اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات41
تعداد شماره‌ها1,105
تعداد مقالات9,470
تعداد مشاهده مقاله17,073,990
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,965,405
الفتی, امیر. (1400). تاثیر حکمرانی خوب بر سلامت سازمانی با نقش میانجی پاسخگویی در وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران. فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 10(3), 77-88. doi: 10.30473/arsm.2022.8529
امیر الفتی. "تاثیر حکمرانی خوب بر سلامت سازمانی با نقش میانجی پاسخگویی در وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران". فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 10, 3, 1400, 77-88. doi: 10.30473/arsm.2022.8529
الفتی, امیر. (1400). 'تاثیر حکمرانی خوب بر سلامت سازمانی با نقش میانجی پاسخگویی در وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران', فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 10(3), pp. 77-88. doi: 10.30473/arsm.2022.8529
الفتی, امیر. تاثیر حکمرانی خوب بر سلامت سازمانی با نقش میانجی پاسخگویی در وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران. فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 1400; 10(3): 77-88. doi: 10.30473/arsm.2022.8529

تاثیر حکمرانی خوب بر سلامت سازمانی با نقش میانجی پاسخگویی در وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران

فصلنامه علمی پژوهش­های کاربردی در مدیریت ورزشی
مقاله 6، دوره 10، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 39، اسفند 1400، صفحه 77-88    اصل مقاله (362.02 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/arsm.2022.8529
نویسنده
امیر الفتی*
دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرمانشاه، کرمانشاه، ایران.
چکیده
هدف از این تحقیق تاثیر حکمرانی خوب بر سلامت سازمانی با نقش میانجی پاسخگویی در وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران بود. پژوهش حاضر از نوع توصیفی – همبستگی و مبتنی بر مدل معادلات ساختاری بوده و به لحاظ هدف کاربردی و روش جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، میدانی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل تمام کارکنان وزارت ورزش و جوانان می باشد که تعداد آن‌ها برابر 900 نفر بود که با توجه به جدول مورگان 269 نفر به روش تصادفی به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شدند. به منظور گردآوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه‌های استاندارد سلامت سازمانی سینگ و جها (2018)، حکمرانی خوب مقیمی و رمضان (1390) و پاسخگویی سازمانی الفتی (1398) استفاده شد. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری رویکرد واریانس محور استفاده شد. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد مدل تحقیق از برازش مناسبی برخوردار است و حکمرانی خوب و پاسخگویی به طور مستقیم بر سلامت سازمانی اثر مثبت و معناداری دارد. همچنین حکمرانی خوب اثر مثبت و معناداری بر پاسخگویی دارد. علاوه بر این مشخص گردید که حکمرانی بر سلامت سازمانی از طریق پاسخگویی اثر مثبت و معناداری دارد. با توجه به نتایج تحقیق مدیران وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران می‌توانند با افزایش حکمرانی خوب و پاسخگویی سازمانی، سلامت سازمانی را در وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران ارتقا دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
حکمرانی خوب؛ سلامت سازمانی؛ پاسخگویی؛ وزارت ورزش و جوانان
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Impact of Good Governance on Organizational Health with the Mediating Role of Accountability in the Ministry of Sport and Youth of Iran
نویسندگان [English]
Amir Olfati
PhD. in Sports Management Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده [English]
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of good governance on organizational health with the mediating role of accountability in the Ministry of Sport and Youth of Iran. The present study is a descriptive-correlational based on structural equation modeling and practical in terms of purpose and is field method in terms of data collection. The statistical population of the study consisted of all employees of the Ministry of Sport and Youth of which the number was 900 and 269 persons were selected randomly according to Morgan table. In order to collect data, standard questionnaires of organizational health of Singh & Jha (2018), Good Governance of Moghimi and Ramazan (2011) and Olfti (2019) Organizational Accountability were used. Structural equation modeling of variance-based approach was used to analyze the data. The results showed that the research model has a good fit and good governance and accountability have a positive and significant effect on organizational health. Good governance also has a positive and significant effect on accountability. In addition, it was found that governance has a positive and significant effect on organizational health with mediating role of accountability. According to the results of the research, managers of the Ministry of Sport and Youth of Iran can improve organizational health in the Ministry of Sport and Youth of Iran by increasing good governance and organizational accountability.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Good Governance, Health, Accountability, Ministry of Sports and Youth
مراجع
  • Ahani, M., Mosakhani, M., Najafbeigi, R., & Afsharkazemi, M. A. (2019). “Cluster Analysis of Iran's Position in the World and Future Trends Based on Good Governance Components”. Scientific Journal Management System, 30(116), 99-118.
  • Allan A, Rieu-Clarke A. (2010). Good governance and a legal perspective. Irrigation and Drainage Systems; 24(3-4): 239-248.
  • Ackert, L. F., Church, B. K., Venkataraman, S., & Zhang, P. (2019). The joint impact of accountability and transparency on managers’ reporting choices and owners’ reaction to those choices. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(2), 130-145.
  • Araei, v., Ghasemi, a., & Moeininfar, y. (2018). “Policy Recommendations about Barriers of Good Governance in Public Affairs (Case Study: Governorate and Municipality of Minoodasht) ”. Strategic Studies of public policy, 7(25), 113-133.
  • Azab Daftar, A., & Rajabi Farjad, H. (2019). “Effect of Good Governance on Organizational Health According to the Mediating Role of Political Behavior”. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 10(1), 141-169.
  • Azeez, A. (2011). “Endangering good governance for sustainable democracy: the continuing struggle against corruption in Nigeria. Jourrnal in Research, Peace, Gender and Development, 1(11), 307-314.
  • Azimi, h., & Fallahi, l. (2019). “The Effect of Work Conscience on Organizational Health and the Mediating Role of Core Value”. Scientific Journal Management System, 27(1), 169-188.
  • Aziz, M. A. A., Ab Rahman, H., Alam, M. M., & Said, J. (2015). “Enhancement of the accountability of public sectors through integrity system, internal control system and leadership practices: A review study”. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 163-169.
  • Christie, N. V. (2018). “A comprehensive accountability framework for public administrators. Public Integrity, 20(1), 80-92.
  • Dass, M., & Abbott, K. (2008). Modelling new public management in an Asian context: public sector reform in Malaysia”. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 30(1), 59-82.
  • Davari, A., & Rezazadeh, A. (2018). “Modeling Structural Equations with PLS Software”. 2nd Edition, Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi Publications.
  • Epstein, G. S., & Gang, I. N. (2019). “Inequality, good governance, and endemic corruption”. International Tax and Public Finance, 26(5), 999-1017.
  • Faúndez, J. (Ed.). (2016). “Good government and law: Legal and institutional reform in developing countries”. Springer.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Han, Y., & Hong, S. (2019). “The impact of accountability on organizational performance in the US federal government: The moderating role of autonomy”. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(1), 3-23.
  • Hassani, m. (2015). “THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING ON ACCOUNTABILITY AND JOB PERFORMANCE OF MEDICAL STAFF”. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Urmia University of Medical Sciences, 12(11), 996-988.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). “The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing”. In New challenges to international marketing(pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Janssens, M. R., & Kaptein, M. (2016). “The ethical responsibility of companies towards animals: A study of the expressed commitment of the Fortune Global 200”. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (63), 42-72.
  • Kline, P. (2014). “An easy guide to factor analysis”. Routledge.
  • Kimani, D., Ullah, S., Kodwani, D., & Akhtar, P. (2020). Analysing corporate governance and accountability practices from an African neo-patrimonialism perspective: Insights from Kenya. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 102260.
  • Lourenço, R. P. (2015). “An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability”. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 323-332.
  • Malek al-Sadati, S. (2008). “The Impact of Good Governance (Based on World Bank Indicators) on Economic Growth in Selected Countries (1996-2005) ”. Master Thesis, Allameh Tabataba'i University.
  • Morrissey Oliver (2012), Governance, Private Investment and Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries, World Development, 40 (3), Pages 437–445.
  • Midri, A., & Khairkhahan, J. (2004). “Good governance, the foundation of development”. Parliamentary Research Center Publications, First Edition.
  • Mobarak, A., & Azar paivand, Z. (2009). “A Look at Good Governance Indicators from the Islamic Perspective and Its Impact on Growth Economic”. Islamic Economics, 9(36), 179-208.
  • Mulgan, R. (2003). “Holding power to account: accountability in modern democracies”. Springer.
  • Özer, Ö., Uğurluoğlu, Ö., Saygılı, M., & Sonğur, C. (2019). “The impact of work alienation on organizational health: A field study in health sector”. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 12(1), 18-24.
  • Robbins S. P. & Judge T. (2016) “Organizational Behavior”, London: Pearson International Edition .
  • Rahimi Sadegh, Somayeh (2020). The Impact of Organizational Transparency Components on Organizational Health in the General Department of Sports and Youth of Kerman Province, Master Thesis, Javid Higher Institute.
  • Sabbagh Kermani, M., & Basakha, M. (2010). “Good Governance and Efficacy of Public Spending: Case of OIC Healthcare and Education Expenditures”. Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat- E- Eghtesadi), 44(1), 109-130.
  • salehi, m., & Abdollahi, M. (2018). “Analysis of the impact of public accountability on the policy of promoting administrative health and organizational transparency in the public sector (Case study: Ministry of Industry, Mine and Trade of the Islamic Republic of Iran)”. Public Policy In Administration, 9(2(30)), 23-41.
  • Shahtalebi, M. A. T. B. (2014). “The relationship between organizational health and organizational maturity among educational organizations”.  Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci, 4(2), 191-200.
  • Singh, A., & Jha, S. (2018). “Scale development of organizational health construct”. Global Business Review, 19(2), 357-375.
  • Soleimani, A., & Arianfar, M. (2014). “Strategies for Promoting Administrative Health Based on Good Governance Model with Emphasis on the Role of Social Media”. 3rd Annual National Conference on Modern Management Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul Branch.
  • Taheriattar, G. (2017). “Ethical Leadership as a Facilitator of Good Governance Realization”. Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management, 6(1), 115-130.
  • Taleb Nia, GH., & Akrami, M. (2014). “The effect of accrual accounting system on the degree of accountability in Iranian universities and higher education institutions through the implementation of operational budgeting system”. 2nd National Conference of Approach to Accounting, Management & Economics, Islamic Azad University Fouman and Shaft Branch.
  • Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004, June). “A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modelling”. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS scientific meeting(Vol. 1, pp. 739-742).
  • Vian T, Bicknell W. (2014). Good governance and budget reform in Lesotho Public Hospitals: performance, root causes and reality. Health Policy and Planning; 29(6); 673–684.
  • Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1974). “Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions”. Educational and Psychological measurement, 34(1), 25-33.
  • Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). “Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration”. MIS quarterly, 177-195.
  • Xenidis, Y., & Theocharous, K. (2014). “Organizational health: Definition and assessment”. Procedia Engineering, 85, 562-570.
  • Yaghoubi, E. (2017). “Good Governance and Health Promoting of Administrative System; Explaining the Role of Electronic Government”. Management Researches, 10(37), 203-222.
  • Zumofen R. (2015). “Redefining accountability in a strategic perspective to enhance performance”. InInternational Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM) conference.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 528
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 370


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب