University Website Quality Improvement Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Ranking Model

[1] Angehrn, A., “Designing mature internet business strategies: The ICDT model”,  European Management Journal,  vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 361-369,1997.

[2] Atanassov, K.T., “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets”,  Fuzzy Sets and Systems,  vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87-96, 1986.

[3] Bilsel, R.U., Büyüközkan.G, “A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites: Research Articles” Int. J. Intell. Syst.,  vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1181-1197, 2006.

[4] Bouri, A., Martel, J.M. & Chabchoub, H., “A multi-criterion approach for selecting attractive portfolio”,  Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,  vol. 11, no. 4-5, pp. 269-277 , 2002.

[5] Boran, F.E., Genç, S., Kurt, M. & Akay, D., “A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method”, Expert Systems with Applications,  vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 11363-11368, 2009.

[6] Brans, J.P., Vincke, P. & Mareschal, B. , “How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method”, European Journal of Operational Research,  vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 228-238, 1986.

[7] Alanis, A., Garcia, M. & Arias, H., “An intuitionistic fuzzy system for time series analysis in plant monitoring and diagnosis” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1227-1233, 2007.

[8] Chen, Z., Yang, M., “A new multiple attribute group decision making method in intuitionistic fuzzy setting”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, In Press, Corrected Proof, 2011.

[9] Chen, Y., Li, B., “Dynamic multi-attribute decision making model based on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers”, Scientia Iranica, In Press, Corrected Proof, 2011. 

[10] CybermetricsLab. “Ranking Web of World Universities”, [cited 2011]; Available from:  www.webometrics.info,2011.

[11] De Boer, L., van der Wegen, L. & J. Telgen, “Outranking methods in support of supplier selection”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management,  vol. 4, no. 2-3, pp. 109-118,1998.

[12] Gehrke, D., Turban, E., “Determinants of successful Website design: relative importance and recommendations for effectiveness”. System Sciences, 1999. HICSS-32.Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 1999.

[13] Geldermann, J., Spengler, T. & O. Rentz, O., “Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry”,  Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 45-65,2000.

[14] Goumas, M. , Lygerou, V., “An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 606-613, 2000.

[15] Huizingh, E.K.R.E., “The content and design of web sites: an empirical study. Information & Management”, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 123-134, 2000.

[16] Le Téno, J.F. & Mareschal, B., “An interval version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of building products' design with ill-defined data on environmental quality”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 522-529,1998.

[17] Li, W.-x., Li, B.-y. , “An extension of the Promethee II method based on generalized fuzzy numbers”,  Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 5314-5319, 2010.

[18] Martin, J. M., Fajardo, W., Blanco, A., & Requena, I, “Constructing linguistic versions for the multicriteria decision support systems preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation I and II”,  International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 18, no. 7,  pp. 711-731,2003.

[19] Middleton, I., McConnell, M., & Davidson, G., “Presenting a model for the structure and content of a university World Wide Web site”, Journal of Information Science, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 219-227,1999.

[20] OEDB. “Online Education Data Base”, [cited 2011]; Available from:  http://oedb.org/rankings, 2009.

[21] Robbins, S. S., & Stylianou, A. C. “Global corporate web sites: an empirical investigation of content and design”,  Information & Management, vol. 40, no.3, pp. 205-212, 2003.

[22] Rosen, D. E., & Purinton, E., “Website design: Viewing the web as a cognitive landscape”, Journal of Business Research, vol. 57, no. 7 , pp. 787-794, 2004.

[23] Roy, B., “The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods”, Theory and Decision, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49-73, 1991.

[24] Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J., “Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 505-518, 2000.

[25] Wagner, N. L., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. M., “Who is responsible for E-Learning Success in Higher Education? A Stakeholders' Analysis”, Educational Technology & Society, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 26-36, 2008.

[26] Wang, J., “Ranking engineering design concepts using a fuzzy outranking preference model”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 161-170, 2001.

[27] Xu, Z., Yager, R.R., “Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 246-262, 2008.

[28] Xu, Z., “Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making”, Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 11, pp. 2363-2379, 2007.

[29] Zadeh, L.A., “Fuzzy sets”,  Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338-353, 1965.