تعداد نشریات | 41 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,120 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,561 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,340,339 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,105,886 |
پروتکلهای اعلام خبر بد به بیمار: یک مطالعهی مروری | ||
روانشناسی سلامت | ||
دوره 12، شماره 47، آذر 1402، صفحه 71-88 اصل مقاله (634.96 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مروری | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/hpj.2024.67159.5762 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
سپیده تمرچی1؛ مونا فرخنده فال2؛ محدثه خردمند2؛ مهتاب ربیعی3؛ فریبا زرانی* 4 | ||
1گروه روانشناسی سلامت، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
2گروه روانشناسی سلامت، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
3گروه روانشناسی سلامت، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
4استادیار،گروه روانشناسی سلامت، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی،تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
مقدمه: اعلام خبر بد به بیمار و خانوادهی وی مرحلهای مهم و دشوار در فرایند یک بیماری است که نیازمند مهارتهای کلامی و غیرکلامی میباشد. مطالعات در حوزهی روانشناسی سلامت به ارائهی پروتکلهایی برای توضیح گامبهگام نحوهی اعلام خبر بد، پرداختهاند. این پروتکلها در حوزههای درمانی مختلف، با رویکردهای متفاوت و از زوایای متنوعی اعلام خبر بد را بررسی کردهاند. تنوع مدلهای ارائه شده میتواند متخصصان سلامت را در انتخاب مدل مناسب دچار تردید نماید. مطالعهی حاضر با هدف شناسایی پرکاربردترین پروتکلهای موجود برای اعلام خبر بد، شباهتها و تفاوتهای آنها و ارائهی ساختاری جهت مقایسهی این پروتکلها با یکدیگر انجام شد. روش: جستجوی پروتکلهای اعلام خبر بد در پایگاههای اطلاعاتی گوگل اسکالر و ساینس دایرکت انجام شد. سپس پرکاربردترین پروتکلها که بیشترین ارجاع در مطالعات دیگر به آنها داده شده بود شناسایی و در نهایت 13 پروتکل برای بررسی دقیقتر انتخاب شد. یافتهها: ر نتیجهی مقایسه این پروتکلها 9 مفهوم مشترک در قالب 47 زیرمرحله شناسایی و سپس سهم هر پروتکل در مفاهیم و زیرمرحلهها در قالب جدولی مقایسهای به تفصیل مشخص شد. به طور کلی، این مطالعه با مرور و مقایسهی مهمترین پروتکلهای اعلام خبر بد، به ارائهی تصویری نسبتاً جامع از آنچه در مطالعات مختلف مورد توجه قرار گرفته پرداخته است. نتیجهگیری: بدین ترتیب، متخصصان میتوانند با مراجعه به مدل مفهومی ارائه شده، تصویری دربردارنده مفاهیم مشترک و زیرمرحلههای متفاوت از مهمترین پروتکلهای اعلام خبر بد دریافت نمایند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
اعلام خبر بد؛ پروتکل اعلام خبر بد؛ روانشناسی سلامت | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Breaking bad news to patients protocols: a review study | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
sepideh Tamrchi1؛ Mona Farkhondehfal2؛ Mohadese Kheradmand2؛ Mahtab Rabiee3؛ Fariba Zarani4 | ||
1Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
2Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
4Assistant professor, Department of health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Objective: Breaking bad news to the patients and their family is an important and difficult stage in disease process requiring both verbal and non-verbal skills. Thus, studies in the field of health psychology have provided protocols to explain step by step how to break bad news. These protocols have focused on how to break bad news in various therapeutic fields and different approaches. The diversity of these models can make health professionals hesitate in choosing the right model. The purpose of this review study was to identify the most widely used protocols for breaking bad news, their similarities and differences, and to provide a structure to compare these protocols. Methods: The search for breaking bad news protocols was conducted in Google Scholar and Science Direct databases. Then, the most widely used protocols that were mostly referred to by other studies were identified. Finally, 13 protocols were selected for detailed investigation. Results: As a result of comparing these protocols, 9 common concepts were find, including: 1- preparation before the session, 2- setting up the proper communicational space, 3- personal evaluation of the patient, 4- evaluation of the patient's environment, 5- approaching the news, 6- exploring the emotions and providing empathic response, 7-talking about treatment plans, 8- investigating support systems, 9- summarizing and concluding the session. Along with these common steps, 47 sub-steps were identified. All these findings were classified altogether in both summarized and extended model. In summarized model the one look table consisting of 9 common concepts and 47 sub-steps was provided. While in an extended table, the contribution of each of 13 investigated protocols in each of the concepts and sub-steps was clarified by detail. Conclusion: The extended table also highlights the unique features of each protocol, allowing health professionals to choose the most appropriate approach based on the specific needs of the patients and their families. In general, this study reviews and compares the most important protocols of breaking bad news to patients to provide a relatively comprehensive picture of what has been considered in different studies for breaking bad news. Therefore, it provided the summarized and extended models of breaking bad news to health professionals as a practical tool containing common concepts and different sub-steps of the most important protocols. This study emphasizes the importance of a structured and empathetic approach to breaking bad news, which can improve patient satisfaction, trust, and coping strategies. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Breaking bad news, Breaking bad news protocol, Health Psychology | ||
مراجع | ||
Abazari, P., Taleghani, F., Hematti, S., Malekian, A., Mokarian, F., Hakimian, S. M. R., & Ehsani, M. (2017). Breaking bad news protocol for cancer disclosure: an Iranian version. Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, 10. PMCID: PMC6164186. in Persian Back, A. L., Arnold, R. M., Baile, W. F., Tulsky, J. A., & Fryer‐Edwards, K. (2005). Approaching difficult communication tasks in oncology 1. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 55(3), 164-177. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.55.3.164. Baile, W. F., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., Glober, G., Beale, E. A., & Kudelka, A. P. (2000). SPIKES—a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. The oncologist, 5(4), 302-311. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302. Baile, W. F., Lenzi, R., Parker, P. A., Buckman, R., & Cohen, L. (2002). Oncologists’ attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: an exploratory study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(8), 2189-2196. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.004. Bousquet, G., Orri, M., Winterman, S., Brugière, C., Verneuil, L., & Revah-Levy, A. (2015). Breaking bad news in oncology: a metasynthesis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(22), 2437-2443. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.6759. Buckman, R. (1992). How to break bad news: a guide for health care professionals. University of Toronto Press. Clandinin, J., Cave, M. T., & Cave, A. (2011). Narrative reflective practice in medical education for residents: composing shifting identities. Advances in medical education and practice, 2, 1. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S13241. Dos Santos, K. L., Gremigni, P., Casu, G., Zaia, V., & Montagna, E. (2021). Development and validation of The Breaking Bad News Attitudes Scale. BMC medical education, 21(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02636-5. Elashiry, A., Abdel Wahed, W. Y., & Elhady, G. W. (2022). Assessing Physicians’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Towards Breaking Bad News: A Multicenter Study in Egypt. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 89(2), 6305-6312. DOI: 10.21608/EJHM.2022.268973. Fallowfield, L., & Jenkins, V. (2004). Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. The Lancet, 363(9405), 312-319. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15392-5. Garg, A., Buckman, R., & Kason, Y. (1997). Teaching medical students how to break bad news. Cmaj, 156(8), 1159-1164. Girgis, A., & Sanson-Fisher, R. W. (1998). Breaking bad news 1: current best advice for clinicians. Behavioral Medicine, 24(2), 53-59. DOI: 10.1080/08964289809596381. Hauk, H., Bernhard, J., McConnell, M., & Wohlfarth, B. (2021). Breaking bad news to cancer patients in times of COVID-19. Supportive care in cancer, 29(8), 4195-4198. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06167-z. Johnson, J., & Panagioti, M. (2018). Interventions to improve the breaking of bad or difficult news by physicians, medical students, and interns/residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine, 93(9), 1400-1412. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002308. Laidsaar-Powell, R., Butow, P., Boyle, F., & Juraskova, I. (2018). Facilitating collaborative and effective family involvement in the cancer setting: guidelines for clinicians (TRIO Guidelines-1). Patient education and counseling, 101(6), 970-982. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.019. Mailankody, S., & Rao, S. R. (2021). “PENS” approach for breaking bad news—a short and sweet way!. Supportive Care in Cancer, 29(3), 1157-1159. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05807-0. Matthews, T. (2020). Breaking bad news about cancer: the experiences of patients, patients' family/whānau members and healthcare professionals: a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Clinical Psychology at Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation, Massey University). Meitar, D., & Karnieli-Miller, O. (2022). Twelve tips to manage a breaking bad news process: Using SPw-ICE-S–A revised version of the SPIKES protocol. Medical teacher, 1-5. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1928618. Monden, K. R., Gentry, L., & Cox, T. R. (2016, January). Delivering bad news to patients. In Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings (Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 101-102). Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2016.11929380. Narayanan, V., Bista, B., & Koshy, C. (2010). ‘BREAKS’protocol for breaking bad news. Indian journal of palliative care, 16(2), 61. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.68401. Nardi, T., & Keefe-Cooperman, K. (2006). Communicating bad news: a model for emergency mental health helpers. PMID: 16944793. Pereira, C. R., Calônego, M. A. M., Lemonica, L., & Barros, G. A. M. D. (2017). The PACIENTE Protocol: An instrument for breaking bad news adapted to the Brazilian medical reality. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 63, 43-49. Salem, A., & Salem, A. F. (2013). Breaking bad news: current prospective and practical guideline for Muslim countries. Journal of Cancer Education, 28(4), 790-794. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-013-0523-8. Smith RC. (2002). Patient-centered interviewing: an evidence-based method. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins VandeKieft, G. (2001). Breaking bad news. American family physician, 64(12), 1975. PMID: 11775763. Villagran, M., Goldsmith, J., Wittenberg-Lyles, E., & Baldwin, P. (2010). Creating COMFORT: A communication-based model for breaking bad news. Communication Education, 59(3), 220-234. DOI: 10.1080/03634521003624031. Zahedi, F. (2011). The challenge of truth telling across cultures: a case study. Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, 4. PMCID: PMC3713926. in Persian | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 562 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 343 |