تعداد نشریات | 41 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,131 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,681 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,625,097 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,303,317 |
An Investigation of the Effective Components Considered in Designing E-Learning Environments in Higher Education and Offering a Framework for E-Learning Instructional Design | ||
Quarterly of Iranian Distance Education Journal | ||
مقاله 1، دوره 1، شماره 4، تیر 2019، صفحه 9-24 اصل مقاله (433.76 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: scientific-research | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/idej.2019.6123 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Yousef Mahdavinasab* 1؛ Esmaeil Sadipour1؛ Mahsa Moradi2 | ||
1عضو هیات علمی | ||
2دانشجوی دکتری | ||
چکیده | ||
The Instructional design plays a key role in the effectiveness of various educational courses. Studies have shown that the Instructional design is one of the key factors that affect the quality of e-learning courses; however, not enough attention has been paid to the instructional design for designing and implementation of e-learning courses. As a result, we face courses and programs which lack quality. Therefore, exploring the effective components of e-learning designing in the literature and offering an e-learning instructional design for higher education was the purpose of this study. To this end, the study used a systematic review and some keywords related to the instructional design were searched for in scientific databases. After reviewing the articles, 33 studies, conducted between 2015 and 2019, were reviewed. The findings showed that needs analysis, content analysis, learner analysis, instructional principles and strategies, learning environment design, electronic content development, messages design, guidance and support, and assessment and evaluation were the primary components affecting the effectiveness of e-learning. Finally, having reviewed and analyzed the results, examined their relevance to the instructional design, and taken into account the experience of authors in the field of e-learning, a framework was proposed for e-learning instructional design, hoped to be utilized by researchers and e-learning practitioners. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
E-Learning؛ instructional design؛ e-learning environment design | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
بررسی مولفه های طراحی محیط های آموزش الکترونیکی در آموزش عالی و ارائه چارچوب طراحی آموزشی | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
یوسف مهدوی نسب1؛ اسماعیل سعدی پور1؛ مهسا مرادی2 | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
طراحی آموزشی نقش کلیدی در اثربخشی دوره های آموزشی مختلف دارد و پژوهش ها نشان می دهند طراحی آموزشی به عنوان یکی از مولفه های تاثیر گذار بر کیفیت دوره های آموزش الکترونیکی نیز محسوب می شود؛ با این وجود در طراحی و اجرای دوره های آموزش الکترونیکی، طراحی آموزشی به نحو شایسته مورد توجه قرار نمی گیرد و در نتیجه شاهد دوره های آموزشی فاقد کیفیت مطلوب هستیم. از این رو هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی مولفه های اثربخش طراحی آموزشی الکترونیکی از دید پژوهش های انجام شده و ارائه چارچوب طراحی آموزش الکترونیکی در آموزش عالی می باشد. بدین منظور پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از روش مرور نظام مند و جستجوی کلید واژه های مرتبط طراحی آموزش الکترونیکی در پایگاه های اطلاعاتی علمی پس از بررسی مقاله های به دست آمده، در نهایت 33 مقاله و پژوهش علمی انجام شده بین سال های 2019-2015را مورد مطالعه و واکاوی قرارد داده است. یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد که تحلیل نیاز، تحلیل محتوا و تحلیل یادگیرنده، اصول و راهبردهای آموزش، طراحی محیط یادگری، تولید محتوای الکترونیکی، طراحی پیام، راهنمایی و پشتیبانی، سنجش و ارزشیابی محتوا و دوره از مولفه های تاثیر گذار بر اثربخشی یادگیری الکترونیکی هستد. پس از بررسی و تحلیل نتایج به دست آمده و تلفیق آن با طراحی آموزشی و در نظر گرفتن تجربه نگارندگان مقاله در زمینه طراحی آموزشی و آموزش الکترونیکی، چارچوب طراحی آموزشی الکترونیکی برای استفاده پژوهشگران و دست اندرکاران آموزش الکترونیکی ارائه شده است. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
یادگیری الکترونیکی طراحی آموزشی طراحی محیط یادگیری الکترونیکی | ||
مراجع | ||
References [1]Cebeci, H. I., Yazgan, H. R., & Geyik, A. (2009). A comparative analysis of the effects of instructional design factors on student success in e-learning: multiple-regression versus neural networks. ALT-J, 17(1), pp.21-31. [2] McGorry, S. Y. (2003). Measuring quality in online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(2), pp.159-177. [3]Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons. [4] Kozuki, N., & Miyata, H. (2008). A Practice of Blended Type e-Learning Course for Studying Instructional Design on Pre-service Teacher Training. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3811-3813). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). [5] Debattista, M. (2018). A comprehensive rubric for instructional design in e-learning. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(2),pp.93–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT- 09-2017-0092. [6] Pribadi, B. A. (2016). Practices in Instructional System Design for Effective Open and Distance Learning Materials. 8(1),pp. 1–7. [7] Prempeh, B. (2016). An assessment of the design of multimedia Instructions in multimedia learning for distance learning: a case study of The Institute of Distance Learning-Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (Doctoral dissertation). [8] Xu, J., & Rees, T. (2016). Distance Learning Course Design Expectations in China and the United Kingdom. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(4), pp.250-263. [9] Aziz, A. A., Ibrahim, M., Jono, M. N. H. H., & Asarani, N. A. M. (2014, May). Incorporating instructional design and adult learning theory in the e-content development of an interactive multimedia course. In 2014 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies ,pp. 296-301. [10] Teräs, H., & Herrington, J. (2014). Neither the frying pan nor the fire: In search of a balanced authentic e-learning design through an educational design research process. The international review of research in open and distributed learning, 15( 2). [11] Rowe, F. A., & Rafferty, J. A. (2013). Instructional design interventions for supporting selfregulated learning: enhancing academic outcomes in postsecondary e-learning environments. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), pp.590-601. [12] Chow, A. S. (2013). One educational technology colleague’s journey from dotcom leadership to university e-learning systems leadership: Merging design principles, systemic change and leadership thinking. TechTrends, 57(5),pp. 64-73. [13] Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y., & Cooshna-Naik, D. (2012). Learning design implementation for distance e-learning: blending rapid e-learning techniques with activity-based pedagogies to design and implement a socio-constructivist environment. European Journal of Open, Distance and Elearning, 15(2). 22 Quarterly Journal of Iranian Distance Education (IDEJ), Vol. 1, No. 4, Spring 2019 [14] Snyder, D., & Gardner, J. (2012). Implementing a world-class e-learning technology in a graduate instructional design course. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(4), pp.389- 399. [15] Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. (2013), Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st century learning, Routledge, London. [16] Triyono, M. B. (2015). The Indicators of instructional design for e-learning in Indonesian vocational high schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, pp54-61. [17] Bashir, K., Hassan, S. S. S., Abdallah, S. S., & Nordin, M. S. (2018). Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of E-learning Instructional Design Quality. African Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 4(4), pp.21–37. [18] Farid, S., Qadir, M., Uddin Ahmed, M., & Daud Khattak, M. (2018). Critical Success Factors of E-Learning Systems: A Quality Perspective. Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning, 1– 20. Retrieved from http://pjdol.aiou.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/1-critical-successfactors-1.pdf. [19] Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (Eds.). (2012). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Boston, MA: Pearson. [20] Patel, S. R., Margolies, P. J., Covell, N. H., Lipscomb, C., & Dixon, L. B. (2018). Using Instructional Design, Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate, to Develop e-Learning Modules to Disseminate Supported Employment for Community Behavioral Health Treatment Programs in New York State. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 113. [21] https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00113. [22] Merrill, M. D. (2012). First principles of instruction. John Wiley & Sons. [23] Seif, A. A. (2011). Psychology of learning and teaching. Tehran: Agah Publication. [24] Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach (Vol. 9). Oxford University Press. [25]AbdEl-Gawad, T. S. A.-B. (2017). Recommendations for implementing quality in classless elearning systems. INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY. [26]Anderson, T & Elloumi, F. Theory and Practice of Online Learning, available at: http://www. cde. athabascau. Ca; 2004. [27]Chin, S. P. P., Tsui, E., & Lee, C. S. (2016). Enhancing learning effectiveness by adopting a knowledge-based usability guidelines. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46(1), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2014-0015 [28]Chopra, G., Madan, P., Jaisingh, P., & Bhaskar, P. (2019). Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. [29]Chou, H. L., & Chen, C. H. (2016). Beyond identifying privacy issues in e-learning settings – Implications for instructional designers. Computers and Education, 103, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.002. [30]de Leeuw, R., de Soet, A., van der Horst, S., Walsh, K., Westerman, M., & Scheele, F. (2019). How We Evaluate Postgraduate Medical E-Learning: Systematic Review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(1), e13128. https://doi.org/10.2196/13128. [31]Donnelly, R. (2016). Opportunities and challenges of interactivity in blended problem-based learning. [32]Fardanesh, H. (2006). Theoretical foundations of educational technology. Tehran, samt publication. [33]Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 11. )۲( [34]Ghonim, M. N. (2018). Evaluating the Experience of Developing and Using Building Construction E-Courses in Architectural Education. Journal Architecture & Planning, 30. )۱( Yousef Mahdavinasab et al: An Investigation of the Effective Components … 23 [35]Hadullo, K., Oboko, R., & Omwenga, E. (2018). Factors affecting asynchronous e-learning quality in developing countries university settings. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 14. )۱( [36]Heather A. Robinson, Anneliese Sheffield, Alana S. Phillips, & Michelle Moore. (2017). BIntroduction to Teaching Online^: Usability Evaluation of Interactivity in an Online Social Constructivist Course. TechTrends, 61(6), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0187-z [37]Hew, K. F. (2014). Towards a Model of Engaging Online Students: Lessons from MOOCs and Four Policy Documents. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(6), pp.425–431. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2015.v5.543. [38]Hong, J.-C., Tai, K.-H., Hwang, M.-Y., Kuo, Y.-C., & Chen, J.-S. (2017). Internet cognitive failure relevant to users’ satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance intention to use a government e-learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, pp.353–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.044 [39]Koohang, A., & Paliszkiewicz, J. (2016). E-Learning Courseware Usability: Building a Theoretical Model. Journal of Computer Information Systems,56(1),pp.55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2015.11645801 [40]Kuo, T. C. T., Chen, H. R., Hwang, W. Y., & Chen, N. S. (2015). The factors and impacts of large-scale digital content accreditations. Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), pp.29–48. [41]Lange, C. (2018). The relationship between system-provided learner control and maintained situational interest within e-learning courses. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2017-0062 [42]LEE, G., KEUM, S., KIM, M., CHOI, Y., & RHA, I. (2016). A study on the development of a MOOC design model. Educational Technology International, 17(1), pp.1–37. [43]Lehmann, R., Lutz, T., Helling-Bakki, A., Kummer, S., Huwendiek, S., & Bosse, H. M. (2019). Animation and interactivity facilitate acquisition of pediatric life support skills: A randomized controlled trial using virtual patients versus video instruction. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), p.7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1442-5 [44]Myer R.E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197 [45]Orooji, F., & Taghiyareh, F. (2018). Enhancing students knowledge building through utilising social interactions in an online learning environment. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 24(4), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2019.1568588 [46]Park, T., & Lim, C. (2018). Design principles for improving emotional affordances in an online learning environment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1–15. [47]Park, T., & Lim, C. (2019). Design principles for improving emotional affordances in an online learning environment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9560-7 [48]Rigas, D. & Algahtani, A. (n.d.). Multimodal e-Assessment Interfaces: An Empirical Investigation. [49]Sadeghi, S. H. (2017). E-Learning Instructional Design Practice in. IADIS International Conference E-Learning 2017, pp.13–24. [50]Said, A., & Syarif, E. (2016). The Development of Online Tutorial Program Design Using Problem-Based Learning in Open Distance Learning System. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 7, pp. 222–229. [51]Saleem Haddad, F. (2018). Examining the effect of learning management system quality and perceived usefulness on student’s satisfaction. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(23), 8034–8044. Retrieved from www.jatit.org [52]Song, H. (2004). The perceptions of college students regarding the instructional quality of online courses delivered via WebCT. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, 24 Quarterly Journal of Iranian Distance Education (IDEJ), Vol. 1, No. 4, Spring 2019 Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2141-2146). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). [53]Sun, J. C. Y., & Chang, K. Y. (2016). Design and development of a location-based mobile learning system to facilitate English learning. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(3), pp.345– 357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0392-x. [54]Taveira-Gomes, T., Ferreira, P., Taveira-Gomes, I., Severo, M., & Ferreira, M. A. (2016). What are we looking for in computer-based learning interventions in medical education? A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(8),pp.1–21. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5461. [55]Trenholm, S., Alcock, L., & Robinson, C. (2015). An investigation of assessment and feedback practices in fully asynchronous online undergraduate mathematics courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(8), 1197–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1036946. [56]V. Nikoli´c, J. Kaljevic, S.a. Jovi´c, D. Petkovi´c, M. Milovanˇcevi´c, L. Dimitrov, P. Dachkinov, Survey of quality models of e-learning systems, Physica A (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.07.058. [57]van Nuland, S. E., & Rogers, K. A. (2016). E-learning, dual-task, and cognitive load: The anatomy of a failed experiment. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(2),pp.186–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1576. [58]Zhang, W., & Duan, C. (2017). Construction and Implementation of Institutional E-learning Development Framework in Continuing Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology Develo. [59] Costley, J., & Lange, C. (2017). The mediating effects of germane cognitive load on the relationship between instructional design and students’ future behavioral intention. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2),pp. 174–187 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,747 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,621 |