پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,101 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,444 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,023,213 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,937,997 |
Questions of Self-regulation and Affect: Affectivity, Locomotion, Assessment, and Psychological Well-Being | ||
| Iranian Journal of Health Psychology | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 1، شماره 1، شهریور 2018، صفحه 37-50 اصل مقاله (1.36 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: research | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Danilo Garcia* 1؛ Ali Al Nima2؛ Erik Lindskär2؛ Alexander Jimmefors3؛ Trevor Archer3؛ Shane MacDonald4 | ||
| 1Blekinge County Council AND University of Gothenburg Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden | ||
| 2Blekinge Centre of Competence, Blekinge County Council, Karlskrona, Sweden Network for Empowerment and Well-Being, Sweden | ||
| 3Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden Network for Empowerment and Well-Being, Sweden | ||
| 4Network for Empowerment and Well-Being, Sweden | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The affectivity system is a complex dynamic system, thus, it needs to be seen as a whole-system unit that is best studied by analyzing four profiles: self-destructive (low positive affect, high negative affect), low affective (low positive affect, low negative affect), high affective (high positive affect, high negative affect), and self-fulfilling (high positive affect, low negative affect). Our purpose was to examine individual differences in psychological well-being and self-regulatory strategies (assessment/locomotion). Additionally, we investigated if the effect of psychological well-being on self-regulatory strategies was moderated by the individual’s type of profile. Method: Participants (N = 567) answered the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule, Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-being, and the Regulatory Mode Questionnaire. We conducted a Multivariate Analysis of Variance using age as covariate and Structural Equation Modeling in a multi-group for moderation analysis. Result: Individuals with a self-fulfilling profile scored highest in all psychological well-being constructs and locomotion and lowest in assessment. Nevertheless, matched comparisons showed that increases in certain psychological resources might lead to profile changes. Moreover, while some psychological well-being constructs (e.g., self-acceptance) had an effect of self-regulatory mode independently of the individual’s profile, other constructs’ (e.g., personal growth) effect on self-regulation was moderated by the person’s unique type of profile. Conclusions: Although only theoretical, these results give an idea of how leaps/changes might be extreme (i.e., from one profile at the extreme of the model to the other extreme), while other might be serial (i.e., from one profile to another depending on matching affective dimensions). | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| affective profiles model؛ assessment؛ cluster analyses؛ locomotion؛ person-centered methods؛ psychological well-being؛ self-regulatory mode | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Questions of Self-regulation and Affect: Affectivity, Locomotion, Assessment, and Psychological Well-Being | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| دانیلو گارسیا1؛ | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Background: The affectivity system is a complex dynamic system, thus, it needs to be seen as a whole-system unit that is best studied by analyzing four profiles: self-destructive (low positive affect, high negative affect), low affective (low positive affect, low negative affect), high affective (high positive affect, high negative affect), and self-fulfilling (high positive affect, low negative affect). Our purpose was to examine individual differences in psychological well-being and self-regulatory strategies (assessment/locomotion). Additionally, we investigated if the effect of psychological well-being on self-regulatory strategies was moderated by the individual’s type of profile. Method: Participants (N = 567) answered the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule, Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-being, and the Regulatory Mode Questionnaire. We conducted a Multivariate Analysis of Variance using age as covariate and Structural Equation Modeling in a multi-group for moderation analysis. Result: Individuals with a self-fulfilling profile scored highest in all psychological well-being constructs and locomotion and lowest in assessment. Nevertheless, matched comparisons showed that increases in certain psychological resources might lead to profile changes. Moreover, while some psychological well-being constructs (e.g., self-acceptance) had an effect of self-regulatory mode independently of the individual’s profile, other constructs’ (e.g., personal growth) effect on self-regulation was moderated by the person’s unique type of profile. Conclusions: Although only theoretical, these results give an idea of how leaps/changes might be extreme (i.e., from one profile at the extreme of the model to the other extreme), while other might be serial (i.e., from one profile to another depending on matching affective dimensions). | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| affective profiles model, assessment, cluster analyses, locomotion, person-centered methods, psychological well-being, self-regulatory mode | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References Amato, C., Pierro, A., Chirumbolo, A., & Pica, G. (2014). Regulatory modes and time management: How locomotors and assessors plan and perceive time. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 192-199. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12047. Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D. (1997). A personoriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9(2), 291–319. DOI: 10.1017/ S095457949700206X. Bergman, L. R., Wångby, M. (2014). The person-oriented approach: a short theoretical and practical guide. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 2:29–49. DOI: 10.12697/ eha.2014.2.1.02b. Clarke, P. J., Marshall, V. W., Ryff, C. D., Wheaton, B. (2001). Measuring psychological well-being in the Canadian study of health and aging. International Psychogeriatrics, 13(1), 79-90. DOI: 10.1017/ S1041610202008013. Cloninger, C. R. (2004). Feeling good: The science of well-being. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Cloninger, C. R. (2006). The science of well-being: an integrated approach to mental health and its disorders. World Psychiatry, 5(2), 71-76. Cloninger, C. R. (2013). What makes people healthy, happy, and fulfilled in the face of current world challenges? Mens Sana Monographs, 11(1), 16-24. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1229.109288. Cloninger, C. R., & Garcia, D. (2015). The Heritability and Development of Positive Affect and Emotionality. In M. Pluess (Ed.), Genetics of Psychological WellBeing – The Role of Heritability and Genetics in Positive Psychology (pp. 97-113). New York: Oxford University Press. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, N. M., Svrakic, D. M. (1997). Role of personality self-organization in development of mental order and disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 9(04), 881-906. De Caroli ME, Sagone E. 2016. Resilience and psychological well-being: differences for affective profiles in Italian middle and late adolescents. Revista INFAD de Psicologia, 1:149-160 DOI: 10.17060/ ijodaep.2016.n1.v1.237. Diener, E. (1984). Subjektive well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575. Di Fabio A, Bucci O. 2015. Affective profiles in Italian high school students: life satisfaction, psychological well-being, self-esteem, and optimism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1310 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01310. Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Garcia, D. (2012). The Affective Temperaments: Differences between Adolescents in the Big Five Model and Cloninger’s Psychobiological Model of Personality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13: 999– 1017. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-011-9303-5. Garcia, D., Adrianson, L., Archer, T., Rosenberg, P. (2015). The Dark Side of the Affective Profiles. SAGE Open, 5(4), DOI: 10.1177/2158244015615167. Garcia, D., Archer, T. (2012). Adolescent Life Satisfaction and Well-Being. Journal of Alternative Medicine Research, 4, 271-279. Garcia, D., Erlandsson, A. (2011). The relationship between personality and subjective well-being: Different association patterns when measuring the affective component in frequency and intensity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(6), 1023-1034. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-010-9242-6. Garcia, D., Jimmefors, A., Mousavi, F., Adrianson, L., Rosenberg, P., Archer, T. (2015). Self-regulatory Mode (Locomotion and Assessment), Well-Being (Subjective and Psychological), and exercise behavior (Frequency and Intensity) in Relation to High- School Pupils’ Academic Achievement. PeerJ, 3:e847. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.847. Garcia, D., Kerekes, N., Andersson, A. C., Archer, T. (2012). Temperament, character, and adolescents’ depressive symptoms: focusing on affect. Depression Research and Treatment. DOI :10.1155/2012/925372.Garcia, D., MacDonald, S., Archer, T. (2015). Two different approaches to the affective profiles model: median splits (variable-oriented) and cluster analysis (person-oriented). PeerJ, 3:e1380. DOI: 10.7717/ peerj.1380. Garcia, D., Rosenberg, P., Erlandsson, A., Siddiqui, A. (2010). On lions and adolescents: Affective temperaments and the influence of negative stimuli on memory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(4), 477-495. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-009-9153-6. Garcia, D., Sailer, U., Nima, A. A., Archer, T. (2016). Questions of Time and Affect: A person’s affectivity profile, time perspective, and well-being. PeerJ, 4:e1826. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1826. Garcia, D., Siddiqui, A. (2009a). Adolescents’ psychological well-being and memory for life events: Influences on life satisfaction with respect to temperamental dispositions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 407-419. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-008- 9096-3. Garcia, D., Siddiqui, A. (2009b). Adolescents’ affective temperaments: Life satisfaction, interpretation, and memory of events. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 155-167. DOI: 10.1080/17439760802399349. Graham, J. W., Donaldson, S. I. (1993). Evaluating interventions with differential attrition: the importance of nonresponse mechanisms and use of follow-up data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 119. DOI: /10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.119. Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention experiences: Relating emotions to nonemotional motivational states. In J. P. Forgas (ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 50-74). New Jersey: Erlbaum. Higgins, E. T. (2012). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Hiver, P. (2014). Attractor States. Motivational dynamics in language learning, 81, 20. Jimmefors, A., Garcia, D., Rosenberg, P., Fariba, M., Adrianson, L., Archer, T. (2014). Locomotion (Empowering) and Assessment (Disempowering) Self-regulatory Dimensions as a Function of Affective Profile in High School Students. International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology, 1: 103. DOI: 10.4172/2469-9837.1000103. Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., Spiegel, S. (2000). To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 793-815. DOI: 10.10371A1022-3514.79.5.793. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803. MacDonald, S., Kormi-Nouri, R. (2013). The affective personality, sleep, and autobiographical memories. The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice, 8:305–313. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2013.800904. Norlander, T., Bood, S., Archer, T. (2002). Performance during stress: Affective personality, age, and regularity of physical exercise. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(5), 495-508. DOI: 10.2224/ sbp.2002.30.5.495. Pierro, A., Giacomantonio, M., Pica, G., Kruglanski, A. W., Higgins, E. T. (2013). Locomotion and the preference for multi-tasking: implications for wellbeing. Motivation and Emotion, 37: 213–223. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-012-9300-y. Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Higgins, E. T. (2006). Regulatory mode and the joys of doing: Effects of ‘locomotion’ and ‘assessment’ on intrinsic and extrinsic task-motivation. European Journal of Personality, 20(5), 355-375. DOI: 10.1002/per.600. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological wellbeing. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 Zohar, A. H., Cloninger, C. R., McCraty, R. (2013). Personality and heart rate variability: Exploring pathways from personality to cardiac coherence and health. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 32-39. DOI: 10.4236/jss.2013.16007. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 394 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 256 |
||