پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,183 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,187 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 19,146,594 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,259,041 |
ارائه مدل پارادایمی تجارت غیرقانونی حیات‌وحش از منظر گروداران (مطالعه موردی: بازار پرندگان وحشی فریدون‌کنار) | ||
| فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 3، 1404، صفحه 47-67 اصل مقاله (4.98 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ee.2023.64667.2547 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| امیرعلی برومند1؛ آزیتا فراشی* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد آموزش محیط‌زیست، گروه برنامه‌ریزی، مدیریت و آموزش محیط‌زیست، دانشکده تحصیلات تکمیلی محیط‌زیست، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه محیط‌زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط‌زیست، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف پژوهش حاضر تبیین پدیده «تجارت غیرقانونی حیات‌وحش» در بازار پرندگان وحشی فریدون‌کنار از منظر گروداران و ارائه رهیافت‌هایی جهت مقابله با آن با رویکرد کیفی به کمک روش «نظریه داده بنیاد» است. درراستای دستیابی به حقیقی‌ترین تصویر از واقعیت، الگوی 6 زنجیره‌ای که پیچیده‌ترین و مافیایی‌ترین الگوی حاکم بر گروداران بود، مبنای مطالعه قرار گرفت. ابزار پژوهش مصاحبه عمیق نیمه ساختاریافته و ملاک مصاحبه «داوطلب بودن» و مبنای اشباع نظری دستیابی به «حداکثر تنوع» و «تکراری شدن پاسخ‌ها» با حضور نمایندگانی از تمام گروه‌های گرودار اصلی بود. پس از مکتوب سازی مصاحبه‌ها، 104 کد باز و 20 کد محوری احصا شد. سپس کدهای محوری در قالب کدهای گزینشی مقوله‌بندی، فشرده‌سازی و به ارائه مدل پارادایمی نهایی انجامید. نتایج حاکی از آن است که شرایط زمینه‌ای تجارت غیرقانونی حیات‌وحش در بازار پرندگان وحشی فریدون‌کنار، «شکل‌گیری شبکه مافیایی»، «برخورد قهری محیط‌بانان با شکارچیان» و «کمبود بودجه، امکانات و نیروهای متخصص در سازمان حفاظت محیط‌زیست» است. شرایط مداخله‌گر «ناآگاهی جوامع محلی از آثار محیط‌زیستی شکار غیرمجاز» و «فساد اداری در سازمان حفاظت محیط‌زیست»، شرایط علی، «فقر و گرانی»، «اختلاف طبقات و تبعیض اجتماعی»، «تقاضای بازار، بازار سیاه گسترده و کم‌ریسک»، «کم‌رنگ شدن اخلاق محیط‌زیستی» و «نبود نظارت بر فضای سایبر» است. راهبردهای مقابله «آموزش و فرهنگ‌پروری»، «مدیریت مشارکتی محیط‌زیست و منابع طبیعی»، «بازنگری در نوع مواجه محیط‌بانان با شکارچیان»، «تنوع‌بخشی به اقتصاد جامعه محلی و کارآفرینی»، «بازنگری در قوانین» و «فراهم‌سازی زیرساختهای نوین شناسایی و ضبط محموله‌ها» و پیامدهای مقابله، «حفاظت از محیط‌زیست و پایداری منابع طبیعی»، «اشتغال‌زایی و تأمین پایدار معیشت جوامع محلی»، «بازتعریف و احیای هویت جوامع محلی» و «کاهش تضادها و تعارضات گروداران با محیط‌بانان» است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تجارت غیرقانونی حیات‌وحش؛ قاچاق حیات‌وحش؛ انقراض تنوع‌زیستی؛ بازار مرطوب؛ بازار پرندگان وحشی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Presenting a Paradigmatic Model of Illegal Wildlife Trade from the Perspective of Stakeholders (Case Study: Fereydounkenar Wild Bird Market) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Amirali Borouamand1؛ Azita Farashi2 | ||
| 1M.Sc. Student in Environmental Education, Department of Environmental Planning, Management and Education, Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this research is to explain the phenomenon of “Illegal Wildlife Trade (IWT)” in the Fereydounkenar wild bird market from the perspective of stakeholders and to provide approaches to effectively address it. The research employed a qualitative approach using the “Grounded Theory” method. To achieve the most accurate depiction of reality, the six-chain stakeholder model—recognized as the most complex and mafia-like structure—was selected as the basis for the study. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted as the primary data collection tool, based on the criterion of “voluntariness” and aimed at achieving “maximum diversity” and “response saturation.” After transcribing the interviews, 104 open codes and 20 axial codes were identified. These were then categorized and condensed into selective codes, resulting in the presentation of the final paradigmatic model. The findings reveal that the contextual conditions for IWT include the formation of mafia networks, the confrontational approach of rangers toward hunters, and the lack of funding, facilities, and specialized personnel within the Department of Environment (DOE). Intervening conditions include local communities’ lack of awareness about the environmental impacts of illegal hunting and administrative corruption within the DOE. Causal conditions include poverty, class disparities and social discrimination, market demand, the existence of a widespread and low-risk black market, the erosion of environmental ethics, and the lack of cyber oversight. The proposed coping strategies are environmental education and awareness, participatory management of the environment and natural resources, revising ranger-hunter interaction protocols, diversifying the local economy through entrepreneurship, revising legal frameworks, and enhancing infrastructure for detection and seizure of wildlife shipments. The anticipated outcomes include environmental protection and the sustainability of natural resources, increased employment and livelihood security for local communities, redefining and revitalizing the identity of local populations, and reducing conflicts between stakeholders. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Illegal Wildlife Trade (IWT), Wildlife Trafficking, Biodiversity Extinction, Wet Market, Wild Bird Market | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
bensperg-Traun, M. (2009). “CITES, sustainable use of wild species and incentive-driven conservation in developing countries, with an emphasis on southern Africa”. Biological Conservation, 142(5), 948-963. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.034
Arameahinia, P., Shobeiri, S., & Larijani, M. (2021). “The Effect of Environmental Education on the Amount of Knowledge Level, Attitude and Behavior of Local Society to Protect the Biological Variety (Subject of Study to Reserve Dena Sphere of Living)”. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 23(3), 103-116. [In Persian] doi: 10.30495/jest.2021.18848.2755
Baker, C. S. (2008). “A truer measure of the market: the molecular ecology of fisheries and wildlife trade”. Molecular Ecology, 17(18), 3985-3998. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03867.x
Baker, S. E., Cain, R., Van Kesteren, F., Zommers, Z. A., D'cruze, N., & Macdonald, D. W. (2013). “Rough trade: animal welfare in the global wildlife trade”. BioScience, 63(12), 928-938. doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.12.6
Basu, G. (2014). “Concealment, corruption, and evasion: A transaction cost and case analysis of illicit supply chain activity”. Journal of Transportation Security, 7(3), 209-226. doi: 10.1007/s12198-014-0140-8
Bennett, E. L. (2015). “Legal ivory trade in a corrupt world and its impact on African elephant populations”. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 54-60. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12377
Boroumand, A. & farashi, A. (2020). “Can the Coronavirus (Covide 19) challenges the wildlife trade?!”. Rahyaft, 30(79), 83-98. [In Persian] doi: 10.22034/rahyaft.2021.10369.1119
Brooks, E. G., Roberton, S. I., & Bell, D. J. (2010). “The conservation impact of commercial wildlife farming of porcupines in Vietnam”. Biological Conservation, 143(11), 2808-2814. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.030
Brown, V. F. (2017). “The extinction market: wildlife trafficking and how to counter it”. Oxford University Press: Oxford. doi: 10.1017/9781108597296.009
Challender, D. W., Harrop, S. R., & MacMillan, D. C. (2015). “Understanding markets to conserve trade-threatened species in CITES”. Biological Conservation, 187, 249-259. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.015
Chaves, W. A., Valle, D. R., Monroe, M. C., Wilkie, D. S., Sieving, K. E., & Sadowsky, B. (2018). “Changing wild meat consumption: An experiment in the Central Amazon, Brazil”. Conservation Letters, 11(2), 1-10. doi: 10.1111/conl.12391
Crespo-Gascón, S., Solórzano, C., & Guerrero-Casado, J. (2022). “National illegal wildlife trafficking of threatened species: A descriptive study in Manabí (Ecuador)”. La Granja, 35(1), 33-44. doi: 10.17163/lgr.n35.2022.03
De Boer, H. J., Ghorbani, A., Manzanilla, V., Raclariu, A. C., Kreziou, A., Ounjai, S., Ounjai, S., Osathanunkul, M. & Gravendeel, B. (2017). “DNA metabarcoding of orchid-derived products reveals widespread illegal orchid trade. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences”, 284(1863), 1-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1182
Deliveyne, N., Cassey, P., Linacre, A., Delean, S., Austin, J. J., & Young, J. M. (2022). “Recovering trace reptile DNA from the illegal wildlife trade. Forensic Science International: Animals and Environments”, 2, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fsiae.2021.100040
Di Minin, E., Selier, J., Louis, M., & Bradshaw, C. J. (2022). “Dismantling the poachernomics of the illegal wildlife trade”. Biological Conservation, 265, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109418
Dormontt, E. E., Boner, M., Braun, B., Breulmann, G., Degen, B., Espinoza, E., Gardner, S., Guillery, P., Hermanson, J. c., Koch, G., Lee, L. S., Kanashiro, M., Rimbawanto, A., Thomas, D., Wiedenhoeft, A. C., Yin, Y., Zahnen, J. & Lowe, A. J. (2015). “Forensic timber identification: It's time to integrate disciplines to combat illegal logging”. Biological Conservation, 191, 790-798. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.038
Duthie, E., Veríssimo, D., Keane, A., & Knight, A. T. (2017). “The effectiveness of celebrities in conservation marketing”. PloS one, 12(7), 1-16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180027
Englund, O., & Berndes, G. (2015). “How do sustainability standards consider biodiversity?”. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 4(1), 26-50. doi: 10.1002/wene.118
Fischer, C. (2010). “Does trade help or hinder the conservation of natural resources?”. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 4(1). 21-103. doi: 10.1093/reep/rep023
Graham-Rowe, D. (2011). “Biodiversity: endangered and in demand”. Nature, 480(7378), S101-S103. doi: 10.1038/480S101a
Greenfield, S., & Veríssimo, D. (2019). “To what extent is social marketing used in demand reduction campaigns for illegal wildlife products? Insights from elephant ivory and rhino horn”. Social Marketing Quarterly, 25(1), 40-54. doi: 10.1177/1524500418813543
Haas, T. C., & Ferreira, S. M. (2015). “Federated databases and actionable intelligence: Using social network analysis to disrupt transnational wildlife trafficking criminal networks”. Security Informatics, 4(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1186/s13388-015-0018-8
Haenlein, C., & Keatinge, T. (2017). “Follow the money: Using financial investigation to combat wildlife crime”. Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies. London. 44. doi: 10.1111/conl.12715
Hall, M., Wyatt, T., South, N., Nurse, A., Potter, G., & Maher, J. (2016). “Greening Criminology in the 21st Century: Contemporary debates and future directions in the study of environmental harm”. Taylor & Francis. New York. 238. doi: 10.4324/9781315585949
Hauenstein, S., Kshatriya, M., Blanc, J., Dormann, C. F., & Beale, C. M. (2019). “African elephant poaching rates correlate with local poverty, national corruption and global ivory price”. Nat. Commun. 10, 1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09993-2
Hinsley, A., Lee, T. E., Harrison, J. R., & Roberts, D. L. (2016). “Estimating the extent and structure of trade in horticultural orchids via social media”. Conservation Biology, 30(5), 1038-1047. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12721
Hinsley, A., Verissimo, D., & Roberts, D. L. (2015). “Heterogeneity in consumer preferences for orchids in international trade and the potential for the use of market research methods to study demand for wildlife”. Biological Conservation, 190, 80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.010
Hughes, J. D. (2003). “Europe as consumer of exotic biodiversity: Greek and Roman times”. Landscape Research, 28(1), 21-31. doi: 10.1080/01426390306535
Jeffreys, E. (2016). “Translocal celebrity activism: shark-protection campaigns in mainland China”. Environmental Communication, 10(6), 763-776. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1198822
Kolahi, M. (2021). “Natural Resources Stakeholders”. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 8(1), 19-30. [In Persian] doi: 10.22067/jwsd.v8i1.88313
Kurland, J. P., & SF, M. SC & Moreto, WD (2017). “Wildlife crime: a conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique”. Crime Science, 6(4), 1-15. doi: 10.1186/s40163-021-00150-z
Lavorgna, A. (2014). “Wildlife trafficking in the Internet age”. Crime Science, 3, 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s40163-014-0005-2
Leverington, F., Costa, K. L., Pavese, H., Lisle, A., & Hockings, M. (2010). “A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness”. Environmental management, 46(5), 685-698. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5
Lucas, B. (2022). “Impact of COVID-19 on Poaching and Illegal Wildlife Trafficking Trends in Southern Africa”. K4D Helpdesk Report 1094. Institute of Development Studies. London. 1-23. doi: 10.19088/K4D.2022.017
Malekian, M. & Hemami, M. (2011). “Basics of Conservation Biology”. Jahad-e-Daneshgahi Press of Mashhad. Mashhad. 304. [In Persian] https://www.jdmpress.com/books/260-%D9%85%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C%20%D8%B2%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA%20%D8%B4%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B3%DB%8C%20%D8%AD%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B8%D8%AA
Megias, D. A., Anderson, S. C., Smith, R. J., & Veríssimo, D. (2017). “Investigating the impact of media on demand for wildlife: A case study of Harry Potter and the UK trade in owls”. PloS one, 12(10), 1-13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182368
Michie, S., & Johnston, M. (2012). “Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change”. Health Psychology Review, 6(1), 1-6. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2012.654964
Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2018). “Documenting and tackling the illegal wildlife trade: change and continuity over 40 years”. Oryx, 52(4), 597-598. doi: 10.1017/S0030605318001047
Moro, M., Fischer, A., Czajkowski, M., Brennan, D., Lowassa, A., Naiman, L. C., & Hanley, N. (2013). “An investigation using the choice experiment method into options for reducing illegal bushmeat hunting in western Serengeti”. Conservation Letters, 6(1), 37-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00284.x
Naidoo, R., Weaver, L. C., Diggle, R. W., Matongo, G., Stuart‐Hill, G., & Thouless, C. (2016). “Complementary benefits of tourism and hunting to communal conservancies in Namibia”. Conservation Biology, 30(3), 628-638. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12643
Nijman, V., Ardiansyah, A., Langgeng, A., Hendrik, R., Hedger, K., Foreman, G., Morcatty, T. Q., Siriwat, P., van Balen. S., Eaton, J. A., Shepherd, C. R., Gomez, L., Imron, M. A., Nekaris, K. A. I. & Nekaris, K. A. I. (2022). “Illegal Wildlife Trade in Traditional Markets, on Instagram and Facebook: Raptors as a Case Study”. Birds, 3(1), 99-116. doi: 10.3390/birds3010008
Nuno, A., & John, F. A. S. (2015). “How to ask sensitive questions in conservation: A review of specialized questioning techniques”. Biological Conservation, 189, 5-15. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107526
Oyanedel, R., Gelcich, S., Mathieu, E., & Milner‐Gulland, E. J. (2021). “A dynamic simulation model to support reduction in illegal trade within legal wildlife markets”. Conservation Biology. 36. 1-12. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13814
Patel, N. G., Rorres, C., Joly, D. O., Brownstein, J. S., Boston, R., Levy, M. Z., & Smith, G. (2015). “Quantitative methods of identifying the key nodes in the illegal wildlife trade network”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(26), 7948-7953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500862112
Roe, D., Dickman, A., Kock, R., Milner-Gulland, E. J., & Rihoy, E. (2020). “Beyond banning wildlife trade: COVID-19, conservation and development”. World Development, 136, 105121. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105121
Rubino, E. C., Pienaar, E. F., & Soto, J. R. (2018). “Structuring legal trade in rhino horn to incentivize the participation of South African private landowners”. Ecological Economics, 154, 306-316. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.012
Salazar, G., Mills, M., & Veríssimo, D. (2019). “Qualitative impact evaluation of a social marketing campaign for conservation”. Conservation Biology, 33(3), 634-644. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13218
Sand, P. H. (2013). “Enforcing CITES: the rise and fall of trade sanctions”. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 22(3), 251-263. doi: 10.1111/reel.12037
Shairp, R., Veríssimo, D., Fraser, I., Challender, D., & MacMillan, D. (2016). “Understanding urban demand for wild meat in Vietnam: implications for conservation actions”. PloS one, 11(1), e0134787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134787
Smith, R. J., Biggs, D., John, F. A. S., Sas-Rolfes, M. T., & Barrington, R. (2015). “Elephant conservation and corruption beyond the ivory trade”. Conservation Biology, 29(3), 953-956. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12488
t Sas-Rolfes M. (2016). “Commodifying wildlife”. In Philosophy: Environmental Ethics, ed. D Schmidtz, Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan, 185–219. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033253
t Sas-Rolfes, M., Challender, D. W., Hinsley, A., Veríssimo, D., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2019). “Illegal wildlife trade: Scale, processes, and governance”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44, 201-228. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033253
Troester, R., & Hiete, M. (2018). “Success of voluntary sustainability certification schemes–A comprehensive review”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1034-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.240
Van Asch E. (2016). “The International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime (ICCWC)”. In Elliott, L., & Schaedla, W. H. (Eds). 2016. Handbook of transnational environmental crime. Edward Elgar Publishing. 469-477. doi: 10.4337/9781783476237.00036
Van Uhm, D. P. (2016). “The illegal wildlife trade: Inside the world of poachers, smugglers and traders”. Springer. 173. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-42129-2
Van Uhm, D. P., & Moreto, W. D. (2018). “Corruption within the illegal wildlife trade: A symbiotic and antithetical enterprise”. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(4), 864-885. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azx032
Veríssimo, D., & Wan, A. K. (2019). “Characterizing efforts to reduce consumer demand for wildlife products”. Conservation Biology, 33(3), 623-633. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13227
Vucetich, J. A., Bruskotter, J. T., & Nelson, M. P. (2015). “Evaluating whether nature's intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation”. Conservation Biology, 29(2), 321-332. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12464
Wallach, A. D., Bekoff, M., Batavia, C., Nelson, M. P., & Ramp, D. (2018). “Summoning compassion to address the challenges of conservation”. Conservation Biology, 32(6), 1255-1265. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13126
Wandesforde-Smith, G. (2016). “Looking for law in all the wrong places? Dying elephants, evolving treaties, and empty threats”. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 19(4), 365-381. doi: 10.1080/13880292.2016.1248701
Wasser, S. K., Mailand, C., Booth, R., Mutayoba, B., Kisamo, E., Clark, B., & Stephens, M. (2007). “Using DNA to track the origin of the largest ivory seizure since the 1989 trade ban”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(10), 4228-4233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609714104
Watson, J. E., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., & Hockings, M. (2014). “The performance and potential of protected areas”. Nature, 515(7525), 67-73. doi: 10.1038/nature13947
Williams, S. J., Jones, J. P. G., Annewandter, R., & Gibbons, J. M. (2014). “Cultivation can increase harvesting pressure on overexploited plant populations”. Ecological Applications, 24(8), 2050-2062. doi: 10.1890/13-2264.1
World Bank Group. (2016). “Analysis of international funding to tackle illegal wildlife trade”. World Bank. World Bank Group. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/25340 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
World Bank Group. (2018). “Tools and Resources to Combat Illegal Wildlife Trade”. World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/131671521451683536
Wyatt, T., Johnson, K., Hunter, L., George, R., & Gunter, R. (2018). “Corruption and wildlife trafficking: three case studies involving Asia”. Asian Journal of Criminology, 13(1), 35-55. doi: 10.1007/s11417-017-9255-8
Young, O., Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., & Weber, E. U. (2002). “The Drama of the Commons”. Washington, DC: Nat. Acad. Press. 263-291. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-15858-000
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 98 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 48 |
||