تعداد نشریات | 41 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,131 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,682 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,639,145 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,308,512 |
بررسی رابطه گرایش به تسهیم دانش با ویژگیهای شخصیتی کتابداران کتابخانههای عمومی استان همدان | ||
پژوهش های کتابخانه های دیجیتالی و هوشمند | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 8، شماره 1 (پیاپی 29)، فروردین 1400، صفحه 39-48 اصل مقاله (1.24 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/mrs.2022.63443.1507 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
مریم سلامی1؛ مریم احمدی نسب* 2؛ وحیده حجهفروش3 | ||
1استادیار، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانششناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران. | ||
2دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانششناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران | ||
3کارشناس ارشد، گروه روانسنجی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد، تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: پژوهش حاضر به بررسی رابطه ویژگیهای شخصیتی (روانرنجوری، برونگرایی، گشودگی، سازگاری و وظیفهشناسی) با گرایش به تسهیم دانش در کتابداران کتابخانههای عمومی استان همدان پرداخته است. روششناسی پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر کاربردی بوده که با روش پیمایشی و با ابزار پرسشنامه انجام شده است. آلفای کرونباخ برای پرسشنامههای پنج عاملی شخصیت و اشتراک دانش مورد استفاده و پایایی ابزار پژوهش مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش تمامی کتابداران کتابخانههای عمومی استان همدان به تعداد 170 نفر بود که از طریق نمونهگیری به روش نمونهگیری تصادفی طبقهای سهمی صورت گرفت و 120 پرسشنامه پاسخ داده شد. برای بررسی فرضیههای پژوهش نیز از آزمونهای آماری نظیر کرونباخ، کولمروگ– اسمیرنوف، اسپیرمن و غیره استفاده گردید. یافتهها: یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد که کتابداران با ویژگی شخصیتی وظیفهشناسی (میانگین=53/40)، برونگرایی (میانگین=30/40)، گشودگی (میانگین=16/38) و سازگاری بالا (میانگین= 02/37) گرایش بیشتری به تسهیم دانش و همکاری در سازمان دارند. همچنین ویژگی شخصیتی روانرنجوری کتابداران (میانگین=79/33) با تسهیم دانش رابطه عکس داشته و هرچه این ویژگی در افراد کاهش یابد گرایش بیشتری به تسهیم دانش دارند. بین ویژگیهای شخصیتی و گرایش به تسهیم دانش مقدار ضریب همبستگی برابر با 207/0r = در سطح معنیداری 023/0> P به دست آمد که نشانگر همبستگی و رابطه مستقیمی بین ویژگیهای شخصیتی و گرایش به تسهیم دانش در افراد است. بحث و نتیجهگیری: نتایج پژوهش رابطه بین ویژگیهای شخصیتی و گرایش به تسهیم دانش در کتابداران را تأیید کرده و نشان داد که هر چه افراد به سمت ویژگیهای مختلف شخصیتی (وظیفهشناسی، برونگرایی، گشودگی و دلپذیری (پیش روند تسهیم دانش آنها افزایش مییابد که این امر میتواند بسترساز ایجاد فرهنگ و مشارکت در سازمان شود و تأثیر قابلتوجهی بر تسهیم دانش کتابداران داشته باشد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
ویژگیهای شخصیتی؛ تسهیم دانش؛ کتابداران؛ کتابخانههای عمومی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Investigating the Relationship between Knowledge Tendency and Personality Traits of Public Librarians in Hamadan Province | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Maryam Salami1؛ Maryam Ahmadinasab2؛ Vahideh Hajjehfrosh3 | ||
1Assistant Professor, Department of Information Science and Knowledge. Payame Noor Uuniversity, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Information Science and Knowledge. Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
3MSc. Department of Psychometrics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between personality characteristics (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, adaptation and conscientiousness) and the tendency to share knowledge in librarians of Hamadan Public Library. Methodology: This is an applied research that was carried out with a survey method and a questionnaire, so Cronbach's alpha was used for NEOPI-FF five-factor personality questionnaires and knowledge sharing and the the reliability of the research tool was confirmed. The statistical population consisted of 170 librarians of public libraries in Hamadan Province.Statistical tests such as Cronbach, Kolmrog-Smirnov, Spearman, etc were used to test the research hypotheses. Findings: The findings of this study indicated that librarians who are conscientious and dutiful (mean = 40.53), extroverted (mean = 40.30), open (mean = 38.16) and high adaptable (mean = 37.02) are more tend to share knowledge and cooperation in the organization. Furthermore the personality characteristic of librarians' neuroticism has an inverse relationship with knowledge sharing (mean = 33.79) The more this feature decreases in librarians , the more they tend to share knowledge. There was a correlation coefficient between personality characteristics and the tendency to share knowledge ( r = 0.207 ), at a significant level of P <0.023, which indicates a positive correlation between personality characteristics and the tendency to share knowledge among librarians. Conclusion: The results of the study confirmed the relationship between personality characteristics and the tendency to share knowledge among librarians. In addition, the more different personality characteristics (conscientiousness, extraversion, openness and pleasantness) are strengthened in librarians, the tendency to share their knowledge increases and this can become the basis for creating a culture of participation in the organization and have a significant impact on the knowledge sharing of librarians. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Personality characteristics, Knowledge sharing, Librarians, Public libraries | ||
مراجع | ||
Aharony, N. (2011). Librarians’ attitudes toward knowledge management. College & Research Libraries, 72(2), 111-126. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136. Al-Kurdi, F. O., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabib, T. (2020). The role of Askari, N., Khalatbari, M., & Hashemianzadeh, S. (2020). Meta-analysis of knowledge sharing backgrounds in Iranian organizations. Scientific Journal of Strategic Organizational Knowledge Management, 3(1), 113-145. (In Persian) Bahrami, M., Rahimi, S., & Zare, A. (2020). Investigating the Relationship between Knowledge Enabling Factors and Knowledge Creation among Public Library Librarians. Journal of Library and Information Science, 10(1), 35-54. (In Persian) Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationship between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 111-118. Biranvand, A., Shabani, A., & Mohammadi Provincial, M. (2017). Investigating the effective factors in sharing the knowledge of librarians and presenting a model for predicting their behavior (Case study: Public libraries of Fars province). Library and Information Science Studies, 10 (91), 31-84. (In Persian) Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 15(2), 14-21. Boland, R. J., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1995). Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing. & Tanc, B. C. (2014). Knowledge sharing among Malaysian universities students: do personality traits, class room and technological factors matter? Educational Studies, 40(1), 1-25. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Esmaeelinezhad, O., & Afrazeh, A. (2018). Linking personality traits and individuals’ knowledge management behavior. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(3), 234-251. Forouzeh, V. (2019). Investigating the relationship between teachers' personality traits and moral intelligence with knowledge sharing in secondary schools in Gerash. Master Thesis, Department of Educational Sciences (Educational Management), Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas Branch. (In Persian) Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A. & Segars, A. H. (2001), Knowledge Management: an Organizational Capabilities Perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214. Goodman, P.S., & Darr, E. D. (1998). Computer-Aided Systems and Communities: Mechanisms for Organizational Learning in Distributed Environments, MIS Quarterly, 22(4), 417-440. Hosseini Fatemi, A., & Barani, Q. (2017). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Learning Culture and Knowledge Sharing Intention with Emphasis on the Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior among English and Non-English Language Professors in Iranian Universities. Language and Translation Studies, 31, 53-85. (In Persian) Karampour, A., Masoudi, N., & Ebrahimi, A. (2018). Investigating the mediating role of knowledge sharing in the relationship between intellectual capital and organizational innovation (Case study: Iranian software companies). Information Technology Management, 10(1), 185-208. (In Persian) Kargar Shuraki, M. H., Haji Mohammad Ali Jahromi, M., Nazeri, A., & Rashidi, M. M. (2016). Investigating the effect of personality traits on knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior of employees (Case study: Petroleum Industry Research Institute). Human Resources Management in Petroleum Industry, 7 (28), 59-35. (In Persian) Khajavi, S., & Kermani, E. (2021). Personality traits affecting knowledge sharing in auditing firms with structural equation approach. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research (Journal of Financial Accounting and Auditing), 13(50), 1-32. (In Persian) Khanifar, H., Moghimi, S., Jandaghi, G., Taheri, F., & Sayyar, A. (2009). Managers Personality Knowing Requisite for Management of Organizational Behavior (A Case Study of Five Factors Model of Personality in Qom University of Medical Sciences) Iran. health Management, 12(37), 49-56. (In Persian) Matzler, K., & Mueller, J. (2011). Antecedents of knowledge sharing Examining the inlfuence of learning. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(3), 317-329. Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Mooradian, T., von Krogh, G., & Mueller, J. (2011). Personality Traits, Affective Commitment, Documentation of Knowledge, and Knowledge Sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), 296-310. Mc Manus, P. (2016). Examining the factors to knowledge sharing within an organisational context. Irish Academy of Management (IAM), Doctoral Colloquium, Dublin. Mesmer-Magnus, J., & DeChurch, L. (2009). Information Sharing and Team Performance: a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535-546. Metaxiotis, K., Ergazakis, K., & Psarras, J. (2005). Exploring the world of knowledge management: agreements and disagreements in the academic/practitioner community. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 6-18. Nazari, R., & Farhadpour, M. R. (2020). The relationship between organizational sense of belonging and employees' tendency to share knowledge in libraries with the moderating role of education. Scientific studies, 6(24), 1-24. (In Persian) Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York. Pee, L. G., & Lee, J. (2019). Intrinsically motivating employees online knowledge Skyrme, D. J. (2012). The 3cs Of knowledge sharing: Culture; competition and Sohrabi, A., Yazdkhasti, A., Sadeghi Arani, Z. (2020). Investigating the effect of individual factors on knowledge sharing in the organization: A meta-analysis of Iranian studies. Organizational Knowledge Management Quarterly, 3(11), 1-44. (In Persian) Wang, C. C., & Yang, Y. J. (2007). Personality and intention to share knowledge: An empirical study of scientists in an R & D laboratory. Social Behavior and Personality, 35(10), 1427-1436. Wang, S., & Noe, R. (2010), Knowledge Sharing: a Review and Directions for Future Research.Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131. Yousefi Amiri, M., Gholipour, A., Abbasi, D., & Ghorbanloo, M. (2015). Study of the role of personality traits in knowledge sharing (Case study: employed students of the Faculty of Management, University of Tehran). Journal of Organizational Culture Management, 13(3), 647-665. (In Persian) Yu, T. K., Lu, L. C., & Liu, T. F. (2010). Exploring Factors that Influence Knowledge Sharing Behavior via Weblogs, Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 32-41. Zack, M. H. (1999), Managing Codified Knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 203 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 186 |