پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,186 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,193 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 19,152,824 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,261,312 |
The Legal Verdict on Meeting and Dialogue before Marriage | ||
| Quran and Religious Enlightenment | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 1، شماره 2، دی 2021، صفحه 113-138 اصل مقاله (966.03 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: The scientific research paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/quran.2020.7754 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Abedeen Momeni* | ||
| . Associate Professor of Jurisprudence and Principles, University of Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Meeting of marriage candidates each other before marriage to reach a final decision to marry or cancel it is so popular in the Islamic society of Iran that it is not even thought to be “denied” and even the most fanatical religious person cannot forbid it; While most jurisprudential schools have allowed seeing suddenly the girl’s face and hands to wrists for the proposal, and some have allowed the girl to see the boy’s face as well, provided that the proposal does not enjoy her if it happens involuntarily and by force, some have prescribed it only once for the proposal to see the girl, and some have prescribed to see her several times. Some jurists have prescribed seeing the female body more than the face and hands to wrists, and seeing the girl’s body behind a lace covering even with pleasure. However, most schools have forbidden meeting and talking, and some jurists have allowed it on the condition of not committing sin. The study of the opinions of all jurisprudential schools shows that these opinions are inferential and based on their own ijtihad. They are not an indisputable legal verdict. They are based on restricting marriage to the pleasure and enjoyment of couples, ignoring other aspects of marriage and limiting the relationship between men and women to a pleasurable relationship. Criticizing the jurisprudential opinions and their principles, it is concluded that the ruling to allow the marriage candidates to meet and talk to the extent of a definite. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
CONCLUSION Reflecting on the rational and narrative arguments and opinions of Islamic jurists, no specific and clear edict on permission or sanctity has been obtained regarding the meeting of marriage candidates with each other and discussing and deciding whether to agree or reject the marriage. Although it is recommended for the man who is going to marry to see the woman, but there is no explicit edict to meet and talk. The jurists believe that any seeing and looking at a man and a woman, unconsciously and forcibly, stimulates a man's lust and makes him enjoy the woman. A woman may also be aroused and enjoy in case of looking at a man. According to this view and attitude, some have absolutely forbidden the view of men and women to each other, while others have conditioned the impermissibility of non-mahram men and women looking at each other subject to the existence of "fear and doubt" and the fear of falling into sin of non-religious pleasure. They have agreed that it is permissible to look at the face and hands up to the wrists if there is certainty about not committing the sin of gratification. On this basis, most jurists believe that looking at the suitor in case of knowledge or the possibility of enjoying the proposee has been allowed by the Shari'ah and it is not considered a sin and they consider the suitor's look permissible. Some, however, have considered the woman's look at the suitor forbidden and haram, whereas others have considered it permissible. Due to the differences between the jurists, it has been concluded that the edict on the absolute or conditional permission or sanctity of marriage candidates to each other is an ijtihad and inferential edict and is not an explicit and prescribed edict of Shari’ah. On the other hand, all interactions between men and women that are limited to gratifying and enjoying are far from human behavior. It is not that every look and encounter between men and women, unintentionally and by force, leads to taking pleasure and enjoying. Humans can have all kinds of legal, cultural, scientific, religious, social, political, and similar relationships and interactions with each other, and this relationship cannot be established between people of the same sex in all circumstances; a woman may need to see a man for religious, legal, medical, commercial, and other matters. By behaving wisely in such needs and communications, how can human beings turn it into an animal behavior which is just enjoying? Marriage is also a wise and prudent decision and action in the destiny of wise people. Marriage is the foundation of a momentous living in a lifetime for both parties. Why build a momentous foundation for life, in which prestige, mental health, economic status of life, socio-scientific status and so on are effected, with the lowest and most ridiculous look and behavior? Why should marriage be limited to hedonistic behavior? Therefore, because all aspects of human activity such as religious, social, professional, spiritual, prestige and such things are affected in some way by marriage, and in the Shari'ah, the religion of Islam, there is no special view of marriage, that is, it is not said that marriage is a "hedonistic contract" and the enjoyment of a couple from each other; Rather it is possible to achieve human perfection through marriage, and Islam has also considered the sublime aspects of marriage, and did not prohibit marriage candidates from meeting each other to make decisions. The fatwas issued to ban them from visiting were not based on the nature of marriage, but on the possible side-effects of communication. Although those side-effects have been magnified. Considering the nature of marriage and giving importance and issuing rulings based on the nature of marriage and its moral, human and religious effects, is preferable to considering its possible side-effects. Therefore, the result of the study and research is that not only there is not any ban for marriage candidates to meet each other, considering the nature of marriage and its moral, human, social and religious effects, but also it is recommended to avoid emotional marriage and momentary susceptibility and to think about marriage wisely, consciously, thoughtfully and philosophically, to talk to each other and consult with those wise around them. To decide to marry each other or to give up getting married wisely so that there would no personality, religious, social, economic, spiritual or similar costs for them. The advice to a wise marriage is to express all the issues of life, that is, to exercise the rights of marriage, to live morally with each other, to forgive and ignore each other’s mistake | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Marriage؛ Meeting؛ Permission؛ Forbiddance | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| حکم شرعی دیدار و گفت‌وگو برای ازدواج | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| عابدین مومنی | ||
| دانشیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| دیدار داوطلبین ازدواج پیش از عقد نکاح جهت رسیدن به تصمیم قطعی برای ازدواج یا انصراف از آن، چنان در جامعه اسلامی ایران مقبولیت دارد که حتی تصور «منکر» بودن آن نمی‌شود و متعصَّب‌ترین دین‌دار نیز، توان نهی آن را ندارد؛ درحالی‌که غالب مذاهب فقهی دیدن- به‌صورت غافل‌گیرانه- چهره و دست‌ها تا مچ زن را برای خواستگار جایز و بعضی اجازه داده‌اند که زن نیز ظاهر مرد را ببیند مشروط برعدم لذت‌بردن خواستگار. و چنانچه خارج از اراده، و قهری رخ دهد، بعضی فقط یک‌بار این‌گونه دیدن زن را برای خواستگار، و بعضی چندبار دیدن آن را تجویز نموده‌اند. فقیهانی هم بیش از چهره و دست‌ها تا مچ، دیدن اندام زن باوجود پوشش نازک حتّی با رخ‌دادن لذت خواستگار را تجویز کرده‌اند، اما دیدار و گفتگو را غالب مذاهب منع نموده و بعضی از فقیهان با شرط عدم مفسده مجاز دانسته‌اند. بررسی آرای همه مذاهب فقهی نشان می‌دهد که آرای اظهارشده استنباطی و اجتهادی است و حکم مسلّم شرع نیست و مبتنی بر منحصرکردن نکاح به کام‌جویی و لذت‌بردن زوجین شده و دیگر جنبه‌های نکاح را نادیده گرفته‌اند و ارتباط زن و مرد را منحصر به رابطه التذاذی دانسته‌اند. با نقد آرای فقهی و مبانی آن، سرانجام حکم به جواز دیدار و گفتگوی داوطلبان ازدواج تا حدّ تصمیم قطعی منجر به ازدواج یا انصراف از آن را با بیانات شرعی و متون کتاب و سنّت منافی ندانسته‌اند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| ازدواج, دیدار, جواز, حرمت, حکم | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
The Holy Quran. Ibn Hazm al-Andalusī, Ahmad al-Muhallā (1436 AH), Al-Nāsikh wal-Mansūkh fi al-Qur'an, Research: Abd al-Ghaffār Sulayman al-Bondārī, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. Ibn Abdul-Salaam, ‘Izz al-Dīn Abdul Aziz (1436 AH), Qawā’id al-Ahkām fī Islāh al-Anām Known as Al-Qawā’id al-Kubrā, Research: Nazīseh Kamal Hammād and Uthmān Jum'ah Zamīrīyah, Damascus: Dar al-Qalam. Ibn Fahd Hillī Ahmad ibn Muhammad (1411 AH), Al-Muhadhab al-Bāri’, Qom: Islamic Publications. Ibn Qudāmeh Maqdasī, Muwaffaq al-Dīn Abdullah (1426 AH), Al-Kāfī fī Fiqh al-Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Beirut: dar al-Fikr, 1st ed. Ibn Muflih Maqdasī, Muhammad (2004), Kitāb al-Furū', Research: Ali Mardāwī and Ra’id ibn Sabrī, Oman: Bayt al-Afkār. Abu Zuhreh, Muhammad (2005), Al-Ahwāl a-Shakhsīyah, Cairo: Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi, 2nd ed. Ahmad, Zīyādah Asmā’ Muhammad (1421 AH), Dawr al-Mar’a al-Sīyāsīyah fī Ahd al-Nabī (PBUH) wa al-Khulafā’ al-Rashidīn, Cairo: Dar al-Slaam, 1st ed. Hurr 'Amili, Muhammad (1412 AH), Wasa’il Al-Shi'a 'Ila Tahsil Masa’il Al-Shari'ah, Qom: 'Āl al-Bayt Institute li- 'Ihya’ al-Turath al-Arabi. Ansari, Murtada (1415 AH), Kitāb al-Nikāh, Qom: World Congress of Sheikh Ansari. Bahrānī, Yūsuf, (1406 AH), Al-Hada'īq al-Naḍirah fi 'Ahkām al-'Itrah al-Tāhirah, Qom: Mu'assissah al-Nashr al-'Islāmī. Bukhārī, Muhammad ibn Ismael (nd), Al-Sahīh, Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifa. Bultājī, Muhammad (nd), Makānat al-Mar’ah fi al-Qur’an al-Karīm wal-Sunnat al-Sahīha. Tamtartāshī, Haskafī and Ibn Abedīn, Muhammad Amin (1431 AH), Tanwīr al-Absār, Beirut: Dar 'Ihyā’ al-Turāth al-Arabi. Jubba'ī Āmilī, Zein al-Dīn (Shahīd Thānī)(nd), Al-Rawdat al-Bahīyah fī Sharh al-Lum'at al-Dameshqīyah, Isfahan: Imam Amir al-Mu’minīn Library. Jafarian, Rasoul (2007), Rasā’il Hijābīyah, Qom: Dalil-e Ma, 2nd ed. Husseini Hisnā Demashqī, Taqī al-Dīn (nd), Kifāyat al-Akhyār fī Hall-i Ghāyat al-Ikhtisār, Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah. Hillī, Ja'far ibn Hassan (1403 AH), Sharā’I’ al-Islām fī Masā’il al-Halāl wal-Harām, Research: Abdul Hussein Muhammad Ali, Beirut: Dar al-Adwā’, 2nd ed. Hillī, Hassan ibn Yusuf (2002), Mukhtalaf al-Shi’a fi al-Ahkām al-Sharī’ah, Qom: Boostan-e Ketab, 2nd ed. Hillī, Hassan ibn Yusuf (1414 AH), Nahj al-Haq wa Kashf al-Sidq, Qom: Dar al-Hijrah, 4th ed. Hillī, Hassan ibn Yusuf (1421 AH), Tahrīr al-Ahkām al-Shar’īyah alā madhhab aImāmīyah, Research: Ibrahim Bahadori, Qom: Imam Sadeq Institute. Hillī, Hassan ibn Yusuf (1435 AH), Tadhkirat al-Fuqahā, Qom: Qom: 'Āl al-Bayt Institute li- 'Ihya’ al-Turath al-Arabi. Hillī, Muhammad ibn Hassan (1389 AH), Īdāh al-Fawā’id fī Sharh Ishkālāt al-Qawā’id, Qom: Ismailian. Hillī, Muhammad (1424 AH), Ma'ālim al-Dīn fī Fiqh Āl-i Yāsīn, Research: Ibrahim Bahadori, Qom: Imam Sadeq Institute. Khomeini, Rouhullah Mousawī (2005), Tahrīr al-Wasīlah, Tehran: The Institute for Revival and Printing of Imam Khomeini’s Works, 2nd ed. Dehlawī, Shah Walīyullah (1433 AH), Research: Saeed Ahmad Balon Bouri, Beirut: Dar Ibn Kathīr, 2nd ed. Sabzevari, Muhammad Bagher (1423 AH), Kifāyat al-Fiqh, Research: Murtada Vaezi Araki, Qom: Al-Nashr al-Islāmī Institute. Sarakhs, Shams al-Dīn (1409 AH), Kitāb al-Mabsout, Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah. Sifārīnī Nablusī, Muhammad (1428 AH), Kashf al-Lathām Sharh ‘Umdat al-Ahkam, Research: Nour al-Din Tālib, Damascues: Dar al-Nawādir. Siwarī, Meqdād ibn Abdullah (1964), Kanz al-Irfān fī Fiqh al-Qur’an, NP. Sharabīnī Khatīb, Muhammad (nd), Mughni al-Muhtāj ilā Ma'rifat al-Ma'ānīAlfāz al-Minhāj, Beirut: dar 'Ihyā’ al-Turāth al-Arabi. Shattā damyātī Kubrā, Uthmān (1429 AH), Hashī 'I'ānat al-Tālibīn alā Hall-i Alfāz Fath al-Mu'īn, Research: Abd al-Razzāq Shaouz al-Najm, Syria: Dar al-Fayhā’. Shawkān, Muhammad ibn Ali (1434 AH), Al-Sayl al-Jarrār al-Mutadaffiqalā Hadā’iq al-Azhār, Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm. Sadr al-Dīn Muhammad (Mullā Sadrā) (2001), Al-Hikmat al-Mutaālīyah, Research: Maqsoud Mohammadi, Tehran: Sadra Islamic Wisdom Foundation. Sanānī, Muhammad (1430 AH), Sub al-Salaam Al-Muwassalat 'ilā Bulū’ al-Marām, Cairo: Dar al-Āfāq al-Arabīyah. Tūsī, Muhammad ibn Hassan (1400 AH), Al-Nihāyah fī Mujarrad al-Fiqh wal-Fatāwī, Beirut: Dar al-Kitāb al-Arabi, 2nd ed. Tūsī, Muhammad ibn Hassan (2009), Al-Mabsūt fī Fiqh al-Imāmīyah, Al-Maktabat al-Murtadawīyah, 2nd ed. Qurtubī, Muhammad ibn Ahmad (nd), Al-Jāmi' li Ahkām al-Qurān, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. Ghalechi, Mohammad (1417 AH), Rawwās Mawsū'a Fiqh Ali ibn Abi Tālib, Riyadh: Dar al-Nafā’is. Āmiī, Muhammad ibn Makkī (Shahīd Thānī) (1410 AH), Al-Lum'at al-Damishqīyah fī Fiqh al-Imāmīyah, Beirut: Fiqh al-Shī'ah Institute. ‘Asqalānī, Shahāb al-Dīn ibn Ahmad (nd), Al-'Isābah fī tamyīz al-Sahāba, cairo: np. Ghuryānī ‘Asqalānī, Sādiq Abdurrahman (1426 AH), Mudawwanat al-Fiqh al-Mālikī wa Adillatuh, Beirut: Al-Rayān Institute. Ghirnātī Mālikī, Ibrāhim ibn Mousā (1425 AH), Al-Muwāfiqāt fī 'Usūl al-Sharī’ah, Research: Abdullah Deraz, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah. Kattānī Maghribī, Muhammad Abdul hay (1434 AH), Kitāb al-Tarātīb al-Idrāyīyah, Beirut: Shirkat Dar al-Bashā’ir al-Islāmīyah, 2nd ed. Golpayeganī, Mohammad Reza (1985), Majma' al-Masā’il, Qom: Dar al-Qur’an al-Karīm Institute, 2nd ed. Marghīyānī, Ali (1429 AH), Al-Hidāyah Sharh Bidāyat al-Mubtadī, Karachi: Maktabat al-Bushrā, 2nd ed. Matarzchi, Mahmoud (1434 AH), Al-Fiqh al-Mālikī wa Adillatuh, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. Mousalī, Abdullah (2015), Al-Ikhtīyār li-Ta'līl al-Mukhtār, Syria: Nūr al-Sabāh. Najafī, Muhammad Hassan (1987), Jawāhir al-Kalām fī Sharh Sharā’i' al-Islam, Tehran: Al-Maktabat al-Islāmīyah, 2nd ed. Nūrī Tabrisī, Hussein (1407 AH), Mustadrak al-Wasā’il wa Mustanbit al-Masā’il, Qom: Āl al-Bayt (AS) li Ihyā’ al-Turāth Institute. Nayshābūrī, Muslim (nd), Al-Sahīh, Research: Al-Nawawī, Dar Ihyā’ al-Turāth al-Arabi, 4th ed.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 395 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 226 |
||