
تعداد نشریات | 41 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,156 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,951 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 18,562,613 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,876,193 |
اندازهگیری و سنجش تراز صوتی در فضاهای شهری، مطالعه موردی: منطقه 4 شهر تهران | ||
فصلنامه علمی پژوهش های بوم شناسی شهری | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 15، شماره 4 (پیاپی 37)، دی 1403، صفحه 99-110 اصل مقاله (2.35 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/grup.2023.66565.2754 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
محیاسادات فرازنده مهر1؛ سید مصطفی طیبیثانی* 2؛ سوسن سهامی3؛ علی فهیمینژاد4 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران. | ||
2استادیار، گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران. | ||
3استادیار، گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران. | ||
4استادیار، گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف از انجام این تحقیق، سنجش تراز صوتی در فضاهای شهری بوده است. بدین منظور بوستانهای واقع در منطقه 4 شهرداری تهران به عنوان پایلوت تحقیق انتخاب گردید. در ابتدا تراز معادل توسط نرمافزار Decibel X نسخه 2020 اندازهگیری و با استاندارد صوتی (OSHA-90 dBA) مورد مقایسه قرار گرفت. سپس با ایجاد تراز صوتی پلکانی اقدام به ثبت مشاهدات اعتراضی کاربران شد. نوآوری این تحقیق در انتخاب مکان و روش اندازهگیری است. کمترین و بیشترین تراز فشار صوتی برابر با 68/65 و 15/77 دسیبل بوده است. اکثر بوستانهای مورد مطالعه دارای میانگین تراز صوتی کمتر از استاندارد NIOSH و OSHAو ACGIH هستند. این در حالی است که تمامی موارد (به استثنای پارک جنگلی لویزان و ساحل)، دارای تراز صوتی بالاتر از استاندارد آژانس حفاظت محیطزیست هستند. همچنین برای کاربران، میانگین زمان حضور در یک روز در بوستانها 2 ساعت میباشد. از سوی دیگر، بیشترین درصد پاسخهای کاربران (88 درصد و 87 درصد) به ترتیب مربوط به حد مطلوب صدا (67-65 دسیبل) و حد آزاردهنده (85-79 دسیبل) میباشد که نشان میدهد اکثر کاربران در خصوص این دو محدوده اتفاق نظر دارند. از سوی دیگر کمترین توافق در پاسخها (37 درصد) مربوط به حد بسیار مطلوب (کمتر از 65 دسیبل) میباشد. فضاهای ورزشی در بوستانهای منطقه 4 از استاندارد نسبی به لحاظ آلودگی صوتی برخوردار هستند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
تراز صوتی؛ فضاهای شهری؛ فضاهای ورزشی؛ اثرات محیط زیستی؛ منطقه 4 شهر تهران | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Measurement of Sound Level in Urban Spaces, Case Study: District 4 of Tehran | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Mahya Sadat Farazandehmehr1؛ Seyed Mostafa Tayebi Sani2؛ Soosan Sahami3؛ Ali Fahiminejad4 | ||
1Ph.D. Student, Department of Physical Education, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran. | ||
2Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran. | ||
3Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran. | ||
4Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The purpose of this research was to measure the sound level in urban spaces. For this purpose, the gardens located in District 4 of Tehran municipality were selected as pilot research. The equivalent level was first measured by Decibel X software version 2020 and compared with the audio standard (OSHA-90 dBA). Then, by creating a stepped sound level, users' protest observations were recorded. The innovation of this research is in choosing the location and measurement method. The lowest and highest sound pressure levels were 65.68 and 77.15 dB. Most of the studied parks have lower average sound levels than NIOSH, OSHA and ACGIH standards. However, all items (except Lavizan Forest Park and Sahel) have a sound level higher than the standard of the Environmental Protection Agency. Also for users, the average time spent in a day is 2 hours. On the other hand, the highest percentage of user responses (88% and 87%) are related to the desired sound level (65-67 decibels) and the annoying limit (79-85 decibels), respectively, which shows that most users agree on these two ranges. have. On the other hand, the lowest agreement in the answers (37%) is related to the very desirable limit (less than 65 decibels). Sports facilities in the parks of Region 4 have a relative standard in terms of noise pollution. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Sound level, Urban spaces, Sports spaces, Environmental effects, District 4 of Tehran | ||
مراجع | ||
Abbaspoor, M. (2016). Environmental engineering. Islamic Azad University. (In Persion) Agrawal, Y., Niparko, J.K., & Dobie, R.A. (2010). Estimating the effect of occupational noise exposure on hearing thresholds: the importance of adjusting for confounding variables. Ear and hearing, 31, 234-237. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c6b9fd Babadi, N., Mohammadi Rouzbahan, M., & HEMADI, K. (2019). Study of Noise Pollution and Noise Annoyance in Residential Areas Affected by Sound of Ahvaz International Airport. Journal of Environmental Science And Technology, 4(83), 1-13. Doi: 10.22034/jest.2019.14559 Babisch, W., & Van Kamp, I. (2009). Exposure-response relationship of the association between aircraft noise and the risk of hypertension. Noise Health. 11, 161-168. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.53363 Babisch, W., Houthuijs, D., Pershagen, G., Cadum, E., Katsouyanni, K., Velonakis, M., Dudley, ML., Marohn, H.D., Swart, W., & Breugelmans, O. (2009). Annoyance due to aircraft noise has increased over the years—results of the HYENA study. Environment International, 35, 1169-1176. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.012 Bahmanpour, H., Salajegheh, B., & Mafi, A. (2011). Investigating the Environmental Situation of Darband Mountains, Environmental Report. Environmental and Energy Research Center. (In Persion) Bazaras, J. (2006). Internal noise modeling problems of transport power equipment. Transport, 21(1), 19-24. Blanchfield, B., Feldman, J., Dunbar, J., & Gardner, E. (2001). The severely to profoundly hearing-impaired population in the United States: Prevalence estimates and demographics. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12, 183–189. Clark, C., Head, J., & Stansfeld, S.A. (2013). Longitudinal effects of aircraft noise exposure on children's health and cognition: A six-year follow-up of the UK RANCH cohort. Environ. Psychol. 35, 1e9 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.03.002 EPA. (2014). Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public health welfare with an adequate margin of safety, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA. Evans, G., & Hygge, S. (2007). Noise and performance in adults and children. Fathi, S., Nasiri, P., Ismailpour, M.R., Moradi, R., & Razzaqi, F. (2015). The study of noise pollution in the 5th district of Tehran, Environmental Science and Technology, 17(2),1-8. (In Persion) Hansell, A.L., Blangiardo, M., Fortunato, L., Floud, S., Hoogh, K., & Fecht, D. (2013). Aircraft noise and cardiovascular disease near London Heathrow Airport. Br. Med. J. 8, 347-5432. Holling, C.S. (2012). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4 (1973), 1-23. Karimi, E., Nassiri, P., & Monnazam, M. (2011). Noise Pollution assessment in 14 distinctions of Tehran. Human and Environment. 23. (In Persion) Luxon, L., & Prasher, D. (Eds.), Noise and its Effects. Whurr Publishers, London. Maffei, L., Iannace, G., Masullo, M., & Nataletti, P. (2009). Noise exposure in school gymnasia and swimming pools. Institute of Noise Control Engineering, Noise Control Engineering Journal, 57( 6), 603-612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3397/1.3155385 Nasiri, P., Behzadi, M., Mostafaii, M., & Mostafaii, M. (2013). Assessment of noise pollution on Mehrabad airport and provide a menagement olutions for reduce noise. 19th national conference iranian society of environmentalists. (In Persion) OEL. (2017). Assessment guideline for Noise and Vibration. Islamic Republic of IRAN Ministry of Health and Medical Education Environmental and Occupational Health Center (EOHC) Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What Makes People Dissatisfied with their Neighborhoods? Urban Studies. 39, 2413–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000027031 Rahimi, A., Moharammi, M., & Faraji, S. (2018). Evaluating the structure of urban parks in Tabriz using network analysis and their optimal location by FAHP. Journal of Physical Development Planning, 3(1), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.30473/psp.2018.4834 Sorensen, M., Andersen, Z.J., Nordsborg, R.B., Jensen, S.S., Lillelund, K.G., & Beelen, R. (2007). Road traffic noise and incident myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One, 7(6), e39283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/. South, T. (2004). Managing noise and vibration at work. Oxford, Elsevier. Stansfeld, S., Haines, M., & Brown, B. (2000). Noise and Health in the Urban M Environment, Reviews of Environmental Health, 15, 43-82. DOI: 10.1515/reveh.2000.15.1-2.43 Taheri, M., Tayebi Sani, S.M., Bahmanpour, H., & Fahiminejad, A. (2019). Measurement of Sound Level in Sport Natural Areas Using the Maintaining Athletes’ Health Approach (The Case of Darakeh Mountainous Region, Tehran). Ann Appl Sport Sci, 7(4), 787. (In Persion) Tin, L., & Lim, O. (2000). A study on the effects of discotheque noise on the hearing of young patrons. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 12, 37–40. DOI: 10.1177/101053950001200108 Vogiatzis, K. (2012). Airport environmental noise mapping and land use management as an environmental protection action policy tool. The case of the Larnaka International Airport (Cyprus). Sci Total Environ; 424, 162-73. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.036 WHO. (2011). European Centre for Environment and Health. Burden of disease from environmental noise quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe 2011. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Yang, W., & Kang, J. (2005). Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces. Applied Acoustics. 66, 211-29. DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2004.07.011 Zannin, P.H.T., Calixto, A., Diniz, F. and Ferreira, J.A.C. (2003) A Survey of Urban Noise Annoyance in a Large Brazilian City: The Importance of Subjective Analysis in Conjunction with Objective Analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(2), 245-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00092-6 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 225 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 25 |