پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,102 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,448 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,040,271 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,948,517 |
نقش هوش و سرمایه انسانی بر کارایی تولید محصولات با فناوری پیشرفته و پیچیدگی اقتصادی | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهش های اقتصاد صنعتی | ||
| دوره 6، شماره 20، شهریور 1401، صفحه 59-74 اصل مقاله (665.66 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کاربردی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/jier.2023.64972.1339 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| کتایون اعلامی* 1؛ محمدعلی کرامتی2؛ قاسم توحیدی3 | ||
| 1دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی دانشکده مدیریت | ||
| 2دانشیار عضو هیئت علمی، مدیریت صنعتی،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی(نویسنده مسئول) | ||
| 3دانشیار ریاضی کاربردی گرایش تحقیق در عملیات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| صنایع با فناوریپیشرفته عامل مزیت رقابتی میان کشورها محسوبمیشوند. فناوری از جنس دانش است و پیچیدگی اقتصادی یک جامعه وابسته به حجم بالای دانش افراد آن جامعه میباشد که در محصولات تولید شده توسط آنها تجلی می یابد. افراد با دانش و مهارت یا همان سرمایههای انسانی با یکدیگر تعامل کرده و دانش خود را با هم ترکیب می کنند تا محصول(خروجی پربازده) تولید کنند. شاخص معتبر سرمایهانسانی هوش است که با نوآوری درارتباط است. بنابراین هدف پژوهش بررسی ضریب هوشیملی، نوآوری، موفقیت تحصیلی و تغذیه به منزله زیرساخت هایی است که گمان می رود بخشی از کارایی ملل را در تولید محصولات با فناوری پیشرفته توضیح دهند. به این منظور شاخص های کمی زیرساخت های هوش ملی و تغذیه در مرحله اول به عنوان ورودی اولیه، و نوآوری و موفقیت تحصیلی به عنوان خروجی برای ورودیهای اولیه در نظر گرفته میشود. در مرحله دوم نوآوری و موفقیت تحصیلی به عنوان ورودی و تولید فناوری پیشرفته به عنوان خروجی نهایی یک مدل شبکه، از نوع سری تحلیل پوششی دادهها برای 23 کشور منتخب، با استفاده از داده های گردآوری شده از مراجع رسمی بین المللی، درنظرگرفته می شود. نتایج تفاوت کارایی کشورهای منتخب در تولید محصولات با فناوری پیشرفته را نشان می دهد و وزن هریک از زیر ساخت ها را نیز برآورد می کند. یافته ها نشان میدهند بیشترین وزن/ اهمیت مربوط به زیرساخت هوش ملی و تغذیه است که با ارتقاء این دو زیرساخت درکشورهای مورد پژوهش می توان به حداکثر شدن تولید فناوری پیشرفته دست یافت. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| فناوری پیشرفته؛ تحلیل پوششی دادههای شبکه؛ هوش ملی؛ نوآوری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The role of intelligence and human capital on the production efficiency of products with high technology and economic complexity | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| katayoun aalami1؛ mohammadali keramati2؛ Ghasem Tohidi3 | ||
| 1Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch Tehran, IRAN. Faculty of Management | ||
| 2Associate Professor Faculty member, Industrial Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch Tehran, IRAN. | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Applied Mathematics, majoring in Operations Research, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, IRAN | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| High-tech industries are a factor of competitive advantage between countries.Technology is knowledge, and the economic complexity of a society is dependent on the high amount of knowledge of the people of that society, which can be seen in the products produced by them.People with knowledge and skills or in other words human capital interact with each other and combine their knowledge to produce a product (productive output).A reliable indicator of human capital is intelligence, which is also related to innovation The purpose of this study is to investigate the infrastructure of national IQ, innovation, educational attainment, nutrition which is supposed to explain part of the efficiency of nations in the production of high-tech. For this purpose, quantitative indicators of national IQ and nutrition infrastructures are considered as primary inputs in the first stage, and innovation and educational attainment are considered as outputs for primary inputs. In the second stage, innovation and educational attainment as input and production of high technology as the final output of a network model, of the type of data envelopment analysis series for 23 selected countries are considered. The data were collected from official international sources. The results show the differences between the efficiency of selected countries in producing high-tech products and also estimate the weight of each infrastructure. The findings show that the highest weight / importance is related to national IQ and nutrition infrastructure, which can be achieved by upgrading these two infrastructures in the studied countries to maximize the production of high technology. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| High-tech products, National IQ, Nutrition, Innovation, Educational attainment, Network Data Envelopment Analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
آذری آرانی، قاسم ، رضایی نور، جلال (1399). شناسایی فرایند خلق و یادگیری دانش ملی و بررسی تاثیر آن بر تولید ناخالص داخلی با درنظر گرفتن نقش واسطه ای هوش ملی، فصلنامه فناوری آموزش، 14(2)، 477-492. magiran.com/p2290912
رادفر, رضا, خمسه, عباس. (1394). مدیریت تکنولوژی نگرشی جامع بر تکنولوژی، نوآوری و تجاری سازی، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
سمیعینصر, محمود؛ صادقپور, علیاصغر؛ تقوی گیلانی, مهرداد. (1392). مدیریت اثر بخش انتقال تکنولوژی (چاپ اول). انتشارات ساد.
ضیایی, ثریا, محسنی طارمسری, مهناز. (1400). بررسی ارتباط بین نوآوری سازمانی و هوش هیجانی با تعهد سازمانی در کتابداران کتابخانه های عمومی شهرستان رشت. فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظامهای معنایی, (), -. doi: 10.22054/jks.2021.52002.1333
محمودزاده، ابراهیم؛ باقری، ابوالفضل؛ دهقان پیر، علی(1394). تاثیر ابعاد فناوری برتر بر عملکرد بازار محصولات جدید. فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری، 3(2), 31-62. doi: 10.22104/jtdm.2016.353
Acham, H. (2010). Nutrition, health and academic achievement of primary school children: A case of Kumi District, Eastern Uganda [PhD Thesis]. Makerere University. Adamides, E., & Karacapilidis, N. (2020). Information technology for supporting the development and maintenance of open innovation capabilities. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(1), 29–38. Altbach, P. G. (2013). The Achilles Heel of India’s High-Tech Future. In The International Imperative in Higher Education (pp. 175-178). SensePublishers, Rotterdam.
Azam, S. (2017). A cross-country empirical test of cognitive abilities and innovation nexus. International Journal of Educational Development, 53, 128–136.
Burhan, N. A. S., Salleh, F., & Burhan, N. M. G. (2015). National intelligence and private health expenditure: Do high IQ societies spend more on health insurance? Intelligence, 52, 1-8.
Chauhan, U., Golhar, S., & Dahake, P. (2016). Correlation between iron deficiency anemia and cognitive achievement in school aged children. Ann Int Med Den Res, 2(4), 178-180.
Coyle, T. R., Rindermann, H., & Hancock, D. (2016). Cognitive capitalism: Economic freedom moderates the effects of intellectual and average classes on economic productivity. Psychological Reports, 119(2), 411–427.
Diebolt, C., & Hippe, R. (2022). The long-run impact of human capital on innovation and economic growth in the regions of Europe. In Human Capital and Regional Development in Europe (pp. 85-115). Springer, Cham.
D’Angelo, A. (2012). Innovation and export performance: A study of Italian high-tech SMEs. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(3), 393–423. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.). (2018). The global innovation index 2018: Energizing the world with innovation. WIPO..
Erkan, B., & Yildirimci, E. (2015). Economic Complexity and Export Competitiveness: The Case of Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.262.
French, B., Outhwaite, L. A., Langley-Evans, S. C., & Pitchford, N. J. (2020). Nutrition, growth, and other factors associated with early cognitive and motor development in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 33(5), 644–669.
Gallié, E. P., & Legros, D. (2012). Firms’ human capital, R&D and innovation: a study on French firms. Empirical Economics, 43(2), 581-596.
Gelade, G. A. (2008). IQ, cultural values, and the technological achievement of nations. Intelligence, 36(6), 711-718. Global food security index. )2018( pdf—Google Search. (n.d.). Retrieved November 6, 2020.
Grantham-McGregor, S. M., & Ani, C. C. (2011). Undernutrition and mental development. Nutrition and Brain. Vevey: Nestec Ltd, and Karger: Basel, 1–14..
Guellec, D., & De La Potterie, B. V. P. (2002). R&D and productivity growth: panel data analysis of 16 OECD countries. OECD Economic studies, 2001(2), 103-126. Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2014). The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9647.001.0001.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/index.
Jones, G., & Podemska-Mikluch, M. (2010). IQ in the utility function: Cognitive skills, time preference, and cross-country differences in savings rates.
Jones, G., & Schneider, W. J. (2006). Intelligence, human capital, and economic growth: A Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. Journal of Economic Growth, 11(1), 71–93.
Jorgenson, D., Ho, M., & Samuels, J. (2019). Education Intensity and the Sources of, and Prospects for, US Economic Growth. International Productivity Monitor, 36, 161–186.
Kao, C. (2017). Network data envelopment analysis: Foundations and extensions. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Kucharčíková, A. (2011). Human capital–definitions and approaches. Human Resources Management & Ergonomics, 5(2), 60-70.
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2012). Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(7), 681–701.
Lederman, D., & Maloney, W. (2013). R&D and development. World Bank policy research. Working Paper, 3024. Leiponen, A. (2005). Skills and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5–6), 303–323
Levinger, B. (1994). Nutrition, health and advancement for all . Education Development Centre and United Nations Development Programme, Newton, MA.
Liu, G., Pang, L., & Kong, D. (2017). Effects of human capital on the relationship between export and firm innovation. Chinese Management Studies. Lund, H. B., & Karlsen, A. (2020). The importance of vocational education institutions in manufacturing regions: adding content to a broad definition of regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 27(6), 660-679.
Lu, W.-M., & Hung, S.-W. (2011). Exploring the operating efficiency of Technology Development Programs by an intellectual capital perspective—A case study of Taiwan. Technovation, 31(8), 374–383.
Lynn, R., & Becker, D. (2019). The intelligence of nations. London, UK: Ulster Institute for Social Research.
Lynn, Richard & Meisenberg, Gerhard. (2010). National IQs calculated and validated for 108 nations. Intelligence. 38. 353-360. 10.1016/j.intell.2010.04.007.
Lynn, Richard & Vanhanen, T. (2006). IQ and global inequality.
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state. Soundings, 49(49), 131-142.
Medase, K. (2020). The Impact of the Heterogeneity of Employees’ Qualifications on Firm-level Innovation Evidence from Nigerian Firms.
Meisenberg, G. (2014). Cognitive human capital and economic growth in the 21st century. Economic Growth in the 21st Century: Perspectives,
Mooghali, A. R., & Azizi, A. R. (2008). Relation between organizational intelligence and organizational knowledge management development. World Aapplied Sciences Journal, 4(1), 1-8.
Naik, S. R., Itagi, S. K., & Patil, M. (2015). Relationship between nutrition status, intelligence and academic performance of Lambani school children of Bellary district, Karnataka. International Journal of Farm Sciences, 5(3), 259-267.
OECD. (n.d.). Education attainment [Text]. Retrieved November 6, 2020, from https://www.oecdilibrary.org/education/educationattainment/indicatorgroup/english_025421e5-en. Rajput, N., Khanna, M. A., & Oberoi, S. (2012). Global innovation index and its impact on GDP of BRICS nations-innovation linkages with economic growth: An empirical study. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 4(2), 35-44.
Ramezani, G., Norouzi, A., Moradi, E., Pourbairamian, G., Aalaa, M., Alizadeh, S., & Sohrabi, Z. (2020). Comparing peer education with TBL workshop in (EBM) teaching. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 34, 70.
Rindermann, H. (2012). Intellectual classes, technological progress and economic development: The rise of cognitive capitalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(2), 108-113.
Roberts, M., Tolar-Peterson, T., Reynolds, A., Wall, C., Reeder, N., & Rico Mendez, G. (2022). The Effects of Nutritional Interventions on the Cognitive Development of Preschool-Age Children: A Systematic Review. Nutrients, 14(3), 532.
Saad, M., Guermat, C., & Brodie, L. (2015). National innovation and knowledge performance: the role of higher education teaching and training. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1194-1209.
Salahodjaev, R. (2015). Intelligence and shadow economy: A cross-country empirical assessment. Intelligence, 49, 129-133.
Squalli, J., & Wilson, K. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and innovation. Intelligence, 46, 250-257.
Sweet, C. M., & Eterovic Maggio, D. S. (2015). Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase Innovation? World Development, 66, 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.025.
Sun, X., Li, H., & Ghosal, V. (2020). Firm-level human capital and innovation: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 59, 101388.
Valero, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. Economics of Education Review, 68, 53-67.
Wang, M., & Lynn, R. (2018). Intelligence in the People’s Republic of China. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 275–277.
Weede, E., & Kämpf, S. (2002). The impact of intelligence and institutional improvements on economic growth. Kyklos, 55(3), 361–380.
Xu, H., & Liu, F. (2017). Measuring the efficiency of education and technology via DEA approach: Implications on national development. Social Sciences, 6(4), 136.
Zhong, L. (2017). Innovation as Determinants of Economic Growth in U.S. Counties. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 19(4), 4. https://articlegateway.com/index.php/JABE/article/view/718. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 141 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 194 |
||