پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,184 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,192 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 19,148,899 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,260,017 |
بررسی نقش سیاست‌های پولی و مالی در بهبود کیفیت محیطزیست و مقایسه آن با سیاست‌های زیست‌محیطی:کاربردی از الگوی E-DSGE | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهش های اقتصاد صنعتی | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 28، تیر 1403، صفحه 68-49 اصل مقاله (669.11 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کاربردی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/jier.2025.72791.1475 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فاطمه مهرابی1؛ سمیه اعظمی* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد،، دانشکده اقتصاد و حسابداری، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و حسابداری، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه، دستیابی به توازن میان اهداف توسعه اقتصادی و حفاظت از محیطزیست به یکی از اولویت‌های اصلی سیاست‌گذاران تبدیل شده است. مقاله حاضر با بهره‌گیری از مدل E-DSGE، یک قاعده جدید برای سیاست‌های مالی، پولی و مالیات کربن ارائه می‌دهد که هدف آن تنظیم و تثبیت سطح انتشار کربن در کنار تأمین رشد اقتصادی است و به تحلیل تعاملات میان سیاست‌های مالی و پولی و سیاست‌های زیست‌محیطی می‌پردازد. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که در حالی که همه سیاست‌های ذکر شده می‌توانند انتشار کربن را به سطح هدف نزدیک کنند، مکانیسم‌های اساسی آنها متفاوت است. سیاست‌های مالی و پولی از طریق تغییر تولید و سیاست‌های زیست‌محیطی از طریق تغییر مخارج بنگاه‌ها برای کاهش آلاینده‌ها منجر به تغییر انتشار میشوند. با وجود شوک‌های بهره‌وری مثبت، سیاست مالی در تعدیل درآمدهای مالیاتی، سیاست پولی در تعدیل قیمت‌ها و سیاست زیست‌محیطی در تعدیل شدت انتشار کربن مؤثرتر است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مالیات کربن؛ سیاست مالی؛ سیاست‌های پولی؛ تغییرات اقلیمی؛ E-DSGE | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Examining the Role of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Improving Environmental Quality and Comparing It with Environmental Policies: An Application of the E-DSGE Model | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fatemeh Mehrabi1؛ Somayeh Azami2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate in Economics, Faculty of Economics and Accounting, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Accounting, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Nowadays, achieving a balance between economic development goals and environmental protection has become one of the main priorities for policymakers. Using the E-DSGE model, this study introduces a new rule for fiscal and monetary policies and carbon taxation, aiming to regulate and stabilize carbon emission levels along with ensuring economic growth. It analyzes the interactions between fiscal and monetary policies and environmental policies. The findings indicate that while all the mentioned policies can bring carbon emissions close to the target level, their underlying mechanisms differ. Fiscal and monetary policies impact emissions by changing production levels, while environmental policies affect emissions by altering firms' spending on pollution reduction. In the presence of positive productivity shocks, fiscal policy is more effective in adjusting tax revenues, monetary policy in regulating prices, and environmental policy in modifying carbon emission intensity | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Carbon Tax, Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policies, Climate Change, E-DSGE | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References Adewuyi, A. O. (2016). Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 489-506. Ahangari, A., Farazmand, H., Montazer Hojjat, A. H., & Haft Lang, R. (2018). "The effects of green tax on economic growth and welfare in Iran: A dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) approach". Quantitative Economics Research Quarterly, 15(1), 27-61.(in Persian). Ahmad, M., Khan, Z., Ur Rahman, Z., Khan, S., 2018. Does financial development asymmetrically affect CO2 emissions in China? An application of the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model. Carbon Manag. 9 (6), 631e644. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1529998 Ahmad, M., Khattak, S.I., 2020. Is aggregate domestic consumption spending (adcs) per capita determining CO2 emissions in South Africa? A new perspective. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1e24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00398-9. Aldy, J.E., Viscusi, W.K., 2014. Environmental risk and uncertainty. In: Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 1. Elsevier, pp. 601–649.the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 1. Elsevier, pp. 601–649. Amirali, M. , bakhshi dastjerdi, R. & vaez barzani, M. (2023). "The Real Effects of the Bank’s Function as a Creator of Liquidity Through Lending and Factitious Rollover of Non-Performing Loans Channels (DSGE Approach)". Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat- E- Eghtesadi), 57(4), 583-628. doi:10.22059/jte.2023.92422. (in Persian). Anderson, P., Johnson, E., & Morris, B. (2018). The impact of fiscal and monetary policies on environmental quality and economic growth. Macroeconomic and Environmental Journal, 11(3), 150-170. Annicchiarico, B., & Di Dio, F. (2015). Environmental policy and macroeconomic dynamics in a new Keynesian model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 69, 1-21. Asghoui, & Mohammad Mehdi Barqi. (2008). "The Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Greenhouse Gases (CO2Emission) in EKC". Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat- E- Eghtesadi), 43(1). (in Persian). Bayat, N., Bahrami, J., & Mohammadi, M. (2017). "Inflation and output targeting in two monetary policy rules: Money growth rate and Taylor rule for the Iranian economy". Applied Economic Theories, 4(1), 29-58 (in Persian). Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (1999). A new database on financial development and structure. The World Bank. Bernauer, T., & Koubi, V. (2013). Are bigger governments better providers of public goods? Evidence from air pollution. Public Choice, 156(3-4), 593-609. Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of monetary Economics, 12(3), 383-398. Canova, F., D. Lopez-Salido, and C. Michelacci (2010). The effects of technology shocks on hours and output: A robustness analysis. Journal of applied Econometrics 25 (5), 755–773. Camarero, M., Forte, A., Garcia-Donato, G., Mendoza, Y., & Ordoñez, J. (2015). Variable selection in the analysis of energy consumption–growth nexus. Energy Economics, 52, 207-216. Campiglio, E., 2016. Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Ecol. Econom. 121, 220–230. Campiglio, E., Dafermos, Y., Monin, P., Ryan-Collins, J., Schotten, G., Tanaka, M., 2017. Finance and climate change: What role for central banks and financial regulators. In: CEP-DNB workshop on ‘‘Central Banking and Green Finance’’, November. pp. 28–29. Chan, Y. T. (2020). Are macroeconomic policies better in curbing air pollution than environmental policies? A DSGE approach with carbon-dependent fiscal and monetary policies. Energy Policy, 141, 111454. Chan, Y. T., & Punzi, M. T. (2023). E-DSGE model with endogenous capital utilization rate. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137640. Dafermos, Y., Nikolaidi, M., Galanis, G., 2018. Climate change, financial stability and monetary policy. Ecol. Econom. 152, 219–234. Dave, C. and S. J. Dressler (2010). Technology shocks, capital utilization and sticky prices.Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34 (10), 2179–2191. Dinda, S., 2004. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol. Econom. 49(4), 431–455. Fischer, C., Springborn, M., 2011. Emissions targets and the real business cycle: Intensity targets versus caps or taxes. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 62 (3), 352–366. Fisher, J. D. (2006). The dynamic effects of neutral and investment-specific technology shocks. Journal of political Economy 114 (3), 413–451 Forni, L., & Kiarsi, M. (2024). Optimal Climate and Monetary-Fiscal Policy in a Climate-DSGE Framework. Social Science Research. Glasure, Y.U., Lee, A.-R., 1996. The macroeconomic effects of relative prices, money, and federal spending on the relationship between US energy consumption and employment. J. Energy Dev. 22 (1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195. Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B., 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Q. J. Econ. 110 (2), 353–377. Halkos, G. E., & Paizanos, E. Α. (2013). The effect of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation. Ecological Economics, 91, 48-56. Halkos, G. E., & Paizanos, E. A. (2016). Environmental macroeconomics: economic growth, fiscal spending and environmental quality. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(3–4), 321-362. Halkos, G. E., & Paizanos, E. Α. (2016). The effects of fiscal policy on CO2 emissions: evidence from the USA. Energy Policy, 88, 317-328. Hekmati Farid, S., Rezazadeh, A., & Fattahi, F. (2018). "The indirect effect of fiscal policy on environmental quality in developing countries: A PSTR approach". Environmental Research, 8(16), 115-126. (in Persian). Heutel, G., 2012. How should environmental policy respond to business cycles? Optimal policy under persistent productivity shocks. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 15 (2), 244–264. Katircioglu, S., & Katircioglu, S. (2018). Testing the role of fiscal policy in the environmental degradation: the case of Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(6), 5616-5630. Katircioğlu, S., & Katircioğlu, S. (2018). Testing the role of urban development in the conventional environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Turkey. Applied Economics Letters, 25(11), 741-746. Khalilian, A., Haqiqat, J., Asgarpoor, H., & Behboudi, D. (2025). The effects of monetary and fiscal policies on environmental pollutants in Iran: A nonlinear approach. Civilica. https://civilica.com/doc/2028583 (In Persian). Kim, S., Patel, R., & Gupta, A. (2022). Comparing the effectiveness of financial and environmental policies in reducing air pollution. Economic Analysis Journal, 16(1), 73-90. Lacunza, H., 2008. Monetary policy and climate change: is there a role for the central bank. In: Bank Indonesia International Seminar on ‘‘Macroeconomic Impact of Climate Change: Opportunities and Challenges’’, Held in Bali. pp. 1–2. Lasani,S.B.,Mashhadi,A.,Habibnejad, S. A., & Habibi Mojandeh, M. (2020). Strategies for environmental protection in economic activities in Iran. Journal of Public Law Studies, 50(3),899-920. https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2019.262830.1801 (In Persian). López, R., Galinato, G. I., & Islam, A. (2011). Fiscal spending and the environment: theory and empirics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(2), 180-198. Lopez, R. E., & Palacios, A. (2010). Have government spending and energy tax policies contributed to make Europe environmentally cleaner? (No. 1667-2016-136345). Madah, M., & Raoufi, F. (2017). Direct and indirect effects of government expenditures on pollution: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(Special Issue No. 4), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.22034/jest.2017.10719.1-17 (In Persian). Matikainen, S., Campiglio, E., Zenghelis, D., 2017. The climate impact of quantitative easing. Policy Paper, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science. McKibbin, W.J., Morris, A.C., Panton, A., Wilcoxen, P., 2017. Climate change and monetary policy: Dealing with disruption. CAMA Working Paper. Olleh, J., Hart, D., & Veer, L. (2020). Environmental sustainability and economic development in developing countries. Sustainable Development Journal, 7(2), 88-105 Osman, R., Ali-Zadeh, M., & Zarei, N. (2020). Climate change reports and greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental and Sustainable Development Journal, 12(3), 55-70. Romer, D., (2006). Advanced Macroeconomics, McGraw-Hill. Rozenberg, J., Hallegatte, S., Perrissin-Fabert, B., Hourcade, J.-C., 2013. Funding low-carbon investments in the absence of a carbon tax. Clim. Policy 13 (1), 134–141. Saravanan, A.P., Mathimani, T., Deviram, G., Rajendran, K., Pugazhendhi, A., 2018. Biofuel policy in India: a review of policy Shahmoradi, A., & Ebrahimi, E. (2010). Evaluating the effects of monetary policies in Iran’s economy using a dynamic stochastic New Keynesian model. Quarterly Journal of Monetary and Banking Research. (In Persian). Stern, D.I., 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 32(8), 1419–1439. Taylor, J. B. (1993). Monetary policy and inflation: The Taylor rule. Journal of Macroeconomics, 15(2), 5-22. Vahabzadeh Moghadam, M. S., Emami Jaza, K., & Haji Hasani, F. (2022). The role of economic and environmental policies in preventing air pollution. Economic Modeling, 16(59). https://doi.org/10.30495/eco.2023.1976456.2719 (in Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 54 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 42 |
||