis tests, Mann-Whitney, rank average used in SPSS and ARC GIS software. According to the obtained results, in terms of economic viability, regions 6, 2, and 1 ranked first to third with the most points, and on the other hand, regions 22, 16, and 9 ranked with the lowest points. They ranked 20th to 22nd. In addition, the dominant space of economic viability in the 22 districts of Tehran metropolis is an unfavorable area. Findings shows that, it concluded that the metropolis of Tehran lacks the unity of economic viability and these spatial heterogeneities between the northern regions and other regions of Tehran are very high. Therefore, this average rank difference for the southern half is 16.17, the central half is 8, the eastern half is 16.60 and the western half is 15.29. Meanwhile, the greatest difference in the economic viability of the northern half regions is with the southern half regions and the lowest is with the central half regions. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Livability, economic viability, Mabac, sustainable development, Tehran metropolis | ||
مراجع | ||
AARP. (2005). Livable Communities: An Evaluation Guide, Public Policy Institute, Washington. Akbari, M., & Ali Akbari, E. (2022). Presenting the livability model of the 22nd district of Tehran metropolis with a human city approach, PHD Geography and Urban planning, supervisor: Dr. Ismail Ali Akbari, Faculty of Social Sciences, Payame Noor University Graduate Studies.(In Persian) Ali Akbari, E., & Akbari, M. (2017). Interpretive structural modeling of factors affecting the livability of Tehran metropolis. Space planning and design, 21(1), 1-31.(In Persian) Ali Akbari, E., Marsousi, N., & Akbari, M. (2021). Designing a model of factors affecting the livability of Iran's megacities with the metacomposite method. Majlis and Strategy Quarterly, 10(35), 106-85.(In Persian) Al-Thani, S. K., Amato, A., Koç, M. & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2019). Urban Sustainability and Livability: An Analysis of Doha’s Urban-form and Possible Mitigation Strategies, Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, 11(3), 1-25. Aluri, J., & Fellow, F. (2017). Livability Index. Manhattan Community. Board 1. Arvin, M., Farhadikhah, H., Pourahmad, A., & Moniri, E. (2018). Evaluation of urban livability indicators based on residents' perception (Case Example: Ahvaz City), Knowledge of Urbanization Quarterly, 2(2), 1-17 .(In Persian) Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2020). Smart Eco-City Strategies and Solutions for Sustainability: The Cases of Royal Seaport, Stockholm, and Western Harbor, Malmö, Sweden. Urban Science, 4(11), 1–42. Brenner, N., Marcuse, P. & Mayer, M. (2009). Cities for people, not for profit, City, 13(2), 176–184. Economist Intelligence Unit’s (EIU). (2019), Quality -of-life index Evans, P. B. (2002). Livable cities? Urban struggles for livelihood and sustainability, Oakland: University of California Press. Davoudi, M., Khadem al-Hosseini, A., Saberi, H., Gandomkar, A., & Mahkoui, H. (2021). Investigating the mechanisms of municipal intervention in the livability of cities (Case Study: Ahvaz City). Quarterly New Perspectives in Human Geography, 13(2), 662-642. (In Persian) Dolatshah, S., Sarwar, R., & Tawaklan, A. (2021). An analysis of livability indicators with the right to the city approach, Case Study: Bandar Mahshahr. Quarterly New Perspectives in Human Geography, 13(3), 110-131.(In Persian) Ghasemi, K., Hamzenejad, M., & Meshkini, A. (2018). The spatial ana-lysis of the livability of 22 districts of Tehran Metropolisusing multi-criteria decision making approaches, Sustainable Cities, 38(2018), 382–404.(In Persian) Godschalk, DR. (2004). Land use planning challenges: coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities, Journal of the American Planning Association ,70, 5–13. Hankins, K. B. & Powers, E. M. (2009). The disappearance of the state from “liveable” urban spaces. Antipode, 41, 845-866 Heylen, K. (2006). Liveability in social housing: Three case studies in Flanders. Paper presented at the ENHR conference "Housing in an expanding Europe: Theory, policy, participation and implementation". Howley, P., Mark, S., & Declan, R. (2009). Sustainability versus Liveability: An Investigation of Neighbourhood Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , 52 (6), 847–64. http://www.mercer.com/qualityofliving#city-rating-tables visited at 3 March2019. IMCL (International Making Cities Livable): http:// www.livableci ties.org/ Iran Statistics Center, (2016). Population and housing census of 2016. (In Persian) Jomehpour, M. (2015). Assessing the livability of the new and old parts of Tehran, municipality districts 22 and 10 of Tehran. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8 (9), 87-96. Kabir, K., (2006). Planning Sustainable and Livable Cities in Nigeria, Research Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 40-50.(In Persian). Khazai-nejad, F., Soleimani M, M., & Tavalayi, S. (2015). Analysis of livability in the central part of Tehran city under study: Neighborhoods of District 12, PhD Thesis, Department of Geography, Kharazmi University. Khazai-nejad, F. (2018). An analysis of macro-economic, environmental and management factors and processes affecting urban livability in the case of research: neighborhoods of district 12 of Tehran. Geography Quarterly, 9(1), 264-245.(In Persian) Knox, P., & Pinch, S. (2010). Urban social geography, an introduction (Sixth Ed.). England: Pearson. Leby, L., Jasmine, H., & Hariza, A. (2010). Liveability Dimensions and Attributes: Their Relative Importance in the Eyes of Neighbourhood Residents, Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 15(1), 67–91. Liu, J., Nijkamp, P., Huang, X., & Lin, D. (2017). Urban livability and tourism development in China: Analysis of sustainable development by means of spatial panel data. Habitat International, 68, 99–107. Lotfi, S., Parizadi, T., Nejati, A. (2018). Spatial analysis of livability of urban neighborhoods (Case Study: District 10 of Tehran), Geography Quarterly, 8(3), 7-22.(In Persian). Mitchell, G. (2005). Components that Contribute to Quality of Life. Environment Centre, University of Leeds, England. Mohreh-Kash, R., Saberi, H., Momeni, M., & Azani, M. (2019). Explanation of effective physical factors on the livability of urban areas (Case Study: Areas of Isfahan City). Urban Planning Geography Research, 7(2), 411-429.(In Persian). Okulicz, A. (2012). City Life: Rankings (Livability) vs Perceptions (Satisfaction), This Version: Saturday 17th Marc. Pan, L., Zhang, L., Qin, S., Yan, H., Peng, R., & Li, F. (2021). Study on an Artificial Society of Urban Safety Livability Change. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 70. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijgi10020070 Paul, A., & Sen, J. (2020). A critical review of liveability approaches and their dimensions. Geoforum, 117, 90-92 Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets and life satisfaction: The Political economy of human happiness, American Political Science Review, 95(4), 939-955. Salari Moghadam, Z., Ziyari, K., & Hatami-Nejad, H. (2019). Measuring and evaluating the livability of urban neighborhoods, a case study: District 15 of Tehran metropolis. Sustainable City Quarterly, 2(3), 41-58.(In Persian) Sasanpour, F., Movahed, A., & Latifi, O. (2017). Analysis of livability in Ahvaz metropolitan areas. Quarterly Journal of Urban Structure and Function Studies, 4(1), 141-161. (In Persian) Saitluanga, B. L. (2014). Spatial pattern of urban livability in Himalayan Region: A case of Aizawl City. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, 117 (2), 541–559. Tang, L., M. Ruth, Q. He, & Mirzaee, S. (2017). Comprehensive Evaluation of Trends in Human Settlements Quality Changes and Spatial Differentiation Characteristics of 35 Chinese Major Cities. Habitat International , 70, 81–90. Tilaki M. J. M. (2014). The necessity of increasing liveability for George Town world heritage site: an analytical review. Modern Appl. 8(1), 123–133. UN-Habitat. (2022). Urbanization and development: emerging futures. Uysal, M., Sirgy, M. J., Woo, E. & Kim, H. L. (2015). Quality of life (QOL) and well-being research in tourism. Tourism Management, 53, 244-261. Veenhoven, R. (2014). Livability Theory. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 3645–3647. Veisinab, B., Babaei Aghdam, F., & Gorbani, R. (2019). Analysis of economic factors affecting urban livability (Case Study: Tabriz Metropolis), Quarterly Journal of Urban Economics and Management, 7(27), 45-31. (In Persian) Wang, Y., & Miao, Z. (2022). Towards the analysis of urban livability in China: spatial–temporal changes, regional types and influencing factors. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20092-6 Wey, W. M., & Huang, J. Y. (2018). Urban sustainable transportation planning strategies for livable City’s quality of life. Habitat International, 82, 9–27. Wheeler, S. M. (2014). Planning for Sustainability: Creating Livable, Equitable and Ecological Communities. New York: Routledge. Wyatt, R. (2009). Heuristic approaches to urban liveability. Malaysian Jo. Environ. Manage, 10(1), 43–66. Yassin, H. H. (2019). Livable city: An approach to pedestrianization through tactical urbanism. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58 (1), 251-259. Yeganeh, A., Talebi Fard, R., & Valai, M. (2021). Analysis of economic viability in the peri-urban villages of Malekan. Peri-urban Spaces Development Quarterly, 3(1), 79-96.(In Persian) Zanella, A., Camanho, A. S., & Dias, T. G. (2015). The assessment of cities’ livability integrating human wellbeing and environmental impact. Annals of Operations Research, 226(1), 695–726. Zheng, S., Han, B., Wang, D., & Ouyang., Z. (2018). Ecological Wisdom and Inspiration Underlying the Planning and Construction of Ancient Human Settlements: Case Study of Hongcun 62- UNESCO World Heritage Site in China. Sustainability, 10(5), 1–19. Ziyari K., & Dastyar, F. (2022). Explaining the livability of the metropolis of Tehran in the post-corona era with a future research approach. Iranian Future Research Quarterly, 7(1), 27-63.(In Persian) | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 347 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 20 |